Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single-gene disorders: experience with more than 200 cycles conducted by a reference laboratory in the United States

Clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions: a systematic review of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to report a summary of clinical outcomes following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions, by performing a systematic review of published literature on clinical pregnancy and live birth rates following preimplantation genetic testing due to a monogenic indication. Additionally, we aimed to undertake a subgroup analysis of clinical outcomes of concurrent monogenic and aneuploidy screening.

DATA SOURCES

Three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed) were searched from inception to May 2024.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Quantitative data audits, observational studies, and case series reporting clinical outcomes for individuals undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for a monogenic indication were included. Only studies using blastocyst biopsies with polymerase chain reaction-based or genome-wide haplotyping methods for molecular analysis were eligible to reflect current laboratory practice.

METHODS

Quality assessment was performed following data extraction using an adaptation of the Joanna Briggs critical appraisal tool for case series. Results were extracted, and pooled mean clinical pregnancy rates and birth rates were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). We compared outcomes between those with and without concurrent preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

RESULTS

Our search identified 1372 publications; 51 were eligible for inclusion. Pooled data on 5305 cycles and 5229 embryo transfers yielded 1806 clinical pregnancies and 1577 births. This translated to clinical pregnancy and birth rates of 34.0% [95% CI: 32.8%-35.3%] and 29.7% [95% CI: 28.5%-31.0%] per cycle and 24.8% [95% CI: 23.6%-26.0%] and 21.7% [95% CI: 20.8%-23.1%] per embryo transfer. In studies with concurrent aneuploidy screening, clinical pregnancy and birth rates were 43.3% [95% CI: 40.2%-46.5%] and 37.6% [95% CI: 34.6%-40.8%] per cycle and 37.0% [95% CI: 33.9%-40.3%] and 31.8% [95% CI: 28.8%-35.0%] per embryo transfer. Studies without aneuploidy screening reported clinical pregnancy and birth rates of 32.5% [95% CI: 31.0%-34.1%] and 28.1% [95% CI: 26.6%-29.7%] per cycle and 21.2% [95% CI: 19.8%-22.6%] and 18.6% [95% CI: 17.3%-20.0%] per embryo transfer.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review reveals promising clinical outcome figures for this indication group. Additionally, synthesizing the published scientific literature on clinical outcomes from preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions provides a rigorous, noncommercial evidence base for counseling.

OneGene PGT: comprehensive preimplantation genetic testing method utilizing next-generation sequencing

PURPOSE

Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) allows early diagnosis in embryos conceived in vitro. PGT-M helps to prevent known genetic disorders in affected families and ensures that pathogenic variants in the male or female partner are not passed on to offspring. The trend in genetic testing of embryos is to provide a comprehensive platform that enables robust and reliable testing for the causal pathogenic variant(s), as well as chromosomal abnormalities that commonly occur in embryos. In this study, we describe PGT protocol that allows direct mutation testing, haplotyping, and aneuploidy screening.

METHODS

Described PGT protocol called OneGene PGT allows direct mutation testing, haplotyping, and aneuploidy screening using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Whole genome amplification product is combined with multiplex PCR used for SNP enrichment. Dedicated bioinformatic tool enables mapping, genotype calling, and haplotyping of informative SNP markers. A commercial software was used for aneuploidy calling.

RESULTS

OneGenePGT has been implemented for seven of the most common monogenic disorders, representing approximately 30% of all PGT-M indications at our IVF centre. The technique has been thoroughly validated, focusing on direct pathogenic variant testing, haplotype identification, and chromosome abnormality detection. Validation results show full concordance with Sanger sequencing and karyomapping, which were used as reference methods.

CONCLUSION

OneGene PGT is a comprehensive, robust, and cost-effective method that can be established for any gene of interest. The technique is particularly suitable for common monogenic diseases, which can be performed based on a universal laboratory protocol without the need for set-up or pre-testing.

Ethical considerations of preconception and prenatal gene modification in the embryo and fetus

The National Academies of Sciences and Medicine 2020 consensus statement advocates the reinstatement of research in preconception heritable human genome editing (HHGE), despite the ethical concerns that have been voiced about interventions in the germline, and outlines criteria for its eventual clinical application to address monogenic disorders. However, the statement does not give adequate consideration to alternative technologies. Importantly, it omits comparison to fetal gene therapy (FGT), which involves gene modification applied prenatally to the developing fetus and which is better researched and less ethically contentious. While both technologies are applicable to the same monogenic diseases causing significant prenatal or early childhood morbidity, the benefits and risks of HHGE are distinct from FGT though there are important overlaps. FGT has the current advantage of a wealth of robust preclinical data, while HHGE is nascent technology and its feasibility for specific diseases still requires scientific proof. The ethical concerns surrounding each are unique and deserving of further discussion, as there are compelling arguments supporting research and eventual clinical translation of both technologies. In this Opinion, we consider HHGE and FGT through technical and ethical lenses, applying common ethical principles to provide a sense of their feasibility and acceptability. Currently, FGT is in a more advanced position for clinical translation and may be less ethically contentious than HHGE, so it deserves to be considered as an alternative therapy in further discussions on HHGE implementation.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Kidney Disease-Related Genes: A Laboratory's Experience

INTRODUCTION

Recent literature highlights the clinical utility of genetic testing for patients with kidney disease. Genetic testing provides significant benefits for reproductive risk counseling, including the option of in vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M). PGT-M allows for a significant reduction in risk for a pregnancy affected with the familial disease. We aim to summarize our experience with PGT-M for genes with kidney involvement as either a primary or secondary feature of the disease.

METHODS

All PGT-M tests performed by the reference laboratory between September 2010 and July 2020 were reviewed for clinical indication and cases for which the disease tested included a renal component. Each patient referred for PGT-M had an existing molecular genetic diagnosis themselves or in their family. Frequency of each condition, gene, inheritance pattern, and year over year increase in referral cases was analyzed.

