1
|
Bourdon M, Peigné M, Maignien C, de Villardi de Montlaur D, Solignac C, Darné B, Languille S, Bendifallah S, Santulli P. Impact of Endometriosis Surgery on In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reprod Sci 2024; 31:1431-1455. [PMID: 38168857 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-023-01421-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
Endometriosis-related infertility remains a therapeutic challenge. A burning issue in this field of research is determining whether pre-assisted reproductive technology (ART) surgery may be of some benefit in terms of reproductive outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and/or live birth rates (LBR) in patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before ART (IVF/ICSI) in comparison with patients who underwent first-line ART (IVF/ICSI). Searches were conducted from January 1990 to June 2021 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: endometriosis, surgery, reproductive outcomes, and IVF/ICSI. The primary outcomes were OPR or LBR. A total of 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences in LBR [0.91[0.63, 1.30]; I2 = 66%; n = 11], OPR [1.28[0.66, 2.49]; I2 = 60%; n = 3], and early pregnancy loss rate [0.88[0.62, 1.25]; I2 = 0%; n = 7] per cycle were found when comparing patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before IVF/ICSI and those who did not. After the exclusion of the studies with high risks of bias, the LBR per cycle was significantly reduced in the case of surgical treatment before IVF/ICSI [0.53[0.33, 0.86]; I2 = 30%; n = 4]. These data urge the clinician to carefully weigh the pros and cons before referring infertile patients with endometriosis to surgery before IVF, highlighting the key role of multidisciplinary referral centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bourdon
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Université de Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France
- Department 3I "Infection, Immunité Et Inflammation", Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, Paris, France
| | - M Peigné
- Department of Reproductive Médecine and Fertility Preservation, AP-HP, Hopital Jean Verdier, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Faculté de Santé, Bondy, France
| | - C Maignien
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Université de Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France
| | | | - C Solignac
- Gedeon Richter France, 75008, Paris, France
| | - B Darné
- Monitoring Force, 78600, Maisons-Laffitte, France
| | - S Languille
- Monitoring Force, 78600, Maisons-Laffitte, France
| | - S Bendifallah
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Université de Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France.
- Department 3I "Infection, Immunité Et Inflammation", Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rubod C, de Prémare C, Kerbage Y, Kyheng M, Plouvier P, Chossegros C, Robin G. Does surgery for colorectal endometriosis prior to IVF±ICSI have an impact on cumulative live birth rates? Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 48:103649. [PMID: 38335899 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Does colorectal endometriosis surgery prior to IVF ± intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) impact cumulative live birth rates? DESIGN This retrospective, monocentric study (Lille University Hospital) was conducted between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018. Two groups of patients from the JFIV database were included: a group undergoing IVF±ICSI alone (120 patients, 215 oocyte retrievals), and a group undergoing surgery and then IVF±ICSI (69 patients, 109 oocyte retrievals). The mode of management was decided after a multidisciplinary team meeting. Different criteria such as age (cut-off 35 years), anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (cut off 2 ng/ml), imaging results and the patient's symptomatology were considered: the most symptomatic patients underwent surgery prior to IVF±ICSI. The cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates obtained after four IVF attempts were estimated and compared between the two groups using competing risk survival methods. RESULTS The cumulative live birth rates after four IVF attempts in the two groups were not statistically significantly different (50.8% in the IVF±ICSI group versus 52.2% in the surgery followed by IVF±ICSI group, P = 0.43). The results for the cumulative clinical pregnancy rates were the same (56.7% in the IVF±ICSI group versus 58% in the surgery followed by IVF±ICSI group, P = 0.47). CONCLUSION The study shows that cumulative live birth and pregnancy rates were similar in infertile patients with colorectal endometriosis who underwent IVF±ICSI either with or without prior colorectal endometriosis surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chrystèle Rubod
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, France.; Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Yohan Kerbage
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Maeva Kyheng
- Service de Biostatistiques, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Pauline Plouvier
- Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation et Préservation de la Fertilité, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Geoffroy Robin
- Univ. Lille, CHU Lille, Lille, France.; Service d'Assistance Médicale à la Procréation et Préservation de la Fertilité, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grigoriadis G, Daniilidis A, Merlot B, Stratakis K, Dennis T, Crestani A, Chanavaz-Lacheray I, Roman H. Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis: Impact on spontaneous conception. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2024; 93:102455. [PMID: 38181664 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2024.102455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
