Comparison of orthotopic and heterotopic autologous ovarian tissue transplantation outcomes

Trends and Regional Differences for Fertility Preservation Procedures in Women With Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women of reproductive age and chemotherapy protocols impair fertility, frequently necessitating fertility preservation (FP) referral. Embryo, oocyte, or ovarian tissue cryopreservation are established FP modalities in women with breast cancer but there are few data on their uptake over time. In this study our aim was to determine the regional time trends and utility differences for fertility preservation methods of reproductive tissue cryopreservation.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 1623 women diagnosed with breast cancer from 7 tertiary centers in 6 countries (Brazil, Italy, Scotland, South Korea, Turkey, USA). Participant centers provided the details of FP cryopreservation approaches broken down annually from 2012 to 2021. Women with newly diagnosed breast cancer, aged 18-45 years who were referred for FP at participating centers and had normal ovarian function at the time were included.

RESULTS

We found a mean increase of 7% per year (P = .002, adjusting for centers) in the number of women referred for FP. Of those who were referred (n = 1623), a mean 38.7% underwent FP (n = 629), with a range of 12% in South Korea) to 95% in Brazil. The number of women undergoing ovarian stimulation for FP continually increased until 2021, with oocyte cryopreservation being the most common procedure throughout the study period (P = .014 for time trend). The proportion of random start ovarian stimulation cycles increased each year from 58.3% in 2012 to 86.8% in 2021, (P = .005 for time trend, and P = .04 for 2012 vs. 2021).

CONCLUSIONS

The utility of FP has steadily increased for young women with breast cancer over the last decade, although regional differences significantly influence FP practices. The findings of our study could have value for policy making in FP care for young women with breast cancer at the local, regional, or global level.

Classification system of human ovarian follicle morphology: recommendations of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development - sponsored ovarian nomenclature workshop

OBJECTIVE

To develop a consensus on histologic human ovarian follicle staging nomenclature, provide guidelines for follicle density calculation, and assess changes due to fixation to enhance communication among clinicians and ovarian biology researchers to gain a deeper understanding of human fertility.

SETTING

Beginning in March 2021, the Ovarian Nomenclature Workshop's Follicle Classification Working Subgroup was organized by the Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

METHODS

After the initial workshop held in May 2021, a Follicle Working Subgroup comprised of experts in reproductive endocrinology and ovarian biology held multiple meetings to develop the human follicle classification system and reported to the collective group during two follow up workshops.

RESULT(S)

The Follicle Working Subgroup recommends consolidation and expansion of the current classification systems to include six stages of normal preantral follicles, five stages of normal antral follicles, as well as categories of corpus lutea, abnormal preantral follicles, abnormal antral follicles, and other distinct follicle types. The new preantral staging added intermediate stages (primordial, transitional primordial, primary, transitional primary, secondary, and multilayer ovarian follicles). The antral follicle staging includes early, preselection, selection, dominance, and preovulatory follicles. Abnormal preantral follicles include those with an abnormal oocyte, granulosa cells, or both. We suggest a uniform way of calculating the mean follicle density in the number of follicles/mm2.

CONCLUSION(S)

To establish a consensus in human ovarian follicle terminology, the Ovarian Follicle Working Subgroup of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Ovarian Nomenclature Workshop standardized follicle staging nomenclature and follicle density calculating systems so consistent common language can be used among ovarian biology researchers and clinicians.

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation as a natural means to delay menopause

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (OTCT) offers hope for preserving fertility and endocrine functions in patients undergoing gonadotoxic treatments. Advancements in techniques for the procedure have transformed OTCT from an experimental procedure into a viable option. There is a growing interest in utilizing OTCT to delay menopause and alleviate associated health issues. Menopausal transition affects women globally, leading to symptoms and long- term health risks. OTCT has the potential to restore endocrine functions, reducing menopause-related symptoms while mitigating health consequences such as osteoporosis and cardiovascular diseases. Although the use of OTCT for delaying menopause is not clinically proven, the discussion around shows potential for future utilization. In essence, the remarkable advancements in OTCT have bestowed upon us the ability to safeguard fertility and sustain the delicate endocrine functions of the ovaries. However, it is the tantalizing prospect of utilizing this technique to postpone menopause and alleviate its associated symptoms that truly captivates the imagination. Further research is imperative to substantiate the clinical efficacy of OTCT; nonetheless, its potential in menopausal therapy is both promising and warrants comprehensive exploration. This review highlights advancements and the feasibility of OTCT to postpone menopause as an alternative approach to currently used conventional menopause therapy methods.

Utility and Outcomes of Ovarian Tissue Cryopreservation and Transplantation for Gynecologic Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility, success, and safety of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation for fertility preservation in patients with gynecologic cancers.

DATA SOURCES

A comprehensive search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov , and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies on the utility and outcomes of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation for gynecologic cancers from inception until January 23, 2024.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, data extraction, and risk-of-bias assessment, and the results were then reviewed together. Twenty-three studies were included in the current systematic review.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The resultant data were meta-analyzed to produce a pooled-effect estimate of the utility of ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous transplantation in gynecologic cancers as a proportion of all indications. We found that 7.5% and 9.6% of women undergoing ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous transplantation, respectively, had gynecologic cancers. In comparison, hematologic malignancies and breast cancer accounted for approximately 66.0% of all indications for these procedures. The return rate for autologous cryopreserved ovarian tissue transplantation in gynecologic cancers (6.0%) was not statistically different from those for other indications. Among women with gynecologic cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation, 27.3% had at least one child, and the ovarian endocrine function was restored in 78.1% of the women after autologous transplantation. The median graft longevity was 32 months, and no graft-site recurrence was reported after autologous transplantation in women with gynecologic cancer.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that ovarian tissue cryopreservation and autologous transplantation are feasible options for preserving ovarian function in women with gynecologic cancers, although ovarian tissue cryopreservation is underutilized, and further studies are needed to determine the longer-term outcomes of autologous transplantation.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42024498522.

