Maternal endometriosis and genital malformations in boys: a Danish register-based study

Endometriosis and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective multicenter cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate first, the association between endometriosis and preterm birth; second, the associations between endometriosis and preeclampsia, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, stillbirth, and small-for-gestational-age infants (assessed by birthweight); and third, the risk of these adverse pregnancy outcomes with and without the use of medically assisted reproduction.

DESIGN

Multicenter retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A total of 103 French maternity units.

PATIENTS

Deliveries by 368,935 women (377,338 infants) from 1999 through 2016.

EXPOSURE

Endometriosis, defined as a single disease entity (endometriosis and/or ademyosis) MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The main outcome was the preterm birth rate (both <37 and <33 weeks). The secondary outcomes were rates of preeclampsia, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, stillbirth, and small-for-gestational-age neonates.

RESULTS

Women in the endometriosis group had more frequent histories of infertility before the included pregnancy (34.7 vs. 5.0%), more hospitalizations during the pregnancy (27.4 vs. 19.8%), and more planned cesarean sections (14.0 vs. 8.7); they more often were nulliparous (51.7 vs. 43.4%). The prevalence of preterm birth at <37 weeks was 11.1% in the endometriosis group and 7.7% in the unexposed group, and for <33 weeks, it was 3.1% and 2.2%, respectively. The adjusted relative risk for confounding factors was higher in the endometriosis than the unexposed group for preterm delivery <37 weeks (1.40, 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.67) or <33 weeks (1.53, 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.16). For the secondary outcomes, the adjusted risk ratios for preeclampsia, placenta previa, postpartum hemorrhage, and small-for-gestational-age status of <10th and <5th percentiles were higher in the endometriosis group. The adjusted risk ratios for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age status of <3rd percentile did not differ between the two groups, and those after stratification by medically assisted reproduction for preterm birth at <37 and <33 weeks did not differ statistically significantly between them, for the secondary outcomes, only the risk of placenta previa was higher in the medically assisted reproduction and non-medically assisted reproduction subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Pregnant women with endometriosis had higher risks of preterm birth and other poor pregnancy outcomes than women without endometriosis.

Live-Birth Outcomes and Congenital Malformations After Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation in Maternal Endometriosis

Purpose

In patients who had advanced endometriosis, we use different protocols including GnRH agonist, GnRH antagonist and progestin-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocols to assess live-birth congenital malformations delivered after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and vitrified embryo transfer cycles.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study is conducted by us. It includes 1495 live-born infants in maternal endometriosis. From January 2010 to January 2017, we brought into infants who underwent either gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist long protocol, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol or PPOS. We chose neonatal outcomes and congenital malformations as our major measures.

Results

Neonatal outcomes, as well as congenital malformations, were considered as the main measures, and gestational age, birth weight, birth length, multiple births and early neonatal death are included. All groups were comparable. The GnRH antagonist group (1.41%) and the GnRH antagonist protocol group (1.8%) had the same incidence of live-birth defects as the PPOS groups (1.33%) were similar. There were no apparent differences when it came to congenital malformations among the three groups. Multivariate logistic regression showed that infertility-time factors as well as multiple births combined to add the risk of congenital malformations; the adjusted odds were 1.143 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.988–1.323) and 3.253 (95% CI: 1.359–7.788). Besides, no association was found among various ovarian stimulations as well as congenital birth defect programs, maternal age, body mass index, parity or infant sex.

Conclusion

This study suggests that, in contrast to conventional ovarian stimulation, PPOS neither has any effect on neonatal outcomes in IVF adverse effects nor does it elevate the rate of congenital malformations in late endometriosis. However, randomized controlled trials of the long-term outcomes of children born after PPOS protocols for maternal endometriosis are needed and the follow-up studies were conducted to confirm this result.

Identifying Mechanisms of Endometriosis-Associated Reduced Fecundity in a Rat Model: Novel Insights toward Understanding Human Infertility

The existence of endometriosis has been known since at least the nineteenth century, yet the lack of understanding of causes of infertility and therefore inadequate treatment approaches in endometriosis creates a significant challenge in reproductive medicine. Women worldwide suffer not only pain and infertility but also economical, societal, and physiological burdens. Studies of reproductive events in women are difficult to conduct due to a host of confounding personal and environmental factors and ethically limited due to the very nature of working with reproductive tissues and cells, especially embryos. Animal models are a viable adjunct to study mechanisms causing human reproductive anomalies and infertility in endometriosis. This chapter discusses reproductive anomalies causing infertility in endometriosis and well-established animal models which help decipher the problems and lead to heretofore unknown nonsurgical, nonhormonal methods to manage endometriosis in women. In addition, studies of effects of developmental exposure to endometriosis are revealing for the first time, in both female and male offspring, transgenerational subfertility in a rat model providing insights into the familial nature of endometriosis and possible epigenetic involvement.

Effect of Maternal Advanced Endometriosis on Risk of Congenital Malformations for Infants Born After in vitro Fertilization and Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer: Analysis of 28,600 Newborns

Background: Endometriosis is one of the most challenging diseases for doctors helping infertile women conceive, which has become a common method to help maternal endometriosis-associated infertility. Women with advanced endometriosis possess a higher risk of several adverse outcomes both during pregnancy and at the time of delivery. Whether endometriosis gives rise to a higher occurrence of congenital abnormalities in infants via in vitro fertilization and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (IVF-ET) remains unknown. Methods: Data collected on 22,865 women undergoing IVF using a freeze-all strategy from 2007 to 2017 were analyzed to estimate the rate of congenital malformations. We used an adjusted OR to compare the fertility outcomes of women with advanced endometriosis to the control group. Results: We studied 1,495 infants born from women with advanced endometriosis and 27,105 infants born from endometriosis-free women. There was a 1.557-fold risk that the infants with advanced maternal endometriosis would develop a congenital malformation (adjusted OR: 1.557, 95% CI: 1.03-2.35). Compared with singletons, twins were 1.957 times more likely to experience an adverse outcome (OR: 1.957, 95% CI: 1.561-2.455). When analyzing specific categories of birth defects, the proportion of circulatory system defects was higher than the other categories of birth defects in total (0.56%), followed by musculoskeletal system defects (0.15%). Conclusions: Maternal advanced endometriosis might increase the risk of congenital malformations for infants born after IVF-ET. The organ system most frequently affected by congenital malformations was the cardiovascular system, followed by the musculoskeletal system.