Kastle-Meyer blood test reagents are deleterious to DNA

Switch-on near infrared emission in albumin behind dark fabric: toward application in forensic latent bloodstain detection

Latent bloodstain detection remains imperative for crime scene investigators. Widely used luminol offers high sensitivity to human blood, but can produce untrustworthy results from a bleach-cleaned crime scene or in a room not dark enough. Furthermore, dark pigments impede imaging bloodstains covered by dark materials with previously reported bloodstain detection agents. A novel on/off human albumin-sensing dye (SO3C7) is reported herein with a longer emission wavelength (942 nm) than previous materials that allows imaging behind ∼5 mm of black fabric. The switch-on emission of SO3C7 is selective and sensitive to human albumin and lasts longer than luminol (24-48 hours). Emission studies, transient absorption spectra (TAS), and near-infrared (NIR) photographs herein describe the albumin sensing properties of the dye.

Latent bloodstain detection using a selective turn-on NIR fluorescence dye responsive to serum albumin

Bloodstain detection can provide crucial information and evidence at a crime scene; however, the ability to selectively detect bloodstains in a non-destructive manner with high sensitivity and low background is limited. This study reports a fluorescent dye (sulfonate indolizine squaraine, SO3SQ) for bloodstain visualization under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation. While the dye itself is minimally fluorescent in aqueous solution, it exhibits a "turn-on" mechanism upon binding with human serum albumin (HSA) as the fluorescence intensity increases over 160 times with strong absorption and emission at 693 nm and 758 nm, respectively. Bloodstains can be visualized on a surface even after being diluted 1000 times, and washed latent bloodstains can be detected with high sensitivity. Further, the turn-on fluorescent emission lasts for a minimum of seven days, allowing adequate time for detection. This study also indicates that the SO3SQ can sensitively detect bloodstain after the bloodstain aged for one week. Furthermore, the detection of latent blood fingerprint patterns from colorful backgrounds is demonstrated using this non-destructive method. The selective turn-on fluorescent dye with NIR excitation and emission is highly suitable in forensic science for bloodstain visualization.

Photoluminescence of blood by acidic hydrogen peroxide-A preliminary test

In this study, the authors found that treating blood with 1 M HCl and 2% (w/v) 5-sulfosalicylic acid (SSA) in 1% (v/v) hydrogen peroxide mixture can produce photoluminescence of blood. SSA was added as a blood fixer. The photoluminescence was induced by irradiation of a forensic light source at 505 nm, which was detected using a 550 nm barrier filter. In this experiment, various level of acid and hydrogen peroxide were tested to find the optimal formulation of reagents, spot tests were conducted with diluted blood to test the sensitivity of this reagent, and impressions in blood left on porous/nonporous surfaces were enhanced. The sensitivity of this solution was slightly lower than Bluestar and was similar to leucocrystal violet or leucomalachite green on both porous/non-porous surfaces. The photoluminescence of blood treated with this reagent has been observed over 2 months. Using this reagent, it was possible to observe fingermarks or footwear impressions in blood on a black porous/non-porous surface. Through this, it was found that using this reagent could enhance bloodstains regardless of the porosity or color of the surface.

Validation of presumptive tests for non-human blood using Kastle Meyer and Hemastix reagents

Kastle Meyer and Hemastix reagents are presumptive tests commonly used in forensic casework for the detection of blood, and their suitability has been reviewed in numerous publications. However, studies to date have focused on the validation of these tests on human blood alone, and no published work has looked at the sensitivity, specificity and effect on DNA analysis when using these reagents to presumptively test for animal blood. The aim of this study was to validate the two reagents for use with animal blood, and compare their performance in order to choose the best test based on the circumstances in wildlife crime investigation. The sensitivity, specificity, stability and robustness of the methods were assessed by experiments with dilutions of animal blood (from 1:4 to 1:65536) using direct and indirect (rub) tests, potential interfering substances, blood sources from different species and aged blood. The effects of the two reagents on subsequent DNA analysis were also investigated. During the direct tests, Kastle Meyer showed a higher sensitivity, detecting blood down to a dilution of 1:16,384, one order of magnitude lower than Hemastix. However during the rub test, Hemastix showed a higher sensitivity, detecting blood down to a dilution of 1:64 on porous materials while Kastle Meyer was positive only down to a dilution of 1:16. Moreover, when using the same swab for presumptive testing and DNA extraction, Hemastix testing allowed amplification of a sufficient amount of DNA for species identification at its limit of sensitivity on porous materials (1:64) while Kastle Meyer inhibited most amplification of DNA at its less sensitive limit of 1:16 dilution. On the other hand, Hemastix showed a much lower specificity, producing false positive results when exposed to tomato, potato, rust, avian uric acid, bleach and sink rot, while Kastle Meyer only produced a faint positive reaction from potato. Both tests performed equally well detecting fresh blood of different animal species. The stability test gave comparable results among the tests except for aged fish blood stains, where the Kastle Meyer test performed poorly. Owing to its ease of use, higher sensitivity, and lack of interference with downstream DNA analysis, and despite its reduced specificity compared to Kastle Meyer, the Hemastix method is more appropriate for use in wildlife crime investigations. Positive results would always be confirmed with DNA analysis and the low interference of the reagent will allow the use of a single swab for presumptive testing and DNA sampling.