Neurosurgical Considerations in Craniofacial Trauma

Changes in Facial Symmetry Following Computer-Assisted Secondary Correction of Craniofacial Fractures

OBJECTIVE

For patients without dysfunctions, the main purpose of secondary correction for craniofacial fractures is restoring facial symmetry. Computer-assisted surgery techniques including virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation provide the help to restore the bony symmetry as much as possible. The authors retrospectively quantitatively analyzed patients who received computer-assisted secondary correction for craniofacial fractures on facial symmetry pre and postoperation.

METHODS

This observational study reviewed the medical records of 17 patients requiring secondary correction for craniofacial fractures. Pre and postoperative computed tomography data were used to quantitatively analyze the changes in facial symmetry and enophthalmos.

RESULT

All patients enrolled in this study showed mid-facial asymmetry but without dysfunctions except for enophthalmos, and 5 patients had bone defects in the frontal-temporal area. The corrective surgical techniques were different for each patient according to their specific condition. Virtual surgical planning with or without intraoperative navigation was performed for all patients. Compared with the preoperative condition, their facial symmetry was significantly improved. The maximum discrepancy value between the affected side and the mirrored unaffected side decreased from 8.10 ± 2.69 to 3.74 ± 2.02 mm postoperatively, and the mean discrepancy value decreased from 3.58 ± 1.29 to 1.57 ± 0.68 mm. In addition, the Enophthalmos Index decreased from 2.65 to 0.35 mm.

CONCLUSION

This observational study objectively demonstrated that computer-assisted secondary correction for craniofacial fractures can significantly improve facial symmetry. And the authors recommend that virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation should be a must step in craniofacial fracture correction.

Underreporting of Traumatic Brain Injuries in Pediatric Craniomaxillofacial Trauma: A 20-Year Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Despite clinical concerns associated with pediatric traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), they remain grossly underreported. This is the first retrospective study to characterize concomitant pediatric TBIs and craniomaxillofacial (CMF) trauma patients, including frequency, presentation, documentation, and outcomes.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved retrospective cohort study was performed to identify all pediatric patients presenting with CMF fractures at a high-volume, tertiary trauma center between the years 1990 and 2010. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, presentation, operative management, length of stay, mortality at 2 years, dentition, CMF fracture patterns, and concomitant TBIs. Data were analyzed using two-tailed t tests and chi-square analysis. A value of P≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Of the 2966 pediatric CMF trauma patients identified and included for analysis [mean age, 7 ± 4.7 years; predominantly White (59.8%), and predominantly male (64.0%)], 809 had concomitant TBI (frequency, 27.3%). Only 1.6% of the TBI cases were documented in charts. Mortality at 2 years, length of stay in the hospital, and time to follow-up increased significantly from mild to severe TBIs. Concomitant TBIs were more common with skull and upper third fractures than CMF trauma without TBIs (81.8% versus 61.1%; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant TBIs were present in a significant number of pediatric CMF trauma cases but were not documented for most cases. CMF surgeons should survey all pediatric CMF trauma patients for TBI and manage with neurology and/or neurosurgery teams. Future prospective studies are necessary to characterize and generate practice-guiding recommendations.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.