Validation of Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a surrogate for Listeria monocytogenes on fresh apples during pilot spray-bar peroxyacetic acid intervention

Assessing the efficacy of sanitizer sprays during brush or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) roller treatment to reduce Salmonella populations on whole mangoes

Sanitizer spray and brush roller treatments have been documented as an effective means of reducing Salmonella on the surface of produce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of chlorine (NaOCl), peroxyacetic acid (PAA), and chlorine dioxide (ClO2) sprays to reduce Salmonella populations on the surface of mangoes during washing with brush or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) rollers. Whole mangoes were spot inoculated with 100 µL of a rifampicin-resistant Salmonella (8 log CFU/mL) cocktail at the equator and dried for 1 h. Mangoes were washed with a lab-scale roller system with either ground water (control), or sanitizers (100 ppm NaOCl, 80 ppm PAA, or 5 ppm ClO2) for 0, 5, 15, 30, or 60 s (n = 15 mangoes). Dey/Engley buffer (100 mL) was used to rinse mangoes before plating on media supplemented with rifampicin. NaOCl, PAA, and ClO2 spray (except for ClO2 at 30 s) had significantly higher reduction on Salmonella population than water spray at all treatment times (P ≤ 0.05) when brush rollers were used. All tested sanitizers also achieved a significantly higher reduction than water at 5 s when PVC rollers were used (P ≤ 0.05). Salmonella reductions achieved by brush and PVC rollers was not statistically different (P > 0.05). After a 5 s treatment on brush and PVC rollers, NaOCl, PAA, and ClO2 spray had ca. 3.03 and 3.45 log, 3.96 and 3.28 log, and 2.54 and 2.00 log CFU/mango reductions, respectively, whereas water spray achieved 1.75 and 0.98 log CFU/mango reduction. Addition of sanitizers to spray water used during brush or PVC washing in mango packinghouses can reduce Salmonella on mango surfaces.

Evaluation of Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a surrogate for Listeria monocytogenes during chlorine and peroxyacetic acid interventions in simulated apple dump tank water

Sanitizers are widely incorporated in commercial apple dump tank systems to mitigate the cross-contamination of foodborne pathogens. This study validated the suitability of Enterococcus faecium NRRL B-2354 as a surrogate for Listeria monocytogenes during sanitizer interventions in dump tank water systems. E. faecium NRRL B-2354 inoculated on apples exhibited statistically equivalent susceptibility to L. monocytogenes when exposed to chlorine-based sanitizers (25-100 ppm free chlorine (FC)) and peroxyacetic acid (PAA, 20-80 ppm) in simulated dump tank water (SDTW) with 1000 ppm chemical oxygen demand (COD), resulting in 0.2-0.9 and 1.1-1.7 log CFU/apple reduction, respectively. Increasing the contact time did not affect sanitizer efficacies against E. faecium NRRL B-2354 and L. monocytogenes on apples. Chlorine and PAA interventions demonstrated statistically similar efficacies against both bacteria inoculated in SDTW. Chlorine at 25 and 100 ppm FC for 0.5-5 min contact yielded ~37.68-78.25 % and > 99.85 % inactivation, respectively, in water with 1000-4000 ppm COD, while ~51.55-99.86 % and > 99.97 % inactivation was observed for PAA at 20 and 80 ppm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the transference of E. faecium NRRL B-2354 and L. monocytogenes from inoculated apples to uninoculated apples and water, and from water to uninoculated apples during chlorine- or PAA-treated SDTW exposure. The data suggest E. faecium NRRL B-2354 is a viable surrogate for L. monocytogenes in dump tank washing systems, which could be used to predict the anti-Listeria efficacy of chlorine and PAA interventions during commercial apple processing. Further investigations are recommended to assess the suitability of E. faecium NRRL B-2354 as a surrogate for L. monocytogenes, when using different sanitizers and different types of produce to ensure reliable and comprehensive results.

Inactivation kinetics of selected pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria by aqueous ozone to validate minimum usage in purified water

