Metatarsal bars more effective than metatarsal pads in reducing impulse on the second metatarsal head

State of the art design protocol for custom made footwear for people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy

Supported by evidence-based guidelines, custom-made footwear is often prescribed to people with diabetes who are at risk for ulceration. However, these guidelines do not specify the footwear design features, despite available scientific evidence for these features. We aimed to develop a design protocol to support custom-made footwear prescription for people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. The population of interest was people with diabetes who are at moderate-to-high risk of developing a foot ulcer, for whom custom-made footwear (shoes and/or insoles) can be prescribed. A group of experts from rehabilitation medicine, orthopaedic shoe technology (pedorthics) and diabetic foot research, reviewed the scientific literature and met during 12 face-to-face meetings to develop a footwear design algorithm and evidence-based pressure-relief algorithm as parts of the protocol. Consensus was reached where evidence was not available. Fourteen domains of foot pathology in combination with loss of protective sensation were specified for the footwear design algorithm and for each domain shoe-specific and insole (orthosis)-specific features were defined. Most insole-related features and some shoe-related features were evidence based, whereas most shoe-related features were consensus based. The pressure-relief algorithm was evidence based using recent footwear trial data and specifically targeted patients with a healed plantar foot ulcer. These footwear design and pressure-relief algorithms are the first of their kind and should facilitate more uniform decision making in the prescription and manufacturing of adequate shoes for moderate-to-high-risk patients, reducing variation in footwear provision and improving clinical outcome in the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers.

Scientific Evidence in the Treatment of Metatarsalgia

Metatarsalgia is a common foot disease with a multitude of causes. Proper identification of underlying diseases is mandatory to formulate an adequate treatment. Multiple surgical solutions are available to treat metatarsalgia. Only limited scientific evidence is available in the literature. However, most of the techniques used in the treatment of metatarsalgia seem to be reasonable with acceptable results.

[Forefoot relief with shoe inserts : Effects of different construction strategies]

BACKGROUND

Shoe inserts and shoe modifications are used to reduce plantar peak pressure. The effects of different shoe inserts and shoe construction strategies for relief of the forefoot have not yet been sufficiently evaluated.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of shoe inserts and shoe construction strategies (e.g. metatarsal pad, forefoot cushioning and control) and shoe modifications (e.g. flexible or stiff) on the peak plantar pressure in the forefoot region.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study 15 healthy subjects were recruited. Plantar pressure distribution was measured using an in-shoe system during walking (3.5km∙h^-1) on a treadmill and the average plantar peak pressure (kPa) in the forefoot was calculated. The statistics for testing the hypothesis were carried out using 2‑factorial ANOVA with repeat measurements (factors: shoe, insert; α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The metatarsal pad and forefoot cushioning led to a reduction of peak pressure, which was statistically significant compared to the control condition (p = 0.009). No differences were observed between both shoe inserts (p > 0.05). A comparison between stiff and flexible shoes revealed a statistically significant pressure reduction in favor of stiff shoes (p = 0.0001). The metatarsal pad led to a peak pressure increase in the midfoot of 12% and by 21% compared to control and forefoot cushioning, respectively.

DISCUSSION

A peak pressure reduction in the forefoot can be achieved with a metatarsal pad or with cushioning; however, the metatarsal pad resulted in a subsequent increase in midfoot pressure. Moreover, shoe construction is crucial because a stiff shoe contributes to a better peak pressure reduction compared to a flexible shoe. Prospective clinical studies should be carried out to prove whether this results in beneficial effects for patients with metatarsalgia.

Low Level Laser Therapy in patients with chronic foot and ankle joint pain

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic foot and ankle joint pain is one of the most frequent complaints which is regularly seen in the out-patient clinic of our medical institute. In previous studies we have reported on the benefits of low level laser therapy (LLLT) for chronic pain in the elbow, hand, finger and the lower back. The present study examined the effects of LLLT on chronic foot and ankle joint pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over the past 5 years, 17 subjects visited the out-patient clinic with complaints of chronic foot and ankle joint pain of a variety of aetiologies. The patients received LLLT using a 1000 mW semi-conductor laser device, delivering 20.1 J/cm2 per point at 830 nm in continuous wave. Each patient was given four shots per session per foot twice a week for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

A visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to determine the effects of LLLT for the chronic pain and after the end of the treatment regimen a significant improvement was observed (p < 0.01). All but 2 of the patients showed improvement: excellent (2) and good (13). After treatment, no significant differences were observed in the ankle joint range of motion, however. Discussions with the patients revealed that it was important for them to learn how to avoid overuse of the ankle when walking, poor walking posture and a poor pacing technique that would caused them foot and ankle pain in everyday life. Following these postural guidelines could ensure continuous benefits from the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated that LLLT was an effective form of treatment for chronic foot and ankle joint pain, in conjunction with postural education during all activities of daily living.

The effect of foot orthoses with forefoot cushioning or metatarsal pad on forefoot peak plantar pressure in running

Background

Foot orthoses are frequently used in sports for the treatment of overuse complaints with sufficient evidence available for certain foot-related overuse pathologies like plantar fasciitis, rheumatoid arthritis and foot pain (e.g., metatarsalgia). One important aim is to reduce plantar pressure under prominent areas like metatarsal heads. For the forefoot region, mainly two common strategies exist: metatarsal pad (MP) and forefoot cushioning (FC). The aim of this study was to evaluate which of these orthosis concepts is superior in reducing plantar pressure in the forefoot during running.

Methods

Twenty-three (13 female, 10 male) asymptomatic runners participated in this cross-sectional experimental trial. Participants ran in a randomised order under the two experimental (MP, FC) conditions and a control (C) condition on a treadmill (2.78 ms⁻¹) for 2 min, respectively. Plantar pressure was measured with the in-shoe plantar pressure measurement device pedar-x®-System and mean peak pressure averaged from ten steps in the forefoot (primary outcome) and total foot was analysed. Insole comfort was measured with the Insole Comfort Index (ICI, sum score 0–100) after each running trial. The primary outcome was tested using the Friedman test (α = 0.05). Secondary outcomes were analysed descriptively (mean ± SD, lower & upper 95%-CI, median and interquartile-range (IQR)).

Results

Peak pressure [kPa] in the forefoot was significantly lower wearing FC (281 ± 80, 95%-CI: 246–315) compared to both C (313 ± 69, 95%-CI: 283–343; p = .003) and MP (315 ± 80, 95%-CI: 280–350; p = .001). No significant difference was found between C and MP (p = .858). Peak pressures under the total foot were: C: 364 ± 82, 95%-CI: 328–399; MP: 357 ± 80, 95%-CI: 326–387; FC: 333 ± 81 95%-CI: 298–368. Median ICI sum scores were: C 50, MP 49, FC 64.

Conclusions

In contrast to the metatarsal pad orthosis, the forefoot cushioning orthosis achieved a significant reduction of peak pressure in the forefoot of recreational runners. Consequently, the use of a prefabricated forefoot cushioning orthosis should be favoured over a prefabricated orthosis with an incorporated metatarsal pad in recreational runners with normal height arches.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13047-016-0176-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Effect of rocker shoes on plantar pressure pattern in healthy female runners

Rocker profile shoes (rocker shoes) are one of the treatment options of metatarsalgia and forefoot stress fractures. The efficacy of rocker shoes in unloading the forefoot pressure has been shown in walking. In running, however, the effect of rocker shoes on forefoot pressure is unknown. Eighteen healthy female runners participated in this study. In-shoe plantar pressures were recorded during running with the standard running shoes and rocker shoes. Shoe comfort was assessed after each shoe measurement. Peak pressure (PP), maximum mean pressure (MMP) and force-time integral (FTI) were determined for seven foot areas. The effects of shoes on the different outcome variables were statistically analyzed using a linear mixed model. Running with the rocker shoes caused a significant reduction (p<0.001) in all pressure parameters in the central and lateral forefoot. FTI and MMP were also reduced by 11% and 12% in the medial forefoot while running with rocker shoes. Running with rocker shoes resulted in a significant increase in all pressure parameters at the heel region (p<0.001). Running with rocker shoes received a significant (p<0.01) lower comfort rate than running with standard running shoes. Rocker shoes might be beneficial for runners who are recovering from metatarsalgia or stress fractures of the forefoot region, as it reduces plantar pressure in the forefoot region.