1
|
Morales C. Current Applications and Controversies in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) in In Vitro Fertilization. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:66-80. [PMID: 37515717 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01301-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has evolved over recent years, including improvements in embryo culture, biopsy, transfer, and genetic testing. The application of new comprehensive chromosome screening analysis has improved the accuracy in determining the chromosomal status of the analyzed sample, but it has brought new challenges such as the management of partial aneuploidies and mosaicisms. For the past two decades, PGT-A has been involved in a controversy regarding its efficiency in improving IVF outcomes, despite its widespread worldwide implementation. Understanding the impact of embryo aneuploidy in IVF (in vitro fertilization) should theoretically allow improving reproductive outcomes. This review of the literature aims to describe the impact of aneuploidy in human reproduction and how PGT-A was introduced to overcome this obstacle in IVF (in vitro fertilization). The article will try to analyze and summarize the evolution of the PGT-A in the recent years, and its current applications and limitations, as well as the controversy it generates. Conflicting published data could indicate the lacking value of a single biopsied sample to determine embryo chromosomal status and/or the lack of standardized methods for embryo culture and management and genetic analysis among other factors. It has to be considered that PGT-A may not be a universal test to improve the reproductive potential in IVF patients, rather each clinic should evaluate the efficacy of PGT-A in their IVF program based on their population, skills, and limitations.
Collapse
|
2
|
Mamas T, Kakourou G, Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J. Hemoglobinopathies and preimplantation diagnostics. Int J Lab Hematol 2022; 44 Suppl 1:21-27. [PMID: 35443077 DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Hemoglobinopathies constitute some of the most common inherited disorders worldwide. Manifestations are very severe, patient management is difficult and treatment is not easily accessible. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a valuable reproductive option for hemoglobinopathy carrier-couples as it precludes the initiation of an affected pregnancy. PGT-M is performed on embryos generated by assisted reproductive technologies and only those found to be free of the monogenic disorder are transferred to the uterus. PGT-M has been applied for 30 years now and β-thalassemia is one of the most common indications. PGT may also be applied for human leukocyte antigen typing to identify embryos that are unaffected and also compatible with an affected sibling in need of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. PGT-M protocols have evolved from PCR amplification-based, where a small number of loci were analysed, to whole genome amplification-based, the latter increasing diagnostic accuracy, enabling the development of more generic strategies and facilitating multiple diagnoses in one embryo. Currently, numerous PGT-M cycles are performed for the simultaneous diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies and screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo in an attempt to further improve success rates and increase deliveries of unaffected babies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thalia Mamas
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Kakourou
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Christina Vrettou
- Laboratory of Medical Genetics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aneuploidiescreening von Eizellen und Embryonen im Rahmen der assistierten Reproduktion. GYNAKOLOGISCHE ENDOKRINOLOGIE 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10304-021-00425-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
4
|
Chen Y, Gao Y, Jia J, Chang L, Liu P, Qiao J, Tang F, Wen L, Huang J. DNA methylome reveals cellular origin of cell-free DNA in spent medium of human preimplantation embryos. J Clin Invest 2021; 131:e146051. [PMID: 34128477 DOI: 10.1172/jci146051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery of embryonic cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in spent embryo culture media (SECM) has brought hope for noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing. However, the cellular origins of SECM cfDNA are not sufficiently understood, and methods for determining maternal DNA contamination are limited. Here, we performed whole-genome DNA methylation sequencing for SECM cfDNA. Our results demonstrated that SECM cfDNA was derived from blastocysts, cumulus cells, and polar bodies. We identified the cumulus-specific differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and oocyte/polar body-specific DMRs, and established an algorithm for deducing the cumulus, polar body, and net maternal DNA contamination ratios in SECM. We showed that DNA methylation sequencing accurately detected chromosome aneuploidy in SECM and distinguished SECM samples with low and high false negative rates and gender discordance rates, after integrating the origin analysis. Our work provides insights into the characterization of embryonic DNA in SECM and provides a perspective for noninvasive preimplantation genetic testing in reproductive medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yidong Chen
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jialin Jia
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Liang Chang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Ping Liu
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiao
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Fuchou Tang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Wen
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jin Huang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Genomics, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and.,Biomedical Pioneering Innovation Center and Center for Reproductive Medicine, Third Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction and Key Laboratory of Cell Proliferation and Differentiation, Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sabria-Back J, Monteagudo-Sánchez A, Sánchez-Delgado M, Ferguson-Smith AC, Gómez O, Pertierra Cartada A, Tenorio J, Nevado J, Lapunzina P, Pereda Aguirre A, Giménez Sevilla C, Toro Toro E, Perez de Nanclares G, Monk D. Preimplantation genetic testing for a chr14q32 microdeletion in a family with Kagami-Ogata syndrome and Temple syndrome. J Med Genet 2021; 59:253-261. [PMID: 33579810 DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Kagami-Ogata syndrome (KOS14) and Temple syndrome (TS14) are two disorders associated with reciprocal alterations within the chr14q32 imprinted domain. Here, we present a work-up strategy for preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to avoid the transmission of a causative micro-deletion. METHODS We analysed DNA from the KOS14 index case and parents using methylation-sensitive ligation-mediated probe amplification and methylation pyrosequencing. The extent of the deletion was mapped using SNP arrays. PGT was performed in trophectoderm samples in order to identify unaffected embryos. Samples were amplified using multiple displacement amplification, followed by genome-wide SNP genotyping to determine the at-risk haplotype and next-generation sequencing to determine aneuploidies. RESULTS A fully methylated pattern at the normally paternally methylated IG-DMR and MEG3 DMR in the KOS14 proband, accompanied by an unmethylated profile in the TS14 mother was consistent with maternal and paternal transmission of a deletion, respectively. Further analysis revealed a 108 kb deletion in both cases. The inheritance of the deletion on different parental alleles was consistent with the opposing phenotypes. In vitro fertilisation with intracytoplasmatic sperm injection and PGT were used to screen for deletion status and to transfer an unaffected embryo in this couple. A single euploid-unaffected embryo was identified resulting in a healthy baby born. DISCUSSION We identify a microdeletion responsible for multigeneration KOS14 and TS14 within a single family where carriers have a 50% risk of transmitting the deletion to their offspring. We show that PGT can successfully be offered to couples with IDs caused by genetic anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Sabria-Back
