1
|
Yazdani A, Sweterlitsch KM, Kim H, Flyckt RL, Christianson MS. Surgical Innovations to Protect Fertility from Oncologic Pelvic Radiation Therapy: Ovarian Transposition and Uterine Fixation. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5577. [PMID: 39337064 PMCID: PMC11432366 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13185577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
As oncologic therapy continues to advance, survivorship care has widened the realm of possibilities for quality-of-life improvements, including fertility preservation and restoration. We aim to summarize the current and future directions of fertility preservation techniques for patients facing gonadotoxic medical therapies who desire pregnancy after their condition is treated. This review of both ovarian and uterine transposition highlights the present roles, techniques, and fertility outcomes of the two fertility preservation treatment modalities designed to protect reproductive organs from harmful pelvic radiation. Current evidence shows that ovarian transposition preserves ovarian function for patients with localized pelvic radiation demonstrating the most successful return of fertility. Uterine transposition holds great promise for patients desiring to conceive and carry a full-term pregnancy after radiation therapy. With ongoing advancements in oncologic treatments leading to increased survival rates, fertility is increasingly becoming a key survivorship issue. Patients can anticipate counseling about these fertility preservation surgical techniques that protect both the ovaries as well as the uterus from harmful pelvic radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hanna Kim
- Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Rebecca L. Flyckt
- University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Nisio V, Daponte N, Messini C, Anifandis G, Antonouli S. Oncofertility and Fertility Preservation for Women with Gynecological Malignancies: Where Do We Stand Today? Biomolecules 2024; 14:943. [PMID: 39199331 PMCID: PMC11353009 DOI: 10.3390/biom14080943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2024] [Revised: 07/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is a growing medical and research field that includes two main areas: oncology and reproductive medicine. Nowadays, the percentage of patients surviving cancer has exponentially increased, leading to the need for intervention for fertility preservation in both men and women. Specifically, gynecological malignancies in women pose an additional layer of complexity due to the reproductive organs being affected. In the present review, we report fertility preservation options with a cancer- and stage-specific focus. We explore the drawbacks and the necessity for planning fertility preservation applications during emergency statuses (i.e., the COVID-19 pandemic) and comment on the importance of repro-counseling for multifaceted patients during their oncological and reproductive journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Di Nisio
- Department of Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden;
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, 14186 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nikoletta Daponte
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| | - Christina Messini
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| | - George Anifandis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| | - Sevastiani Antonouli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larisa, Greece; (N.D.); (C.M.); (G.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Łubik-Lejawka D, Gabriel I, Marzec A, Olejek A. Oncofertility as an Essential Part of Comprehensive Cancer Treatment in Patients of Reproductive Age, Adolescents and Children. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1858. [PMID: 38791937 PMCID: PMC11119835 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2024] [Revised: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
The number of children, adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer has been rising recently. Various oncological treatments have a detrimental effect on female fertility, and childbearing becomes a major issue during surveillance after recovery. This review discusses the impact of oncological treatments on the ovarian reserve with a thorough explanation of oncologic treatments' effects and modes of oncofertility procedures. The aim of this review is to help clinicians in making an informed decision about post-treatment fertility in their patients. Ultimately, it may lead to improved overall long-term outcomes among young populations suffering from cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Anita Olejek
- Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Oncological Gynaecology in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland; (D.Ł.-L.); (I.G.); (A.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bussies P, Sweterlitsch KM, Richards EG. Elegance is bliss: a novel approach to treating undescended ovaries in select patients with primary infertility. Fertil Steril 2024; 121:258. [PMID: 38065468 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Parker Bussies
