Storage, transport, and disposition of gametes and embryos: legal issues and practical considerations

The international transportation of frozen embryos does not affect IVF outcomes

PURPOSE

The regulated transportation of cryopreserved human embryos resulting from assisted reproduction treatments offers opportunities for patients undergoing embryo transfer in other regions/countries. However, the principal concern for fertility clinics is maintaining unaltered embryo quality to ensure satisfactory clinical outcomes. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of the transportation process comparing the survival rate and competence of transported embryos to embryos produced and transferred on-site, in frozen embryo transfer cycles.

METHODS

This retrospective study assessed the outcomes of 621 blastocysts thawed at IVI Roma (Italy) between March 2021 and March 2022. Autologous or donated oocytes fertilized in vitro, cultured to the blastocyst stage, and cryopreserved in IVI Roma clinic (Group A, n = 450), were compared to embryos generated in IVI Spain clinics and transported to IVI Roma (Group B, n = 171).

RESULTS

Groups A and B respectively showed no significant difference in embryo survival rates after thawing (N = 440/450, 97.8% vs. N = 168/171, 98.2%, p = 0.71), pregnancy rates (N = 221/440, 50.23% vs. N = 77/168, 45.83%, p = 0.33), clinical pregnancy rates (N = 200/440, 45.45% vs. N = 62/168, 36.90%, p = 0.06), and miscarriage rates (N = 42/221, 19,00% vs. 21/77, 28.57%, p = 0.13), even after stratification for the source of the oocyte. Logistic binomial regression considering donor oocytes, preimplantation genetic testing, and patients' age, did not show any significant results on embryo survival and IVF outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The regulated transport of cryopreserved blastocysts did not affect embryo survival rate or IVF outcomes. Our data support the safety of embryo cryopreservation and medical transportation services, allowing clinics and patients to transport embryos with no significant risk to embryo competence.

Islamic Perspectives on Elective Ovarian Tissue Freezing by Single Women for Non-medical or Social Reasons

Non-medical or Social egg freezing (oocyte cryopreservation) is currently a controversial topic in Islam, with contradictory fatwas being issued in different Muslim countries. While Islamic authorities in Egypt permit the procedure, fatwas issued in Malaysia have banned single Muslim women from freezing their unfertilized eggs (vitrified oocytes) to be used later in marriage. The underlying principles of the Malaysian fatwas are that (i) sperm and egg cells produced before marriage, should not be used during marriage to conceive a child; (ii) extraction of mature egg cells from single women being unacceptable; and (iii) fertility preservation in anticipation of late marriage is a conjecture that has not yet occurred. Ovarian tissue freezing can potentially be a more Shariah-compliant alternative to social egg freezing, because once the frozen ovarian cortical tissue sections have been re-transplanted back into the woman, mature egg cells can readily be produced, collected, and fertilized by the husband's sperm only during the period of marriage contract ('akd al-nikāḥ). Unlike accidental mix-ups with frozen eggs, muddling of lineage (nasab) would be automatically avoided in ovarian tissue freezing due to immunological rejection. However, upon critical analysis based on Qawā'id Fiqhiyyah (Islamic Legal Maxims), Maqāṣid-al-Shariah (Higher Objectives of Islamic Law), and Maslaḥah-Mafsadah (benefits versus harmful effects on society), elective ovarian tissue freezing by healthy single women for social reasons would likely be a highly contentious and controversial issue within Muslim communities that may conflict with conservative social-religious norms. This thus needs further debate among Islamic jurists in dialogue with medical doctors and biomedical scientists.

When elective egg freezers become egg donors: practical and ethical issues

Many people hope that the unused and unwanted eggs frozen by women for self-use could be applied to reduce the shortage of donor eggs. However, several practical (additional screening and counselling) and ethical (informed consent and reimbursement) issues may dampen this hope. This paper also considers the question of whether elective egg freezers who want to donate their eggs should be reimbursed for the costs they have met for the IVF cycle and storage. It is argued that a partial reimbursement for the collection (hormonal stimulation and retrieval) is morally acceptable because it is limited to proven expenses (and does not violate the altruism rule) and because the recipients should contribute to the costs of a scheme from which they are benefiting. The storage fee should be paid by the egg freezer herself and no reward for effort, time and inconvenience should be given. This compromise benefits both donors and recipients.