- BCNatal, Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Monteagudo-Sánchez
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Sánchez-Delgado
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Olga Gómez
- BCNatal, Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Africa Pertierra Cartada
- BCNatal, Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu and Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jair Tenorio
- INGEMM (Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular), Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Hospital universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain.,CIBERER (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras), Madrid, Spain.,ITHACA, European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disabilities, Madrid, Spain
| | - Julián Nevado
- INGEMM (Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular), Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Hospital universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain.,CIBERER (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras), Madrid, Spain.,ITHACA, European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disabilities, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Lapunzina
- INGEMM (Instituto de Genética Médica y Molecular), Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPaz, Hospital universitario la Paz, Madrid, Spain.,CIBERER (Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras), Madrid, Spain.,ITHACA, European Reference Network on Rare Congenital Malformations and Rare Intellectual Disabilities, Madrid, Spain
| | - Arrate Pereda Aguirre
- Molecular (Epi)Genetics Laboratory, Bioaraba Health Research Institute, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
| | | | | | | | - David Monk
- Cancer Epigenetics and Biology Program, Bellvitge Institute for Biomedical Research, Barcelona, Spain .,Biomedical Research Center, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Brouillet S, Martinez G, Coutton C, Hamamah S. Is cell-free DNA in spent embryo culture medium an alternative to embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing? A systematic review. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 40:779-796. [PMID: 32417199 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) is increasingly used worldwide. It currently entails the use of invasive techniques, i.e. polar body, blastomere, trophectoderm biopsy or blastocentesis, to obtain embryonic DNA, with major technical limitations and ethical issues. Evidence suggests that invasive PGT can lead to genetic misdiagnosis in the case of embryo mosaicism, and, consequently, to the selection of affected embryos for implantation or to the destruction of healthy embryos. Recently, spent culture medium (SCM) has been proposed as an alternative source of embryonic DNA. An increasing number of studies have reported the detection of cell-free DNA in SCM and highlighted the diagnostic potential of non-invasive SCM-based PGT for assessing the genetic status of preimplantation human embryos obtained by IVF. The reliability of this approach for clinical applications, however, needs to be determined. In this systematic review, published evidence on non-invasive SCM-based PGT is presented, and its current benefits and limitations compared with invasive PGT. Then, ways of optimizing and standardizing procedures for non-invasive SCM-based PGT to prevent technical biases and to improve performance in future studies are discussed. Finally, clinical perspectives of non-invasive PGT are presented and its future applications in reproductive medicine highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Brouillet
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm 1036, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), Institut de Biosciences et Biotechnologies de Grenoble (BIG), Laboratoire Biologie du Cancer et de l'Infection (BCI), Grenoble 38000, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Hôpital Couple-Enfant, Centre Clinique et Biologique d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation- Centre d'étude et de conservation des œufs et du sperme humains (CECOS), La Tronche 38700, France; INSERM U1203, Equipe "Développement Embryonnaire Précoce Humain et Pluripotence", Institut de Médecine Régénératrice et de Biothérapie, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier 34295, France
| | - Guillaume Martinez
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), équipe Génétique Epigénétique et Thérapie de l'Infertilité (GETI), Grenoble 38000, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Hôpital Couple Enfant, Département de Génétique et Procréation, Laboratoire de Génétique Chromosomique, La Tronche 38700, France
| | - Charles Coutton
- Université Grenoble-Alpes, Inserm, Institute for Advanced Biosciences (IAB), équipe Génétique Epigénétique et Thérapie de l'Infertilité (GETI), Grenoble 38000, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, Hôpital Couple Enfant, Département de Génétique et Procréation, Laboratoire de Génétique Chromosomique, La Tronche 38700, France
| | - Samir Hamamah
- INSERM U1203, Equipe "Développement Embryonnaire Précoce Humain et Pluripotence", Institut de Médecine Régénératrice et de Biothérapie, Hôpital Saint-Eloi, Montpellier 34295, France; CHU Montpellier, ART/PGD Division, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, Cedex 5, Montpellier 34295, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Verpoest W, Staessen C, Bossuyt PM, Goossens V, Altarescu G, Bonduelle M, Devesa M, Eldar-Geva T, Gianaroli L, Griesinger G, Kakourou G, Kokkali G, Liebenthron J, Magli MC, Parriego M, Schmutzler AG, Tobler M, van der Ven K, Geraedts J, Sermon K. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy by microarray analysis of polar bodies in advanced maternal age: a randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod 2019; 33:1767-1776. [PMID: 30085138 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) by comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) of the first and second polar body to select embryos for transfer increase the likelihood of a live birth within 1 year in advanced maternal age women aged 36-40 years planning an ICSI cycle, compared to ICSI without chromosome analysis? SUMMARY ANSWER PGT-A by CCS in the first and second polar body to select euploid embryos for transfer does not substantially increase the live birth rate in women aged 36-40 years. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY PGT-A has been used widely to select embryos for transfer in ICSI treatment, with the aim of improving treatment effectiveness. Whether PGT-A improves ICSI outcomes and is beneficial to the patients has remained controversial. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a multinational, multicentre, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Of 396 women enroled between June 2012 and December 2016, 205 were allocated to CCS of the first and second polar body (study group) as part of their ICSI treatment cycle and 191 were allocated to ICSI treatment without chromosome screening (control group). Block randomization was performed stratified for centre and age group. Participants and clinicians were blinded at the time of enrolment until the day after intervention. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Infertile couples in which the female partner was 36-40 years old and who were scheduled to undergo ICSI treatment were eligible. In those assigned to PGT-A, array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) analysis of the first and second polar bodies of the fertilized oocytes was performed using the 24sure array of Illumina. If in the first treatment cycle all oocytes were aneuploid, a second treatment with PB array CGH was offered. Participants in the control arm were planned for ICSI without PGT-A. Main exclusion criteria were three or more previous unsuccessful IVF or ICSI cycles, three or more clinical miscarriages, poor response or low ovarian reserve. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate after fresh or frozen embryo transfer recorded over 1 year after the start of the intervention. