Clinical pregnancy and live birth increase significantly with every additional blastocyst up to five and decline after that: an analysis of 16,666 first fresh single-blastocyst transfers from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry

Paternal age does not jeopardize the live birth rate and perinatal outcomes after in vitro fertilization: an analysis based on 56,113 frozen embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND

The global trend of delaying childbearing has led to an increasing number of couples seeking in vitro fertilization. The adverse effects of advanced maternal age on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes are well documented, regardless of the conception method. In addition, advanced paternal age may contribute to poor reproductive potential because of high levels of sperm DNA fragmentation. However, it remains challenging to guide older men regarding the effect of paternal age on pregnancy and birth outcomes in the field of assisted reproduction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association of paternal age with live birth and perinatal outcomes following in vitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study was performed at a university-affiliated fertility center, involving women who were younger than 36 years and had undergone frozen embryo transfer from January 2011 to June 2021. Subjects were categorized into 6 groups based on paternal age: <25, 25 to 29, 30 to 34, 35 to 39, 40 to 44, and ≥45 years. A generalized estimating equation logistic regression model was used to account for the clustered nature of data and to adjust for confounders. Paternal age between 25 and 29 years served as the reference group in the logistic regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 56,113 cycles who met the inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. On unadjusted analyses, the reproductive outcome parameters showed a considerable decline with increasing male age. The live birth rate decreased from 47.9% for men aged 25 to 29 years to 40.3% among men aged ≥40 years. Similarly, the clinical pregnancy rate decreased from 54.4% in the reference group to 47.8% in the ≥40 years age group. Conversely, the miscarriage rate increased as male age increased, from 10.2% among men aged 25 to 29 years to 13.5% among men aged ≥45 years. However, the differences in the reproductive outcomes mentioned above were no longer significant in the multivariable models. Compared with the younger controls, advanced paternal age was not associated with a lower chance of live birth (males aged 40-44 years: adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.04; males aged ≥45 years: adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.10). In addition, the rates of clinical pregnancy (males aged 40-44 years: adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.05; males aged ≥45 years: adjusted odds ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-1.12) and miscarriage (males aged 40-44 years: adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-1.31; males aged ≥45 years: adjusted odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.50) were comparable between the reference and advanced paternal age groups. Furthermore, men in the youngest age group (<25 years) did not have worse pregnancy outcomes than those in the reference group. Regarding perinatal outcomes, there was no difference among the study cohorts in terms of preterm birth, low birthweight, macrosomia, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age, both in the unadjusted and confounder-adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

This study did not demonstrate a significant association between paternal age and live birth and perinatal outcomes after in vitro fertilization-frozen embryo transfer when the female partners were younger than 36 years. With the global trend toward delaying childbirth, our findings provide useful information for counseling patients that increasing paternal age may not adversely affect pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in assisted reproduction.

Impact of having surplus blastocysts cryopreserved on the ongoing pregnancy rate following a fresh transfer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate whether a surplus of vitrified blastocysts correlated with ongoing pregnancy by analyzing the clinical outcomes of fresh transfer cycles with/without a surplus of vitrified blastocysts.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis carried out in the Reproductive Medicine Center of Guizhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital between January 2020 and December 2021. Overall, 2482 fresh embryo transfer cycles were included in this study, including 1731 cycles with a surplus of vitrified blastocysts (group A) and 751 cycles with no surplus of vitrified blastocysts (group B). The clinical outcomes of fresh embryo transfer cycles were analyzed and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

In total, the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) after fresh transfer in group A were significantly higher than those in group B (59% vs. 34.1%, p < .001; 51.9% vs. 27.8%, p < .001, respectively). Moreover, the miscarriage rate was significantly lower in group A when compared to that in group B (10.8% vs. 16.8%, p = .008). When grouped by either female age or the number of good-quality embryos transferred, the same trends for CPR and OPR were seen in all subgroups. After adjusting for potential confounding factors in multivariate analysis, a surplus of vitrified blastocysts remained significantly associated with a higher OPR (OR: 1.52; 95% CI:1.21-1.92).

CONCLUSION

Ongoing pregnancy outcome increases significantly in fresh transfer cycle with a surplus of vitrified blastocysts.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting ongoing pregnancy in single vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer cycles

Introduction

The global adoption of the "freeze-all strategy" has led to a continuous increase in utilization of single vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer (SVBT) owing to its clinical effectiveness. Accurate prediction of clinical pregnancy is crucial from a patient-centered perspective. However, this remains challenging, with inherent limitations due to the absence of precise and user-friendly prediction tools. Thus, this study primarily aimed to develop and assess a nomogram based on quantitative clinical data to optimize the efficacy of personalized prognosis assessment.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of ongoing pregnancy data from 658 patients with infertility who underwent SVBT at our center between October 17, 2017, and December 18, 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to the training (n=461) or validation (n=197) cohort for nomogram development and testing, respectively. A nomogram was constructed using the results of the multivariable logistic regression (MLR), which included clinical covariates that were assessed for their association with ongoing pregnancy.