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Najafi A, Asadi E, Benson JD. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation: a review on reactive oxygen species generation and antioxidant therapy. Cell Tissue Res 2023; 393:401-423. [PMID: 37328708 DOI: 10.1007/s00441-023-03794-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide. Fortunately, the survival rate of cancer continues to rise, owing to advances in cancer treatments. However, these treatments are gonadotoxic and cause infertility. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (OTCT) is the most flexible option to preserve fertility in women and children with cancer. However, OTCT is associated with significant follicle loss and an accompanying short lifespan of the grafts. There has been a decade of research in cryopreservation-induced oxidative stress in single cells with significant successes in mitigating this major source of loss of viability. However, despite its success elsewhere and beyond a few promising experiments, little attention has been paid to this key aspect of OTCT-induced damage. As more and more clinical practices adopt OTCT for fertility preservation, it is a critical time to review oxidative stress as a cause of damage and to outline potential ameliorative interventions. Here we give an overview of the application of OTCT for female fertility preservation and existing challenges; clarify the potential contribution of oxidative stress in ovarian follicle loss; and highlight potential ability of antioxidant treatments to mitigate the OTCT-induced injuries that might be of interest to cryobiologists and reproductive clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atefeh Najafi
- Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - Ebrahim Asadi
- Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | - James D Benson
- Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, S7N 5E2, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Varlas VN, Borș RG, Crețoiu R, Bălescu I, Bacalbașa N, Cîrstoiu M. Fertility-sparing surgery: a hopeful strategy for young women with cancer. J Med Life 2023; 16:974-980. [PMID: 37900072 PMCID: PMC10600681 DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation in cancer patients is currently based on either assisted reproductive technology or fertility-sparing surgery. Loss of fertility may be caused by excisional surgery associated with an adnexal or uterine pathology or secondary to gonadal insufficiency caused by chemotherapy or radiation. The counseling of these patients is very important, being carried out jointly by the oncologist, gynecologist, and reproductive medicine specialist. Reproductive surgery usually requires avoiding laparotomy to significantly reduce the formation of adhesions and trauma or tissue damage. This is done using standard laparoscopic surgery or robotic surgery (computer-assisted laparoscopy), a method increasingly used and accessible to all specialists who want to maintain the fertility of their patients with various oncological diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Nicolae Varlas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Faculty of Dentistry, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Roxana Georgiana Borș
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Rebeca Crețoiu
- Department of Pituitary and Neuroendocrine Disorders, C.I. Parhon National Institute of Endocrinology, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Irina Bălescu
- Department of Surgery, Ponderas Academic Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Nicolae Bacalbașa
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Monica Cîrstoiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The current and future state of surgery in reproductive endocrinology. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 34:164-171. [PMID: 35895956 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The last decade has witnessed a radical change in the field of reproductive surgery. The increasing success of in-vitro fertilization (IVF) has caused a huge shift in emphasis with many downstream consequences. This review outlines the changes and provides insight into the future of reproductive surgery. RECENT FINDINGS With compelling evidence that IVF overcomes the detrimental effects of endometriosis on infertility and with two new oral medications available for management of endometriosis, momentum is shifting towards nonsurgical management of endometriosis. There is increasing recognition that except for submucous myomas, other myomas are unlikely to affect fertility and miscarriage. This, in addition to many emerging alternative modalities for management of myomas (oral GnRH antagonists, radiofrequency ablation), is likely to further decrease classic myomectomies but provide alternative, less invasive options. Caesarean scar defects have been recognized as having significant reproductive consequences and surgical management has become the standard of care. Fallopian tubes are now implicated in development of ovarian cancer, and as a result, salpingectomies are being performed in lieu of tubal ligations. Tubal anastomosis will soon become a historical surgery. Division of uterine septum remains controversial, and a clear answer will remain elusive. Uterine transplant is the single most significant advance in reproductive surgery in the past century. SUMMARY Reproductive surgery is evolving with the times. Although some surgical techniques will become historical, others will become mainstream.
