Imagerie des anévrismes infectieux (mycotiques) de l’aorte abdominale

Endovascular wall-grafting for mycotic common iliac pseudo-aneurysm: Systemic mycoses

Mycotic pseudoaneurysms of the iliac arteries are extremely rare and are caused by infection of the artery wall. It is difficult to diagnose early due to its silent manifestation. We present a case of a 64-year-old man with an isolated left common iliac artery pseudoaneurysm caused by Candida albicans who presented with thrombophlebitis, abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting associated with fever, which was successfully treated with interposition grafting and antibiotic therapy. We present this case to highlight that aneurysms and other vascular lesions can affect different arteries in the body and may therefore only be discovered during routine investigations of non-specific symptoms.

Mycotic arterial aneurysm secondary to BCG intravesical instillation: A review

OBJECTIVE

Mycotic aortic aneurysm is a rare and life-threatening pathology. The first case of mycotic aneurysm induced by immunotherapy with bacille Calmette-Guérin for malignancy was published in 1988. The main objective of this review is to characterize this rare pathology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since then, 60 cases of arterial aneurysm following intra vesical BCG instillation have been described in the literature. All cases have been included, and characteristics have been collected retrospectively, with simple statistical analyses of the cases.

RESULTS

We present a brief review from 1988 to 2022 enhancing the contemporary understanding of this arterial infection. Mycotic aneurysm secondary to BCG instillation has a poor prognosis, up to 50% complication and 15% mortality at 1 month, whether managed by open repair or endovascular means.

CONCLUSION

BCG mycotic aneurysm is an extremely serious condition, the diagnosis of which must be considered at an early stage in order to adapt diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Tubular Reconstruction with Bovine Pericardium Xenografts to Treat Native Aortic Infections

BACKGROUND

The treatment of aortic infections is complex, and the material of reconstruction remains discussed. Several alternatives were suggested in the literature. The current consensus is the use of biological material. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term results of bovine pericardium xenografts.

METHODS

Between November 2016 and June 2019, we included consecutively all the patients presenting with native aortic infections in which arterial reconstruction was carried out with tubular bovine pericardium grafts sutured longitudinally. We collected the preoperative, peroperative, and postoperative clinical, radiological, biological, and bacteriological characteristics. The recurrence of infection, the graft failures, and the morbimortality were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twelve patients including three women were treated. Their mean age was 68.4 ± 9 years. They presented 2 thoracic, 4 thoracoabdominal, 4 abdominal, and 2 aortoiliac aneurysms. The diagnosis was made using angio-CT in all the cases and was confirmed by positron emission tomography (PET) scan in 7 cases and blood cultures in 9 cases. Peroperative cultures were positive in 11 cases. Antibiotics were given in 9 patients before operation for a median duration of 9 (3-19) days and in all the patients postoperatively for a median duration of 42 (1-540) days. The median follow-up was 355 (98-839) days. Six medical complications occurred, including 2 (16.6%) leading to death in the immediate postoperative period. No reoperation was needed. The PET scan returned positive in 1/10 cases (10%) during the follow-up. The diameter of the grafts was preserved, without any defect observed on the angio-CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term results showed a mechanical resistance to infection of the bovine pericardium. This biological material offers a promising alternative with multiple advantages including availability, simplicity of preparation, and adaptability to the various locations of the aortic infection.

Aorto-enteric fistulas: a physiopathological approach and computed tomography diagnosis

Infection of an abdominal aortic prosthesis with an enteroprosthetic fistula is a very serious, life-threatening complication, leading sometimes to severe functional consequences, the most serious being amputation. Since the symptoms, if there are any, are often rather non-specific, diagnosis is frequently difficult and has always to be based on a whole series of justifications. Early diagnosis is essential and this fistula should be the first possibility considered in a patient with an abdominal aortic prosthesis who is presenting rectorrhagia or melaena (even if only to a slight degree), sepsis and/or abdominal pain. Although rare, the clinical existence of hypertrophic osteoarthropathy may assist diagnosis. A CT scan is the examination of choice, the criteria providing evidence of a fistula being the presence of gaseous images in a periprosthetic fluid collection, thickening and/or retraction of the intestinal walls in contact, the existence of a false aneurysm, and finally, very rarely, extravasation of contrast agent into the intestinal lumen. The differential diagnoses that may mimic a fistula need to be well known, and can include retroperitoneal fibrosis, an infectious aneurysm, inflammatory or infectious aortitis, and above all, a 'simple' prosthesis infection without fistulisation.