Perioperative opioid prescribing after male fertility procedures is associated with new persistent opioid use: retrospective analysis of a large claims database

Persistent Opioid Use Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: A Large Claims Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess risk of persistent opioid use and emergency department (ED) and office/outpatient visits following post-operative prescriptions of common opioids in patients following artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation using a nationwide claims database.

METHODS

The TriNetX US Collaborative Network, which encompasses over 115 million patients from 66 healthcare organizations was used to identify males who underwent first-time AUS placement between 2010-2024. Patients with history of opioid dependence/abuse, opioid use within 6 months prior to AUS placement, or surgery within 9 months post-operation were excluded. Patients were distributed into 2 cohorts: those who received opioids post-operatively or those that did not. Cohorts were propensity score matched on demographic characteristics, pain, mental health, and substance-related diagnoses. Primary outcome was risk of persistent opioid use 3-9 months post-operatively. Secondary outcomes included risk of ED or office/outpatient visit 30- and 90-days post-operatively.

RESULTS

Each cohort contained 1036 patients following application of exclusion criteria and propensity score matching. Post-operative Oxycodone, Hydrocodone, or Codeine had a 3-fold increase in risk of persistent opioid use at 3-9 months (15.15% vs 4.92%, RR=3.08, 95% CI=[2.27-4.17]). Risk of ED or office visits was not significantly lower in patients receiving these opioids.

CONCLUSION

Opioid prescriptions following AUS placement increase risk of persistent opioid use without lowering the risk of ED or outpatient visits. These findings highlight the necessity for opioid-sparing approaches to post-operative pain control following AUS placement.

Racial Disparities in Diagnosis and Treatment of Depression Associated with Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze potential racial disparities in the diagnosis and management of depression associated with androgen deprivation therapy.

METHODS

TriNetX health record network was queried for prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy from 2003-2023. Differences in rates of depression diagnosis and treatment were compared between White and Black patients. Means, odds ratios, and t tests were calculated in univariate analysis with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Data were queried from 93 health care organizations to yield 78,313 prostate cancer patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Patients on androgen deprivation therapy had 60% greater odds of developing depression vs other patients [9% vs 6%; odds ratio (OR) 1.6; 95% CI (1.5-1.7); P <.0001]. Of those with depression secondary to androgen deprivation therapy, only 35% were treated with antidepressants. After starting androgen deprivation therapy, White patients had 30% greater odds of being diagnosed with depression, compared to Black patients [10% vs 8%; OR 1.3; 95% CI (1.2-1.4); P <.001]. White patients also had higher odds of being treated with a first line antidepressant than Black patients [56% vs 48%; OR 1.4, 95% CI (1.2-1.6), P <.001].

CONCLUSION

This analysis confirms a significant association between androgen deprivation therapy and the development of clinical depression, and highlights its medical undertreatment. Importantly, our findings also indicate significant racial disparities in the identification and treatment of depression. Routine screening initiatives that account for social determinants of health may alleviate this disparity. Limitations of this study include retrospective design and lack of data describing severity of depression, which might correlate with need for medication.