Deep endometriosis (DE) is the most severe form of endometriosis and is commonly associated with infertility. Surgical treatment of DE appears to increase chances of spontaneous conception in appropriately selected patients wishing to conceive. Identifying, however, the exact impact of DE, and its surgical removal, on natural conception is highly challenging. The surgical approach should be favoured in symptomatic patients with pregnancy intention. Limited data from infertile patients suggest that outcomes may not differ from patients without known infertility. Complex DE surgery carries a risk of serious complications, therefore, it should be performed in centers of expertise. Such complications may, however, not have a significant negative impact on fertility outcomes, according to limited available data. Data on obstetric outcomes of spontaneous conceptions after DE surgery are too scarce. In asymptomatic, infertile patients the debate between primary surgery or Artifial Reproductive Technology is ongoing, until randomized studies report their results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angelos Daniilidis
- 1st Department in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Papageorgiou General Hospital, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54643, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Benjamin Merlot
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Konstantinos Stratakis
- 1st Surgical Department, Peripheral General Hospital Giorgos Gennimatas, 11527, Athens, Greece
| | - Thomas Dennis
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Adrien Crestani
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Isabella Chanavaz-Lacheray
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Horace Roman
- Institut Franco-Europeen Multidisciplinaire d'Endometriose (IFEMEndo), Endometriosis Centre, CliniqueTivoli-Ducos, 33000, Bordeaux, France; Franco-European Multidisciplinary Endometriosis Institute (IFEMEndo), Middle East Clinic, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, 7400, United Arab Emirates; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aarhus University, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Maignien C, Bourdon M, Parpex G, Ferreux L, Patrat C, Bordonne C, Marcellin L, Chapron C, Santulli P. Endometriosis-related infertility: severe pain symptoms do not impact assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:346-354. [PMID: 38142239 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/25/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Do severe endometriosis-related painful symptoms impact ART live birth rates? SUMMARY ANSWER Severe pain symptoms are not associated with reduced ART live birth rates in endometriosis patients. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY ART is currently recognized as one of the main therapeutic options to manage endometriosis-related infertility. Presently, no data exist in the literature regarding the association between the core symptom of the disease, e.g. pain and ART reproductive outcomes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Observational cohort study of 354 endometriosis patients, who underwent ART at a tertiary care university hospital, between October 2014 and October 2021. Diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria using transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging, and histologically confirmed in women who had a previous history of endometriosis surgery (n = 127, 35.9%). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The intensity of painful symptoms related to dysmenorrhea (DM), dyspareunia (DP), noncyclic chronic pelvic pain, gastrointestinal (GI) pain, or lower urinary tract pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), before ART. Severe pain was defined as having a VAS of 7 or higher for at least one symptom. The main outcome measure was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per patient. We analyzed the impact of endometriosis-related painful symptoms on ART live births using univariable and multivariate analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Three hundred and fifty-four endometriosis patients underwent 711 ART cycles. The mean age of the population was 33.8 ± 3.7 years, and the mean duration of infertility was 3.6 ± 2.1 years. The distribution of the endometriosis phenotypes was 3.1% superficial endometriosis, 8.2% ovarian endometrioma, and 88.7% deep infiltrating endometriosis. The mean VAS scores for DM, DP, and GI pain symptoms were 6.6 ± 2.7, 3.4 ± 3.1, and 3.1 ± 3.6, respectively. Two hundred and forty-two patients (68.4%) had severe pain symptoms. The CLBR per patient was 63.8% (226/354). Neither the mean VAS scores for the various painful symptoms nor the proportion of patients displaying severe pain differed significantly between patients who had a live birth and those who had not, based on univariate and multivariate analyses (P = 0.229). The only significant factors associated with negative ART live births were age >35 years (P < 0.001) and anti-Müllerian hormone levels <1.2 ng/ml (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on imaging rather than surgery. This limitation is, however, inherent to the design of most studies on endometriosis patients reverting to ART first. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Rather than considering a single argument such as pain, the decision-making process for choosing between ART and surgery in infertile endometriosis patients should be based on a multitude of aspects, including the patient's choice, the associated infertility factors, the endometriosis phenotypes, and the efficiency of medical therapies in regard to pain symptoms, through an individualized approach guided by a multidisciplinary team of experts. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding; no conflict of interest. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Maignien
