1
|
Girard-Perier N, Marque SRA, Dupuy N, Claeys-Bruno M, Gaston F, Dorey S, Fifield LS, Ni Y, Li D, Fuchs WK, Murphy MK, Pillai SD, Pharr M, Nichols L. Effects of X-Rays, Electron Beam, and Gamma Irradiation on Chemical and Physical Properties of EVA Multilayer Films. Front Chem 2022; 10:888285. [PMID: 35646817 PMCID: PMC9131251 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.888285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gamma-ray irradiation, using the cobalt-60 isotope, is the most common radiation modality used for medical device and biopharmaceutical products sterilization. Although X-ray and electron-beam (e-beam) sterilization technologies are mature and have been in use for decades, impediments remain to switching to these sterilization modalities because of lack of data on the resulting radiation effects for the associated polymers, as well as a lack of education for manufacturers and regulators on the viability of these sterilization alternatives. For this study, the compatibility of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) multilayer films with different ionizing radiation sterilization (X-ray, e-beam, and gamma irradiation) is determined by measuring chemical and physical film properties using high performance liquid chromatography, differential scanning calorimetry, Fourier-Transform InfraRed spectroscopy (FTIR), surface energy measurement, and electron spin resonance techniques. The results indicate that the three irradiation modalities induce no differences in thermal properties in the investigated dose range. Gamma and X-Ray irradiations generate the same level of reactive species in the EVA multilayer film, whereas e-beam generates a reduced quantity of reactive species.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sylvain R. A. Marque
- Case 551, CNRS, ICR, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
- *Correspondence: Sylvain R. A. Marque, ; Nathalie Dupuy, ; Samuel Dorey, ; Leonard S. Fifield,
| | - Nathalie Dupuy
- CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix Marseille University, Avignon Université, Marseille, France
- *Correspondence: Sylvain R. A. Marque, ; Nathalie Dupuy, ; Samuel Dorey, ; Leonard S. Fifield,
| | - Magalie Claeys-Bruno
- CNRS, IRD, IMBE, Aix Marseille University, Avignon Université, Marseille, France
| | | | - Samuel Dorey
- Sartorius Stedim FMT S. A. S., Aubagne, France
- *Correspondence: Sylvain R. A. Marque, ; Nathalie Dupuy, ; Samuel Dorey, ; Leonard S. Fifield,
| | - Leonard S. Fifield
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
- *Correspondence: Sylvain R. A. Marque, ; Nathalie Dupuy, ; Samuel Dorey, ; Leonard S. Fifield,
| | - Yelin Ni
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Donghui Li
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Witold K. Fuchs
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Mark K. Murphy
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Suresh D. Pillai
- National Center for Electron Beam Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Matt Pharr
- National Center for Electron Beam Research, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|