Collapse
|
8
|
Bizzarri N, Loverro M, Angeles MA, Pedone Anchora L, Fagotti A, Fanfani F, Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Querleu D. Laparoscopic Ovarian Transposition with Extraperitonealization of the Infundibulopelvic Ligament for Cervical Cancer in Ten Steps. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:5906-5907. [PMID: 35610495 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-11870-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Preservation of ovarian function is important for the physical and psychosexual well-being of young patients with cancer. Patients with pelvic malignancies such as cervical or rectal cancer planned for radiotherapy may benefit from ovarian transposition with the aim of moving the ovaries outside the radiation field.1 Different surgical techniques have been reported previously.2,3 With the present video, we aim to standardize the surgical technique of laparoscopic ovarian transposition in ten steps. We present the case of a 30-year-old nulliparous woman diagnosed with grade 3 squamous cell cervical carcinoma having a largest tumor diameter of 41 mm on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. The tumor was staged as FIGO 2018 stage IIIC1r with a common iliac lymphadenopathy reported on both MRI and positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scan. The multidisciplinary team recommended exclusive chemoradiation extended to paraaortic area. The patient underwent laparoscopic bilateral salpingectomy and bilateral ovarian transposition with extraperitonealization of the infundibulopelvic ligament. The procedure was divided into the following ten steps: division of uteroovarian ligament, incision of lateral pelvic peritoneum, identification of ureter, incision of medial pelvic peritoneum, skeletonization of the infundibulopelvic ligament, retroperitoneal tunnel in paracolic gutter, creating the window (as high as possible), mobilization of the ovary without torsion, intraperitonealization of the ovary, and fix ovary with clips (Fig. 1). Surgical time was 30 min, with minimal estimated blood loss. No intra- or postoperative complication was recorded. The patient started radiotherapy 14 days after the procedure. In conclusion, we showed that laparoscopic ovarian transposition in cervical cancer before radiotherapy can be standardized in ten steps with encouraging perioperative results, making it an easily reproducible procedure. Ovarian function is reported to be preserved in 62-65% of cases undergoing ovarian transposition and radiation therapy.4,5 Fig. 1 Laparoscopic view of right ovary transposed below the liver edge after extraperitonealization of the infudibulopelvic ligament.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
| | - Matteo Loverro
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina A Angeles
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (IUCT-Oncopole), Toulouse, France
| | - Luigi Pedone Anchora
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Fagotti
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Fanfani
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriella Ferrandina
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Denis Querleu
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marchocki Z, May T. High laparoscopic bilateral ovarian transposition to the upper abdomen prior to pelvic radiotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1384-1385. [PMID: 34301756 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zibi Marchocki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taymaa May
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada .,Department of Surgical Oncology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Laios A, Duarte Portela S, Papadopoulou A, Gallos ID, Otify M, Ind T. Ovarian transposition and cervical cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 75:37-53. [PMID: 33715965 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the fourth most common female malignancy worldwide. As the focus of treatment is shifting towards balancing oncological outcomes with reproductive benefit, women are becoming increasingly aware of their fertility options. Cervical cancer is one of the primary malignancies where transposition of the ovaries may be indicated. Ovarian transposition should be performed in pre-menopausal women, undergoing pelvic irradiation to preserve ovarian function and prevent early menopause. The review discusses the available literature and synthesises a concise summary for gynaecologic oncology surgeons to counsel affected women. The paradoxical controversy, leading to its under use is acknowledged, due to the scarcity of published data with regard to functional outcomes, and the lack of clinical trials. In cervical cancer, ovarian transposition remains a safe fertility preservation (FP) option, which is associated with high ovarian function preservation, an acceptable rate of ovarian cysts and a negligible risk for metastases in the transposed ovaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Laios
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Harehills, Leeds, LS97TF, UK.
| | - Sara Duarte Portela
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Harehills, Leeds, LS97TF, UK.
| | - Argyro Papadopoulou
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham Women's Foundation NHS Trust, Heritage Building, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Ioannis D Gallos
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (IMSR), University of Birmingham, Birmingham Women's Foundation NHS Trust, Heritage Building, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| | - Mohamed Otify
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Harehills, Leeds, LS97TF, UK.