RESULTS

In the study cohort, the most common disease targeted was autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, caused by pathogenic variants in the PKD1 or PKD2 genes, which accounted for 16.5% (64/389) of cases. The 5 most common referral indications accounted for 51.9% (202/389) of the cases. Autosomal recessive inheritance accounted for 52.0% (26/50) of conditions for which PGT-M was performed. The number of PGT-M tests performed for conditions that included either primary or secondary kidney disease increased from 5 cases in 2010 to 47 cases in the 2020 study period.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

These data suggest that the pursuit of PGT-M by couples at risk for passing on conditions with a kidney component is common and has significantly increased since 2010. With this rising trend of patients undergoing PGT-M and the prerequisite of molecular genetic confirmation in the PGT-M process, this study underscores the importance of the reproductive component to a molecular genetic diagnosis for patients with kidney disease, especially as the accessibility of genetic testing and utilization by nephrologists grows.

Euploid Day-5 Blastocysts Versus Euploid Day-6 Blastocysts — Will the Reproductive Outcomes Differ? An Observational Study

Background and objective: Day-5 blastocyst embryos are usually chosen for assisted reproductive therapy. We compared the reproductive outcomes of the euploid blastocysts developed on Day 5 versus Day 6.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective observational study analyzed patients aged 25–45 years, who underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection from December 2014 to November 2018. Depending on the day of trophectoderm biopsy, patients were categorized into Day-5 and Day-6 groups. Percentages of euploid embryos were calculated for both groups, and elective single euploid blastocysts were transferred in a frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. The study endpoints were the comparisons of the reproductive outcomes including clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), miscarriage rate (MR), and live birth rate (LBR) between Day-5 and Day-6 euploid FET groups.

Results: A total of 801 embryos from 184 patients were evaluated [Day 5 ([Formula: see text]=769); Day 6 ([Formula: see text]=32); 42.45% were euploid] with the rate of euploidy in Day-5 and Day-6 groups at 42.52% and 40.62%, respectively. A total of 126 patients underwent FET with 126 elective single euploid embryos (Day 5: 117; Day 6: 9). For Day-5 versus Day-6 groups, a significantly higher IR (61.54% vs. 44.44%; [Formula: see text] = 0.0531), CPR (61.54% vs. 44.44%; [Formula: see text] = 0.0531), and LBR (61.54% vs. 33.33%; [Formula: see text] = 0.0014) were reported. Multivariate analysis on ANOVA suggested, comparable pregnancy rates at Day 5 and Day 6 ([Formula: see text] = 0.728).

Conclusions: Day-5 euploid blastocysts seem to offer better reproductive outcomes than Day-6 euploid blastocysts. Further research is recommended to evaluate the reproductive outcomes of Day-6 blastocysts.

Specialist physicians' referral behavior regarding preimplantation genetic testing for single-gene disorders: Is there room to grow?

Objective

To assess whether primary care specialists’ demographics, specialty, and knowledge of preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) influence their practice patterns.

Design

Cross-sectional survey study.

Setting

Academic medical center.

Patient(s)

Not applicable.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Objective PGT-M knowledge, subjective comfort with PGT-related topics, PGT care practices (discussions/referrals), and PGT-M implementation barriers.

Result(s)

Our survey had 145 respondents: 65 obstetrician/gynecologists, 36 internists, and 44 pediatricians. Overall, 88% believed that patients at a risk of passing on genetic disorders should be provided PGT-M information. However, few discussed PGT-M with their patients (24%) or referred them for testing (23%). Over half (63%) believed that the lack of physician knowledge was a barrier to PGT use. In terms of subjective comfort with PGT, only 1 in 5 physicians felt familiar enough with the topic to answer patient questions. There were higher odds of discussing (odds ratio, 3.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–5.87) or referring for PGT (odds ratio, 2.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.41–4.51) for each additional 0.5 correct answers to PGT knowledge-related questions. The odds of referring patients for PGT-M were the highest among obstetrician/gynecologists compared with those among the internists and pediatricians.

Conclusion(s)

Physician specialty and PGT knowledge were associated with PGT-M care delivery practices. Although most specialists believed in equipping at-risk patients with PGT-M information, <1 in 4 discussed or referred patients for PGT. The low levels of PGT-related care among providers may be owed to inadequate knowledge of and comfort with the topic. An opportunity to promote greater understanding of PGT-M among primary care specialists exists and can in turn improve the use of referrals to PGT-M services.

The Biological Function of Extracellular Vesicles during Fertilization, Early Embryo-Maternal Crosstalk and Their Involvement in Reproduction: Review and Overview

Secretory extracellular vesicles (EVs) are membrane-enclosed microparticles that mediate cell to cell communication in proximity to, or distant from, the cell of origin. Cells release a heterogeneous spectrum of EVs depending on their physiologic and metabolic state. Extracellular vesicles are generally classified as either exosomes or microvesicles depending on their size and biogenesis. Extracellular vesicles mediate temporal and spatial interaction during many events in sexual reproduction and supporting embryo-maternal dialogue. Although many omic technologies provide detailed understanding of the molecular cargo of EVs, the difficulty in obtaining populations of homogeneous EVs makes difficult to interpret the molecular profile of the molecules derived from a miscellaneous EV population. Notwithstanding, molecular characterization of EVs isolated in physiological and pathological conditions may increase our understanding of reproductive and obstetric diseases and assist the search for potential non-invasive biomarkers. Moreover, a more precise vision of the cocktail of biomolecules inside the EVs mediating communication between the embryo and mother could provide new insights to optimize the therapeutic action and safety of EV use.

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT): the next revolution in reproductive genetics?

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) encompasses methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited conditions or for chromosome abnormalities, relevant to embryo health and viability. In order to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis, a biopsy is required, involving the removal of one or more cells. This invasive procedure greatly increases the costs of PGT and there have been concerns that embryo viability could be compromised in some cases. The recent discovery of DNA within the blastocoele fluid (BF) of blastocysts and in spent embryo culture media (SCM) has led to interest in the development of non-invasive methods of PGT (niPGT).