Ozone is often used as an antimicrobial agent at the final step in purified water processing. When used in purified bottled water manufacturing, residual ozone should not exceed 0.4 mg/L, per US-FDA regulations. These regulations require the control of Escherichia coli and other coliform bacteria; however, non-coliform pathogens can contaminate bottled water. Hence, it is prudent to test the efficacy of ozone against such pathogens to determine if the regulated ozone level adequately ensures the safety of the product. Inactivation of selected pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria in purified water was investigated as a function of ozone dose, expressed in Ct units (mg O3*min/L). Bacterial species tested were Enterococcus faecium, E. coli (two serotypes), Listeria monocytogenes (three strains), Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Salmonella enterica (three serovars). Resulting dose (Ct)-response (reduction in populations' log10 CFU/mL) relationships were mostly linear with obvious heteroscedasticity. This heteroscedastic relationship required developing a novel statistical approach to analyze these data so that the lower bound of the dose-response relationships can be determined and appropriate predictive models for such a bound can be formulated. An example of this analysis was determining the 95%-confidence lower bound equation for the pooled dose-responses of all tested species; the model can be presented as follows: Logpopulationreduction = 3.80Ct + 1.84. Based on this relationship, application ozone at a Ct of 0.832 and 21°C achieves ≥ 5-log reduction in the population of any of the tested pathogenic and non-pathogenic bacteria. This dose can be implemented by applying ozone at 0.832 mg/L for 1 min, 0.416 mg/L for 2 min, or other combinations. The study also proved the suitability of E. faecium ATCC 8459 as a surrogate strain for the pathogens tested in the current study for validating water decontamination processes by ozone. In conclusion, the study findings can be usefully implemented in processing validation of purified water and possibly other water types.

Enhancing the efficacy of peracetic acid against Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua on fresh apples using commercial acidic and alkaline cleaners

Peracetic acid (PAA) is a commonly used antimicrobial in brush-bed spray bar interventions during apple packing. Prior to sanitizer application on the brush-bed, specific fruit cleaners, such as Acidex Duo (AD), EpiClean (EC), Nature's Shield 220-ACL (NS 220), or Nature's Shield 330-ALK (NS 330), are used to remove of soil, debris, and natural wax from the surfaces of apples. This study evaluated the effectiveness of commonly used cleaners in the apple industry to improve the antimicrobial efficacy of PAA against Listeria monocytogenes on apple surfaces during brush-bed spray bar interventions. Granny Smith apples, 48 h post-inoculation, underwent submersion treatment with different cleaners, as well as PAA alone or in combination with the cleaners. A 30-sec treatment of 5.0% AD, 4.2% EC, 10.0% NS 220, and 10.0% NS 330 resulted in 0.65, 0.50, 0.68, and 0.51 log10 CFU/apple reduction of L. monocytogenes on apples, respectively. Incorporating AD, NS 220, and EC significantly enhanced the antimicrobial efficacy of an 80 ppm PAA intervention. The enhancing effects were not impacted whether the cleaner was applied consecutively with PAA (sequentially) or in combination with PAA (simultaneously), nor were they impacted by a post-treatment water rinse. A 30-120 s wash of 80 ppm PAA with AD, EC, and NS 220 at their suggested concentration resulted in 2.46-2.55, 1.87-2.03, and 2.34-2.48 log10 CFU/apple reduction of L. monocytogenes, respectively, compared to 1.39-1.64 log10 CFU/apple in PAA treatment alone. The inclusion of AD or NS 220 in 80 ppm PAA solution resulted in a reduction of 1.51-1.63 log10 CFU/apple of Listeria after 30-60 s brush-bed spray wash. This enhancement in efficacy was significant compared to the treatment with 80 ppm PAA alone, which resulted in a reduction of 0.94-1.03 log10 CFU/apple. This study demonstrated that using certain commercially available cleaners along with PAA can enhance the effectiveness of PAA in reducing L. monocytogenes on fresh apples.

Exploring Peracetic Acid and Acidic pH Tolerance of Antibiotic-Resistant Non-Typhoidal Salmonella and Enterococcus faecium from Diverse Epidemiological and Genetic Backgrounds

Acid stress poses a common challenge for bacteria in diverse environments by the presence of inorganic (e.g., mammals' stomach) or organic acids (e.g., feed additives; acid-based disinfectants). Limited knowledge exists regarding acid-tolerant strains of specific serotypes, clonal lineages, or sources in human/animal pathogens: namely, non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica (NTS) and Enterococcus faecium (Efm). This study evaluated the acidic pH (Mueller-Hinton acidified with HCl) and peracetic acid (PAA) susceptibility of Efm (n = 72) and NTS (n = 60) from diverse epidemiological/genetic backgrounds and with multiple antibiotic resistance profiles. Efm minimum growth/survival pH was 4.5-5.0/3.0-4.0, and for NTS it was 4.0-4.5/3.5-4.0. Efm distribution among acidic pH values showed that only isolates of clade-non-A1 (non-hospital associated) or the food chain were more tolerant to acidic pH compared to clade-A1 (hospital-associated clones) or clinical isolates (p < 0.05). In the case of NTS, multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates survived better in acidic pH (p < 0.05). The PAA MIC/MBC for Efm was 70-120/80-150 mg/L, and for NTS, it was 50-70/60-100 mg/L. The distribution of Efm among PAA concentrations showed that clade-A1 or MDR strains exhibited higher tolerance than clade-non-A1 or non-MDR ones (p < 0.05). NTS distribution also showed higher tolerance to PAA among non-MDR and clinical isolates than food chain ones (p < 0.05) but there were no differences among different serogroups. This unique study identifies specific NTS or Efm populations more tolerant to acidic pH or PAA, emphasizing the need for further research to tailor controlled measures of public health and food safety within a One Health framework.

