Should empiric therapies be used for male factor infertility?

Male infertility: what on earth is going on? Pilot international questionnaire study regarding clinical evaluation and fertility treatment for men

Infertility is a time-consuming and exhaustive process, which disproportionally affects women. Although concerns have been raised about deficiencies in clinical evaluation of infertile men, there is currently little published data documenting this. A SurveyMonkey questionnaire was therefore created to capture current clinical practice of fertility specialists working in IVF clinics. Responses were collected May - July 2021. 112 clinicians completed the pilot survey with respondents from Europe (n=49; 43.8%), Africa (n=39, 34.8%), North America (n=6; 5.4%), Asia (n=16; 14.3%), South America (n=1; 0.9%) and Australasia (n=1;0.9%). 41% fertility specialists (45/110) reported taking only a brief medical history and 24% reported that they never routinely examined infertile male patients. 54% fertility specialists also reported issues getting men to undertake diagnostic semen analysis. Treatment for male infertility spanned Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), with themes of individualised medicine influencing treatment recommendations. 48.2% clinicians reported using empirical medical therapy (EMT) for unexplained male infertility. Notably, 3.6% respondents recommended testosterone treatment, despite likely negative impact on spermatogenesis. However, high levels of opportunistic general health advice were reported, including discussion of life exposures thought to be important for male reproductive health. This study adds novel evidence and highlights current deficiencies in clinical practice relating to male infertility. Evaluation of the infertile male using simple medical tools (detailed history taking and clinical examination) has the potential to identify treatable or reversible conditions and should be an immediate focus for education and improvement in Reproductive Medicine. Investment in research and development is much needed in the field of andrology, to develop effective non-ART treatment options for male infertility.

Baseline levels of seminal reactive oxygen species predict improvements in sperm function following antioxidant therapy in men with infertility

BACKGROUND

Poor sperm function is a major cause of infertility. There is no drug therapy to improve sperm function. Semen oxidative stress is a recently identified pathway for sperm damage. Commercial antioxidants such as L-carnitine and acetyl-L-carnitine (LAL) are commonly self-administered by infertile men. However, concerns have been raised whether inappropriate LAL therapy causes reductive stress-mediated sperm damage. It is imperative to investigate whether: (1) LAL improves sperm function by reducing reactive oxidative species (ROS); (2) LAL has differential effects on sperm function between men with normal and elevated ROS.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study of routine clinical practice was performed in infertile men with abnormal sperm quality. Changes in sperm function and semen ROS levels following three months of oral LAL therapy were compared between participants with baseline seminal normal ROS (≤10RLU/SEC/10⁶ sperm; n = 29) and High ROS (>10 RLU/SEC/10⁶ sperm; n = 15) levels measured using an established colorimetric-luminol method.

RESULTS

In normal ROS group, sperm function did not change following LAL therapy. In high ROS group, LAL therapy reduced semen ROS fivefold, increased sperm count by 50% (mean count in mill/ml: 21.5 + 7.2, baseline; 32.6 + 9.5, post-treatment, P = .0005), and total and progressive sperm motility each by 30% (mean total sperm motility in % 29.8 + 5.0, baseline: 39.4 + 6.2, post-treatment, P = .004; mean progressive sperm motility in % 23.1 + 4.6, baseline: 30.0 + 5.5, post-treatment, P = .014 vs. baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

We report for the first time that LAL only improves sperm quality in infertile men who have baseline high-ROS levels prior to treatment. These data have important potential implications for couples with male infertility and their clinicians.