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review evaluates the current scientific evidence regarding non-invasive genetic assessment of preimplantation embryos. The success of different PGT methodologies in collecting and analysing extra-embryonic DNA is evaluated, and consideration is given to the potential biological and technical hindrances to obtaining a reliable clinical diagnosis.

SEARCH METHODS

Original research and review papers concerning niPGT were sourced by searching PubMed and Google Scholar databases until July 2019. Searches comprised the keywords: 'non-invasive'; 'cell-free DNA'; 'blastocentesis'; 'blastocoel fluid'; 'spent culture media'; 'embryo culture medium'; 'preimplantation genetic testing'; 'preimplantation genetic diagnosis'; 'preimplantation genetic screening'; and 'aneuploidy'.

OUTCOMES

Embryonic DNA is frequently detectable in BF and SCM of embryos produced during IVF treatment. Initial studies have achieved some success when performing cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis. However, in many cases, the efficiency has been restricted by technical complications associated with the low quantity and quality of the DNA. Reported levels of ploidy agreement between SCM/BF samples and biopsied embryonic cells vary widely. In some cases, a discrepancy with respect to cytogenetic data obtained after trophectoderm biopsy may be attributable to embryonic mosaicism or DNA contamination (usually of maternal origin). Some research indicates that aneuploid cells are preferentially eliminated from the embryo, suggesting that their DNA might be over-represented in SCM and BF samples; this hypothesis requires further investigation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Available data suggest that BF and SCM samples frequently provide DNA templates suitable for genetic analyses, offering a potential means of PGT that is less expensive than traditional methods, requires less micromanipulation skill and poses a lower risk to embryos. Critically, DNA isolation and amplification protocols must be optimised to reproducibly obtain an accurate clinical diagnosis, whilst minimising the impact of confounding factors such as contamination. Further investigations are required to understand the mechanisms underlying the release of embryonic DNA and to determine the extent to which this material reflects the true genetic status of the corresponding embryo. Currently, the clinic al potential of niPGT remains unknown.

Birth of a healthy boy following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for congenital adrenal hyperplasia

Classical 3β-HSD deficiency due to mutations in the HSD3B2 gene is responsible for a rare form of congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) and is identified by varying degrees of salt wasting. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) was performed in a couple carrying mutation c.690 G>A in the HSD3B2 gene. Four polymorphic short tandem repeat markers closely linked to the HSD3B2 gene (D1S185, D1S453, D1S514, D1S540) for linkage analysis in conjunction with the direct mutation analysis were used in embryo genotyping. Two CODIS STRs (VWA and THO1) were also used to confirm embryo zygosity and rule out possible contaminations. Finally, SRY and AMYLOGENIN markers were used for embryo sex determination. PGD was performed by fluorescent multiplex seminested polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Six embryos were tested and one male carrier embryo was transferred, resulting in the birth of a healthy boy.

Preimplantation genetic testing in assisted reproduction technology

A significant proportion of clinically recognized pregnancies end in miscarriage. About 50 % of early pregnancy losses are due to chromosome abnormalities. In assisted reproduction technology (ART), a high proportion of top-quality embryos with morphological values are aneuploid whenever they have been evaluated in terms of genetic integrity in human preimplantation embryos either from in vitro or in vivo matured oocytes. It is plausible to think of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) as a means of increasing pregnancy rates and minimizing the risk of fetal aneuploidy. It is believed that PGT will assume a prominent role in the field of ART, especially in a successful pregnancy, so it is embraced recently as a popular diagnostic technique. The PGT includes three sub-categories of PGT for aneuploidies (PGT-A), PGT for single gene / monogenic disorders (PGT-M), and PGT for chromosome structural rearrangements (PGT-SR). PGT-A is used to detect aneuploidies and previously it was known as PGS. PGT-M, formerly known as PGD, is intended to reduce monogenic defects. Previously known as PGS translocation, PGT-SR is PGT to identify structural chromosomal rearrangements. Since many of the old and new definitions for PGT are still vague and confusing for some researchers in the field of reproductive genetics, the main purpose of this study is to introduce all PGT classifications as well as elaborate on different aspects of this technology to improve ART outcomes.

Overview of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD): Historical Perspective and Future Direction

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) can be considered the earliest form of prenatal testing. It was first used in humans over 26 years ago. At its inception, PGD could only be performed for a limited number of genetic disorders. Technological advances in molecular biology and cytogenomics have been utilized in the field of PGD to greatly expand the spectrum of genetic disorders that can now be detected in early human embryos.

Optimal timing for blastomere biopsy of 8-cell embryos for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