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Of the 205 participants in the chromosome screening group, 50 (24%) had a live birth with intervention within 1 year, compared to 45 of the 191 in the group without intervention (24%), a difference of 0.83% (95% CI: -7.60 to 9.18%). There were significantly fewer participants in the chromosome screening group with a transfer (relative risk (RR) = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.74-0.89) and fewer with a miscarriage (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.26-0.90). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The targeted sample size was not reached because of suboptimal recruitment; however, the included sample allowed a 90% power to detect the targeted increase. Cumulative outcome data were limited to 1 year. Only 11 patients out of 32 with exclusively aneuploid results underwent a second treatment cycle in the chromosome screening group. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The observation that the similarity in birth rates was achieved with fewer transfers, less cryopreservation and fewer miscarriages points to a clinical benefit of PGT-A, and this form of embryo selection may, therefore, be considered to minimize the number of interventions while producing comparable outcomes. Whether these benefits outweigh drawbacks such as the cost for the patient, the higher workload for the IVF lab and the potential effect on the children born after prolonged culture and/or cryopreservation remains to be shown. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This study was funded by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Illumina provided microarrays and other consumables necessary for aCGH testing of polar bodies. M.B.'s institution (UZBrussel) has received educational grants from IBSA, Ferring, Organon, Schering-Plough, Merck and Merck Belgium. M.B. has received consultancy and speakers' fees from Organon, Serono Symposia and Merck. G.G. has received personal fees and non-financial support from MSD, Ferring, Merck-Serono, Finox, TEVA, IBSA, Glycotope, Abbott and Gedeon-Richter as well as personal fees from VitroLife, NMC Healthcare, ReprodWissen, BioSilu and ZIVA. W.V., C.S., P.M.B., V.G., G.A., M.D., T.E.G., L.G., G.Ka., G.Ko., J.L., M.C.M., M.P., A.S., M.T., K.V., J.G. and K.S. declare no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01532284. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 7 February 2012. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 25 June 2012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Willem Verpoest
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Belgium.,Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catherine Staessen
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Patrick M Bossuyt
- Academisch Medisch Centrum, Meibergdreef 9, AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Goossens
- The European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology, Meerstraat 60, Grimbergen, Belgium
| | - Gheona Altarescu
- Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University School of Medicine, 2 Bayit Street, Jerusalem, Israël
| | - Maryse Bonduelle
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, Belgium.,Centre for Medical Genetics, UZ Brussel, Laarbeeklaan, Belgium
| | - Martha Devesa
- Hospital Univeritario Dexeus, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecolgy and Reproduction, Gran Via de Carles III 71-74, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Talia Eldar-Geva
- Shaare-Zedek Medical Center, The Hebrew University School of Medicine, 2 Bayit Street, Jerusalem, Israël
| | - Luca Gianaroli
- SISMER, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Via Mazzini 12, Bologna, Italy
| | - Georg Griesinger
- University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Georgia Kakourou
- Department of Medical Genetics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 'Aghia Sophia' Children's Hospital, 75 Mikras Asias str., Goudi, Athens, Greece
| | - Georgia Kokkali
- Genesis Athens Clinic, Reproductive Medicine Unit, Papanikoli 14-16, Chalandri, Athens, Greece
| | - Jana Liebenthron
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Monica Parriego
- Hospital Univeritario Dexeus, Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecolgy and Reproduction, Gran Via de Carles III 71-74, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andreas G Schmutzler
- Women's Hospital, Christian-Albrechts-University, Christian-Albrechts-Platz 4, Kiel, Germany.,Gyn-medicum, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Waldweg 5, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Monica Tobler
- Gyn-medicum, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Waldweg 5, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Katrin van der Ven
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, University Hospital Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, Bonn, Germany
| | - Joep Geraedts
- Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Karen Sermon
- Research Group Reproduction and Genetics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kar B, Aftab A. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in India: The Current Scenario and Potential Developments. JOURNAL OF FETAL MEDICINE 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40556-018-0159-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
9
|
Schenk M, Groselj-Strele A, Eberhard K, Feldmeier E, Kastelic D, Cerk S, Weiss G. Impact of polar body biopsy on embryo morphokinetics-back to the roots in preimplantation genetic testing? J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1521-1528. [PMID: 29790071 PMCID: PMC6086803 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1207-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Polar body biopsy (PBB) is a common technique in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) to assess the chromosomal status of the oocyte. Numerous studies have been implemented to investigate the impact of biopsies on embryo development; however, information on embryo morphokinetics is still lacking. Hence, we investigated the impact of PBB on morphokinetic parameters in early embryo development. Methods Four hundred four embryos (202 PBB, 202 control) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stimulated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol. After fertilization check, embryos were incubated in a time-lapse incubator. The groups were matched for maternal age at time of oocyte retrieval. Results Mean group times for reaching specific developmental time points showed no significant difference comparing embryos with PBB conducted and without. Likewise, further subdivision of the PBB group in euploid and aneuploid embryos revealed no differences in the early embryo morphokinetic development compared to the control group. Aneuploidy testing revealed a high prevalence of chromosomal aberrations for chromosomes 21, 4, 16, and 19. Conclusions In conclusion, PBB does not impact the morphokinetic parameters of the embryo development. PBB can be safely applied without the risk of impairing the reproductive potential of the embryo and can be highly recommended as safe and practicable PGT approach, especially in countries with prevailing restrictions regarding PGT analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schenk
- Das Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Am Sendergrund 11, 8143, Dobl, Austria.,Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University of Graz, Neue Stiftingtalstrasse 2, 8010, Graz, Austria
| | - Andrea Groselj-Strele
- Core Facility Computational Bioanalytics, Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstraße 24, 8010, Graz, Austria
| | - Katharina Eberhard
- Core Facility Computational Bioanalytics, Center for Medical Research, Medical University of Graz, Stiftingtalstraße 24, 8010, Graz, Austria
| | - Elisabeth Feldmeier
- Das Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Am Sendergrund 11, 8143, Dobl, Austria
| | - Darja Kastelic
- Das Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Am Sendergrund 11, 8143, Dobl, Austria
| | - Stefanie Cerk
- Das Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Am Sendergrund 11, 8143, Dobl, Austria
| | - Gregor Weiss
