Methodological evaluation of DNA-based molecular keys to identify categories of mislabelling in commercial products from genus Merluccius spp

DNA Barcode Identification of Fish Products from Guiyang Markets in Southwestern People's Republic of China

ABSTRACT

Global fish consumption is increasing in tandem with population growth, resulting in the dilemma of overfishing. Overfished high-value fish are often replaced with other fish in markets. Therefore, the accurate identification of fish products in the market is important. In this study, full-DNA and mini-DNA barcoding were used to detect fish product fraud in Guiyang, Guizhou Province, People's Republic of China. The molecular results revealed that 39 (20.42%) of the 191 samples were inconsistent with the labels. The percentages of mislabeling of fresh, frozen, cooked, and canned fish products were 11.70, 20.00, 34.09, and 50.00%, respectively. The average Kimura two-parameter distances of mini-DNA barcoding within species and within genera were 0.56 and 6.42%, respectively, and those of full-DNA barcoding were 0.53 and 7.25%, respectively. Commercial fraud was evident in this study; most high-priced fish were replaced with low-priced fish with similar features. Our findings indicate that DNA barcoding is an effective tool for identifying fish products and could be used to enhance transparency and fair trade in domestic fisheries.

HIGHLIGHTS

Fraud in highly appreciated fish detected from DNA in Europe may undermine the Development Goal of sustainable fishing in Africa

Despite high effort for food traceability to ensure safe and sustainable consumption, mislabeling persists on seafood markets. Determining what drives deliberate fraud is necessary to improve food authenticity and sustainability. In this study, the relationship between consumer's appreciation and fraudulent mislabeling was assessed through a combination of a survey on consumer's preferences (N = 1608) and molecular tools applied to fish samples commercialized by European companies. We analyzed 401 samples of fish highly consumed in Europe and worldwide (i.e. tuna, hake, anchovy, and blue whiting) through PCR-amplification and sequencing of a suite of DNA markers. Results revealed low mislabeling rate (1.9%), with a higher mislabeling risk in non-recognizable products and significant mediation of fish price between consumer´s appreciation and mislabeling risk of a species. Furthermore, the use of endangered species (e.g. Thunnus thynnus), tuna juveniles for anchovy, and still not regulated Merluccius polli hake as substitutes, points towards illegal, unreported and/or unregulated fishing from African waters. These findings reveal a worrying intentional fraud that hampers the goal of sustainable seafood production and consumption, and suggest to prioritize control efforts on highly appreciated species.

Phylogenetic prospecting for cryptic species of the genus Merluccius (Actinopterygii: Merlucciidae)

Hakes of the genus Merluccius include 11 valid species as well a number of rare morphotypes suspected to be "cryptic species". Concatenated nucDNA ITS1-rDNA and mtDNA cyt b sequences plus nested ITS1Nes sequences allowed to ascribe 14 specimens of nine rare morphotypes from the South Pacific and the South Atlantic to the phylogenetic backbone of this genus. Bayesian analyses pointed to M. bilinearis and M. albidus as the oldest species of the genus and the New World cluster, respectively. The phylogenetic status of M. angustimanus from the upper Gulf of California suggests its hybrid origin between M. gayi and M. productus from about 0.25 MYA, although an ever since confinement of a subset of those species cannot be ruled out. The molecular phylodiagnostic test suggests a common origin of all rare morphotypes and the absence of cryptic hake species in the Southern Cone. The molecular background of the morphotypes distributed between the Western Pacific South of New Zealand and the western Atlantic South of Argentina is compatible with their hybrid origin between M. gayi and both, M. australis or M. hubbsi, respectively.

Fish-Based Baby Food Concern-From Species Authentication to Exposure Risk Assessment

In this work, two different but complementary approaches were used to evaluate the reliability of fish-based baby foods as a source of safe nourishment for babies. More specifically, barcoding analysis based on the Cytochrome Oxidase I sequences was used for fish species authentication and an analysis of metal/metalloid levels was performed to estimate the exposure risk assessment derived from consumption of selected fish-based baby food in infants and toddlers. COI DNA barcoding revealed that in three samples the species detected did not match the common name of the species shown on the label. In particular, G. chalcogrammus and M. australis were found in place of M. merluccius and O. mykiss was found in place of S. salar. The analysis of exposure risk assessment indicated a low risk for developing chronic systemic and carcinogenic effects in infants and toddler, under an exposure scenario based on daily consumption of a single box of fish-based baby food. However, it is important to highlight that in order to provide a comprehensive risk assessment it would be important to supplement the levels of exposure resulting from the total diet. Overall, our results suggest that more attention should be paid by authorities to ensure the safety of food for infants and toddlers.