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
| | - M Bourdon
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
- Department "Development, Reproduction and Cancer", Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Paris, France
| | - G Parpex
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
- Department "Development, Reproduction and Cancer", Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Paris, France
| | - L Ferreux
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Reproductive Biology (Professor Patrat), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
| | - C Patrat
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Reproductive Biology (Professor Patrat), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
| | - C Bordonne
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
- Department of Radiology (Professor Dion), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, France
| | - L Marcellin
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
- Department "Development, Reproduction and Cancer", Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Paris, France
| | - C Chapron
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
- Department "Development, Reproduction and Cancer", Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Paris, France
| | - P Santulli
- Faculté de Santé, Université de Paris, Paris, France
- Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France
- Department "Development, Reproduction and Cancer", Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Maignien C, Hachem RE, Bourdon M, Marcellin L, Chalas C, Patrat C, Gonzàlez-Foruria I, Chapron C, Santulli P. Oocyte donation outcomes in endometriosis patients with multiple IVF failures. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:103236. [PMID: 37390602 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/02/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What are the reproductive outcomes and the prognostic factors of live birth rates in patients with endometriosis referred to oocyte donation after multiple IVF failures? DESIGN Observational cohort study including all women with endometriosis-related infertility and two or more failed IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles referred to oocyte donation between January 2013 and June 2022. Endometriosis was diagnosed based on published imaging criteria, and was confirmed histologically in women who had a history of surgery for endometriosis. The main outcome measured was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The characteristics of women who had a live birth were compared with those who did not using univariate and multivariate analysis to identify determinant factors of fertility outcome. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients underwent 90 oocyte donation cycles after 244 failed autologous IVF cycles. The mean ± SD age of the population was 36.8 ± 3.3 years, with a mean duration of infertility of 3.6 ± 2.2 years, and a mean number of autologous IVF/ICSI cycles of 4.4 ± 2.3 cycles per patient. Three patients (5.3%) had superficial peritoneal endometriosis, two patients (3.5%) had ovarian endometriomas, and 52 patients (91.2%) had deep infiltrating endometriosis, among which 30 patients (57.7%) had bowel lesions. Thirty patients (52.6%) had associated adenomyosis. Overall, CLBR per patient was 36/57 (63.2%). After multivariate analysis, only being nulligravida (P=0.002) remained an independent negative predictive factor of the live birth rate. Previous surgery did not impact reproductive outcomes. CONCLUSION This study suggests that oocyte donation appears to be a viable option to optimize the live birth rate in women with endometriosis-related infertility and recurrent IVF failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Maignien
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Rami El Hachem
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Mathilde Bourdon
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France; Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016, Paris, France
| | - Louis Marcellin
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France; Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016, Paris, France
| | - Céline Chalas
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Histology and Reproductive Biology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Catherine Patrat
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Histology and Reproductive Biology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Iñaki Gonzàlez-Foruria
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus Mujer - Dexeus University Hospital, 08028 Barcelona, Spain; NatuVitro, Travessera de les Corts, 322, 08029 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Charles Chapron
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France; Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016, Paris, France
