Maternal and neonatal outcomes after gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization

The effect of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotrophin trigger on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in Letrozole-HMG IUI cycles

BACKGROUND

GnRHa and hCG are both used for oocyte maturation and ovulation triggering. However, GnRHa have a shorter half-life than hCG, which leads to luteal phase deficiency. Letrozole (LE) has been found to improve the luteal function. Thus, the choice of triggering strategy can be different in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles using LE and human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG). The aim of this study was to compare the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients triggered with GnRHa versus hCG versus dual trigger in LE-IUI cycles.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 6,075 LE-HMG IUI cycles between January 2010 and May 2021 at a tertiary-care academic medical center in China. All cycles were divided into three groups according to different trigger strategies as hCG trigger group, GnRHa trigger group and dual trigger group. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore other risk factors for clinical pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in clinical pregnancy rate between hCG, GnRHa and dual trigger cycles in LE-HMG IUI cycles (P = 0.964). The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the GnRHa trigger group, and higher in the dual trigger group, compared with the hCG group (P = 0.045). Logistic analysis confirmed that triggering strategy was associated with miscarriage (aOR:0.427, 95%CI: 0.183-0.996, P = 0.049; aOR:0.298, 95%CI: 0.128-0.693, P = 0.005). No significant differences were observed regarding neonatal outcomes between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggested that both GnRHa and dual trigger can be used to trigger ovulation in LE-HMG IUI cycles, but dual trigger must be used with caution.

Is the Occurrence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Pregnancies Higher Following In Vitro Fertilization Treatment? Why? A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose: This study aim to determine the occurrence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnancies after IVF treatment and to evaluate the factors that reduce this risk. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the medical records of pregnant women who conceived following IVF at the in-vitro fertilization center between 2002–2019. The data were obtained from medical records and phone interviews. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: The incidence of GDM was found to be 16.7%. The regression model indicated that the risk of GDM was 4.57 times higher in the age group 36–40 at conception during the IVF cycle than the age group 31–35 (95% CI = 1.18–17.73, p = .028). Furthermore, women who conceived after the second IVF trial had a risk of GDM 3.464 times higher than those that conceived after their first IVF trial (95% CI = 1.07–11.23, p= .038). Conclusion: As age and number of IVF trials increase in infertile women, the risk of GDM increases after IVF treatment.

The use of GnRH-agonist trigger for the final maturation of oocytes in normal and low responders undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation

STUDY QUESTION

Does GnRH-agonist trigger offer similar maturity rate (MR) in low and normal responders compared to high responders in women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation, for whom even a small risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) may not be acceptable?

SUMMARY ANSWER

GnRH-agonist is an appropriate choice for final maturation of oocytes in planned oocyte cryopreservation, regardless of response to stimulation or risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of GnRH-agonist trigger for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation in high-responder in vitro fertilization cycles. Limited data exist supporting its use in normal or low responders, or in non-infertile women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective cohort study of 1189 subjects including all planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles performed at a large, single center, oocyte cryopreservation program from April 2016 to December 2018.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 1680 cycles were included in the study. A total of 57.1% (959/1680) utilized GnRH-agonist for trigger. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the medical record. Maturation rate was calculated for the entire cohort, and by trigger type, using the quotient of Metaphase II (MII) oocytes and retrieved oocytes. A sub-cohort of GnRH-agonist trigger cycles were categorized by peak estradiol (E2) levels and maturation rates compared between groups. Associations were made using Student's t test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis, where appropriate. A sample size calculation for 90% power with a significance of 5% to detect non-inferiority of <0.05 from a 0.75 maturity rate between subjects with E2 > 3000 pg/mL and E2 < 3000 pg/mL demonstrated the need for at least 116 cycles per group.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Mean MR was 0.71 ± 0.19 overall, and 0.73 ± 0.18 in the sub-cohort of GnRH-agonist trigger cycles. A total of 611 cycles (63.7%) had peak E2 < 3000, and 331 (34.5%) had E2 > 3000. No significant difference in maturity rate was noted between cycles with E2 levels >3000 pg/mL and <3000 pg/mL (0.72 ± 0.19 vs. 0.74 ± 0.14, P = 0.18), confirming the non-inferiority of maturity rates with GnRH-agonist triggers in cycles with peak E2 < 3000 pg/mL. While lower mean oocytes retrieved and mean MII oocytes were associated with lower peak E2 levels, maturity rate did not significantly differ amongst E2 level groups. Cycles with E2 < 1000 pg/mL had lower MR irrespective of trigger type.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The retrospective nature cannot entirely exclude selection biases, confounding factors or additional variables that could not be accounted for or were not collected by the electronic medical record. Given the nature of planned oocyte cryopreservation, studies of ongoing pregnancy rates and birth outcomes will naturally be delayed. Lastly, the study population was limited to women undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation; therefore, the results may not be generalizable to women undergoing in vitro fertilization.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the first study specifically comparing the efficacy of GnRH-agonist in patients at lower risk for OHSS to those at high risk, as well the first study evaluating GnRH-agonist's efficacy specifically in planned oocyte cryopreservation cycles.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Study support provided by departmental funds from the Center for Fertility Research and Education-Extend Fertility Medical Practice. BLM discloses personal fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck KgAA, unrelated to the submitted work. C.S., M.G., L.R. and J.K. have nothing to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Gonadotropin levels at the start of ovarian stimulation predict normal fertilization after hCG re-trigger in GnRH antagonist cycles