| | - Thomas Ind
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, Fulham Road, SW36JJ, London, UK; St Georges's University of London, Blackshaw Road, SW170QT, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wall MA, Padmanabhan V, Shikanov A. Hormonal Stimulation of Human Ovarian Xenografts in Mice: Studying Folliculogenesis, Activation, and Oocyte Maturation. Endocrinology 2020; 161:5939202. [PMID: 33099627 PMCID: PMC7671278 DOI: 10.1210/endocr/bqaa194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and banking provides a fertility preservation option for patients who cannot undergo oocyte retrieval; it is quickly becoming a critical component of assisted reproductive technology programs across the world. While the transplantation of cryopreserved ovarian tissue has resulted in over 130 live births, the field has ample room for technological improvements. Specifically, the functional timeline of grafted tissue and each patient's probability of achieving pregnancy is largely unpredictable due to patient-to-patient variability in ovarian reserve, lack of a reliable method for quantifying follicle numbers within tissue fragments, potential risk of reintroduction of cancer cells harbored in ovarian tissues, and an inability to control follicle activation rates. This review focuses on one of the most common physiological techniques used to study human ovarian tissue transplantation, xenotransplantation of human ovarian tissue to mice and endeavors to inform future studies by discussing the elements of the xenotransplantation model, challenges unique to the use of human ovarian tissue, and novel tissue engineering techniques currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Anne Wall
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Vasantha Padmanabhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ariella Shikanov
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Macromolecular Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- Correspondence: Ariella Shikanov, PhD, 2126 LBME, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Biomedical Engineering Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hossay C, Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Whole Ovary Cryopreservation and Transplantation: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Research Developments in Animal Experiments and Humans. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9103196. [PMID: 33023111 PMCID: PMC7601276 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation is the only fertility preservation option that enables both restoration of fertility and resumption of ovarian endocrine function, avoiding the morbidity associated with premature menopause. It is also the only technique available to prepubertal patients and those whose treatment cannot be delayed for life-threatening reasons. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be carried out in two different ways, either as ovarian cortical fragments or as a whole organ with its vascular pedicle. Although use of cortical strips is the only procedure that has been approved by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, it is fraught with drawbacks, the major one being serious follicle loss occurring after avascular transplantation due to prolonged warm ischemia. Whole ovary cryopreservation involves vascular transplantation, which could theoretically counteract the latter phenomenon and markedly improve follicle survival. In theory, this technique should maintain endocrine and reproductive functions much longer than grafting of ovarian cortical fragments. However, this procedure includes a number of critical steps related to (A) the level of surgical expertise required to accomplish retrieval of a whole ovary with its vascular pedicle, (B) the choice of cryopreservation technique for freezing of the intact organ, and (C) successful execution of functional vascular reanastomosis upon thawing. The aim of this systematic review is to shed light on these challenges and summarize solutions that have been proposed so far in animal experiments and humans in the field of whole ovary cryopreservation and transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille Hossay
- Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Jacques Donnez
- Society for Research into Infertility, 1150 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
- Pôle de Recherche en Gynécologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
- Gynecology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-(0)2-764-5237; Fax: +32-(0)2-764-9507
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hussein RS, Khan Z, Zhao Y. Fertility Preservation in Women: Indications and Options for Therapy. Mayo Clin Proc 2020; 95:770-783. [PMID: 32247351 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Revised: 09/25/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Fertility preservation (FP) is a vital issue for individuals in either reproductive or prepubescent stage of life when future fertility may be compromised. The objective of any FP intervention is to minimize or eliminate primary disease burden and to ensure maintaining or preserving reproductive health. Fertility potential can be affected by cancer therapy and numerous other factors, including advancing age, metabolic conditions, autoimmune diseases, specific surgical interventions, and sex affirmation procedures. A paradigm shift focusing on quality-of-life issues and long-term survivorship has emerged, especially because of advances in cancer diagnostics and treatment. Several FP techniques have been widely distributed, while others are still in the research stage. In addition, specific procedures and some potentially fertoprotective agents are being developed, aiming to minimize the hazards of gonadal damage caused by cancer therapy and decrease the need for more costly, invasive, and time-consuming FP methods. This review highlights the advances, indications, and options for FP, both experimental and well-established, in females of various age groups. An electronic search in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases was conducted, including retrospective studies, prospective clinical trials, meta-analyses, original reviews, and online abstracts published up to June 30, 2019. The search terms used included fertility preservation, oncofertility, embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, and ovarian tissue cryopreservation. The meeting proceedings of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology were also hand searched.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reda S Hussein
