Low-dose estrogen and drospirenone combination: effects on glycoinsulinemic metabolism and other cardiovascular risk factors in healthy postmenopausal women

The benefits and risks of menopause hormone therapy for the cardiovascular system in postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Menopause hormone therapy (MHT), as an effective method to alleviate the menopause-related symptoms of women, its benefits, risks, and potential influencing factors for the cardiovascular system of postmenopausal women are not very clear.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate cardiovascular benefits and risks of MHT in postmenopausal women, and analyze the underlying factors that affect both.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from 1975 to July 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) that met pre-specified inclusion criteria were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data independently. A meta-analysis of random effects was used to analyze data.

MAIN RESULTS

This systematic review identified 33 RCTs using MHT involving 44,639 postmenopausal women with a mean age of 60.3 (range 48 to 72 years). There was no significant difference between MHT and placebo (or no treatment) in all-cause death (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.09, I2 = 14%) and cardiovascular events (RR = 0.97, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.14, I2 = 38%) in the overall population of postmenopausal women. However, MHT would increase the risk of stroke (RR = 1.23, 95%CI 1.08 to 1.41,I2 = 0%) and venous thromboembolism (RR = 1.86, 95%CI 1.39 to 2.50, I2 = 24%). Compared with placebo, MHT could improve flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMD) (SMD = 1.46, 95%CI 0.86 to 2.07, I2 = 90%), but it did not improve nitroglycerin-mediated arterial dilation (NMD) (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI - 0.08 to 0.62, I2 = 76%). Compared with women started MHT more than 10 years after menopause, women started MHT within 10 years after menopause had lower frequency of all-cause death (P = 0.02) and cardiovascular events (P = 0.002), and more significant improvement in FMD (P = 0.0003). Compared to mono-estrogen therapy, the combination therapy of estrogen and progesterone would not alter the outcomes of endpoint event. (all-cause death P = 0.52, cardiovascular events P = 0.90, stroke P = 0.85, venous thromboembolism P = 0.33, FMD P = 0.46, NMD P = 0.27).

CONCLUSIONS

MHT improves flow-mediated arterial dilation (FMD) but fails to lower the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events, and increases the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women. Early acceptance of MHT not only reduces the risk of all-cause death and cardiovascular events but also further improves FMD, although the risk of stroke and venous thrombosis is not reduced. There is no difference in the outcome of cardiovascular system endpoints between mono-estrogen therapy and combination therapy of estrogen and progesterone.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Syndrome and Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Update: What's New?

(1) Background: This narrative review aimed to analyze the epidemiological, clinical, surgical, prognostic, and instrumental aspects of the link between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), collecting the most recent evidence from the scientific literature. (2) Methods: We matched the terms "pelvic organ prolapse" (POP) and "lower urinary tract symptoms" (LUTS) on the following databases: Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, Google scholar, and Cochrane. We excluded case reports, systematic reviews, articles published in a language other than English, and studies focusing only on a surgical technique. (3) Results: There is a link between POP and LUTS. Bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) would increase variation in bladder structure and function, which could lead to an overactive bladder (OAB). There is no connection between the POP stage and LUTS. Prolapse surgery could modify the symptoms of OAB with improvement or healing. Post-surgical predictive factors of non-improvement of OAB or de novo onset include high BMI, neurological pathologies, age > 65 years, and the severity of symptoms; predictors of emptying disorders are neurological pathologies, BOO, perineal dysfunctions, severity of pre-surgery symptoms, and severe anterior prolapse. Urodynamics should be performed on a specific subset of patients (i.e., stress urinary incontinence, correct surgery planning), (4) Conclusions: Correction of prolapse is the primary treatment for detrusor underactivity and for patients with both POP and OAB.

The Effects of Menopause Hormone Therapy on Lipid Profile in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance: The incidence of dyslipidemia increases after menopause. Menopause hormone therapy (MHT) is recommended for menopause related disease. However, it is benefit for lipid profiles is inconclusive. Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of MHT on lipid profile in postmenopausal women. Evidence Review: Related articles were searched on PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to December 2020. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality was assessed using the "Cochrane Risk of Bias checklist". Results: Seventy-three eligible studies were selected. The results showed that MHT significantly decreased the levels of TC (WMD: -0.43, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.33), LDL-C (WMD: -0.47, 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.40) and LP (a) (WMD: -49.46, 95% CI: -64.27 to -34.64) compared with placebo or no treatment. Oral MHT led to a significantly higher TG compared with transdermal MHT (WMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04-0.21). The benefits of low dose MHT on TG was also concluded when comparing with conventional-dose estrogen (WMD: -0.18, 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.03). The results also showed that conventional MHT significantly decreased LDL-C (WMD: -0.35, 95% CI: -0.50 to -0.19), but increase TG (WMD: 0.42, 95%CI: 0.18-0.65) compared with tibolone. When comparing with the different MHT regimens, estrogen (E) + progesterone (P) regimen significantly increased TC (WMD: 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09 to 0.20), LDL-C (WMD: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07-0.17) and Lp(a) (WMD: 44.58, 95% CI:28.09-61.06) compared with estrogen alone. Conclusion and Relevance: MHT plays a positive role in lipid profile in postmenopausal women, meanwhile for women with hypertriglyceridemia, low doses or transdermal MHT or tibolone would be a safer choice. Moreover, E + P regimen might blunt the benefit of estrogen on the lipid profile. Clinical Trial Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42018092924], identifier [No. CRD42018092924].