STUDY QUESTION

What is the optimal timing for blastomere biopsy during the 8-cell stage, at which embryos will have the best implantation potential?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Fast-cleaving embryos that are biopsied during the last quarter (Q4) of the 8-cell stage and are less affected by the biopsy procedure, and their implantation potential is better than that of embryos biopsied earlier during the 8-cell stage (Q1-Q3).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Blastomer biopsy from cleavage-stage embryos is usually performed on the morning of Day 3 when the embryos are at the 6- to 8-cell stage and is still the preferred biopsy method for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for monogentic disorders or chromosomal translocations. Human embryos usually remain at the 8-cell stage for a relatively long 'arrest phase' in which cells grow, duplicate their DNA and synthesize various proteins in preparation for the subsequent division.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a retrospective cohort study. The study group (195 embryos) included all 8-cell stage embryos that underwent blastomere biopsy for PGD for monogenetic disorders and chromosomal translocations in our unit between 2012-2014 and cultured in the EmbryoScope until transfer. The control group (115 embryos) included all embryos that underwent intracytoplasmic sperm injection without a biopsy during the same period.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The 8-cell stage was divided into four quarters: the first 5 h post-t8 (Q1), 5-10 h post-t8 (Q2), 10-15 h post-t8 (Q3) and at 15-20 h post-t8 (Q4). Non-biopsied control embryos were divided into four equivalent quarters. Embryos were evaluated for timing of developmental events following biopsy including timing of first cleavge after biopsy, timing of comapction (tM) and start of blastulation (tSB). Timing of these events were compared between PGD and control embryos, as well as with 56 PGD implanted embryos with Known Implantation Data (PGD-KID-positive embryos).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Embryos that were biopsied during Q3 (10-15 h from entry into 8-cell stage) were delayed in all three subsequent developmental events, including first cleavage after biopsy, compaction and start of blastulation. In contrast, these events occurred exactly at the same time as in the control group, in embryos that were biopsied during Q1, Q2 or Q4 of the 8-cell stage. The results show also that embryos that were biopsied during Q1, Q2 or Q3 of the 8-cell stage demonstrated a significant delay from the biopsied implanted embryos already in t8 as well as in tM and tSB. However, embryos that were biopsied during Q4 demonstrated dynamics similar to those of the biopsied implanted embryos in t8 and tM, and a delay was noticed only in the last stage of tSB.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is a retrospective study that is limited to the timing of biopsy that is routinely performed in the IVF lab. A prospective study in which biopsy will be performed at a desired timing is needed in order to differ between the effect of biopsy itself and the cleavage rate of the embryo.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings showed that blastomere biopsy can be less harmful to further development if it is carried out during a critical period of embryonic growth, i.e during Q4 of the 8-cell stage. They also demonstrated the added value of time-lapse microscopy for determining the optimal timing for blastomere biopsy.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by the routine budget of our IVF unit.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Identification of extracellular vesicles and characterization of miRNA expression profiles in human blastocoel fluid

In this study, for the first time, we demonstrated the presence of microRNAs and extracellular vesicles in human blastocoel fluid. The bioinformatic and comparative analyses identified the biological function of blastocoel fluid microRNAs and suggested a potential role inside the human blastocyst. We found 89 microRNAs, expressed at different levels, able to regulate critical signaling pathways controlling embryo development, such as pluripotency, cell reprogramming, epigenetic modifications, intercellular communication, cell adhesion and cell fate. Blastocoel fluid microRNAs reflect the miRNome of embryonic cells and their presence, associated with the discovery of extracellular vesicles, inside blastocoel fluid, strongly suggests their important role in mediating cell communication among blastocyst cells. Their characterization is important to better understand the earliest stages of embryogenesis and the complex circuits regulating pluripotency. Moreover, blastocoel fluid microRNA profiles could be influenced by blastocyst quality, therefore, microRNAs might be used to assess embryo potential in IVF cycles.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis as a strategy to prevent having a child born with an heritable eye disease

BACKGROUND

In developed countries, genetically inherited eye diseases are responsible for a high percentage of childhood visual impairment. We aim to report our experience using preimplantation genetic diagnostics (PGD) in order to avoid transmitting a genetic form of eye disease associated with childhood visual impairment and ocular cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective case series of women who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGD due to a familial history of inherited eye disease and/or ocular cancer, in order to avoid having a child affected with the known familial disease. Each family underwent genetic testing in order to identify the underlying disease-causing mutation. IVF and PGD treatment were performed; unaffected embryos were implanted in their respective mothers.

RESULTS

Thirty-five unrelated mothers underwent PGD, and the following hereditary conditions were identified in their families: albinism (10 families); retinitis pigmentosa (7 families); retinoblastoma (4 families); blue cone monochromatism, achromatopsia, and aniridia (2 families each); and Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome, Leber congenital amaurosis, Norrie disease, papillorenal syndrome, primary congenital cataract, congenital glaucoma, Usher syndrome type 1F, and microphthalmia with coloboma (1 family each). Following a total of 88 PGD cycles, 18 healthy (i.e., unaffected) children were born.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the importance an ophthalmologist plays in informing patients regarding the options now available for using prenatal and preimplantation genetic diagnosis to avoid having a child with a potentially devastating genetic form of eye disease or ocular cancer. This strategy is highly relevant, particularly given the limited options currently available for treating these conditions.

Importance of embryo aneuploidy screening in preimplantation genetic diagnosis for monogenic diseases using the karyomap gene chip

We investigated the incidence of aneuploidy in embryos from couples carrying monogenic diseases and the effect of embryo aneuploidy screening on the monogenic disease preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). From November 2014 to April 2017, 36 couples carrying monogenic diseases were enrolled. The karyomap gene chip technique was used to analyze the blastocysts from the subjects and select normal embryos for transfer. A total of 43 single-gene PGD cycles were performed. A total of 687 eggs were obtained and 186 blastocysts were biopsed. After analysis via karyomap chip, 175 blastocysts received diagnostic results. In our monogenic disease PGD, 66.8% (117/175) of the embryos were diagnosed as normal or non-pathogenic (silent carriers), and 33.2% (58/175) of the embryos were diagnosed as abnormal or pathogenic. For preimplantation genetic screening (PGS), the aneuploidy rate of embryos was 22.9% (40/175). Among embryos diagnosed as normal for monogenic diseases, 26.5% (31/117) of the embryos were aneuploid and could not be transferred. Thus, approximately 1/4 of normal or non-pathogenic blastocysts diagnosed based on monogenic disease PGD were aneuploid, indicating the necessity and importance of embryo aneuploidy screening during PGD for monogenic diseases.

