How many assessors are necessary for the Optimized Descriptive Profile when associated with training?

Study of the influence of line scale length (9 and 15 cm) on the sensory evaluations of two descriptive methods

The line scale is widely used in different lengths to quantify the intensity of descriptors in sensory evaluation. Since studies related to its size are still limited the objective was to determine what variables of descriptive sensory evaluation can be influenced when different scale length is considered in two different methods: Optimized Descriptive Profile (ODP) (low degree of training) and Conventional Profile (CP) (high degree of training). Five chocolate samples were evaluated by two panels, one using the 9 cm and the other using the 15 cm line scale. The panels performed the sensory analysis using the ODP and after the CP method. The following criteria were investigated: interaction between sample and evaluator, discriminative capacity, repeatability of results, and frequency of score use on the unstructured scale. The influence of scale length on sensory responses was similar in the two methods (ODP and CP). When comparing the two scales in both methods, it was observed that the 15 cm scale resulted in an improvement in discriminative capacity, reduction of interaction and the evaluators tended to distribute their ratings more evenly across this scale length. The repeatability of results showed a slight tendency to be better on the 9 cm scale.

Sensory Characteristics and Volatile Compounds of Herbal Teas and Mixtures of Bush Tea with Other Selected Herbal Teas of South Africa

South Africa has a traditional heritage of using indigenous herbal teas, and the demand for herbal teas motivated by the functional health benefits has far exceeded global supply. This has led to worldwide interest in the sensory characteristics and volatile compound characterisation of herbal drink formulations. The objective of this study was to investigate the descriptive sensory analysis and volatile compounds of bush, special, honeybush and rooibos tea and the blend of bush tea with special, honeybush and rooibos, respectively. The trained sensory panel scored each tea sample for aroma, taste, aftertaste and mouthfeel attributes using sensory evaluation practices. Compound identification was performed by gas chromatography connected to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS). The results of the study demonstrated that rooibos and honeybush tea had an overall sweet-caramel, honey-sweet, perfume floral and woody aroma while bush tea and special tea depicted green-cut grass, dry green herbal and astringent/dry mouth feel. The GC-MS analyses depicted the following compounds 2-furanmethanol, 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol, D-limonene, dihydroactinidolide, linalool, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, and phytol. The blending of bush tea with rooibos and honeybush tea toned down its astringent mouth feel. Compounds identified in this study may be useful markers for potential herbal tea sensory characteristics.

Validation of rapid descriptive sensory methods against conventional descriptive analyses: A systematic review

A major drawback of conventional descriptive profile (CDP) in sensory evaluation is the long time spent in panel training. Rapid descriptive methods (RDM) have increased significantly. Some of them have been compared with CDP for validation. In Health Sciences, systematic reviews (SR) are performed to evaluate validation of diagnostic tests in relation to a gold standard method. SR present a well-defined protocol to summarize research evidence and to evaluate the quality of the studies with determined criteria. We adapted SR protocol to evaluate the validation of RDM against CDP as satisfactory procedures to obtain food characterization. We used "Population Intervention Comparison Outcome Study - PICOS" framework to design the research in which "Population" was food/ beverages; "intervention" were RDM, "Comparison" was CDP as gold standard, "Outcome" was the ability of RDM to generate similar descriptive profiles in comparison with CDP and "Studies" was sensory descriptive analyses. The proportion of studies concluding for similarity of the RDM with CDP ranged from 0% to 100%. Low and moderate risk of bias were reached by 87% and 13% of the studies, respectively, supporting the conclusions of SR. RDM with semi-trained assessors and evaluation of individual attributes presented higher percentages of concordance with CDP.