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Zaraq Khan
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Yulian Zhao
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Division of Laboratory Genetics and Genomics, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ovarian protection and fertility preservation in women with cancer: A French national registry analysis between 2005 and 2014. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2019; 48:705-710. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
15
|
Grynberg M, Sermondade N. Fertility preservation: should we reconsider the terminology? Hum Reprod 2019; 34:1855-1857. [PMID: 31553798 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The term 'fertility preservation' embraces techniques that are actually mostly based on gamete and gonadal tissue cryopreservation. While the efficiency of these techniques in terms of live births remains difficult to establish, it is remarkable that this ambiguous terminology is routinely used and seems currently well accepted. In order to limit false hopes about the real chances of truly preserving fertility, our medical community should discuss qualifying the term 'fertility preservation'. 'Gamete or gonadal tissue cryopreservation' could appear as a more unambiguous and realistic term. However, it probably captures only a segment of a more global 'fertility preservation' process. Discussing how and when to use which terminology, and even finding a more realistic and unifying term, should be further explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Sud, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clamart, France.,Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Department of Reproductive Biology, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Sorbonne Universités, UPMC Université Paris 6, INSERM UMRS 938, Centre de Recherche Saint Antoine, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gorgun E, Cengiz TB, Aytac E, Aiello A, da Silva G, Goldberg JM, Holubar SD, Stocchi L, Wexner SD, Steele SR, Hull TL. Does laparoscopic ileal pouch-anal anastomosis reduce infertility compared with open approach? Surgery 2019; 166:670-677. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.04.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
|
17
|
Advances in fertility-preservation surgery: navigating new frontiers. Fertil Steril 2019; 112:438-445. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
18
|
Recent Advances in Fertility Preservation and Counseling for Reproductive-Aged Women with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Dis Colon Rectum 2019; 62:762-771. [PMID: 30730458 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of colorectal cancer among reproductive-aged women is increasing. Concerns regarding future fertility are secondary only to concerns regarding survival and may significantly impact quality of life among reproductive-aged female cancer survivors. Fertility preservation counseling reduces long-term regret and dissatisfaction among cancer survivors. Health care providers counseling patients with colorectal cancer must understand the impact of cancer treatment on future reproductive potential. OBJECTIVE This review aims to examine the effects that colorectal cancer treatments have on female fertility and summarize existing and emerging options for fertility preservation. DATA SOURCES EMBASE, National Library of Medicine (MEDLINE)/PubMed, Cochrane Review Library were the data sources for this review. STUDY SELECTION A systematic literature review was performed using exploded MeSH terms to identify articles examining the effect of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, as well as fertility preservation options for colorectal cancer on female fertility. Relevant studies were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the effect of colorectal cancer treatment on fertility. RESULTS There are limited data regarding the impact of colorectal surgery on fertility. The gonadotoxic effects of chemotherapy on reproductive capacity depend on age at the time of chemotherapy administration, cumulative chemotherapy, radiation dose, type of agent, and baseline fertility status. Chemotherapy-induced risks for colorectal cancers are considered low to moderate, whereas pelvic radiation with a dose of 45 to 50 Gray induces premature menopause in greater than 90% of patients. Ovarian transposition may reduce but not eliminate the damaging effect of radiation on the ovaries. Embryo and oocyte cryopreservation are considered standard of care for women desiring fertility preservation, with oocyte cryopreservation no longer being considered experimental. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation remains experimental but may be an option for select patients. The use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists remains controversial and has not been definitively shown to preserve fertility. LIMITATIONS The limitations of this review are the lack of randomized controlled trials and high-quality studies, as well as the small sample sizes and the use of surrogate fertility markers. CONCLUSION Reproductive-aged women with colorectal cancer benefit from fertility preservation counseling before the initiation of cancer treatment.
