Peripheral blood stem cell transplants do not result in endometrial stromal engraftment

Mechanisms of Regeneration and Fibrosis in the Endometrium

The uterine lining (endometrium) regenerates repeatedly over the life span as part of its normal physiology. Substantial portions of the endometrium are shed during childbirth (parturition) and, in some species, menstruation, but the tissue is rapidly rebuilt without scarring, rendering it a powerful model of regeneration in mammals. Nonetheless, following some assaults, including medical procedures and infections, the endometrium fails to regenerate and instead forms scars that may interfere with normal endometrial function and contribute to infertility. Thus, the endometrium provides an exceptional platform to answer a central question of regenerative medicine: Why do some systems regenerate while others scar? Here, we review our current understanding of diverse endometrial disruption events in humans, nonhuman primates, and rodents, and the associated mechanisms of regenerative success and failure. Elucidating the determinants of these disparate repair processes promises insights into fundamental mechanisms of mammalian regeneration with substantial implications for reproductive health.

Regenerative Medicine Approaches in Bioengineering Female Reproductive Tissues

Diseases, disorders, and dysfunctions of the female reproductive tract tissues can result in either infertility and/or hormonal imbalance. Current treatment options are limited and often do not result in tissue function restoration, requiring alternative therapeutic approaches. Regenerative medicine offers potential new therapies through the bioengineering of female reproductive tissues. This review focuses on some of the current technologies that could address the restoration of functional female reproductive tissues, including the use of stem cells, biomaterial scaffolds, bio-printing, and bio-fabrication of tissues or organoids. The use of these approaches could also be used to address issues in infertility. Strategies such as cell-based hormone replacement therapy could provide a more natural means of restoring normal ovarian physiology. Engineering of reproductive tissues and organs could serve as a powerful tool for correcting developmental anomalies. Organ-on-a-chip technologies could be used to perform drug screening for personalized medicine approaches and scientific investigations of the complex physiological interactions between the female reproductive tissues and other organ systems. While some of these technologies have already been developed, others have not been translated for clinical application. The continuous evolution of biomaterials and techniques, advances in bioprinting, along with emerging ideas for new approaches, shows a promising future for treating female reproductive tract-related disorders and dysfunctions.

Stem cell paracrine actions in tissue regeneration and potential therapeutic effect in human endometrium: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Determining genetic and paracrine mechanisms behind endometrial regeneration in Asherman's syndrome and endometrial atrophy (AS/EA) patients after autologous CD133⁺ bone marrow-derived stem cell (CD133⁺ BMDSC) transplantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective study using human endometrial biopsies and mouse models.

SETTING

Fundación-IVI, IIS-La Fe, Valencia, Spain.

SAMPLES

Endometrial biopsies collected before and after CD133⁺ BMDSC therapy, from eight women with AS/EA (NCT02144987) from the uterus of five mice with only left horns receiving CD133⁺ BMDSC therapy.

METHODS

In human samples, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, RNA arrays, PCR validation, and neutrophil elastase (NE) immunohistochemistry (IHQ). In mouse samples, PCR validation and protein immunoarrays.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

H&E microscopic evaluation, RNA expression levels, PCR, and growth/angiogenic factors quantification, NE IHQ signal.

RESULTS

Treatment improved endometrial morphology and thickness for all patients. In human samples, Jun, Serpine1, and Il4 were up-regulated whereas Ccnd1 and Cxcl8 were down-regulated after treatment. The significant decrease of NE signal corroborated Cxcl8 expression. Animal model analysis confirmed human results and revealed a higher expression of pro-angiogenic cytokines (IL18, HGF, MCP-1, MIP2) in treated uterine horns.

CONCLUSIONS

CD133⁺ BMDSC seems to activate several factors through a paracrine mechanism to help tissue regeneration, modifying endometrial behaviour through an immunomodulatory milieu that precedes proliferation and angiogenic processes. Insight into these processes could bring us one step closer to a non-invasive treatment for AS/EA patients.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

CD133⁺ BMDSC therapy regenerates endometrium, modifying the immunological milieu that precedes proliferation and angiogenesis.