- Das Kinderwunsch Institut Schenk GmbH, Am Sendergrund 11, 8143, Dobl, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Craven L, Tang MX, Gorman GS, De Sutter P, Heindryckx B. Novel reproductive technologies to prevent mitochondrial disease. Hum Reprod Update 2018. [PMID: 28651360 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmx018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of nuclear transfer (NT) has been proposed as a novel reproductive treatment to overcome the transmission of maternally-inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations. Pathogenic mutations in mtDNA can cause a wide-spectrum of life-limiting disorders, collectively known as mtDNA disease, for which there are currently few effective treatments and no known cures. The many unique features of mtDNA make genetic counselling challenging for women harbouring pathogenic mtDNA mutations but reproductive options that involve medical intervention are available that will minimize the risk of mtDNA disease in their offspring. This includes PGD, which is currently offered as a clinical treatment but will not be suitable for all. The potential for NT to reduce transmission of mtDNA mutations has been demonstrated in both animal and human models, and has recently been clinically applied not only to prevent mtDNA disease but also for some infertility cases. In this review, we will interrogate the different NT techniques, including a discussion on the available safety and efficacy data of these technologies for mtDNA disease prevention. In addition, we appraise the evidence for the translational use of NT technologies in infertility. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We propose to review the current scientific evidence regarding the clinical use of NT to prevent mitochondrial disease. SEARCH METHODS The scientific literature was investigated by searching PubMed database until Jan 2017. Relevant documents from Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority as well as reports from both the scientific and popular media were also implemented. The above searches were based on the following key words: 'mitochondria', 'mitochondrial DNA'; 'mitochondrial DNA disease', 'fertility'; 'preimplantation genetic diagnosis', 'nuclear transfer', 'mitochondrial replacement' and 'mitochondrial donation'. OUTCOMES While NT techniques have been shown to effectively reduce the transmission of heteroplasmic mtDNA variants in animal models, and increasing evidence supports their use to prevent the transmission of human mtDNA disease, the need for robust, long-term evaluation is still warranted. Moreover, prenatal screening would still be strongly advocated in combination with the use of these IVF-based technologies. Scientific evidence to support the use of NT and other novel reproductive techniques for infertility is currently lacking. WIDER IMPLICATIONS It is mandatory that any new ART treatments are first adequately assessed in both animal and human models before the cautious implementation of these new therapeutic approaches is clinically undertaken. There is growing evidence to suggest that the translation of these innovative technologies into clinical practice should be cautiously adopted only in highly selected patients. Indeed, given the limited safety and efficacy data, close monitoring of any offspring remains paramount.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsey Craven
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Mao-Xing Tang
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Gráinne S Gorman
- Wellcome Centre for Mitochondrial Research, Institute of Neuroscience, The Medical School, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Petra De Sutter
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Björn Heindryckx
- Ghent-Fertility and Stem Cell Team (G-FaST), Department for Reproductive Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Weissman A, Shoham G, Shoham Z, Fishel S, Leong M, Yaron Y. Preimplantation genetic screening: results of a worldwide web-based survey. Reprod Biomed Online 2017; 35:693-700. [PMID: 28988928 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2017] [Revised: 09/03/2017] [Accepted: 09/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Our objective was to evaluate and characterize the extent and patterns of worldwide usage of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) among the assisted reproductive technique community. A prospective, web-based questionnaire with questions relating to practices of, and views on, PGS was directed to users and non-users of PGS. A total of 386 IVF units from 70 countries conducting 342,600 IVF cycles annually responded to the survey. A total of 77% of respondents routinely carry out PGS in their clinics for a variety of indications: advanced maternal age (27%), recurrent implantation failure (32%) and recurrent pregnancy loss (31%). Few (6%) offer PGS to all their patients. In most cycles (72%), trophectoderm biopsy is carried out and either array-comparative genomic hybridization (59%) or next-generation sequencing (16%) are used for genetic analysis. Only 30% of respondents regard PGS as clearly evidenced-based, and most (84%) believe that more randomized controlled trials are needed to support the use of PGS. Despite ongoing debate and lack of robust evidence, most respondents support the use of PGS, and believe that it may aid in transferring only euploid embryos, thereby reducing miscarriage rates and multiple pregnancies, increasing live birth rates and reducing the risk of aneuploid pregnancies and births.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ariel Weissman
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, 62 Halochamim Street, Holon, 5822012, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel.
| | - Gon Shoham
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 6997801, Israel
| | - Zeev Shoham
- IVF Unit, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, 7661041, Israel; Hadassah Medical School, Affiliated to the Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Simon Fishel
- CARE Fertility Group, John Webster House, 6 Lawrence Drive, Nottingham Business Park, Nottingham, NG14 5GU, UK
| | - Milton Leong
- The IVF Clinic, 13/F Central Tower, 28 Queens Road Central, Hong Kong, China
| | - Yuval Yaron
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, 62 Halochamim Street, Holon, 5822012, Israel; Prenatal Genetic Diagnosis Unit, Genetic Institute, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann Street, Tel Aviv, 6423906, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mise à jour technique : Diagnostic et dépistage génétiques préimplantatoires. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2017; 38:S629-S645. [PMID: 28063571 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.09.068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
13
|
Guimarães F, Roque M, Valle M, Kostolias A, Azevedo RAD, Martinhago CD, Sampaio M, Geber S. Live births after polar body biopsy and frozen-thawed cleavage stage embryo transfer: case report. JBRA Assist Reprod 2016; 20:253-256. [PMID: 28050963 PMCID: PMC5265627 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20160049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) or screening (PGS) technology, has
emerged and developed in the past few years, benefiting couples as it allows the
selection and transfer of healthy embryos during IVF treatments. These
techniques can be performed in oocytes (polar-body biopsy) or embryos
(blastomere or trophectoderm biopsy). In this case report, we describe the first
two live births to be published in Brazil after a polar-body (PB) biopsy. In
case 1, a 42-year-old was submitted to PB biopsy with PGS due to advanced
maternal age and poor ovarian reserve. Five MII oocytes underwent first and
second polar body biopsy and four cleavage embryos were cryopreserved. The PGS
analysis resulted in two euploid embryos (next generation sequence). A
frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was performed after endometrial priming and
a healthy baby was delivered after a cesarean section (37 weeks, female, 3390g,
47.5 cm). In case 2, a 40-year old patient with balanced translocation and poor
ovarian response was submitted to PB biopsy. Two MII oocytes underwent first and
second polar body biopsy and two embryos were cryopreserved in cleavage stage.