Fact or Fiction? The Role of Regulated Body-Identical Hormone Therapy for Menopausal Women

Many menopausal women use hormone therapy, including regulated body-identical hormone therapy (rBHT), to relieve vasomotor symptoms and prevent cardiovascular disease. Despite growing interest in rBHT, there is uncertainty regarding potential benefits and risks. With this narrative review, we aimed to synthesize the literature regarding the efficacy of these therapies for managing vasomotor symptoms and preventing cardiovascular disease. Thirteen articles were identified, with authors of several studies showing rBHT and combination therapy (rBHT with synthetic hormone therapy) to be efficacious in managing vasomotor symptoms when compared to placebo. Conflicting evidence exists regarding the efficacy of rBHT in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, with some studies demonstrating improved cardiovascular biomarkers, particularly among women who are at the beginning of the menopausal journey and experiencing symptoms. In summary, rBHT may have a role in the care of women trying to manage vasomotor symptoms and in protecting against cardiovascular disease among menopausal women; however, larger, more rigorously designed randomized controlled trials are required.

Serum metabolomic profiles associated with postmenopausal hormone use

INTRODUCTION

Postmenopausal hormone use is linked to several health outcomes and the risk associated with some may differ depending on whether estrogen is used alone or in combination with progestin.

OBJECTIVE

Metabolomic analyses of postmenopausal hormone use and differences between hormone regimes was done to identify metabolites associated with each type of hormone treatment.

METHODS

Untargeted metabolomics analysis was done on serum from 1336 women enrolled in the Cancer Prevention II Nutrition Cohort. Levels of 781 named metabolites were compared between 667 nonusers with 332 estrogen-only and with 337 estrogen plus progestin users using linear regression. Metabolite levels were also compared between estrogen-only and estrogen plus progestin users.

RESULTS

Compared to nonusers, 276 metabolites were statistically significantly (P < 6.40 × 10^- 5) associated with estrogen-only use and 222 were associated with estrogen plus progestin use. The metabolites associated with both types of hormones included numerous lipids, acyl carnitines, and amino acids as well as the thyroid hormone thyroxine and the oncometabolite fumarate. The 65 metabolites that differed significantly between estrogen-only and estrogen plus progestin users included 19 steroids and 12 lipids that contained the bioactive fatty acid arachidonic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that postmenopausal hormone use influences metabolic pathways linked to a variety of cellular processes, including the regulation of metabolism and stress responses, energy production, and inflammation. The differential association of numerous lipids which influence cellular signaling suggests that differences in signal transduction may contribute to the disparate risks for some diseases between estrogen-only and estrogen plus progestin users.

Hormonal therapy with estradiol and drospirenone improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in the coronary bed of ovariectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats

Drospirenone (DRSP) is a progestin with anti-aldosterone properties and it reduces blood pressure in hypertensive women. However, the effects of DRSP on endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilation have not been evaluated. This study investigated the effects of combined therapy with estrogen (E2) and DRSP on endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the coronary bed of ovariectomized (OVX) spontaneously hypertensive rats. Female spontaneously hypertensive rats (n=87) at 12 weeks of age were randomly divided into sham operated (Sham), OVX, OVX treated with E2 (E2), and OVX treated with E2 and DRSP (E2+DRSP) groups. Hemodynamic parameters were directly evaluated by catheter insertion into the femoral artery. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation in response to bradykinin in the coronary arterial bed was assessed using isolated hearts according to a modified Langendorff method. Coronary protein expression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase and estrogen receptor alpha (ER-α) was assessed by Western blotting. Histological slices of coronary arteries were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, and morphometric parameters were analyzed. Oxidative stress was assessed in situ by dihydroethidium fluorescence. Ovariectomy increased systolic blood pressure, which was only prevented by E2+DRSP treatment. Estrogen deficiency caused endothelial dysfunction, which was prevented by both treatments. However, the vasodilator response in the E2+DRSP group was significantly higher at the three highest concentrations compared with the OVX group. Reduced ER-α expression in OVX rats was restored by both treatments. Morphometric parameters and oxidative stress were augmented by OVX and reduced by E2 and E2+DRSP treatments. Hormonal therapy with E2 and DRSP may be an important therapeutic option in the prevention of coronary heart disease in hypertensive post-menopausal women.