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Université Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, 12 Rue de l'Ecole de Médecine, 75006 Paris, France; Department of Gynaecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Cochin, 123 Boulevard de Port Royal, 75014 Paris, France; Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Cochin Institute, INSERM U1016, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fertility Outcomes after Surgical Management of Colorectal Endometriosis: A Single-center Retrospective Study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2023; 30:230-239. [PMID: 36509394 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To assess the pregnancy rate after surgery for colorectal endometriosis. DESIGN A retrospective, single-center study performed from January 2014 to December 2019. SETTING A university tertiary referral center. PATIENTS Patients with the intention to get pregnant younger than the age of 43 years, with or without a history of infertility and who were surgically managed for colorectal endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS Complete excision of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The postoperative pregnancy rate was assessed. Seventy-seven patients had surgery; their mean age was 32.5 ± 4.4 years. Preoperative documented infertility was present in 77.9% of patients (n = 60). The mean length of history of infertility was 36.2 ± 24.9 months. The procedure was performed by laparoscopic surgery in 92.2% of patients (n = 71). Nonconservative, conservative, and mixed treatment were performed in 66.2% (n = 51), 29.9% (n = 23), and 3.9% of patients (n = 3), respectively. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the 3B complication rate was 6.5% (n = 5). The mean follow-up was 46.7 ± 20.6 months. Clinical pregnancies were defined by the presence of intrauterine pregnancy with an embryo with cardiac activity. The postoperative pregnancy rate was 62.3% (n = 48), and 54.2% (n = 26) were spontaneous. The mean number of pregnancies was 1.2 ± 0.4 per patient. In addition, 18.7% of patients (n = 9) got pregnant twice. The mean time from surgery to pregnancy was 13.8 ± 13.1 months. The live birth rate was 89.1% (n = 41). There were no significant differences concerning the prognostic criteria reported in the literature (antimüllerian hormone level, age, presence of adenomyosis). There were no predictive criteria for live births. CONCLUSION According to this study, surgery for colorectal endometriosis results in a high postoperative pregnancy rate. Studies with a high level of evidence are needed to determine good candidates for this type of surgery.
Collapse
|
7
|
Puscasiu L, Mircea O, Hennetier C, Rubod C, Schmied R, Resch B, Merlot B, Roman H. Pregnancy rate following endometriomas management by ablation using plasma energy, cystectomy and drainage: A three-arm comparative study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 160:947-954. [PMID: 36085559 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2022] [Revised: 08/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare differences in the postoperative pregnancy rate in women seeking to conceive and presenting with endometriomas larger than 3 cm in diameter, which were managed by ablation using plasma energy, cystectomy, or simple drainage. METHODS A retrospective three-arm comparative study based on prospective collection of data evaluating 363 patients, undergoing endometrioma cystectomy, ablation using plasma energy, or simple drainage. RESULTS In this series, 204 (56.2%) patients underwent endometrioma ablation using plasma energy, 121 (33.3%) received cystectomy, and 38 (10.5%) had a simple drainage. Postoperative follow up was 50 ± 26 months. Overall postoperative pregnancy rate was 60.3%. The probability of being pregnant after cystectomy, ablation, and drainage was respectively 27%, 32%, and 16% at 12 months, with a statistically significant difference between pregnancy rates among the three arms (P = 0.015). Simple drainage was associated with a probability of conception over 50% after 2 years, mainly based on postoperative assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS We reveal good postoperative pregnancy rate after ablation using plasma energy or cystectomy for endometriomas. Surgical management should be carefully considered in women with endometriomas and pregnancy intention, because the postoperative pregnancy rate may be compared with that observed after first-line assisted reproductive technology management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucian Puscasiu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology "George Emil Palade" Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Oana Mircea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology "George Emil Palade" Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Clotilde Hennetier
- Expert Centre in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Christelle Rubod
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CHRU Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
| | | | - Benoit Resch
- Expert Centre in the Diagnosis and Multidisciplinary Management of Endometriosis, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France.,Clinique Mathilde, Rouen, France
| | | | - Horace Roman
- IFEMEndo, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Endometriosis is associated with a lowered cumulative live birth rate: A retrospective matched cohort study including 3071 in vitro fertilization cycles. J Reprod Immunol 2022; 151:103631. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2022.103631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
9
|