PURPOSE

To assess the appropriateness of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) re-trigger in poor responders to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger in controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles.

METHODS

The 2251 cycles in 2251 patients triggered with GnRHa for oocyte stimulation, with or without requiring hCG re-trigger between 2013 and 2018, were retrospectively analyzed to compare gonadotropin levels at the start of COS and the rate of normal fertilization between the re-trigger and non-re-trigger group. Furthermore, patients in the re-trigger group were stratified by the rate of normal fertilization (good: ≥60% or poor: <60%) to compare patient demographics, hormone profiles, and clinical outcome between the subgroups.

RESULTS

In the re-trigger group, FSH and LH levels at the start of COS were significantly lower in the good fertilization group than in the poor fertilization group (P < .01). Receiver operating characteristic curves identified cutoff values of the FSH and LH levels of 1.30 and 0.35 mIU/mL, respectively, for predicting ≥60% normal fertilization.

CONCLUSION

Gonadotropin levels at the start of COS are predictors of response to GnRHa trigger and hCG re-trigger necessity, and may serve as indicators to help clinicians appropriately choose hCG re-trigger rather than abandoning the cycles or continuing the first oocyte aspiration attempt.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of small follicle-derived blastocyst transfer in modified natural cycle in vitro fertilization

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of blastocyst transfer derived from small follicles (SF; ≤10 mm) and large follicles (LF; ≥11 mm).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Private clinic.

PATIENT(S)

Patients (n = 1,072) 30-40 years old who underwent blastocyst transfer (BT; n = 1,247) between January 2012 and December 2014.

INTERVENTION(S)

Oocytes retrieved during a modified natural cycle from both LF and SF were fertilized by a conventional method or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The blastocysts were frozen, thawed, and transferred one by one in the following spontaneous ovulatory cycles or hormone replacement cycles.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

BT resulted in live births and major congenital anomalies.

RESULT(S)

SF-derived BTs (n = 597) yielded 55 chemical abortions (9.2%), 73 clinical abortions (12.2%), and 261 live births (43.8%), whereas LF-derived BTs (n = 650) yielded 71 chemical abortions (10.9%), 73 clinical abortions (11.2%), and 311 live births (47.9%). These incidences were not statistically different between SF- and LF-derived BTs. The incidence of abnormal karyotypes was also not statistically different between SF- and LF-derived spontaneous abortions (71% [39/55] vs. 72% [40/55], respectively). The incidence of major congenital anomalies in neonates did not differ between SF- and LF-derived pregnancies (1.5% and 1.3%, respectively; relative risk = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [0.55-3.21]).

CONCLUSION(S)

SF-derived BT is as efficacious and safe as LF-derived BT.

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile patients who conceived following low technology interventions for fertility enhancement: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE

Low technology interventions for fertility enhancement (LTIFE) are strategies that avoid retrieval, handling, and manipulation of female gametes. The definition of LTIFE is yet to be widely accepted and clarified, but they are commonly used in milder cases of infertility and subfertility. Based on these considerations, the aim of the present study was comprehensively to review and investigate the obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile patients who underwent LTIFE.