Collapse
|
19
|
Reproductive outcomes following treatment for a gynecological cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv 2019; 13:269-281. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-019-00749-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
20
|
Marci R, Mallozzi M, Di Benedetto L, Schimberni M, Mossa S, Soave I, Palomba S, Caserta D. Radiations and female fertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2018; 16:112. [PMID: 30553277 PMCID: PMC6295315 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-018-0432-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hundreds of thousands of young women are diagnosed with cancer each year, and due to recent advances in screening programs, diagnostic methods and treatment options, survival rates have significantly improved. Radiation therapy plays an important role in cancer treatment and in some cases it constitutes the first therapy proposed to the patient. However, ionizing radiations have a gonadotoxic action with long-term effects that include ovarian insufficiency, pubertal arrest and subsequent infertility. Cranial irradiation may lead to disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, with consequent dysregulation of the normal hormonal secretion. The uterus might be damaged by radiotherapy, as well. In fact, exposure to radiation during childhood leads to altered uterine vascularization, decreased uterine volume and elasticity, myometrial fibrosis and necrosis, endometrial atrophy and insufficiency. As radiations have a relevant impact on reproductive potential, fertility preservation procedures should be carried out before and/or during anticancer treatments. Fertility preservation strategies have been employed for some years now and have recently been diversified thanks to advances in reproductive biology. Aim of this paper is to give an overview of the various effects of radiotherapy on female reproductive function and to describe the current fertility preservation options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Marci
- Department of Morphology, Surgery and Experimental Medicine, University of Ferrara, via L. Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara, Italy.
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Geneva, Boulevard de la Cluse 30, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - Maddalena Mallozzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Luisa Di Benedetto
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Schimberni
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Mossa
- Radiation Oncology Unit, S Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Ilaria Soave
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| | - Stefano Palomba
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano 'Bianchi - Melacrino - Morelli', Reggio Calabria, Italy
| | - Donatella Caserta
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, University of Rome "Sapienza", Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mahmoodi N, Bekker HL, King NV, Hughes J, Jones GL. Are publicly available internet resources enabling women to make informed fertility preservation decisions before starting cancer treatment: an environmental scan? BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2018; 18:104. [PMID: 30453942 PMCID: PMC6245564 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-018-0698-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To identify publicly available internet resources and assess their likelihood to support women making informed decisions about, and between, fertility preservation procedures before starting their cancer treatment. Methods A survey of publically available internet resources utilising an environmental scan method. Inclusion criteria were applied to hits from searches of three data sources (November 2015; repeated June 2017): Google (Chrome) for patient resources; repositories for clinical guidelines and projects; distribution email lists to contact patient decision aid experts. The Data Extraction Sheet applied to eligible resources elicited: resource characteristics; informed and shared decision making components; engagement health services. Results Four thousand eight hundred fifty one records were identified; 24 patient resources and 0 clinical guidelines met scan inclusion criteria. Most resources aimed to inform women with cancer about fertility preservation procedures and infertility treatment options, but not decision making between options. There was a lack of consistency about how health conditions, decision problems and treatment options were described, and resources were difficult to understand. Conclusions Unless developed as part of a patient decision aid project, resources did not include components to support proactively women’s fertility preservation decisions. Current guidelines help people deliver information relevant to treatment options within a single disease pathway; we identified five additional components for patient decision aid checklists to support more effectively people’s treatment decision making across health pathways, linking current with future health problems. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12911-018-0698-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Mahmoodi
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK.