Raos M, Roman H, Seyer-Hansen M, Kesmodel US, Knudsen UB. EFFORT study: Comparing impact of operation and assisted reproductive technologies on fertility for women with deep infiltrating endometriosis - study protocol for a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e052877. [PMID: 35410921 PMCID: PMC9003604 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) affecting the rectum or sigmoid colon is associated with infertility, severe pain and decreased quality of life. As most women with DIE are young, many have a pregnancy intention. Treatment possibilities of endometriosis-associated infertility are surgery or assisted reproductive technologies (ART). However, no studies have compared the two interventions directly. Therefore, this study aims to determine the cumulative pregnancy rate (CPR) and the live birth rate (LBR) after first-line surgery compared with first-line ART for women with rectosigmoid DIE and a pregnancy intention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Multicentre, parallel-group, randomised trial of women with rectosigmoid DIE and a pregnancy intention for at least 6 months in Aarhus, Denmark and Bordeaux, France. 352 women aged 18-38 years are randomised 1:1 to either surgical management (shaving, disc excision or segmental resection) or ART management (at least two in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures if not pregnant after the first cycle). Women in the surgical intervention group will attempt to get pregnant by either spontaneous conception or ART, depending on the endometriosis fertility index score. Primary outcome measures are CPR and LBR at 18 months' follow-up. Secondary outcomes are: Non-viable pregnancies, time to pregnancy, pain score, quality of life, complication rate, bowel and bladder function, endocrine and inflammatory profile, number of oocytes, blastocysts, frozen embryos and blastocyst morphology score within 18 months after either intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Conduct of this study is approved by the Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics and Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VIII. Study participants must sign an informed consent form. The results will be presented at national and international conferences and published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT04610710). PROTOCOL VERSION The Danish National Committee on Health Research Ethics: Fifth protocol version approved 7 September 2020 (no. 1-10-72-96-20). Comité de Protection des Personnes Ile de France VIII: Version 1.1 22JAN2021 the 9 March 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Raos
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Fertility Clinic, Regional Hospital Horsens, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Horace Roman
- Endometriosis Center, Clinique Tivoli-Ducos, Bordeaux, France
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Seyer-Hansen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Ulla Breth Knudsen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus N, Denmark
- Fertility Clinic, Regional Hospital Horsens, Horsens, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Long term outcomes following surgical management of rectal endometriosis: 7-year follow-up of patients enrolled in a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2022; 29:767-775. [PMID: 35181523 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare functional outcomes, recurrence rate and pregnancy likelihood in patients undergoing conservative or radical surgery in patients with deep rectal endometriosis 7 years post-operatively. DESIGN Prospective study in a cohort of patients enrolled in a 2-arm randomized trial from March 2011 to August 2013. SETTING A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS 55 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum. INTERVENTIONS Patients underwent either segmental resection or nodule excision by shaving or disc excision, depending on a randomization which was performed preoperatively using sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelopes. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS The primary endpoint was the number of patients experiencing one of the following symptoms: constipation, frequent bowel movements, anal incontinence or bladder dysfunction 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints were values of gastrointestinal and overall quality of life scores. The 7 year-recurrence rates (new deep endometriosis nodule infiltrating the rectum) in the excision vs. the segmental resection arms were 7.4 % vs. 0% (P=.24). One of more symptoms included in the definition of the primary outcomes were recorded in 55.6% vs. 60.7% of patients (P=0.79). However, 51.9% vs. 53.6% of patients considered their bowel movements as normal (P=.99). An intention-to-treat comparison of overall quality of life scores did not find differences between the two groups 7 years postoperatively. At the end of the 7-year study period, 31 of the 37 patients who tried to conceive were successful (83.8%) including: 27 (57.4%) natural conceptions and 20 (42.6%) pregnancies resulting from ART procedures. Pregnancy rate was 82.4% vs. 85% in the two arms (P=.99). A 75.7% live birth rate was recorded. At the end of the follow up there were 15 women with one child (40.5%) and 13 women with 2 children (35.1%). During the 7-year follow- up, the reoperation rate was respectively 37% and 35.7% in each arm, P=0.84). Among the 27 reoperation procedures during the follow up period, 11 were postoperative complications (40.7%), 7 were necessary prior to ART management (25.9%), 8 were for recurrent abdominal or pelvic pain (29.6%) and one for midline ventral hernia following pregnancy (3.7%). CONCLUSIONS Our study did not reveal a significant difference in terms of digestive functional outcomes, recurrence rate, reoperation risk and pregnancy likelihood when conservative and radical rectal surgery for deep endometriosis were compared 7 years postoperatively. Postoperative pregnancy rate observed in our series is high.
