The visualisation of fingermarks on Pangolin scales using gelatine lifters

Visualisation and detection of latent DNA deposited by pangolin scales onto plastic packaging materials

We report on the detection and visualisation of latent DNA from pangolin scales deposited onto a plastic packaging material through the use of a nucleic acid staining dye. This latent DNA deposited by pangolin scales was subsequently isolated and analysed using DNA barcoding method. Pangolins are the most illegally traded mammalian species due to the demand for their scales and meat. The demand for their scales were mostly fuelled by its use in traditional medicines. The scales are usually packed into bags and transported globally via sea routes. This is the first report detailing the detection of trace latent DNA from processed wildlife products, on surfaces of bags that they were packaged in. Prior to this report, it was not known if the dried pangolin scales contained transferable quantities of biological material for DNA analyses. To address this, scales were removed from a roadkill Sunda pangolin (Manis javanica), processed by drying and packaged into one of five plastic bags. The presence of pangolin latent DNA was detected on the surface of the plastic bags and visualised using Diamond™ nucleic acid dye. Swabs were then used to recover the stained biological material from various locations in the five bags. The DNA was isolated and quantified using a newly designed quantitative PCR (qPCR) specific to M. javanica to amplify a fragment of the mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b gene. There was a positive correlation between the number of stained particles and DNA quantity, and a greater number of stained particles were found at the bottom of the bag than were found at the top. Conventional PCR targeting part of the cyt b gene amplified a product from all 30 samples taken from the bags and in all cases, sequence data generated matched that of the Sunda pangolin, as expected. All negative controls yielded no results. The method described here is the very first use of a nucleic acid staining dye to detect latent DNA from a mammalian species, other than humans, and highlights the opportunity for further use of Diamond™ nucleic acid dye in wildlife forensic science. It is anticipated that this method will be invaluable in retrieving latent DNA deposited by wildlife products from the environment in which they were contained, to determine the presence of these illegal wildlife products even when previously hidden, inaccessible, or no longer present physically. Further research is required to understand if the use on non-human mammalian wildlife species is feasible.

Fingermarks in wildlife forensics: A review

Wildlife forensics is defined as providing forensic evidence to support legal investigations involving wildlife crime, such as the trafficking and poaching of animals and/ or their goods. While wildlife forensics is an underexplored field of science, the ramifications of poaching can be catastrophic. The consequences of wildlife crime include disease spread, species and habitat loss, human injury, and cultural loss. Efforts to use forensic science to combat poaching are currently limited to DNA-based techniques. However, fingermark analysis for the identification of perpetrators of wildlife crimes has not been explored to the same extent, despite being a cost-effective, simple-to-use forensic method that is easy to deploy in-field. This review covers literature that has explored fingermark examination techniques used on wildlife-related samples, such as pangolin scales, ivory-based substances, bone, and eggs, as well as feathers and skins, among more obscure trafficked items. Useful preliminary work has been conducted in this subject area, demonstrating that commonly used fingermark analysis techniques can be applied to wildlife-based items. However, many of these studies suffer from limitations in terms of experimental design. More work should be done on creating studies with larger sample sizes and novel approaches should be validated under environmental conditions that mimic real crime scenes. Further research into determining the forensic fingermark analysis techniques that perform the most efficiently in the environmental conditions of the countries where they are needed would therefore benefit legal investigations and help to reduce instances of poaching.

Fingermark quality assessment, a transversal study of subjective quality scales

Fingermark detection research aims to improve the quantity and quality of fingermarks detected through the development of novel techniques. Subsequently, there is a need to evaluate these methods to determine the quality of the developed mark. Since the 1980's there has been a significant number of publications, which utilise a variety of different quality assessment methods. The introduction of common practice methods from the International Fingerprint Research Group (IFRG) aimed to implement a more standardised approach. Although these schemes are recommended as common practice, they are only guidelines. Consequentially, there is currently no universally accepted method to evaluate the enhancement techniques implemented in research. Therefore, this study aimed to collate and analyse the published protocols being used within fingermark detection research in order to better understand their application and how research is currently analysing and interpreting fingermark quality. This study comprised of manual and automatic searches of over 2000 published papers within the fingermark detection area. After thorough analysis of the articles, 396 published papers were found to have used a scale within the years spanning 1998-2022. The number of publications that report the use of a scale to assess quality for fingermark detection research has considerably increased over the last decade. However, whilst the number of publications utilising scales has increased, it is not proportional to the number of papers using the IFRG scales. The choice of scale is often institution specific and even more specific to their location. There are also numerous different adaptations of the IFRG recommended scales, as well as novel scales, which do not associate with the IFRG recommended versions being introduced the more research continues to grow. One such reason for this is investigated here, as different quality parameters are utilised within each individual scale. There is underrepresentation of these quality parameters within some of the IFRG scales, in particular the Centre for Applied Science and Technology (CAST) scale. This correlates to the considerable number of tailored approaches as authors are forced to add these parameters within the descriptions. Until there is an introduction of clear guidelines surrounding all areas of fingermark quality, from definition to parameters chosen within phases, the research area will continue to face such issues. This article recommends areas of potential study, whilst also recommending procedures that may be employed to alleviate some of the issues seen with fingermark quality evaluation.