Thirteen years' experience of 893 PGD cycles for monogenic disorders in a publicly funded, nationally regulated regional hospital service

This study provides an overview of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for single gene diseases and the management of expanding indications in the context of a fully financially covered service at Montpellier's regional hospital centre. Within the framework of a restrictive law ruling PGD in France, only the parental genetic risk can be studied in embryos (concurrent aneuploidy screening is not allowed). PCR-based techniques were developed combining mutation detection and closely linked short tandem repeat markers within or flanking the affected genes, and set up more than 100 different robust fluorescent multiplex assays for 61 monogenic disorders. This strategy was used to analyse blastomeres from cleavage-stage embryos. Overall, 893 cycles were initiated in 384 couples; 727 cycles proceeded to oocyte retrieval and 608 cycles to embryo transfer, resulting in 184 deliveries. Clinical pregnancy rate per transfer, implantation and miscarriage rates were 33.6%, 25.1% and 8.8%, respectively. Our PGD programme resulted in the birth of 214 healthy babies for 162 out of 358 couples (45.3%), constituting a relevant achievement within an organizational framework that does not allow aneuploidy screening but provides equal access to PGD, both geographically and socioeconomically. This is a rare example of a fully free-of-charge PGD service.

A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents

Noninvasive, prenatal whole genome sequencing (NIPW) may be a technological reality in the near future, making available a vast array of genetic information early in pregnancy at no risk to the fetus or mother. Many worry that the timing, safety, and ease of the test will lead to informational overload and reproductive consumerism. The prevailing response among commentators has been to restrict conditions eligible for testing based on medical severity, which imposes disputed value judgments and devalues those living with eligible conditions. To avoid these difficulties, we propose an unrestricted testing policy, under which prospective parents could obtain information on any variant of known significance after a careful informed consent process that uses an interactive decision aid to deliver a mandatory presentation on the purposes, techniques, and limitations of genomic testing, as well as optional resources for reflection and consultation. This process would encourage thoughtful, informed deliberation by prospective parents before deciding whether or how to use NIPW.

Characterizing nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in spent embryo culture media: genetic contamination identified

OBJECTIVE

To characterize nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in spent culture media from normally developing blastocysts to determine whether it could be used for noninvasive genetic assessment.

DESIGN

Prospective embryo cohort study.

SETTING

Academic center and private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Seventy patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and 227 blastocysts.

INTERVENTION(S)

Culture media assessment, artificial blastocoele fluid collapse and DNA analysis using digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), long-range PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and DNA fingerprinting.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Presence of nuclear and mtDNA in three different commercial culture media from Vitrolife and Irvine Scientific, spent embryo media assessment at the cleavage and blastocyst stages of development, and analysis of the internal media controls for each patient that had been exposed to identical conditions as embryo media but did not come into contact with embryos.

RESULT(S)

Higher levels of nuclear and mtDNA were observed in the culture media that had been exposed to embryos compared with the internal media controls. Nuclear DNA (∼4 copies) and mtDNA (∼600 copies) could be detected in spent media, and the levels increased at the blastocyst stage. No increase in DNA was detected after artificial blastocoele fluid collapse. Mixed sex chromosome DNA was detected. This originated from contamination in the culture media and from maternal (cumulus) cells. Due to the limited amount of template, the presence of embryonic nuclear DNA could not be confirmed by DNA fingerprinting analysis.

CONCLUSION(S)

Currently DNA from culture media cannot be used for genetic assessment because embryo-associated structures release DNA into the culture medium and the DNA is of mixed origin.

First successful trial of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration

PURPOSE

We aim to present a case of a healthy infant born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection-in vitro fertilization (ICSI-IVF) with a preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for pantothenate kinase-associated neurodegeneration (PKAN) due to PANK2 mutation.

METHODS

ICSI-IVF was performed on a Thai couple, 34-year-old female and 33-year-old male, with a family history of PKAN in their first child. Following fertilization, each of the embryos were biopsied in the cleavage stage and subsequently processed for whole-genome amplification. Genetic status of the embryos was diagnosed by linkage analysis and direct mutation testing using primer extension-based mini-sequencing. Comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening was performed using a next-generation sequencing-based strategy.

RESULTS

Only a single cycle of ICSI-IVF was processed. There were seven embryos from this couple-two were likely affected, three were likely carriers, one was likely unaffected, and one failed in target genome amplification. Aneuploidy screening was performed before making a decision on embryo transfer, and only one unaffected embryo passed the screening. That embryo was transferred in a frozen thawed cycle, and the pregnancy was successful. The diagnosis was confirmed by amniocentesis, which presented with a result consistent with PGD. At 38 weeks of gestational age, a healthy male baby was born. Postnatal genetic confirmation was also consistent with PGD and the prenatal results. At the age of 24 months, the baby presented with normal growth and development lacking any neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

We report the first successful trial of PGD for PKAN in a developing country using linkage analysis and mini-sequencing in cleavage stage embryos.

Blastomere biopsy for PGD delays embryo compaction and blastulation: a time-lapse microscopic analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to explore the effect of blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) on the embryos' dynamics, further cleavage, development, and implantation.

METHODS

The study group included 366 embryos from all PGD treatments (September 2012 to June 2014) cultured in the EmbryoScope™ time-lapse monitoring system. The control group included all intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) embryos cultured in EmbryoScope™ until day 5 during the same time period (385 embryos). Time points of key embryonic events were analyzed with an EmbryoViewer™.

RESULTS

Most (88 %) of the embryos were biopsied at ≥8 cells. These results summarize the further dynamic development of the largest cohort of biopsied embryos and demonstrate that blastomere biopsy of cleavage-stage embryos significantly delayed compaction and blastulation compared to the control non-biopsied embryos. This delay in preimplanation developmental events also affected postimplantation development as observed when the dynamics of non-implanted embryos (known implantation data (KID) negative) were compared to those of implanted embryos (KID positive).

CONCLUSION

Analysis of morphokinetic parameters enabled us to explore how blastomere biopsy interferes with the dynamic sequence of developmental events. Our results show that biopsy delays the compaction and the blastulation of the embryos, leading to a decrease in implantation.

