Relationship between paternal factors and embryonic aneuploidy of paternal origin

Total gonadotropin dose did not affect euploid blastocyst rates: an analysis of more than 19,000 oocytes

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether increasing total gonadotropin (Gn) dose is associated with changes in euploid blastocyst rate in preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) oocytes.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2017 and 2022, and 19,246 oocytes were grouped and analyzed based on tri-sectional quantiles of total Gn doses.

SETTING

Single reproductive medical center.

SUBJECTS

All the patients who underwent PGT cycles, including PGT for aneuploidy, monogenic disorders, and structural rearrangements, were included.

EXPOSURE

Next-generation sequencing platforms for chromosomal analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates.

RESULTS

In total, 19,246 oocytes and 5375 PGT blastocysts were analyzed. There were significant differences in blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates among the groups classified according to tri-sectional quantiles of total Gn doses. Significant differences in age, body mass index (BMI), proportion of primary infertility, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels, number of oocytes retrieved, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) regimen, type of Gn, and PGT category were observed among the three groups. After stratifying the analysis by age, BMI, infertility diagnosis, AMH levels, number of oocytes retrieved, PGT category, type of Gn, and COS regimen, significant differences were only seen in a small number of specific subgroups. Furthermore, the results of the multiple logistic regression analysis showed that the blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates did not significantly increase or decrease with the total Gn dose, whether treated as a continuous variable or divided into three Gn groups as categorical variables. Notably, advancing age was a risk factor for blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates. PGT for structural rearrangements was a risk factor for blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates as compared with PGT for aneuploidy.

CONCLUSION

In the total PGT cycles, advancing age, and preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements negatively affected blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates; however, the total Gn dose did not affect blastocyst formation and euploid blastocyst rates.

The impact of paternal age on cumulative assisted reproductive technology outcomes

Objective

To investigate the impact of paternal age on cumulative live birth rate in ART.

Design

Retrospective single-center cohort study.

Patients

All female patients aged 18-43 years and male patients aged 18-60 years, who performed their first ART cycle between January 2018 and December 2020, were included.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome, cumulative live birth rate (cLBR), was estimated following fresh or frozen embryo transfers issued from an ART cycle. Secondary outcomes included the cumulative pregnancy rate (cPR) and miscarriage rate. Subgroup analyzes were performed as follows: men <45 and ≥ 45; female <35, 35-38, and > 38 years.

Results

A total of 2,358 couples were included in this study. The sperm quantity of male patients within both age groups was divided in two groups: normal and abnormal, which were found to be in significantly equal proportions. There were significantly fewer current smokers in the male group ≥45. The cPR was 0.5301 in the group <45 and 0.3111 in the group ≥45, with a p-value <0.001. Analysis according to the female age revealed that, in the female group >38, the cLBR rate was 0.26 for men <45 and 0.19 for men ≥45, with a p-value of 0.061. Additionally, the cPR was 0.34 in the male group <45 and 0.21 in the group ≥45, with a p-value <0.001. In the female group between 35 and 38 years of age, the cLBR was 0.44 in the male group <45 and 0.3 in the male group ≥45, with a p-value of 0.031. The cPR was 0.49 in the male group <45 and 0.34 in the group ≥45, p = 0.036. Within the female group <35, we observed non-significant results. The miscarriage rate results were not significantly different for women ≤38.

Conclusion

According to the results from our study, male age ≥ 45 has a significant impact on cumulative ART outcomes.

Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion may have negative effect on embryo euploidy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Embryo aneuploidy is a main of principal reason of pregnancy loss, in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure and birth defects in offspring. Previous researchs have demonstrated that Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion was associated with reproduction outcomes, however, the relationship between Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion and embryo aneuploidy remains unexplored.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study enrolled 513 patients with 603 cycles in the reproductive center of Nanjing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2022. The study cohort was divided into two groups: the AZFc microdeletion group, comprising 53 patients and 58 cycles, and the control group, comprising 460 patients and 545 cycles. Statistical methods including restricted cubic spline and generalized estimating equation (GEE) were employed to evaluate the relationship between Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion and embryo euploidy.

RESULTS

294 and 2833 blastocysts were selected as AZFc microdeletion group and control group, respectively. Patients with Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion had significantly higher embryo aneuploid rate (33.0% vs. 27.3%, P < 0.05), lower rate of normal fertilization rate (81.5% vs. 90.3%, P < 0.05) and lower blastocysts formation rate (47.0% vs. 57.8%, P < 0.05) compared with the control group. However, no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes after euploid embryos transfer were observed between these two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study underscored the association between Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion and an elevated risk of embryo aneuploidy. Before the conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment, couples with Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion should be apprised of the heightened susceptibility to embryo aneuploidy. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) should be introduced for selection.

Sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®) and flow cytometry-assisted TUNEL assay provide a concordant assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation as a function of age in a large cohort of approximately 10,000 patients

BACKGROUND

Sperm DNA integrity is increasingly seen as a critical characteristic determining reproductive success, both in natural reproduction and in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). Despite this awareness, sperm DNA and nuclear integrity tests are still not part of routine examinations for either infertile men or fertile men wishing to assess their reproductive capacity. This is not due to the unavailability of DNA and sperm nuclear integrity tests. On the contrary, several relevant but distinct tests are available and have been used in many clinical trials, which has led to conflicting results and confusion. The reasons for this are mainly the lack of standardization between different clinics and between the tests themselves. In addition, the small number of samples analyzed in these trials has often weakened the value of the analyses performed. In the present work, we used a large cohort of semen samples, covering a wide age range, which were simultaneously evaluated for sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) using two of the most frequently used SDF assays, namely the TUNEL assay and the sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA®). At the same time, as standard seminal parameters (sperm motility, sperm morphology, sperm count) were available for these samples, correlations between age, SDF and conventional seminal parameters were analyzed.

RESULTS

We show that the SCSA® and TUNEL assessments of SDF produce concordant data. However, the SDF assessed by TUNEL is systematically lower than that assessed by SCSA®. Regardless of the test used, the SDF increases steadily during aging, while the HDS parameter (High DNA stainability assessed via SCSA®) remains unchanged. In the cohort analyzed, conventional sperm parameters do not seem to discriminate with aging. Only sperm volume and motility were significantly lower in the oldest age group analyzed [50-59 years of age].

CONCLUSIONS

In the large cohort analyzed, SDF is an age-dependent parameter, increasing linearly with aging. The SCSA® assessment of SDF and the flow cytometry-assisted TUNEL assessment are well correlated, although TUNEL is less sensitive than SCSA®. This difference in sensitivity should be taken into account in the final assessment of the true level of fragmentation of the sperm nucleus of a given sample. The classical sperm parameters (motility, morphology, sperm count) do not change dramatically with age, making them inadequate to assess the fertility potential of an individual.

Impact of male age on paternal aneuploidy: single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray outcomes following blastocyst biopsy

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does advanced paternal age (APA; ≥40 years) contribute to a higher incidence of paternal origin aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos?

DESIGN

This was a multicentre retrospective study of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) microarray (Natera and Karyomapping) preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) outcomes of blastocyst-stage embryos. Whole-chromosome aneuploidy analysis was performed on 2409 embryos from 389 male patients undertaking 681 assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycles between 2012-2021. Segmental aneuploidy analysis was performed on 867 embryos from 140 men undertaking 242 ART cycles between 2016-2021. Embryos were grouped based on paternal age at sperm collection: <35, 35-39 and ≥40 years. Paternal and maternal origin aneuploidy rates were compared between groups using chi-squared and/or Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference across groups in paternal origin whole-chromosome aneuploidy rate, overall (P=0.7561) or when segregated by type (trisomy and monosomy: P=0.2235 and 0.8156) or complexity (single versus 2, 3 or ≥4 aneuploidies: P=0.9733, 0.7517, 0.669 and 0.1481). Conversely, maternal origin whole-chromosome aneuploidy rate differed across groups (P<0.0001) in alignment with differing mean maternal age (P<0.001). Paternal origin deletions were 2.9-fold higher than maternal origin deletions (P=0.0084), independent of age stratification. No significant difference in paternal origin deletions was observed with APA ≥40 compared with the younger age groups (4.8% versus 2.5% and 2.8%, P=0.5292). Individual chromosome aneuploidy rates were too low to perform statistical comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant association was found between APA and the incidence of paternal origin aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos, irrespective of type or complexity. Thus, APA may not be an indication for PGT.

Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo implantation. Yet, its positive predictive value is not higher than 50-60%. This gap of knowledge on the causes of euploid blastocysts' reproductive failure is known as 'the black box of implantation'.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Several embryonic, maternal, paternal, clinical, and IVF laboratory features were scrutinized for their putative association with reproductive success or implantation failure of euploid blastocysts.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to August 2021. The keywords were '(blastocyst OR day5 embryo OR day6 embryo OR day7 embryo) AND (euploid OR chromosomally normal OR preimplantation genetic testing) AND (implantation OR implantation failure OR miscarriage OR abortion OR live birth OR biochemical pregnancy OR recurrent implantation failure)'. Overall, 1608 items were identified and screened. We included all prospective or retrospective clinical studies and randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) that assessed any feature associated with live-birth rates (LBR) and/or miscarriage rates (MR) among non-mosaic euploid blastocyst transfer after TE biopsy and PGT-A. In total, 41 reviews and 372 papers were selected, clustered according to a common focus, and thoroughly reviewed. The PRISMA guideline was followed, the PICO model was adopted, and ROBINS-I and ROB 2.0 scoring were used to assess putative bias. Bias across studies regarding the LBR was also assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim and fill method. Categorical data were combined with a pooled-OR. The random-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was addressed using I2. Whenever not suitable for the meta-analysis, the included studies were simply described for their results. The study protocol was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number CRD42021275329).