Listeria monocytogenes Outbreaks Related to Commercially Produced Caramel Apples: Developments in Sanitation, Product Formulation, and Packaging: A Review

ABSTRACT

Prior to a deadly 2014 listeriosis outbreak, caramel apples were not thought to be vehicles for the foodborne pathogen Listeria monocytogenes. The purpose of this review article is to summarize what has been learned from research prompted by this outbreak. This overview includes descriptions of the two L. monocytogenes infection outbreaks related to prepackaged caramel apples and a brief discussion of apple sanitation, the production processes used to make caramel apples, and research on ways to prevent future outbreaks associated with caramel apples. A qualitative analysis of the literature and interviews with current caramel apple manufacturers were conducted. Sanitation, packaging, and storage procedures used by manufacturers in the past may not effectively inactivate L. monocytogenes from contaminated product. Novel apple sanitation methods and product formulations to control L. monocytogenes on caramel apples have been developed and, in some cases, implemented in commercial production.

HIGHLIGHTS

Practical in-storage interventions to control foodborne pathogens on fresh produce

Although tremendous efforts have been made to ensure fresh produce safety, various foodborne outbreaks and recalls occur annually. Most of the current intervention strategies are evaluated within a short timeframe (less than 1 h), leaving the behavior of the remaining pathogens unknown during subsequent storages. This review summarized outbreak and recall surveillance data from 2009 to 2018 obtained from government agencies in the United States to identify major safety concerns associated with fresh produce, discussed the postharvest handling of fresh produce and the limitations of current antimicrobial interventions, and reviewed the intervention strategies that have the potential to be applied in each storage stage at the commercial scale. One long-term (up to 12 months) prepacking storage (apples, pears, citrus among others) and three short-term (up to 3 months) postpacking storages were identified. During the prepacking storage, continuous application of gaseous ozone at low doses (≤1 ppm) is a feasible option. Proper concentration, adequate circulation, as well as excess gas destruction and ventilation systems are essential to commercial application. At the postpacking storage stages, continuous inhibition can be achieved through controlled release of gaseous chlorine dioxide in packaging, antimicrobial edible coatings, and biocontrol agents. During commercialization, factors that need to be taken into consideration include physicochemical properties of antimicrobials, impacts on fresh produce quality and sensory attributes, recontamination and cross-contamination, cost, and feasibility of large-scale production. To improve fresh produce safety and quality during storage, the collaboration between researchers and the fresh produce industry needs to be improved.

Synergistic Effects of Lauric Arginate and Peracetic Acid in Reducing Listeria monocytogenes on Fresh Apples

Apples are naturally coated with a water-repelling hydrophobic wax layer, which may limit the antimicrobial efficacies of surface sanitizer solutions. Lauric arginate (LAE) is a cationic surfactant with antimicrobial efficacy against Listeria monocytogenes. In this study, we investigated the antimicrobial and the wettability effects of LAE in enhancing anti-L. monocytogenes efficacy of peracetic acid (PAA) and further verified the optimized treatment combinations in a pilot spray-bar brush bed system. Apples after 48 h of inoculation were treated with PAA surface sanitation in combination with different concentrations of LAE at 22 or 46°C. The effectiveness of PAA with LAE solutions in decontaminating L. monocytogenes significantly increased with the increased concentration of PAA (60-80 ppm) or LAE (0.01-0.05%) or the treatment temperature (from 22 to 46°C). A 30-120-sec wash by 80 ppm PAA with 0.01 and 0.05% LAE at 22°C reduced L. monocytogenes on apples by 2.10-2.25 and 2.48-2.58 log10 CFU/apple, respectively. Including LAE in the PAA solution decreased contact angles on apple surfaces. However, the increased wettability of the sanitizer solution may not be the main contributor to the enhanced antimicrobial efficacy of the PAA solution, given that the addition of Tween 80 or Tween 85 only slightly boosted the anti-L. monocytogenes efficacy of PAA solutions though both increased the wettability of the PAA solutions. The synergistic effects of PAA and LAE were further validated in a pilot spray-bar brush bed packing system, where a 30-sec spray wash with 80 ppm PAA and 0.05% LAE at 22 and 46°C caused 1.68 and 2.08 log reduction of Listeria on fresh apples, respectively. This study provides an improved PAA process/preventive strategy for ensuring microbial food safety of fresh apples that is applicable to commercial apple packing lines.