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium: evidence and potential clinical use

The ability to screen embryos for aneuploidy or inherited disorders in a minimally invasive manner may represent a major advancement for the future of embryo viability assessment. Recent studies have demonstrated that both blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium contain genetic material, which can be isolated and subjected to downstream genetic analysis. The blastocoele fluid may represent an alternative source of nuclear DNA for aneuploidy testing, although the degree to which the isolated genetic material is solely representative of the developing embryo is currently unclear. In addition to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can be detected in the embryo culture medium. Currently, the origin of this nuclear and mtDNA has not been fully evaluated and there are several potential sources of contamination that may contribute to the genetic material detected in the culture medium. There is however evidence that the mtDNA content of the culture medium is related to embryo fragmentation levels and its presence is predictive of blastulation, indicating that embryo development may influence the levels of genetic material detected. If the levels of genetic material are strongly related to aspects of embryo quality, then this may be a novel biomarker of embryo viability. If the genetic material does have an embryo origin, the mechanisms by which DNA may be released into the blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium are unknown, although apoptosis may play a role. While the presence of this genetic material is an exciting discovery, the DNA in the blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium appears to be of low yield and integrity, which makes it challenging to study. Further research aimed at assessing the methodologies used for both isolating and analysing this genetic material, as well as tracing its origin, are needed in order to evaluate its potential for clinical use. Should such methodologies prove to be routinely successful and the DNA recovered demonstrated to be embryonic in origin, then they may be used in a minimally invasive and less technical methodology for genetic analysis and embryo viability assessment than those currently available.

Current recommendations: Screening for Mendelian disorders

Over the last 50 years, screening for Mendelian disorders has progressed from screening of neonates for phenylketonuria (PKU) to screening of healthy individuals in the preconception or prenatal setting for more than 100 disorders. Traditional carrier screening has been based on ethnicity, and, as ethnic distinctions become less defined, the ability to screen effectively has become increasingly more limited. At the same time, advances in molecular technology have produced large screening panels without reliance on ethnicity. This article outlines the historical and traditional use of single gene carrier screening.

Detection and phasing of single base de novo mutations in biopsies from human in vitro fertilized embryos by advanced whole-genome sequencing

Currently, the methods available for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos do not detect de novo single-nucleotide and short indel mutations, which have been shown to cause a large fraction of genetic diseases. Detection of all these types of mutations requires whole-genome sequencing (WGS). In this study, advanced massively parallel WGS was performed on three 5- to 10-cell biopsies from two blastocyst-stage embryos. Both parents and paternal grandparents were also analyzed to allow for accurate measurements of false-positive and false-negative error rates. Overall, >95% of each genome was called. In the embryos, experimentally derived haplotypes and barcoded read data were used to detect and phase up to 82% of de novo single base mutations with a false-positive rate of about one error per Gb, resulting in fewer than 10 such errors per embryo. This represents a ∼100-fold lower error rate than previously published from 10 cells, and it is the first demonstration that advanced WGS can be used to accurately identify these de novo mutations in spite of the thousands of false-positive errors introduced by the extensive DNA amplification required for deep sequencing. Using haplotype information, we also demonstrate how small de novo deletions could be detected. These results suggest that phased WGS using barcoded DNA could be used in the future as part of the PGD process to maximize comprehensiveness in detecting disease-causing mutations and to reduce the incidence of genetic diseases.

Embryonic aneuploidy: overcoming molecular genetics challenges improves outcomes and changes practice patterns

Since its inception, in vitro fertilization (IVF) has pursued molecular technology to improve patient outcomes, leading to enhanced methods of embryo selection. Comprehensive chromosomal screening (CCS) is a powerful tool that decreases maternal and neonatal morbidity due to multiple gestations by allowing the transfer of fewer embryos while maintaining success rates. To optimize this genetic test, physiological principles limiting the timing and type of cells to be removed had to be realized. Molecular barriers involved in genome amplification and ensuring the accuracy and validity of the CCS platform required a multistep approach to ensure that this technology was not used prematurely. Only after ensuring that the potential for harm was minimized and benefit maximized could clinicians use this technology to improve patient care.

Validating a rapid, real-time, PCR-based direct mutation detection assay for preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Although co-amplification of polymorphic microsatellite markers is the current gold standard for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of single-gene disorders (SGD), this approach can be hampered by the lack of availability of informative markers. We recently (2011) devised a novel in-house assay for PGD of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase deficiency, based on an amplification refractory mutation system and quantitative PCR (ARMS-qPCR). The objective of the present study was to verify ARMS-qPCR in a cohort of 20 PGD cycles with a diverse group of SGDs (15 couples at risk for 10 SGDs). Day-3 cleavage-stage embryos were subjected to biopsy and genotyping, followed by fresh embryo transfer (FET). The diagnostic rate was 82.9%; unaffected live births were achieved in 9 of 20 FET cycles (45%), with only one false negative (among 54 transferred embryos). Overall, the ARMS-qPCR had frequent allele-dropout (ADO), rendering it inappropriate as the sole diagnostic method (despite a favorable live-birth rate). Regardless, it has the potential to complement the current gold-standard methodology, especially when trophectoderm biopsy becomes a preferred option and genotyping needs to be timely enough to enable FET.

Cross-border reprogenetic services

The purpose of this review is to synthesize the current knowledge on the international movement of patients and biopsied embryo cells for pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and its different applications. Thus far, few attempts have been made to identify the specific nature of this phenomenon called 'cross-border reprogenetic services'. There is scattered evidence, both empirical and speculative, suggesting that these services raise major issues in terms of service provision, risks for patients and the children-to-come, the legal liabilities of physicians, as well as social justice. To compile this evidence, this review uses the narrative overview protocol combined with thematic analysis. Five major themes have emerged from the literature at the conjunction of cross-border treatments and reprogenetics: 'scope', 'scale', 'motivations', 'concerns', and 'governance'. Similar themes have already been observed in the case of other medical tourism activities, but this review highlights their singularity with reprogenetic services. It emphasizes the diagnostic and autologous feature of reprogenetics, the constant risk of misdiagnosis, the restriction on certain tests for medically controversial conditions, and the uncertain accessibility of genetic counseling in cross-border settings.

Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro

Purpose:

Our aim was to compare the accuracy of family- or disease-specific targeted haplotyping and direct mutation-detection strategies with the accuracy of genome-wide mapping of the parental origin of each chromosome, or karyomapping, by single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of the parents, a close relative of known disease status, and the embryo cell(s) used for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single-gene defects in a single cell or small numbers of cells biopsied from human embryos following in vitro fertilization.

Methods:

Genomic DNA and whole-genome amplification products from embryo samples, which were previously diagnosed by targeted haplotyping, were genotyped for single-nucleotide polymorphisms genome-wide detection and retrospectively analyzed blind by karyomapping.

Results:

Single-nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and karyomapping were successful in 213/218 (97.7%) samples from 44 preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for 25 single-gene defects with various modes of inheritance distributed widely across the genome. Karyomapping was concordant with targeted haplotyping in 208 (97.7%) samples, and the five nonconcordant samples were all in consanguineous regions with limited or inconsistent haplotyping results.

Conclusion:

Genome-wide karyomapping is highly accurate and facilitates analysis of the inheritance of almost any single-gene defect, or any combination of loci, at the single-cell level, greatly expanding the range of conditions for which preimplantation genetic diagnosis can be offered clinically without the need for customized test development.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: technical advances and expanding applications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the foundations, recent technical advances, and increasing number of applications for in-vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).

RECENT FINDINGS

PGD is an important technique for reducing the burden of genetic disease. Studies have shown that the diagnostic accuracy and subsequent live-birth rate after PGD are impacted by the developmental stage at the time of biopsy, as well as the biopsy protocol used. Also essential for accurate diagnosis are refined mutation detection protocols which avoid the common problem of allele drop-out. As the technique has improved, there has been a concomitant increase in the popularity and breadth of application of PGD. A recently published 10-year dataset of worldwide PGD reveals the increasing frequency of its use and the growing number of indications for which PGD is offered.

SUMMARY

Technical advances from biopsy to detection of mutations have led to improved diagnostic accuracy and an increased frequency and breadth of use for PGD.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve pregnancy outcomes in subfertility

Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis provides prenatal genetic diagnosis before implantation, thus allowing detection of chromosomal abnormalities and their exclusion from embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologies. Polar body, blastomere or trophectoderm can each be used to obtain requisite genetic or embryonic DNA. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for excluding unbalanced translocations is well accepted, and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis aneuploidy testing to avoid repeated pregnancy losses in couples having recurrent aneuploidy is efficacious in reducing miscarriages. Controversy remains about whether pre-implantation genetic diagnosis aneuploidy testing improves take home pregnancy rates, for which reason adherence to specific indications is recommended while the issue is being adjudicated. Current recommendations are for obligatory 24 chromosome testing, most readily using array comparative genome hybridisation.

The decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis: initial findings from a grounded theory study

Exponential growth in genomics has led to public and private initiatives worldwide that have dramatically increased the number of procreative couples who are aware of their ability to transmit genetic disorders to their future children. Understanding how couples process the meaning of being genetically at-risk for their procreative life lags far behind the advances in genomic and reproductive sciences. Moreover, society, policy makers, and clinicians are not aware of the experiences and nuances involved when modern couples are faced with using Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD). The purpose of this study was to discover the decision-making process of genetically at-risk couples as they decide whether to use PGD to prevent the transmission of known single-gene or sex-linked genetic disorders to their children. A qualitative, grounded theory design guided the study in which 22 couples (44 individual partners) from the USA, who were actively considering PGD, participated. Couples were recruited from June 2009 to May 2010 from the Internet and from a large PGD center and a patient newsletter. In-depth semi-structured interviews were completed with each individual partner within the couple dyad, separate from their respective partner. We discovered that couples move through four phases (Identify, Contemplate, Resolve, Engage) of a complex, dynamic, and iterative decision-making process where multiple, sequential decisions are made. In the Identify phase, couples acknowledge the meaning of their at-risk status. Parenthood and reproductive options are explored in the Contemplate phase, where 41% of couples remained for up to 36 months before moving into the Resolve phase. In Resolve, one of three decisions about PGD use is reached, including: Accepting, Declining, or Oscillating. Actualizing decisions occur in the Engage phase. Awareness of the decision-making process among genetically at-risk couples provides foundational work for understanding critical processes and aids in identifying important gaps for intervention and future research.

Development of an informational web site for recruiting research participants: process, implementation, and evaluation

Internet-based research is increasing, yet there is little known about recruitment approaches that target the Internet. Investigators have been slow to discuss how to plan, develop, and enhance recruitment using the Internet when well-concealed or disparate populations, sensitive topics, or qualitative methods are interspersed into the aims of the study. The twofold purpose of this article was to (1) highlight the major steps and strategies undertaken to develop and implement an innovative Web site for recruiting high-genetic-risk couples who were considering preimplantation genetic diagnosis use, and (2) present the recruitment results and lessons learned based on enrollment, self-evaluation, and descriptive data. The Web site was developed using a five-step process designed by the investigators. A significant step in the process was determining the Web site objectives, which were enacted through contextual and design decisions, and also by incorporating a brief video and study logo into the Web site. The recruitment results indicate that, of the 22 participant couples, ∼82% were recruited via the Internet versus traditional recruitment approaches (ie, clinics, newsletters) and that the majority of couples viewed the Web site prior to enrolling in the study. In conclusion, developing a Web site using the five-step process can facilitate recruitment.