Systematic protocol and methodology needed for pre-procedure counselling of elective egg freezing patients in Singapore

Upon legalization of social egg freezing in Singapore from 2023 onwards, compulsory pre-procedure counselling is mandated for all prospective patients to enable informed choice about whether to undergo the procedure. Being a newly introduced medical procedure in Singapore, there are currently no clear directives on what pre-procedure counselling for elective egg freezing should entail. Due to pervasive media and internet influences, prospective egg freezing patients could be misled into believing that the procedure represents a guaranteed path to future motherhood, contrary to statements by professional bodies such as the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the British Fertility Society (BFS). Hence, comprehensive counselling is recommended to provide women with evidence-based information (e.g. success rates of social egg freezing for women of their age) to ensure they make informed decisions and to avoid possible decision regret. For this purpose, a systematic protocol and methodology for pre-procedure counselling of women considering elective egg freezing was developed, incorporating flowcharts and decision trees that are specifically tailored to the unique sociocultural values and legal restrictions in Singapore. Questions relating to the why, what, how, where and when of the egg freezing procedure should be addressed, which could serve as a roadmap to facilitate informed decision-making by women considering elective egg freezing.

Automation in ART: Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment

In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is estimated to account for the birth of more than nine million babies worldwide, perhaps making it one of the most intriguing as well as commoditised and industrialised modern medical interventions. Nevertheless, most IVF procedures are currently limited by accessibility, affordability and most importantly multistep, labour-intensive, technically challenging processes undertaken by skilled professionals. Therefore, in order to sustain the exponential demand for IVF on one hand, and streamline existing processes on the other, innovation is essential. This may not only effectively manage clinical time but also reduce cost, thereby increasing accessibility, affordability and efficiency. Recent years have seen a diverse range of technologies, some integrated with artificial intelligence, throughout the IVF pathway, which promise personalisation and, at least, partial automation in the not-so-distant future. This review aims to summarise the rapidly evolving state of these innovations in automation, with or without the integration of artificial intelligence, encompassing the patient treatment pathway, gamete/embryo selection, endometrial evaluation and cryopreservation of gametes/embryos. Additionally, it shall highlight the resulting prospective change in the role of IVF professionals and challenges of implementation of some of these technologies, thereby aiming to motivate continued research in this field.

The impact of Covid-19 on gamete shipping by Australian and New Zealand patients

BACKGROUND

Cross-border surrogacy and egg donor arrangements are an increasingly common means to family building. Establishing patterns of use has always been difficult in relation to Australian patients. Accurate data is stymied by lack of documentation of international third-party reproductive care available to Australian authorities. When international travel bans came into effect, it is hypothesised that those planning to use cross-border reproductive care had to rely significantly more on local in vitro fertilisation (IVF) clinics for services such as sperm freezing, embryo creation and gamete release procedures.

AIM

To quantify and characterise the impact of the Covid-19-related travel ban on international and interstate gamete shipping by Australian IVF clinics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-one Australian and New Zealand IVF clinics were invited to provide de-identified data on interstate and international gamete export applications from two 12 month time periods pre- and during Covid-19-related international travel lockdowns. Seven IVF organisations provided data on: patient age; type of gametes exported; destination country/state; and date gamete release approved.

RESULTS

Most gametes (78%) were shipped to another Australian IVF clinic and 22% internationally. Patient-initiated shipping domestically and internationally both showed significant increases when comparing pre- and post-Covid datasets. Of the 21 destination countries reported for international shipments, the US was the commonest (39%), followed by Ukraine (21%) and Canada (9%).

CONCLUSIONS

The inability of involuntarily infertile patients to travel internationally, rather than halt cross-border reproductive care, has led to a significant increase in the uptake of gamete shipping. The high proportion of internationally shipped gametes going to the US and Ukraine is likely a reflection of the availability of surrogates and donors and more amenable legal frameworks.