Collapse
|
11
|
Mathilde L, Mary P, Emilie F, Massimo L, Françoise F, Lise L, Arnaud W, Cherif A. Impact of surgery for colorectal endometriosis on postoperative fertility and pregnancy outcomes. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2022; 51:102348. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2022.102348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
12
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod 2022; 37:1470-1479. [DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deac083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
13
|
Cacciottola L, Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Can Endometriosis-Related Oxidative Stress Pave the Way for New Treatment Targets? Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22137138. [PMID: 34281188 PMCID: PMC8267660 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22137138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometriosis is a disease of reproductive age characterized by chronic pelvic pain and infertility. Its pathogenesis is complex and still partially unexplained. However, there is increasing evidence of the role of chronic inflammation, immune system dysregulation, and oxidative stress in its development and progression. The latter appears to be involved in multiple aspects of the disease. Indeed, disease progression sustained by a hyperproliferative phenotype can be related to reactive oxygen species (ROS) imbalance, as numerous experiments using drugs to counteract hyperproliferation have shown in recent years. Chronic pelvic pain is also associated with cell function dysregulation favoring chronic inflammation and oxidative stress, specifically involving macrophages and mast cell activation. Moreover, there is increasing evidence of a role for ROS and impaired mitochondrial function not only as deleterious effectors of the ovarian reserve in patients with endometriomas but also in terms of oocyte quality and, hence, embryo development impairment. Targeting oxidative stress looks to be a promising strategy to both curb endometriotic lesion progression and alleviate endometriosis-associated symptoms of chronic pain and infertility. More investigations are nevertheless needed to develop effective therapeutic strategies for clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Cacciottola
- Gynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Jacques Donnez
- Society for Research into Infertility, 1150 Brussels, Belgium;
- Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
- Gynecology Research Unit, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
- Department of Gynecology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +32-(0)2-764-5287
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chapron C, Marcellin L, Borghese B, Santulli P. [Endometriosis: A new paradigm!]. Med Sci (Paris) 2021; 37:563-564. [PMID: 34180808 DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2021105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Chapron
- Université de Paris, Faculté de santé Faculté de médecine Paris Centre, Paris, France - Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC) Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Service de gynécologie obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction (Professeur Chapron) Paris, France - Département Développement, reproduction et cancer Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, Paris, France
| | - Louis Marcellin
- Université de Paris, Faculté de santé Faculté de médecine Paris Centre, Paris, France - Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC) Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Service de gynécologie obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction (Professeur Chapron) Paris, France - Département Développement, reproduction et cancer Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, Paris, France
| | - Bruno Borghese
- Université de Paris, Faculté de santé Faculté de médecine Paris Centre, Paris, France - Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC) Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Service de gynécologie obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction (Professeur Chapron) Paris, France - Personalized medicine, pharmacogenomics, therapeutic optimization Centre de recherche des Cordeliers, Inserm UMR-S1138, Paris, France
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Université de Paris, Faculté de santé Faculté de médecine Paris Centre, Paris, France - Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) Hôpital universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC) Centre hospitalier universitaire (CHU) Cochin Service de gynécologie obstétrique II et médecine de la reproduction (Professeur Chapron) Paris, France - Département Développement, reproduction et cancer Institut Cochin, Inserm U1016, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vercellini P, Viganò P, Somigliana E. First-line in vitro fertilization or surgery for infertile women with bowel endometriosis? Fertil Steril 2021; 115:593-594. [PMID: 33563397 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Vercellini
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy; Gynecology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Viganò
- Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Edgardo Somigliana
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy; Infertility Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|