| | - H L Bekker
- Institute of Health Sciences - School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - N V King
- Institute of Health Sciences - School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - J Hughes
- School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - G L Jones
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Laparoscopic uterine fixation to spare fertility before pelvic radiation therapy. Fertil Steril 2018; 110:974-975. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
23
|
Pinelli S, Basile S. Fertility Preservation: Current and Future Perspectives for Oncologic Patients at Risk for Iatrogenic Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:6465903. [PMID: 30112413 PMCID: PMC6077410 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6465903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2018] [Revised: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Progress in recent years in the efficacy of oncologic treatment and early diagnosis of cancer has determined an increase in life expectance in cancer patients. About 10% of all cancer cases affect women younger than 45 years; therefore nowadays approximately 5-6% of the population in childbearing age consists in cancer survivors. A crucial issue is the high risk of premature ovarian insufficiency due to possible gonadotoxic effects of oncologic treatments. Considering combined chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and bone marrow transplantation, this risk can reach 92-100%, depending on the age and ovarian reserve of the patient, as well as the schedule and type of therapy. International guidelines recommend addressing all the patients diagnosed with a neoplasia treatable with potentially gonadotoxic therapies to fertility preservation. Moreover, fertility preservation also seems to reserve fascinating implications for women who want to delay childbearing for social reasons or women affected with endometriosis, who could receive unexpected opportunities. At present, the most widespread techniques to preserve fertility in adult women are embryo or oocyte cryopreservation, depending on the presence of a partner or according to legislative issues, but these procedures require time for ovarian stimulation. In prepubertal patients or when there is no possibility of delaying chemotherapy, ovarian tissue cryopreservation and subsequent transplantation represent the main strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Pinelli
- Maternal and Child Health Department, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stefano Basile
- Maternal and Child Health Department, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fisch B, Abir R. Female fertility preservation: past, present and future. Reproduction 2018; 156:F11-F27. [DOI: 10.1530/rep-17-0483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Anti-cancer therapy, particularly chemotherapy, damages ovarian follicles and promotes ovarian failure. The only pharmacological means for protecting the ovaries from chemotherapy-induced injury is gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, but its efficiency remains controversial; ovarian transposition is used to shield the ovary from radiation when indicated. Until the late 1990s, the only option for fertility preservation and restoration in women with cancer was embryo cryopreservation. The development of other assisted reproductive technologies such as mature oocyte cryopreservation andin vitromaturation of oocytes has contributed to fertility preservation. Treatment regimens to obtain mature oocytes/embryos have been modified to overcome various limitations of conventional ovarian stimulation protocols. In the last decades, several centres have begun cryopreserving ovarian samples containing primordial follicles from young patients before anti-cancer therapy. The first live birth following implantation of cryopreserved-thawed ovarian tissue was reported in 2004; since then, the number has risen to more than 130. Nowadays, ovarian tissue cryopreservation can be combined within vitromaturation and vitrification of oocytes. The use of cryopreserved oocytes eliminates the risk posed by ovarian implantation of reseeding the cancer. Novel methods for enhancing follicular survival after implantation are presently being studied. In addition, researchers are currently investigating agents for ovarian protection. It is expected that the risk of reimplantation of malignant cells with ovarian grafts will be overcome with the putative development of an artificial ovary and an efficient follicle class- and species-dependentin vitrosystem for culturing primordial follicles.
Collapse
|
25
|
Chaput L, Grémeau AS, Vorilhon S, Pons H, Chabrot C, Grèze V, Pouly JL, Brugnon F. Préservation de la fertilité en cancérologie. Bull Cancer 2018; 105:99-110. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2017] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|