Premature ovarian insufficiency

Premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) is a cause of infertility and endocrine dysfunction in women, defined by loss of normal, predictable ovarian activity before the age of 40 years. POI is clinically characterized by amenorrhoea (primary or secondary) with raised circulating levels of follicle-stimulating hormone. This condition can occur due to medical interventions such as ovarian surgery or cytotoxic cancer therapy, metabolic and lysosomal storage diseases, infections, chromosomal anomalies and autoimmune diseases. At least 1 in 100 women is affected by POI, including 1 in 1,000 before the age of 30 years. Substantial evidence suggests a genetic basis to POI. However, the cause of idiopathic POI remains unknown in most patients, indicating that gene variants associated with this condition remain to be discovered. Over the past 10 years, tremendous progress has been made in our knowledge of genes involved in POI. Genetic approaches in diagnosis are important as they enable patients with familial POI to be identified, with the opportunity for oocyte preservation. Moreover, genetic approaches could provide a better understanding of disease mechanisms, which will ultimately aid the development of improved treatments.

Heterotopic ovarian transplantation instead hormonal replacement therapy after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: case report and review of literature

PURPOSE

Only a few case reports have described heterotopic ovarian tissue transplantation (OTT) with the only objective of restoring ovarian function.

METHODS

Case report and review of the literature for reporting cases of heterotopic OTT with the only aim of restoring ovarian endocrine function. In a cancer survivor woman with a history of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy for cervical cancer and because she poorly tolerated hormone replacement therapy (HRT), we performed a heterotopic OTT in a pelvic subcutaneous "pocket" after an OT cryostorage of 17 years.

RESULTS

A cyclic ovarian endocrine function started 3 months after OTT with an immediate patient self-described improvement of her quality of life. A second OTT was performed 19 months after, due to hot flushes recurrence and FSH increase. Despite a cyclic endocrine function, progesterone levels have always been low, resulting in a relative hyperoestrogenism state.

CONCLUSION

In the future, the indications of heterotopic OTT could be spread in alternative to HRT. However, our data suggest that the heterotopic graft environment is less favorable to corpus luteum development, and further studies are needed to assay the best site of heterotopic graft, the optimal number of ovarian cortex fragments to graft, and the potential risk of relapse in case of malignant residual disease.

Maximizing Success: An Overview of Optimizing the Ovarian Tissue Transplantation Site

Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (OTCT) has emerged in recent years as a potential method for reversing abnormal endocrine and reproductive functions, particularly in patients receiving gonadotoxic cancer treatments having longer survival rates. From its first rodent experiments to human trials, OTCT has evolved tremendously, opening new windows for further utilization. Since then, significant progress has been achieved in terms of techniques used for surgical removal of the tissue, optimal fragment size, freezing and thawing procedures, and appropriate surgical sites for the subsequent reimplementation of the graft. In addition, various approaches have been proposed to decrease the risk of ischemic injury, which is the leading cause of significant follicle loss during neo-angiogenesis. This review aims to discuss the pros and cons of ovarian and retroperitoneal transplantation sites, highlighting the justifications for the viability and efficacy of different transplantation sites as well as the potential advantages and drawbacks of retroperitoneal or preperitoneal area.

Oncofertility care for children, adolescents, and young adults at risk for treatment-related fertility loss

As therapy for childhood malignancies becomes more sophisticated and survival has improved, long-term therapy-related sequelae have emerged. Loss of reproductive potential among childhood cancer survivors is one such concern that has become increasingly recognized among patients, families, and healthcare providers. The risk status for infertility based upon therapy received, state of current reproductive technology and outcomes, and an emphasis on adequate referral and counseling for fertility preservation options are reviewed. Contributing factors to infertility are discussed, and options for female and male preservation based upon age and pubertal status are summarized. This article highlights the current state of fertility opportunities for children and adolescents undergoing therapy for cancer. Providers caring for these young patients should be familiar with such options and should routinely initiate evaluations for eligibility of fertility preservation.

The Shared Ovary: A Multidisciplinary Discussion With Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology

Pediatric and adolescent ovarian lesions are common and are frequently managed by both pediatric surgeons and pediatric and adolescent gynecologists. During the 2023 American Academy of Pediatric Section on Surgery meeting, an educational symposium was delivered focusing on various aspects of management of pediatric and adolescent benign and malignant masses, borderline lesions, and fertility options for children and adolescents undergoing cancer therapies. This article highlights the discussion during this symposium.

Oncofertility as an Essential Part of Comprehensive Cancer Treatment in Patients of Reproductive Age, Adolescents and Children

The number of children, adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer has been rising recently. Various oncological treatments have a detrimental effect on female fertility, and childbearing becomes a major issue during surveillance after recovery. This review discusses the impact of oncological treatments on the ovarian reserve with a thorough explanation of oncologic treatments' effects and modes of oncofertility procedures. The aim of this review is to help clinicians in making an informed decision about post-treatment fertility in their patients. Ultimately, it may lead to improved overall long-term outcomes among young populations suffering from cancer.