METHODS

A literature search up to May 2017 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. An evidence-based hierarchy was used according to The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine to determine which articles to include and analyze, and to provide a level of evidence of each association between intervention and outcome.

RESULTS

This analysis identified preliminary and low-grade evidence on the influence of LTIFE on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women.

CONCLUSIONS

LTIFE women should deserve major consideration from Clinicians/Researchers of Reproductive Medicine, because these treatments could be potentially responsible for mothers' and babies' complications. So far, the lack of well-designed and unbiased studies makes further conclusions difficult to be drawn.

Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review

In the literature, there is growing evidence that subfertile patients who conceived after infertility treatments have an increased risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications and this is particularly true for patients who conceived through use of high technology infertility treatments. Moreover, high technology infertility treatments include many concomitant clinical and biological risk factors. This review aims to summarize in a systematic fashion the current evidence regarding the relative effect of the different procedures for high technology infertility treatments on the risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcome. A literature search up to August 2016 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar and an evidence-based hierarchy was used to determine which articles to include and analyze. Data on prepregnancy maternal factors, low technology interventions, specific procedures for male factor, ovarian tissue/ovary and uterus transplantation, and chromosomal abnormalities and malformations of the offspring were excluded. The available evidences were analyzed assessing the level and the quality of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system, respectively. Current review highlights that every single procedure of high technology infertility treatments can play a crucial role in increasing the risk of pregnancy and perinatal complications. Due to the suboptimal level and quality of the current evidence, further well-designed studies are needed.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of oocyte maturation in assisted reproductive technology cycles

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) have gained increasing attention in the last decade as an alternative trigger for oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). They provide a short luteinizing hormone (LH) peak that limits the production of vascular endothelial growth factor, which is the key mediator leading to increased vascular permeability, the hallmark of OHSS. Initial studies showed similar oocyte yield and embryo quality compared with conventional human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering; however, lower pregnancy rates and higher miscarriage rates were alarming in GnRHa triggered groups. Therefore, two approaches have been implemented to rescue the luteal phase in fresh transfers. Intensive luteal phase support (iLPS) involves administiration of high doses of progesterone and estrogen and active patient monitoring. iLPS has been shown to provide satisfactory fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates, and to be especially useful in patients with high endogenous LH levels, such as in polycystic ovary syndrome. The other method for luteal phase rescue is low-dose hCG administiration 35 hours after GnRHa trigger. Likewise, this method results in statistically similar ongoing pregnancy rates (although slightly lower than) to those of hCG triggered cycles. GnRHa triggering decreased OHSS rates dramatically, however, none of the rescue methods prevent OHSS totally. Cases were reported even in patients who underwent cryopreservation and did not receive hCG. GnRH triggering induces a follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) surge, similar to natural cycles. Its possible benefits have been investigated and dual triggering, GnRHa trigger accompanied by a simultaneous low-dose hCG injection, has produced promising results that urge further exploration. Last of all, GnRHa triggering is useful in fertility preservation cycles in patients with hormone sensitive tumors. In conclusion, GnRHa triggering accompanied by appropriate luteal phase rescue protocols is a relatively safe option for patients at high risk for OHSS.

Neonatal outcomes after the implantation of human embryos vitrified using a closed-system device

PURPOSE

Closed vitrification poses a risk of adversely affecting embryo development, while it may minimize the risk of contamination. We assessed the effects of closed-system human embryo vitrification on fetal development after implantation, neonatal outcome, and clinical safety.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at a private fertility clinic. A total of 875 vitrified-warmed blastocysts that were single-transferred under hormone-replacement cycles between November 2011 and December 2013 were randomly divided into two groups (closed vitrification, n 313; open vitrification, n 562) after receiving the patients' consent forms. Developmental competence after implantation, including gestational age, birth weight, sex, Apgar score, and anomalies of newborns, after the transfer of blastocysts vitrified by closing vitrification was compared with that obtained in the case of open vitrification.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the use of closed and open vitrification systems in embryo development after implantation, gestational age, birth weight, sex ratio, Apgar score, and congenital anomalies of newborns.

CONCLUSION

Human embryos can be vitrified using a closed vitrification system without impairment of neonatal development.