OUTCOMES

We included 372 original papers (335 retrospective studies, 30 prospective studies and 7 RCTs) and 41 reviews. However, most of the studies were retrospective, or characterized by small sample sizes, thus prone to bias, which reduces the quality of the evidence to low or very low. Reduced inner cell mass (7 studies, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52, I2 = 53%), or TE quality (9 studies, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, I2 = 70%), overall blastocyst quality worse than Gardner's BB-grade (8 studies, OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, I2 = 83%), developmental delay (18 studies, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49-0.63, I2 = 47%), and (by qualitative analysis) some morphodynamic abnormalities pinpointed through time-lapse microscopy (abnormal cleavage patterns, spontaneous blastocyst collapse, longer time of morula formation I, time of blastulation (tB), and duration of blastulation) were all associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. Slightly lower LBR, even in the context of PGT-A, was reported among women ≥38 years (7 studies, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, I2 = 31%), while obesity was associated with both lower LBR (2 studies, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, I2 = 0%) and higher MR (2 studies, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.08-2.99, I2 = 52%). The experience of previous repeated implantation failures (RIF) was also associated with lower LBR (3 studies, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, I2 = 0%). By qualitative analysis, among hormonal assessments, only abnormal progesterone levels prior to transfer were associated with LBR and MR after PGT-A. Among the clinical protocols used, vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was more effective than fresh transfer (2 studies, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.33, I2 = 23%) after PGT-A. Lastly, multiple vitrification-warming cycles (2 studies, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, I2 = 50%) or (by qualitative analysis) a high number of cells biopsied may slightly reduce the LBR, while simultaneous zona-pellucida opening and TE biopsy allowed better results than the Day 3 hatching-based protocol (3 studies, OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69, I2 = 0%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Embryo selection aims at shortening the time-to-pregnancy, while minimizing the reproductive risks. Knowing which features are associated with the reproductive competence of euploid blastocysts is therefore critical to define, implement, and validate safer and more efficient clinical workflows. Future research should be directed towards: (i) systematic investigations of the mechanisms involved in reproductive aging beyond de novo chromosomal abnormalities, and how lifestyle and nutrition may accelerate or exacerbate their consequences; (ii) improved evaluation of the uterine and blastocyst-endometrial dialogue, both of which represent black boxes themselves; (iii) standardization/automation of embryo assessment and IVF protocols; (iv) additional invasive or preferably non-invasive tools for embryo selection. Only by filling these gaps we may finally crack the riddle behind 'the black box of implantation'.

Obesity and Miscarriage

Obesity affects nearly 40% of reproductive-aged women and has serious implications for women's overall and reproductive health. Women with an elevated body mass index (BMI) have higher rates of anovulation and irregular menses, lower success with fertility treatment, and significantly higher rates of pregnancy complications, such as hypertension/preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, and preterm delivery. Many studies have also shown an association between obesity and early pregnancy loss. However, the causal association between BMI and miscarriage has not been elucidated, likely due to the multifactorial effects that BMI may have on early pregnancy development. In addition, BMI as an isolated variable fails to capture other relevant confounding health risk factors, such as nutrition, physical activity, and insulin resistance. In this review, we will summarize the current literature demonstrating the association between BMI and miscarriage, highlight the research that attempts to explain the association, and finally provide data on therapeutic interventions to improve reproductive outcomes in women suffering from obesity and early pregnancy loss.

Risk assessment of assisted reproductive technology and parental age at childbirth for the development of uniparental disomy-mediated imprinting disorders caused by aneuploid gametes

BACKGROUND

Our previous study suggested that assisted reproductive technology (ART) may be a possible risk factor for the development of epimutation-mediated imprinting disorders (epi-IDs) for mothers aged ≥ 30 years. However, whether ART or advanced parental age facilitates the development of uniparental disomy-mediated IDs (UPD-IDs) has not yet been investigated.

RESULTS

We enrolled 130 patients with aneuploid UPD-IDs including various IDs confirmed by molecular studies and obtained ART data of the general population and patients with epi-IDs from a robust nationwide database and our previous report, respectively. We compared the proportion of ART-conceived livebirths and maternal childbearing age between patients with UPD-IDs and the general population or patients with epi-IDs. The proportion of ART-conceived livebirths in patients with aneuploid UPD-IDs was consistent with that in the general population of maternal age ≥ 30 years and was lower than that in the patients with epi-IDs, although there was no significant difference. The maternal childbearing age of patients with aneuploid UPD-IDs was skewed to the increased ages with several cases exceeding the 97.5th percentile of maternal childbearing age of the general population and significantly higher than that of patients with epi-IDs (P < 0.001). In addition, we compared the proportion of ART-conceived livebirths and parental age at childbirth between patients with UPD-IDs caused by aneuploid oocytes (oUPD-IDs) and that by aneuploid sperm (sUPD-IDs). Almost all ART-conceived livebirths were identified in patients with oUPD-IDs, and both maternal age and paternal age at childbirth were significantly higher in patients with oUPD-IDs than in patients with sUPD-IDs. Because maternal age and paternal age were strongly correlated (r_s = 0.637, P < 0.001), higher paternal age in oUPD-IDs was explained by the higher maternal age in this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Different from the case of epi-IDs, ART itself is not likely to facilitate the development of aneuploid UPD-IDs. We demonstrated that advanced maternal age can be a risk factor for the development of aneuploid UPD-IDs, particularly oUPD-IDs.