The analysis resulted in one euploid embryo that was transferred after
endometrial priming. A preterm healthy baby (34 weeks, female, 2100g, 40 cm) was
delivered via cesarean section. In conclusion, although the blastocyst biopsy is
the norm when performing PGS/PGD during IVF treatments, other alternatives (as
PB biopsy) should be considered in some specific situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matheus Roque
- ORIGEN - Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rio de Janeiro/RJ - Brazil.,UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte/MG - Brazil
| | - Marcello Valle
- ORIGEN - Center for Reproductive Medicine, Rio de Janeiro/RJ - Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Marcos Sampaio
- ORIGEN - Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte/MG - Brazil
| | - Selmo Geber
- UFMG - Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte/MG - Brazil.,ORIGEN - Center for Reproductive Medicine, Belo Horizonte/MG - Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hammond ER, McGillivray BC, Wicker SM, Peek JC, Shelling AN, Stone P, Chamley LW, Cree LM. Characterizing nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in spent embryo culture media: genetic contamination identified. Fertil Steril 2016; 107:220-228.e5. [PMID: 27865449 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2016] [Revised: 10/10/2016] [Accepted: 10/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To characterize nuclear and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in spent culture media from normally developing blastocysts to determine whether it could be used for noninvasive genetic assessment. DESIGN Prospective embryo cohort study. SETTING Academic center and private in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinic. PATIENT(S) Seventy patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and 227 blastocysts. INTERVENTION(S) Culture media assessment, artificial blastocoele fluid collapse and DNA analysis using digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR), long-range PCR, quantitative PCR (qPCR), and DNA fingerprinting. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Presence of nuclear and mtDNA in three different commercial culture media from Vitrolife and Irvine Scientific, spent embryo media assessment at the cleavage and blastocyst stages of development, and analysis of the internal media controls for each patient that had been exposed to identical conditions as embryo media but did not come into contact with embryos. RESULT(S) Higher levels of nuclear and mtDNA were observed in the culture media that had been exposed to embryos compared with the internal media controls. Nuclear DNA (∼4 copies) and mtDNA (∼600 copies) could be detected in spent media, and the levels increased at the blastocyst stage. No increase in DNA was detected after artificial blastocoele fluid collapse. Mixed sex chromosome DNA was detected. This originated from contamination in the culture media and from maternal (cumulus) cells. Due to the limited amount of template, the presence of embryonic nuclear DNA could not be confirmed by DNA fingerprinting analysis. CONCLUSION(S) Currently DNA from culture media cannot be used for genetic assessment because embryo-associated structures release DNA into the culture medium and the DNA is of mixed origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Hammond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Brent C McGillivray
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Sophie M Wicker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Andrew N Shelling
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Peter Stone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Larry W Chamley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Lynsey M Cree
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Fertility Associates, Auckland, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Combination of spindle and first polar body chromosome images for the enhanced prediction of developmental potency of mouse metaphase II oocytes. ZYGOTE 2016; 24:900-908. [PMID: 27733212 DOI: 10.1017/s096719941600023x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to classify spindle and first polar body (PB1) chromosome images in ovulated mouse oocytes over time to predict the developmental competence of metaphase II (MII) oocytes. Oocytes were collected at 12, 15, 20, and 25 h after human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) injection, and stained for spindle tubulin, chromosomes, and PB1 chromosomes. MII spindle morphology was classified as tapered type or barrel type and PB1 chromosomes were categorized as aggregated, separated, dot, or collapsed. To determine whether differences in spindle and PB1 images in MII oocytes are associated with fertilization success, we performed in vitro fertilization (IVF) at various times after hCG injection. Barrel-type spindles and aggregate-type PB1 were dominant at 12 h after hCG injection. Oocyte spindles collected 1 h after injection were tapered, and PB1 chromosomes were separated. At 20 and 25 h after treatment, spindle and PB1 images were classified as collapsed. The rate of development to 2-cell embryos after IVF did not differ between the 12 h and 15 h treatments; however, it was significantly lower for the 25 h treatment than for other treatments. The rates of development to blastocysts at 12, 15, 20, and 25 h after hCG injection were 61, 46, 42, and 9%, respectively. MII oocytes with barrel-type spindles and aggregate-type PB1 had high rates of fertilization and blastocyst development, and spindle and PB1 characteristics were correlated with the outcomes of IVF and embryo culture. These results suggested that images of spindles combined with those of PB1 chromosomes enable the prediction of oocytic and/or embryonic quality.
Collapse
|
16
|
Oktay K, Bedoschi G, Berkowitz K, Bronson R, Kashani B, McGovern P, Pal L, Quinn G, Rubin K. Fertility Preservation in Women with Turner Syndrome: A Comprehensive Review and Practical Guidelines. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2016; 29:409-416. [PMID: 26485320 PMCID: PMC5015771 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpag.2015.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 10/12/2015] [Accepted: 10/14/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
In this article we review the existing fertility preservation options for women diagnosed with Turner syndrome and provide practical guidelines for the practitioner. Turner syndrome is the most common sex chromosome abnormality in women, occurring in approximately 1 in 2500 live births. Women with Turner syndrome are at extremely high risk for primary ovarian insufficiency and infertility. Although approximately 70%-80% have no spontaneous pubertal development and 90% experience primary amenorrhea, the remainder might possess a small residual of ovarian follicles at birth or early childhood. The present challenge is to identify these women as early in life as is possible, to allow them to benefit from a variety of existing fertility preservation options. To maximize the benefits of fertility preservation, all women with Turner syndrome should be evaluated by an expert as soon as possible in childhood because the vast majority will have their ovarian reserve depleted before adulthood. Cryopreservation of mature oocytes and embryos is a proven fertility preservation approach, and cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is a promising technique with a growing number of live births, but remains investigational. Oocyte cryopreservation has been performed in children with Turner syndrome as young as 13 years of age and ovarian tissue cryopreservation in affected prepubertal children. However, current efficacy of these approaches is unknown in this cohort. For those who have already lost their ovarian reserve, oocyte or embryo donation and adoption are strategies that allow fulfillment of the desire for parenting. For those with Turner syndrome-related cardiac contraindications to pregnancy, use of gestational surrogacy allows the possibility of biological parenting using their own oocytes. Alternatively, gestational surrogacy can serve to carry pregnancy resulting from the use of donor oocytes or embryos, if needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kutluk Oktay
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and In Vitro Fertilization, New York, New York.
| | - Giuliano Bedoschi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laboratory of Molecular Reproduction and Fertility Preservation, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York; Innovation Institute for Fertility Preservation and In Vitro Fertilization, New York, New York
| | - Karen Berkowitz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Richard Bronson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pathology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Banafsheh Kashani
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Peter McGovern
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey
| | - Lubna Pal
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Gwendolyn Quinn
- Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; Department of Oncologic Sciences, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Karen Rubin
