Inactivation kinetics of pulsed electric field-resistant strains of Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in media of different pH

Application of electric field treatment (EFT) for microbial control in water and liquid food

Water disinfection and food pasteurization are critical to reducing waterborne and foodborne diseases, which have been a pressing public health issue globally. Electrified treatment processes are emerging and have become promising alternatives due to the low cost of electricity, independence of chemicals, and low potential to form by-products. Electric field treatment (EFT) is a physical pathogen inactivation approach, which damages cell membrane by irreversible electroporation. EFT has been studied for both water disinfection and food pasteurization. However, no study has systematically connected the two fields with an up-to-date review. In this article, we first provide a comprehensive background of microbial control in water and food, followed by the introduction of EFT. Subsequently, we summarize the recent EFT studies for pathogen inactivation from three aspects, the processing parameters, its efficacy against different pathogens, and the impact of liquid properties on the inactivation performance. We also review the development of novel configurations and materials for EFT devices to address the current challenges of EFT. This review introduces EFT from an engineering perspective and may serve as a bridge to connect the field of environmental engineering and food science.

Effect of Moderate Intensity Pulsed Electric Field on Shelf-life of Chicken Breast Meat

Moderate intensity pulsed electric field (MIPEF) is a fairly new research topic for microbial inactivation on muscle foods. In this study, indirect application of MIPEF (2.5 kV/cm, 4.67 kV/cm, 7 kV/cm) was evaluated in terms of the growth of some pathogenic bacteria and the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat during cold storage (4°C). Broth cultures of E. coli and C. jejuni showed a remarkable resistance to MIPEF under 4.67 kV/cm and 7 kV/cm, respectively. The limit for total mesophilic aerobic bacteria (TMAB) count was exceeded in 4.67 and 7 kV/cm applied groups 2 days later than control (C). In the end, almost 2 log differences were determined for total coliform bacteria in 4.67 and 7 kV/cm applied groups as compared to C (p<0.05). Inoculated P. aeruginosa count remained the same whereas L. monocytogenes growth was promoted by 4.67 kV/cm (p<0.05). pH value, CIE L*, b*, C* color values of chicken breast fillets were not affected by MIPEF application while ΔE values showed the maximum change in the C group. This study demonstrated that improved shelf-life of chicken breast fillets was provided by moderate intensity DC-pulses in combination with cold storage.

Influence of processing parameters and stress adaptation on the inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes by Non-Thermal Atmospheric Plasma (NTAP)

This study evaluated the effectiveness of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Plasma (NTAP) treatments against Listeria. Firstly, the impact of gas composition and flow rate on L. monocytogenes and L. innocua (used as a surrogate) inactivation by NTAP was monitored. Secondly, the influence of stress adaptation (growth under suboptimal conditions, using a wide range of temperatures and media acidified up to pH5.5 with citric, lactic, malic or hydrochloric acid, or short-term exposure to acid, cold or thermal shocks) on L. monocytogenes NTAP resistance was assessed. Survival curves obtained were concave upward. A mathematical model based on the Weibull distribution accurately described the inactivation kinetics. Both L. monocytogenes and L. innocua showed a higher sensitivity to plasma when the treatment was performed using air than when nitrogen was used. In fact, the use of nitrogen as working gas made the plasma treatment almost ineffective. The effect of gas flow rate on the effectiveness of the NTAP treatment depended on the type of gas used to generate plasma. Increases in flow rate from 5 to 10L/min caused an acceleration of bacterial inactivation when air was used, while an additional increase of gas flow from 10 to 15L/min had a minor impact on microbial inactivation. On the other hand, gas flow rate hardly affected NTAP treatment efficiency when nitrogen was used to generate plasma. L. monocytogenes growth under sub-optimal temperature or pH conditions or short-term exposure to acid, heat or cold stress conditions did not significantly modify its NTAP resistance. This suggests that temperature and pH stress adaptation does not induce a cross-protection response against NTAP treatments in L. monocytogenes, what makes NTAP an attractive technology for food decontamination within minimal processing strategies targeting this pathogenic microorganism.

Comparative Resistance of Bacterial Foodborne Pathogens to Non-thermal Technologies for Food Preservation

In this paper the resistance of bacterial foodborne pathogens to manosonication (MS), pulsed electric fields (PEFs), high hydrostatic pressure (HHP), and UV-light (UV) is reviewed and compared. The influence of different factors on the resistance of bacterial foodborne pathogens to these technologies is also compared and discussed. Only results obtained under harmonized experimental conditions have been considered. This has allowed us to establish meaningful comparisons and draw significant conclusions. Among the six microorganisms here considered, Staphyloccocus aureus is the most resistant foodborne pathogen to MS and HHP and Listeria monocytogenes to UV. The target microorganism of PEF would change depending on the treatment medium pH. Thus, L. monocytogenes is the most PEF resistant microorganism at neutral pH but Gram-negatives (Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., Cronobacter sakazakii, Campylobacter jejuni) would display a similar or even higher resistance at acidic pH. It should be noted that, in acidic products, the baroresistance of some E. coli strains would be comparable to that of S. aureus. The factors affecting the resistance of bacterial foodborne pathogens, as well as the magnitude of the effect, varied depending on the technology considered. Inter- and intra-specific differences in microbial resistance to PEF and HHP are much greater than to MS and UV. Similarly, both the pH and aw of the treatment medium highly condition microbial resistance to PEF and HHP but no to MS or UV. Growth phase also drastically affected bacterial HHP resistance. Regarding UV, the optical properties of the medium are, by far, the most influential factor affecting its lethal efficacy. Finally, increasing treatment temperature leads to a significant increase in lethality of the four technologies, what opens the possibility of the development of combined processes including heat. The appearance of sublethally damaged cells following PEF and HHP treatments could also be exploited in order to design combined processes. Further work would be required in order to fully elucidate the mechanisms of action of these technologies and to exhaustively characterize the influence of all the factors acting before, during, and after treatment. This would be very useful in the areas of process optimization and combined process design.

Inactivation and sublethal injury kinetics of Staphylococcus aureus in broth at low temperature storage

Low temperatures are widely used to ensure food quality and safety. However, sublethally injured Staphylococcus aureus is an important microbiological safety concern in low temperature food. The objective of this study was to develop predictive inactivation kinetic models for the inactivation and sublethal injury of S. aureus in broth at different temperatures (4 to -18°C) and time points. S. aureus was diluted in tryptic soy broth plus 0.6% (wt/vol) yeast extract (TSBYE) to obtain approximately 10(8) CFU/ml and was stored separately at 4, -3, -11, and -18°C. After specific time points within 96 days, survival of S. aureus was determined on TSBYE and TSBYE agar plus 10% NaCl for enumeration of the total viable and noninjured cell numbers, respectively. Linear, Weibull, and modified Gompertz models were applied to determine survival curve regression. The combination of low temperature and time resulted in S. aureus inactivation, although the cells were able to survive in this sublethal state. Storage temperature was the critical parameter in survival of S. aureus. The modified Weibull model successfully described a second model of noninjured S. aureus cell survival at different low temperatures, whereas only the linear model was able to fit the total viable cells. The predictive model may be used to estimate the level of S. aureus contamination in food at low storage temperatures and times, and it provides new insight into the sublethally injured survival state of S. aureus in low temperature food.