Short-term effects of low-dose estrogen/drospirenone vs low-dose estrogen/dydrogesterone on glycemic fluctuations in postmenopausal women with metabolic syndrome

This study aims to compare the effects of low-dose emidrate estradiol/drospirenone (E2/DRSP) vs low-dose emidrate estradiol/dydrogesterone (E2/DG) combination on the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) value in postmenopausal women affected by metabolic syndrome (MS). One hundred sixty postmenopausal women were recruited to receive a treatment with oral doses of E2/1 mg plus drospirenone/2 mg (E2/DRSP group) or oral dose of E2/1 mg plus dydrogesterone/5 mg (E2/DG group) for 6 months. At enrollment and after 6 months, anthropometric, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters have been assessed. MAGE, evaluated during 48-h continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring (CSGM), allowed us to assess daily glucose fluctuations at baseline and after 6 months. After hormone therapy, both groups showed a significant decline in fasting plasma glucose levels (p < 0.05), while only E2/DRSP group showed a statistically significant decline in waist circumferences, post-prandial glycemia, LDL, plasma triglycerides, MAGE, HOMA index, and plasma IL-6 (p < 0.05) levels. In the whole population (n = 160), after 6 months of indicated therapy, changes in fasting plasma glucose and PAI-1 levels correlated with the changes in MAGE values, while only in E2/DRSP group that MAGE reduction was positively associated with a stronger decrease in waist circumferences, triglycerides, and TNF-α plasma levels. The independent effect of hormone therapy (HT) on reduction in MAGE value has been tested in three different multiple linear regression models. HT resulted to be associated with MAGE, independent of other confounding variables. Although both groups had a decline in fasting plasma glucose, only drospirenone treatment revealed positive effects on glycemic excursions and insulin sensitivity, induced favorable changes in lipid profile, and showed an improvement of inflammatory indices in postmenopausal women with MS.

Estrogen, hormonal replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Premenopausal women have a lower risk and incidence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to age-matched men and this sex advantage for women gradually disappears after menopause, suggesting that sexual hormones play a cardioprotective role in women. However, randomized prospective primary or secondary prevention trials failed to confirm that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) affords cardioprotection. This review highlights the factors that may contribute to this divergent outcome and could reveal why young or premenopausal women are protected from CVD and yet postmenopausal women do not benefit from HRT.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to the two classical estrogen receptors, ERα and ERβ, a third, G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30, has been identified. New intracellular signaling pathways and actions for the cardiovascular protective properties of estrogen have been proposed. In addition, recent Women's Health Initiative (WHI) studies restricted to younger postmenopausal women showed that initiation of HRT closer to menopause reduced the risk of CVD. Moreover, dosage, duration, the type of estrogen and route of administration all merit consideration when determining the outcome of HRT.

SUMMARY

HRT has become one of the most controversial topics related to women's health. Future studies are necessary if we are to understand the divergent published findings regarding HRT and develop new therapeutic strategies to improve the quality of life for women.

Dose-dependent toxic effects of high-dose estrogen on renal and cardiac injury in surgically postmenopausal mice

AIMS

We previously found that in mice with experimental myocardial infarction (MI), 17β-estradiol (E2) increased mortality and worsened cardiac remodeling and these deleterious effects were associated with renal enlargement and hydronephrosis in a dose-dependent manner. In the present study we questioned whether E2-induced renal damage predisposes to rather than results from its adverse effects on the heart.

MAIN METHODS

Ovariectomized (ovx) mice received either placebo (P) or E2 at 0.02 (E2-L, low dose), 0.42 (E2-M, moderate dose) or 4.2 μg/d (E2-H, high dose) for 8 weeks.

KEY FINDINGS

E2-L partially restored uterine weight and plasma estrogen levels without affecting heart, lung and liver weight, hemodynamic parameters, or heart and kidney morphology and function. E2-M restored normal uterine weight, but this was accompanied by a significant increase in kidney weight, albuminuria, glomerular matrix formation and markers for oxidative stress. E2-H increased uterine weight 4.5-fold and resulted in higher plasma creatinine levels, severe albuminuria, renal tubular dilatation, tubulointerstitial injury, hydronephrosis, glomerulosclerosis and oxidative stress. E2-H also caused ascites, hepatomegaly and fluid retention in the uterine horns but had no significant effect on blood pressure or heart function.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our data demonstrated that an excessive dose of E2 that raises uterine weight beyond physiological levels adversely affects the kidney even before it damages the heart. We believe estrogen dosage should be taken into account when considering hormonal replacement therapy, since inappropriate doses of E2 may damage not only the heart but also the kidney.