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, Connecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford, Connecticut and University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hammond ER, Shelling AN, Cree LM. Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA in blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium: evidence and potential clinical use. Hum Reprod 2016; 31:1653-61. [PMID: 27270971 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2016] [Accepted: 05/17/2016] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to screen embryos for aneuploidy or inherited disorders in a minimally invasive manner may represent a major advancement for the future of embryo viability assessment. Recent studies have demonstrated that both blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium contain genetic material, which can be isolated and subjected to downstream genetic analysis. The blastocoele fluid may represent an alternative source of nuclear DNA for aneuploidy testing, although the degree to which the isolated genetic material is solely representative of the developing embryo is currently unclear. In addition to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) can be detected in the embryo culture medium. Currently, the origin of this nuclear and mtDNA has not been fully evaluated and there are several potential sources of contamination that may contribute to the genetic material detected in the culture medium. There is however evidence that the mtDNA content of the culture medium is related to embryo fragmentation levels and its presence is predictive of blastulation, indicating that embryo development may influence the levels of genetic material detected. If the levels of genetic material are strongly related to aspects of embryo quality, then this may be a novel biomarker of embryo viability. If the genetic material does have an embryo origin, the mechanisms by which DNA may be released into the blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium are unknown, although apoptosis may play a role. While the presence of this genetic material is an exciting discovery, the DNA in the blastocoele fluid and embryo culture medium appears to be of low yield and integrity, which makes it challenging to study. Further research aimed at assessing the methodologies used for both isolating and analysing this genetic material, as well as tracing its origin, are needed in order to evaluate its potential for clinical use. Should such methodologies prove to be routinely successful and the DNA recovered demonstrated to be embryonic in origin, then they may be used in a minimally invasive and less technical methodology for genetic analysis and embryo viability assessment than those currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth R Hammond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
| | - Andrew N Shelling
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand
| | - Lynsey M Cree
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand Fertility Associates, Greenlane, Auckland 1051, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Brayboy LM, Wessel GM. The double-edged sword of the mammalian oocyte--advantages, drawbacks and approaches for basic and clinical analysis at the single cell level. Mol Hum Reprod 2016; 22:200-7. [PMID: 26590170 PMCID: PMC4767051 DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gav064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2015] [Revised: 10/30/2015] [Accepted: 11/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Oocytes are usually the largest cells in the body and as such offer unique opportunities for single-cell analysis. Unfortunately, these cells are also some of the rarest in the mammalian female, usually necessitating single-cell analysis. In cases of infertility in humans, determining the quality of the oocyte is often restricted to a morphological analysis or to the study of cellular behaviors in the developing embryo. Minimally invasive approaches could greatly assist the clinician to prioritize oocytes for fertilization or following fertilization, which embryo to transfer back into the woman. Transcriptomics of human and mouse oocytes may have great utility, and recently it was learned that the polar body faithfully reflects the transcript prevalence in the oocyte. The polar body may thus serve as a minimally invasive proxy for an oocyte in the clinic. In the mouse, the transcriptomes of oocytes from mice of the same strain are markedly similar; no significant differences are apparent in transcript prevalence or identity. In human oocytes however, the transcript pool is highly variable. This is likely the result of different histories of each oocyte, in the age of the donor woman, the different hormonal exposures and the prolonged time from specification of the primary oocyte to the fully grown and ovulated egg. This variability in human oocytes also emphasizes the need for cell-by-cell analysis of the oocytes in vitro; which oocytes have a better potential for fertilization and development? To this end, new imaging capabilities are being employed. For example, a single-cell analytical device for oocytes (the simple perfusion apparatus, or SPA) enables investigators to load multiple oocytes in individual wells, to visualize them on the microscope and to use controlled temperature and media flow by perfusion for optimal clinical applications. Recently, developed Raman microspectroscopy approaches suggest that this imaging modality may enable more in-depth analysis of the molecular characteristics of an oocyte that, in combination with the SPA and transcriptomic approaches, might assist the clinician to prioritize more effectively human oocytes and embryos for transfer into women. This review is intended to update the reader on the status of the examination of single oocytes from a variety of approaches and to emphasize areas that may be primed for advancement in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Brayboy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Women & Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, 101 Dudley, Fl1, Providence, RI 020905, USA
| | - G M Wessel
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology & Biochemistry, Brown University, 185 Meeting Street, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cimadomo D, Capalbo A, Ubaldi FM, Scarica C, Palagiano A, Canipari R, Rienzi L. The Impact of Biopsy on Human Embryo Developmental Potential during Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2016; 2016:7193075. [PMID: 26942198 PMCID: PMC4749789 DOI: 10.1155/2016/7193075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 108] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2015] [Revised: 12/15/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening (PGD/PGS) for monogenic diseases and/or numerical/structural chromosomal abnormalities is a tool for embryo testing aimed at identifying nonaffected and/or euploid embryos in a cohort produced during an IVF cycle. A critical aspect of this technology is the potential detrimental effect that the biopsy itself can have upon the embryo. Different embryo biopsy strategies have been proposed. Cleavage stage blastomere biopsy still represents the most commonly used method in Europe nowadays, although this approach has been shown to have a negative impact on embryo viability and implantation potential. Polar body biopsy has been proposed as an alternative to embryo biopsy especially for aneuploidy testing. However, to date no sufficiently powered study has clarified the impact of this procedure on embryo reproductive competence. Blastocyst stage biopsy represents nowadays the safest approach not to impact embryo implantation potential. For this reason, as well as for the evidences of a higher consistency of the molecular analysis when performed on trophectoderm cells, blastocyst biopsy implementation is gradually increasing worldwide. The aim of this review is to present the evidences published to date on the impact of the biopsy at different stages of preimplantation development upon human embryos reproductive potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Cimadomo
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. de Notaris 2/b, 00197 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Istologiche, Medico Legali e dell'Apparato Locomotore, Sezione Istologia ed Embriologia Medica, Via Antonio Scarpa 16, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Capalbo
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. de Notaris 2/b, 00197 Rome, Italy
- GENETYX, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Via Fermi 1, 36063 Marostica, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. de Notaris 2/b, 00197 Rome, Italy
- GENETYX, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Via Fermi 1, 36063 Marostica, Italy
| | - Catello Scarica
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. de Notaris 2/b, 00197 Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Istologiche, Medico Legali e dell'Apparato Locomotore, Sezione Istologia ed Embriologia Medica, Via Antonio Scarpa 16, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Palagiano
- Seconda Università di Napoli, Via Antonio Vivaldi 43, 81100 Caserta, Italy
| | - Rita Canipari
- Dipartimento di Scienze Anatomiche, University of Rome “La Sapienza”, Istologiche, Medico Legali e dell'Apparato Locomotore, Sezione Istologia ed Embriologia Medica, Via Antonio Scarpa 16, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- GENERA Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Via G. de Notaris 2/b, 00197 Rome, Italy
- GENETYX, Molecular Biology Laboratory, Via Fermi 1, 36063 Marostica, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Grynberg M, Bidet M, Benard J, Poulain M, Sonigo C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Polak M. Fertility preservation in Turner syndrome. Fertil Steril 2015; 105:13-9. [PMID: 26677790 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.11.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2015] [Revised: 11/20/2015] [Accepted: 11/20/2015] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Premature ovarian insufficiency is a relatively rare condition that can appear early in life. In a non-negligible number of cases the ovarian dysfunction results from genetic diseases. Turner syndrome (TS), the most common sex chromosome abnormality in females, is associated with an inevitable premature exhaustion of the follicular stockpile. The possible or probable infertility is a major concern for TS patients and their parents, and physicians are often asked about possible options to preserve fertility. Unfortunately, there are no recommendations on fertility preservation in this group. The severely reduced follicle pool even during prepubertal life represents the major limit for fertility preservation and is the root of numerous questions regarding the competence of gametes or ovarian tissue crybanked. In addition, patients suffering from TS show higher than usual rates of spontaneous abortion, fetal anomaly, and maternal morbidity and mortality, which should be considered at the time of fertility preservation and before reutilization of the cryopreserved gametes. Apart from fulfillment of the desire of becoming genetic parents, TS patients may be potential candidates for egg donation, gestational surrogacy, and adoption. The present review discusses the different options for preserving female fertility in TS and the ethical questions raised by these approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France; University Paris XIII, Bobigny, France; Unité Inserm (U1133), University Paris-Diderot, Paris, France.