Results

The MLR identified eight significant variables that independently predicted ongoing pregnancy outcomes in the study population. These predictors encompassed maternal physiology, including maternal age at oocyte retrieval and serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels; uterine factors, such as adenomyosis; and various embryo assessment parameters, including the number of fertilized embryos, blastocyst morphology, blastulation day, blastocyst re-expansion speed, and presence of embryo string. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in our prediction model was 0.675 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.622-0.729) and 0.656 (95% CI, 0.573-0.739) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively, indicating good discrimination performance in both cohorts.

Conclusions

Our individualized nomogram is a practical and user-friendly tool that can provide accurate and useful SVBT information for patients and clinicians. By offering this model to patients, clinical stakeholders can alleviate uncertainty and confusion about fertility treatment options and enhance patients' confidence in making informed decisions.

GnRH agonist and hCG (dual trigger) versus hCG trigger for final follicular maturation: a double-blinded, randomized controlled study

STUDY QUESTION

Does co-administration of GnRH agonist and Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; dual trigger) in IVF cycles improve the number of mature oocytes and pregnancy outcome compared to hCG alone?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Using the dual trigger for final follicular maturation increases the number of oocytes, mature oocytes and number of blastocysts (total and top-quality) compared to triggering with hCG alone.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

hCG is used at the end of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation as a surrogate LH surge to induce final oocyte maturation. Recently, based on retrospective studies, the co-administration of GnRH agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation (dual trigger) has been suggested to improve IVF outcome and pregnancy rates.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A single center, randomized controlled, double-blinded clinical trial between May 2016 and June 2018 analyzed by intention to treat (ITT).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTINGS, METHODS

One hundred and fifty-five normal responder patients were randomized either to receive hCG or dual trigger for final oocyte maturation. Data on patients age, BMI, AMH, number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase 2 (MII) oocytes, zygotes and blastocysts, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were assessed and compared between the dual trigger group and the hCG group. We performed a planned interim analysis after the recruitment of 50% of the patients. Based on the totality of outcomes at the interim analysis we decided to discontinue further recruitment.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

One hundred and fifty-five patients were included in the study. The age (36 years versus 35.3 years P = NS), BMI (24 kg/m2 versus 23.7 kg/m2) and the AMH (20.1 pmol/l versus 22.4 pmol/l) were comparable between the two groups. Based on ITT analysis, the number of eggs retrieved (11.1 versus 13.4, P = 0.002), the MII oocytes (8.6 versus 10.3, P = 0.009), total number of blastocysts (2.9 versus 3.9, P = 0.01) and top-quality blastocysts transferred (44.7% versus 64.9%; P = 0.003) were significantly higher in the dual trigger group compared to the hCG group. The clinical pregnancy rate (24.3% versus 46.1%, OR 2.65 (1.43-1.93), P = 0.009) and the live birth rate per transfer (22% versus 36.2%, OR= 1.98 (1.05-3.75), P = 0.03) were significantly higher in the dual trigger group compared to the hCG group.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

None.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The enhanced response observed with the dual trigger might lead to better IVF outcomes were it used more widely.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was funded by TRIO Fertility. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02703584.

DATE OF TRIAL REGISTRATION

March 2016.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLLMENT

May 2016.

Frozen–thawed cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in high responder patients

Clinical outcomes following frozen–thawed cleavage embryo transfer versus frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer in high responder patients undergoingin vitrofertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles are still debated. In a retrospective study, 106 high responder patients who were candidate for ‘freeze-all embryos’ were recruited. Frozen–thawed embryos were transferred at the cleavage stage (n= 53) or the blastocyst stage (n= 53). Clinical pregnancy was considered as the primary outcome and chemical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, implantation rate, and fertilization rate, as well as miscarriage rate, were measured as the secondary outcome. Clinical (47.2% vs. 24.5%), chemical (56.6% vs. 32.1%), and ongoing pregnancy rates (37.7% vs. 17%) as well as implantation rates (33.6% vs. 13.5%) were significantly higher in the blastocyst group compared with the cleavage group respectively (P< 0.05). Miscarriage rate was comparable between groups (P> 0.05). Transfer of frozen–thawed embryos at the blastocyst stage was preferable in the high responder patients to increase implantation, pregnancy and live birth rates compared with cleavage stage embryo transfer.