Assessment of patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of embryos to a research biobank

PURPOSE

To explore perceptions towards embryo disposition among patients donating excess embryos to a research biobank.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of survey responses collected as part of enrollment in a research biobank. Patients are asked questions regarding the difficulty of their disposition decision, their alternative disposition choice if donation to research was not available, quality of the counseling they received, and if additional counseling throughout their treatment would have been beneficial. Survey responses use 5-point Likert scales, with "1" being lowest/least and "5" being highest/most.

RESULTS

A total of 157 men and 163 women enrolled in the biobank. Median scores for difficulty of disposition decision were 3 for females and 2 for males, and for quality of counseling, the median scores were 4 for females and 3 for males. Seventy percent of patients would have chosen to discard their excess embryos had donation to research not been an option. Statistical analyses showed no significant difference in responses based on variations in race, religion, sexual orientation, and infertility diagnoses. Concordance of responses within heterosexual couples was tested and found to be poor to moderate.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing patients' perceptions towards embryo disposition after donation of their excess embryos to a research biobank affords a unique perspective. The difficulty of the disposition decision, the tendency to discard embryos in the absence of a means for donation to research, and the poor agreement between heterosexual partners highlight the importance of donation to research as an accessible disposition option and the need for a personalized approach to counseling and consenting for embryo disposition.

Implementation of a comprehensive fertility biobanking initiative

OBJECTIVE

To present the framework of Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Health's comprehensive reproductive biobanking initiatives and the results of the first year of recruitment.

DESIGN

Technical description article.

SETTING

Academic fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

Fertility patients >18 years of age.

INTERVENTION(S)

Enroll the patients interested in research in biobanking protocols.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Patient recruitment and sample inventory from September 2020 to September 2021.

RESULT(S)

A total of 253 patients have enrolled in the Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Health biobanking initiatives since September 2020. The current inventory consists of 1,176 samples, including serums, plasmas, buffy coats, endometria, maternal deciduae, miscarriage chorionic villi, and human embryos (zygote, cleavage, and blastocyst stages).

CONCLUSION(S)

This biobanking initiative addresses a critical, unmet need in reproductive health research to make it possible for patients to donate excess embryos and gametes and preserves, for future research, valuable somatic and reproductive tissues that would otherwise be discarded. We present the framework of this biobanking initiative in order to support future efforts of establishing similar biorepositories.

Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients

PURPOSE

To characterize the frozen oocyte disposition preferences of patients undergoing medical and planned fertility preservation.

METHODS

All oocyte cryopreservation (OC) patients were identified between 2015 and 2018. Demographic information and fertility preservation (FP) indication (medical or planned) were identified for each patient. Oocyte disposition options included disposal, donation to research, or donation to a specified third party, which was decided at the time of initial consent and made available in the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was the disposition selection. Secondary outcomes included differences in demographic variables and disposition selections between medical and planned FP patients using chi-squared analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 336 OC patients with a documented oocyte disposition preference were identified in the study timeframe. Patients were on average 34.5 years old (SD = 5.1) and were predominantly White (70.2%), nulliparous (83.0%), with a BMI of 24.7 (SD = 5.4). A total of 101 patients underwent OC for medical FP and 235 for planned FP. In both groups, the most commonly selected disposition option was donation to research (50% planned, 52% medical), followed by donation to a specified third party (30% planned, 30% medical), and finally disposal of oocytes (20% planned, 18% medical). There were no significant differences in disposition selection between each group. When comparing patient variables between groups, medical FP patients were more likely to be under the age of 35 and were less likely to be nulliparous (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that oocyte disposition choices are similar in patients undergoing OC for medical and planned indications. As donation to research was the most commonly selected option in both groups, it is time to start thinking of streamlining ways to utilize this potential research material in the future.

Balancing embryo donation and double gamete donation

Huele and colleagues started a debate on the comparison between embryo donation and double donation. Although I largely agree with their final conclusion, I believe that the perspective of the recipients needs to be added to get a more complete picture. The present contribution focuses on that perspective and advances other arguments to balance the two methods. The main argument in favour of double donation is the difference in perceived meaning for the recipients compared to surplus embryos. The main arguments in favour of embryo donation are the fair distribution of scarce resources (i.e. donor gametes) and the principle of non-maleficence through the avoidance of unnecessary oocyte donation cycles. The balance would be to put both treatments on an equal footing.