| | - Maud Bidet
- Pediatric Endocrinology, Gynecology and Diabetology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre des Maladies Endocrines Rares de la Croissance, Centre des Pathologies Gynécologiques Rares, Paris, France
| | - Julie Benard
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France; University Paris XIII, Bobigny, France
| | - Marine Poulain
- Department of Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Courbevoie-Neuilly-Puteaux, Neuilly sur Seine, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
| | - Isabelle Cédrin-Durnerin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Hôpital Jean Verdier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Bondy, France
| | - Michel Polak
- Pediatric Endocrinology, Gynecology and Diabetology, Hôpital Universitaire Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre des Maladies Endocrines Rares de la Croissance, Centre des Pathologies Gynécologiques Rares, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes, Institut IMAGINE, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2015; 104:1503-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2015] [Revised: 08/26/2015] [Accepted: 08/26/2015] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
22
|
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Audibert F, Wilson RD, Audibert F, Brock JA, Campagnolo C, Carroll J, Chong K, Gagnon A, Johnson JA, MacDonald W, Okun N, Pastuck M, Vallée-Pouliot K. Technical Update: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screening. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2015; 37:451-63. [PMID: 26168107 DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30261-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update and review the techniques and indications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). OPTIONS Discussion about the genetic and technical aspects of preimplantation reproductive techniques, particularly those using new cytogenetic technologies and embryo-stage biopsy. OUTCOMES Clinical outcomes of reproductive techniques following the use of PGD and PGS are included. This update does not discuss in detail the adverse outcomes that have been recorded in association with assisted reproductive technologies. EVIDENCE Published literature was retrieved through searches of The Cochrane Library and Medline in April 2014 using appropriate controlled vocabulary (aneuploidy, blastocyst/physiology, genetic diseases, preimplantation diagnosis/methods, fertilization in vitro) and key words (e.g., preimplantation genetic diagnosis, preimplantation genetic screening, comprehensive chromosome screening, aCGH, SNP microarray, qPCR, and embryo selection). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1990 to April 2014. There were no language restrictions. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the update to January 2015. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of retrieved articles. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies. VALUES The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. (Table 1) BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS: This update will educate readers about new preimplantation genetic concepts, directions, and technologies. The major harms and costs identified are those of assisted reproductive technologies. SUMMARY Preimplantation genetic diagnosis is an alternative to prenatal diagnosis for the detection of genetic disorders in couples at risk of transmitting a genetic condition to their offspring. Preimplantation genetic screening is being proposed to improve the effectiveness of in vitro fertilization by screening for embryonic aneuploidy. Though FISH-based PGS showed adverse effects on IVF success, emerging evidence from new studies using comprehensive chromosome screening technology appears promising. Recommendations 1. Before preimplantation genetic diagnosis is performed, genetic counselling must be provided by a certified genetic counsellor to ensure that patients fully understand the risk of having an affected child, the impact of the disease on an affected child, and the benefits and limitations of all available options for preimplantation and prenatal diagnosis. (III-A) 2. Couples should be informed that preimplantation genetic diagnosis can reduce the risk of conceiving a child with a genetic abnormality carried by one or both parents if that abnormality can be identified with tests performed on a single cell or on multiple trophectoderm cells. (II-2B) 3. Invasive prenatal or postnatal testing to confirm the results of preimplantation genetic diagnosis is encouraged because the methods used for preimplantation genetic diagnosis have technical limitations that include the possibility of a false result. (II-2B) 4. Trophectoderm biopsy has no measurable impact on embryo development, as opposed to blastomere biopsy. Therefore, whenever possible, trophectoderm biopsy should be the method of choice in embryo biopsy and should be performed by experienced hands. (I-B) 5. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of single-gene disorders should ideally be performed with multiplex polymerase chain reaction coupled with trophectoderm biopsy whenever available. (II-2B) 6. The use of comprehensive chromosome screening technology coupled with trophectoderm biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis in couples carrying chromosomal translocations is recommended because it is associated with favourable clinical outcomes. (II-2B) 7. Before preimplantation genetic screening is performed, thorough education and counselling must be provided by a certified genetic counsellor to ensure that patients fully understand the limitations of the technique, the risk of error, and the ongoing debate on whether preimplantation genetic screening is necessary to improve live birth rates with in vitro fertilization. (III-A) 8. Preimplantation genetic screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization technology on day-3 embryo biopsy is associated with decreased live birth rates and therefore should not be performed with in vitro fertilization. (I-E) 9. Preimplantation genetic screening using comprehensive chromosome screening technology on blastocyst biopsy, increases implantation rates and improves embryo selection in IVF cycles in patients with a good prognosis. (I-B).
Collapse
|
23
|
Increasing live birth rate by preimplantation genetic screening of pooled polar bodies using array comparative genomic hybridization. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0128317. [PMID: 26024488 PMCID: PMC4449032 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Accepted: 04/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Meiotic errors during oocyte maturation are considered the major contributors to embryonic aneuploidy and failures in human IVF treatment. Various technologies have been developed to screen polar bodies, blastomeres and trophectoderm cells for chromosomal aberrations. Array-CGH analysis using bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) arrays is widely applied for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) using single cells. Recently, an increase in the pregnancy rate has been demonstrated using array-CGH to evaluate trophectoderm cells. However, in some countries, the analysis of embryonic cells is restricted by law. Therefore, we used BAC array-CGH to assess the impact of polar body analysis on the live birth rate. A disadvantage of polar body aneuploidy screening is the necessity of the analysis of both the first and second polar bodies, resulting in increases in costs for the patient and complex data interpretation. Aneuploidy screening results may sometimes be ambiguous if the first and second polar bodies show reciprocal chromosomal aberrations. To overcome this disadvantage, we tested a strategy involving the pooling of DNA from both polar bodies before DNA amplification. We retrospectively studied 351 patients, of whom 111 underwent polar body array-CGH before embryo transfer. In the group receiving pooled polar body array-CGH (aCGH) analysis, 110 embryos were transferred, and 29 babies were born, corresponding to live birth rates of 26.4% per embryo and 35.7% per patient. In contrast, in the control group, the IVF treatment was performed without preimplantation genetic screening (PGS). For this group, 403 embryos were transferred, and 60 babies were born, resulting in live birth rates of 14.9% per embryo and 22.7% per patient. In conclusion, our data show that in the aCGH group, the use of aneuploidy screening resulted in a significantly higher live birth rate compared with the control group, supporting the benefit of PGS for IVF couples in addition to the suitability and effectiveness of our polar body pooling strategy.