Bone Marrow Stem Cells Do Not Contribute to Endometrial Cell Lineages in Chimeric Mouse Models

Studies from five independent laboratories conclude that bone marrow stem cells transdifferentiate into endometrial stroma, epithelium, and endothelium. We investigated the nature of bone marrow-derived cells in the mouse endometrium by reconstituting irradiated wild type recipients with bone marrow containing transgenic mTert-green fluorescent protein (GFP) or chicken β-actin (Ch β-actin)-GFP reporters. mTert-GFP is a telomerase marker identifying hematopoietic stem cells and subpopulations of epithelial, endothelial, and immune cells in the endometrium. Ch β-actin-GFP is a ubiquitous reporter previously used to identify bone marrow-derived cells in the endometrium. Confocal fluorescence microscopy for GFP and markers of endometrial and immune cells were used to characterize bone marrow-derived cells in the endometrium of transplant recipients. No evidence of GFP⁺ bone marrow-derived stroma, epithelium, or endothelium was observed in the endometrium of mTert-GFP or Ch β-actin-GFP recipients. All GFP⁺ cells detected in the endometrium were immune cells expressing the pan leukocyte marker CD45, including CD3⁺ T cells and F4/80⁺ macrophages. Further examination of the Ch β-actin-GFP transplant model revealed that bone marrow-derived F4/80⁺ macrophages immunostained weakly for CD45. These macrophages were abundant in the stroma, infiltrated the epithelial and vascular compartments, and could easily be mistaken for bone marrow-derived endometrial cells. We conclude that it is unlikely that bone marrow cells are able to transdifferentiate into endometrial stroma, epithelium, and endothelium. This result has important therapeutic implications, as the expectation that bone marrow stem cells contribute directly to endometrial regeneration is shaping strategies designed to regenerate endometrium in Asherman's syndrome and to control aberrant endometrial growth in endometriosis. Stem Cells 2018;36:91-102.

Advances in improving fertility in women through stem cell-based clinical platforms

INTRODUCTION

Due to their regenerative ability, stem cells are looked at as a promising tool for improving infertility treatments in women. As the main limiting factor in female fertility is represented by the decrease of ovarian reserve, the main goals of stem cell-based clinical platforms would be to obtain in vitro or in vivo neo-oogenesis. Refractory endometrial factor infertility also represents an obstacle for female reproduction for which stem cells might provide novel treatment strategies. Areas covered: A systematic search of the literature was performed on MEDLINE/PubMed database to identify relevant articles using stem-cell based clinical or research platforms in the field of female infertility. Expert opinion: In vitro oogenesis has not so far developed beyond the stage of oocyte-like cells whose normal progression to mature oocytes and ability to be fertilized was not proved. Extensive epigenetic programming of gamete precursors and the complex interactions between somatic and germ cells required for human oogenesis likely represent the main obstacles in stem-cell-based neo-oogenesis. Also resuming oogenesis in vivo in adulthood still appears a distant hypothesis, as there is still a lack of consensus about the existence and functionality of adult ovarian stem cells.

Endometrial stem/progenitor cells: the first 10 years

BACKGROUND

The existence of stem/progenitor cells in the endometrium was postulated many years ago, but the first functional evidence was only published in 2004. The identification of rare epithelial and stromal populations of clonogenic cells in human endometrium has opened an active area of research on endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the subsequent 10 years.

METHODS

The published literature was searched using the PubMed database with the search terms ‘endometrial stem cells and menstrual blood stem cells' until December 2014.

RESULTS

Endometrial epithelial stem/progenitor cells have been identified as clonogenic cells in human and as label-retaining or CD44⁺ cells in mouse endometrium, but their characterization has been modest. In contrast, endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been well characterized and show similar properties to bone marrow MSCs. Specific markers for their enrichment have been identified, CD146⁺PDGFRβ⁺ (platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta) and SUSD2⁺ (sushi domain containing-2), which detected their perivascular location and likely pericyte identity in endometrial basalis and functionalis vessels. Transcriptomics and secretomics of SUSD2⁺ cells confirm their perivascular phenotype. Stromal fibroblasts cultured from endometrial tissue or menstrual blood also have some MSC characteristics and demonstrate broad multilineage differentiation potential for mesodermal, endodermal and ectodermal lineages, indicating their plasticity. Side population (SP) cells are a mixed population, although predominantly vascular cells, which exhibit adult stem cell properties, including tissue reconstitution. There is some evidence that bone marrow cells contribute a small population of endometrial epithelial and stromal cells. The discovery of specific markers for endometrial stem/progenitor cells has enabled the examination of their role in endometrial proliferative disorders, including endometriosis, adenomyosis and Asherman's syndrome. Endometrial MSCs (eMSCs) and menstrual blood stromal fibroblasts are an attractive source of MSCs for regenerative medicine because of their relative ease of acquisition with minimal morbidity. Their homologous and non-homologous use as autologous and allogeneic cells for therapeutic purposes is currently being assessed in preclinical animal models of pelvic organ prolapse and phase I/II clinical trials for cardiac failure. eMSCs and stromal fibroblasts also exhibit non-stem cell-associated immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties, further emphasizing their desirable properties for cell-based therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Much has been learnt about endometrial stem/progenitor cells in the 10 years since their discovery, although several unresolved issues remain. These include rationalizing the terminology and diagnostic characteristics used for distinguishing perivascular stem/progenitor cells from stromal fibroblasts, which also have considerable differentiation potential. The hierarchical relationship between clonogenic epithelial progenitor cells, endometrial and decidual SP cells, CD146⁺PDGFR-β⁺ and SUSD2⁺ cells and menstrual blood stromal fibroblasts still needs to be resolved. Developing more genetic animal models for investigating the role of endometrial stem/progenitor cells in endometrial disorders is required, as well as elucidating which bone marrow cells contribute to endometrial tissue. Deep sequencing and epigenetic profiling of enriched populations of endometrial stem/progenitor cells and their differentiated progeny at the population and single-cell level will shed new light on the regulation and function of endometrial stem/progenitor cells.