An update of preimplantation genetic diagnosis in gene diseases, chromosomal translocation, and aneuploidy screening

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is gradually widely used in prevention of gene diseases and chromosomal abnormalities. Much improvement has been achieved in biopsy technique and molecular diagnosis. Blastocyst biopsy can increase diagnostic accuracy and reduce allele dropout. It is cost-effective and currently plays an important role. Whole genome amplification permits subsequent individual detection of multiple gene loci and screening all 23 pairs of chromosomes. For PGD of chromosomal translocation, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is traditionally used, but with technical difficulty. Array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) can detect translocation and 23 pairs of chromosomes that may replace FISH. Single nucleotide polymorphisms array with haplotyping can further distinguish between normal chromosomes and balanced translocation. PGD may shorten time to conceive and reduce miscarriage for patients with chromosomal translocation. PGD has a potential value for mitochondrial diseases. Preimplantation genetic haplotyping has been applied for unknown mutation sites of single gene disease. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) using limited FISH probes in the cleavage-stage embryo did not increase live birth rates for patients with advanced maternal age, unexplained recurrent abortions, and repeated implantation failure. Polar body and blastocyst biopsy may circumvent the problem of mosaicism. PGS using blastocyst biopsy and array CGH is encouraging and merit further studies. Cryopreservation of biopsied blastocysts instead of fresh transfer permits sufficient time for transportation and genetic analysis. Cryopreservation of embryos may avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and possible suboptimal endometrium.

Use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic screening in the United States: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group paper

OBJECTIVE

To comprehensively report Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) member program usage of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for diagnosis of specific conditions, and preimplantation genetic screening for aneuploidy (PGS).

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

United States SART cohort data.

PATIENT(S)

Women undergoing a PGT cycle in which at least one embryo underwent biopsy.

INTERVENTION(S)

PGT.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

PGT use, indications, and delivery rates.

RESULT(S)

Of 190,260 fresh, nondonor assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles reported to SART CORS in 2007-2008, 8,337 included PGT. Of 6,971 cycles with a defined indication, 1,382 cycles were for genetic diagnosis, 3,645 for aneuploidy screening (PGS), 527 for translocation, and 1,417 for elective sex election. Although the total number of fresh, autologous cycles increased by 3.6% from 2007 to 2008, the percentage of cycles with PGT decreased by 5.8% (4,293 in 2007 and 4,044 in 2008). As a percentage of fresh, nondonor ART cycles, use dropped from 4.6% (4,293/93,433) in 2007 to 4.2% (4,044/96,827) in 2008. The primary indication for PGT was PGS: cycles performed for this indication decreased (-8.0%). PGD use for single-gene defects (+3.2%), elective sex selection (+5.3%), and translocation analysis (+0.5%) increased. PGT usage varied significantly by geographical region.

CONCLUSION(S)

PGT usage in the United States decreased between 2007 and 2008 owing to a decrease in PGS. Use of elective sex selection increased. High transfer cancellation rates correlated with reduced live-birth rates for some PGT indications.

Successful application of the strategy of blastocyst biopsy, vitrification, whole genome amplification, and thawed embryo transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1

OBJECTIVE

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) offers an alternative for women to carry an unaffected fetus risk of hereditary diseases. Trophectoderm biopsy may provide more cells for accurate diagnosis. However, the time allowed for transportation of the specimens to the laboratory and performance of molecular diagnosis is limited. We designed a PGD program of trophectoderm biopsy, vitrification of blastocysts, whole genome amplification (WGA), double confirmatory genotypings, and thawed embryo transfer.

CASE REPORT

We conducted this strategy for a woman of familial neurofibromatosis type I (NF-1). She had a genotype of heterozygous c.6709C>T mutation of NF1 gene. Trophectoderm biopsies were performed on 13 blastocysts. Then, individual blastocyst was vitrified. WGA was performed for the samples, followed by genotypings with both real-time polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Eight embryos were diagnosed as unaffected, four were affected, and one was inconclusive because of allele drop-out. In the next cycle, two unaffected blastocysts were thawed and transferred, that resulted in a singleton pregnancy. The pregnancy was confirmed as unaffected by means of chorionic villi sampling.

CONCLUSION

We first demonstrate successful application of blastocyst biopsy, vitrification, WGA, and thawed embryo transfer for PGD of a monogenic disease. Vitrification of blastocysts after biopsy permits sufficient time for shipment of samples and operation of molecular diagnosis.

Whole-chromosome aneuploidy analysis in human oocytes: focus on comparative genomic hybridization

The study of aneuploidy in human oocytes, discarded from IVF cycles, has provided a better understanding of the incidence of aneuploidy of female origin and the responsible mechanisms. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is an established technique that allows for the detection of aneuploidy in all chromosomes avoiding artifactual chromosome losses. In this review, results obtained using CGH in single cells (1PB and/or MII oocytes) are included. The results of oocyte aneuploidy rates obtained by CGH from discarded oocytes of IVF patients and of oocyte donors are summarized. Moreover, the mechanisms involved in the aneuploid events, e.g. whether alterations occurred due to first meiotic errors or germ-line mitotic errors are also discussed. Finally, the incidence of aneuploid oocyte production due to first meiotic errors and germ-line mitotic errors observed in oocytes coming from IVF patients and IVF oocyte donors was assessed.

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years

First reported in 1990, PGD has evolved into a complementary form of prenatal diagnosis offering novel indications. DNA for PGD can be recovered with equal safety and facility from polar bodies I and II, blastomere (8 cell embryo) and trophectoderm (5-6 day blastocyst). Diagnostic accuracy is very high (>99%) for both chromosomal abnormalities and single gene disorders. Traditional application of FISH with chromosome specific probes for detecting aneuploidy and translocations may be replaced or complemented by array comparative genome hybridization (array CGH); biopsied embryos can now be cryopreserved (vitrification) while analysis proceeds in orderly fashion. PGD has been accomplished for over 200 different single gene disorders. Novel indications for PGD not readily applicable by traditional prenatal genetic diagnosis include avoiding clinical pregnancy termination, performing preconceptional diagnosis (polar body I), obtaining prenatal diagnosis without disclosure of prenatal genotype (nondisclosure), diagnosing adult-onset disorders particularly cancer, and identifying HLA compatible embryos suitable for recovering umbilical cord blood stem cells.