Collapse
|
24
|
Greco E, Biricik A, Cotarelo RP, Iammarone E, Rubino P, Tesarik J, Fiorentino F, Minasi MG. Successful implantation and live birth of a healthy boy after triple biopsy and double vitrification of oocyte-embryo-blastocyst. SPRINGERPLUS 2015; 4:22. [PMID: 25625041 PMCID: PMC4300308 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-0788-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2014] [Accepted: 01/02/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and/or screening (PGD/PGS) allow the assessment of the genetic health of an embryo before transferring it into the uterus. These techniques require the removal of cellular material (polar bodies, blastomere(s) or trophectoderm cells) in order to perform the proper genetic analysis. We report the implantation and live birth outcome of a vitrified-warmed blastocyst developed after triple biopsy and double vitrification procedures at oocyte, cleavage embryo and blastocyst stage. Case description An infertile couple, with family history of β-thalassemia, searched for IVF procedure and PGD. First polar bodies biopsy with subsequent vitrification was uninformative due to meiotic crossing-over, so oocytes were inseminated after warming. Two embryos were obtained and blastomere biopsy was performed on day 3 with inconclusive results on their genetic status. Their culture resulted in one expanded blastocyst stage on day 7 that underwent trophectoderm biopsy and vitrification. This embryo showed to be normal. It was then warmed and transferred in an artificial cycle. Discussion and Evaluation Preconception genetic analysis by removal and analysis of the first polar body is technically possible, but the genetic information that we can obtain at this stage may be limited and the oocytes to be inseminated is not predictable. Compared to blastomere biopsy, trophectoderm biopsy has more diagnostic efficiency with respect to both chromosomal mosaicism and PCR accuracy, reducing the problems of amplification failure and allele drop out. Moreover, embryos biopsied at the cleavage stage seem to have lower implantation rate than biopsied blastocyst. Conclusions This is the first case report of a live birth obtained from a three step biopsy and double vitrification procedures of a blastocyst. This case report seems also to suggest the harmlessness of all these procedures if carefully performed by a skilled biologist in an IVF lab with quality management system. Finally, our study highlight that blastocyst cryopreserved on day 7 have clinically important potential and embryos that not reach blastocyst stage on day 6 should not to be discharged because they may result in an ongoing pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ermanno Greco
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Anil Biricik
- Genoma, Molecular Genetics Laboratory, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocio P Cotarelo
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Patrizia Rubino
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, European Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Jan Tesarik
- MAR&Gen Clinic, Molecular Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Granada, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, García-Velasco JA. Impact of blastocyst biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Reprod Biomed Online 2014; 30:281-9. [PMID: 25599824 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2014] [Revised: 10/12/2014] [Accepted: 11/27/2014] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Embryonic aneuploidy is highly prevalent in IVF cycles and contributes to decreased implantation rates, IVF cycle failure and early pregnancy loss. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) selects the most competent (euploid) embryos for transfer, and has been proposed to improve IVF outcomes. Use of PGS with fluorescence-in-situ hybridization technology after day 3 embryo biopsy (PGS-v1) significantly lowers live birth rates and is not recommended for use. Comprehensive chromosome screening technology, which assesses the whole chromosome complement, can be achieved using different genetic platforms. Whether PGS using comprehensive chromosome screening after blastocyst biopsy (PGS-v2) improves IVF outcomes remains to be determined. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted on PGS-v2. Three trials met full inclusion criteria, comparing PGS-v2 and routine IVF care. PGS-v2 is associated with higher clinical implantation rates, and higher ongoing pregnancy rates when the same number of embryos is transferred in both PGS and control groups. Additionally, PGS-v2 improves embryo selection in eSET practice, maintaining the same ongoing pregnancy rates between PGS and control groups, while sharply decreasing multiple pregnancy rates. These results stem from good-prognosis patients undergoing IVF. Whether these findings can be extrapolated to poor-prognosis patients with decreased ovarian reserve remains to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elias M Dahdouh
- ART-PGD Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, University of Montreal, Canada, H3T 1C5; PROCREA Clinics, Montreal, Canada, H3P 2W3; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada, H3T 1C5.
| | - Jacques Balayla
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada, H3T 1C5
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wei Y, Zhang T, Wang YP, Schatten H, Sun QY. Polar bodies in assisted reproductive technology: current progress and future perspectives. Biol Reprod 2014; 92:19. [PMID: 25472922 DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.114.125575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
During meiotic cell-cycle progression, unequal divisions take place, resulting in a large oocyte and two diminutive polar bodies. The first polar body contains a subset of bivalent chromosomes, whereas the second polar body contains a haploid set of chromatids. One unique feature of the female gamete is that the polar bodies can provide beneficial information about the genetic background of the oocyte without potentially destroying it. Therefore, polar body biopsies have been applied in preimplantation genetic diagnosis to detect chromosomal or genetic abnormalities that might be inherited by the offspring. Besides the traditional use in preimplantation diagnosis, recent findings suggest additional important roles for polar bodies in assisted reproductive technology. In this paper, we review the new roles of polar bodies in assisted reproductive technology, mainly focusing on single-cell sequencing of the polar body genome to deduce the genomic information of its sibling oocyte and on polar body transfer to prevent the transmission of mtDNA-associated diseases. We also discuss additional potential roles for polar bodies and related key questions in human reproductive health. We believe that further exploration of new roles for polar bodies will contribute to a better understanding of reproductive health and that polar body manipulation and diagnosis will allow production of a greater number of healthy babies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanchang Wei
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Teng Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ya-Peng Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Heide Schatten
- Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri
| | - Qing-Yuan Sun
- State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Stern HJ. Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Prenatal Testing for Embryos Finally Achieving Its Potential. J Clin Med 2014; 3:280-309. [PMID: 26237262 PMCID: PMC4449675 DOI: 10.3390/jcm3010280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 02/12/2014] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis was developed nearly a quarter-century ago as an alternative form of prenatal diagnosis that is carried out on embryos. Initially offered for diagnosis in couples at-risk for single gene genetic disorders, such as cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy and Huntington disease, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has most frequently been employed in assisted reproduction for detection of chromosome aneuploidy from advancing maternal age or structural chromosome rearrangements. Major improvements have been seen in PGD analysis with movement away from older, less effective technologies, such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), to newer molecular tools, such as DNA microarrays and next generation sequencing. Improved results have also started to be seen with decreasing use of Day 3 blastomere biopsy in favor of polar body or Day 5 trophectoderm biopsy. Discussions regarding the scientific, ethical, legal and social issues surrounding the use of sequence data from embryo biopsy have begun and must continue to avoid concern regarding eugenic or inappropriate use of this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harvey J Stern
- Division of Reproductive Genetics, Genetics & IVF Institute, 3015 Williams Drive, Fairfax, VA 22031, USA.
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics and Human Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA.
| |
Collapse
|