Human CD133(+) bone marrow-derived stem cells promote endometrial proliferation in a murine model of Asherman syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the engraftment and proliferation of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIOs)-labeled human CD133(+) bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMDSCs) in an animal model of Asherman syndrome (AS).

DESIGN

Prospective experimental animal study.

SETTING

University research laboratories.

ANIMAL(S)

Nonobese diabetic mice (strain code 394; NOD.CB17- Prkdc(scid)/NcrCrl) in which AS was induced according to a published protocol.

INTERVENTION(S)

Human CD133(+) BMDSCs were obtained from patients undergoing autologous cell therapy in refractory AS and endometrial atrophy, labeled with SPIOs and injected either intrauterinely (n = 5) or systemically through the tail vein (n = 5) in the animal model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Accumulation of collagen and glycosaminoglycan deposits detected by trichrome staining. Percentage and localization of engrafted human SPIOs-labeled CD133(+) BMDSCs by Prussian blue staining. Cell proliferation assay using Ki67 and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for specific paracrine factors.

RESULT(S)

The induction of the AS in the murine model was demonstrated by the accumulation of collagen and glycosaminoglycan deposits in the damaged horns by trichrome staining. Human SPIOs labeled CD133(+) BMDSCs homing represents 0.59% and 0.65% of total number of cells present in the horns after intrauterine or tail vein injections, respectively. Engrafted cells were localized around endometrial blood vessels, inducing proliferation in surrounding cells based on Ki67 and regulation of the paracrine factors thrombospondin 1 and insulin-like growth factor 1.

CONCLUSION(S)

The injection of human SPIOs labeled CD133(+) BMDSCs in a murine model of AS confirms that these cells engraft around endometrial vessels, inducing proliferation of surrounding cells through paracrine molecules such as thrombospondin 1 and insulin-like growth factor 1.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02144987.

Stem cells in reproductive medicine: ready for the patient?

STUDY QUESTION

Are there effective and clinically validated stem cell-based therapies for reproductive diseases?

SUMMARY ANSWER

At the moment, clinically validated stem cell treatments for reproductive diseases and alterations are not available.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Research in stem cells and regenerative medicine is growing in scope, and its translation to the clinic is heralded by the recent initiation of controlled clinical trials with pluripotent derived cells. Unfortunately, stem cell 'treatments' are currently offered to patients outside of the controlled framework of scientifically sound research and regulated clinical trials. Both physicians and patients in reproductive medicine are often unsure about stem cells therapeutic options.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

An international working group was assembled to review critically the available scientific literature in both the human species and animal models.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

This review includes work published in English until December 2014, and available through Pubmed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A few areas of research in stem cell and reproductive medicine were identified: in vitro gamete production, endometrial regeneration, erectile dysfunction amelioration, vaginal reconstruction. The stem cells studied range from pluripotent (embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells) to monopotent stem cells, such as spermatogonial stem cells or mesenchymal stem cells. The vast majority of studies have been carried out in animal models, with data that are preliminary at best.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This review was not conducted in a systematic fashion, and reports in publications not indexed in Pubmed were not analyzed.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A much broader clinical knowledge will have to be acquired before translation to the clinic of stem cell therapies in reproductive medicine; patients and physicians should be wary of unfounded claims of improvement of existing medical conditions; at the moment, effective stem cell treatment for reproductive diseases and alterations is not available.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NA.