Correction of Short Nose

Trends of rhinoplasty research in the last decade with bibliometric analysis

Background

As rhinoplasty (RP) with different requirements is becoming more and more popular in the latest decade, this study aims to quantitatively and qualitatively explore the trends in RP research, depict research hotspots, and point out the future direction with a bibliometric analysis.

Methods

All RP literature studies in the last decade (from 2012 to 2021) were retrieved from the Web of Science Core database. Annual output, institutions, authors, journals, and most-cited literature studies were analyzed by bibliometric tools, including CiteSpace, bibliometric online platform, bibliometrix R language kit, BICOMB, and gCLUTO.

Results

A total of 2,590 RP research studies dated between 2012 and 2021 were included according to our criterion. As for the country, the United States, Turkey, and Korea maintained the top three in RP research. As for the institutions, the University of California, Irvine, Stanford University, and University of Ulsan ranked top three in RP research publications based on article counts. Professor Rhorich RJ, Most SP, and Jang YJ were the most contributed authors according to article counts and citation number. The top journals were The Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery, and Aesthetic Surgery Journal. The 10 most-cited literature studies were also listed explicitly in this study. Finally, biclustering analysis on the most frequent keywords were conducted which helped us to identify seven hotspot clusters in RP research.

Conclusions

We comprehensively summarized the publication information of RP literature studies in the past decade, highlighted the current status and trends over time, and provide guidance for in-depth research direction on RP for the future.

Surgical Approaches and Outcomes of Short Nose Correction: A Descriptive Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to describe all published techniques of short nose correction released by surgeons over the years and summarize their outcomes in a descriptive systematic review of the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A computerized literature search was conducted using 5 major databases. All original studies discussing correction methods and/or outcomes of shortened noses were included. The risk of bias was evaluated blindly by 2 reviewers, and the data were descriptively presented. The study protocol was recorded in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies including 1450 patients were included. Lengthening of the nose was performed through a cartilage-only graft in 14 studies, whereas bone graft was used in 3 studies. The mean increase in nasal tip projection in 5 reports ranged from 0.05 to 2.2 mm. The mean nasal length before and after rhinoplasty was reported in 8 studies, with a mean increase ranging from 0.28 to 6.2 mm. Regarding surgical complications, 30 patients had implant deviation or migration, 22 patients experienced postoperative infection, and 12 patients required corrective surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Augmentation of a short nose is a challenging surgical procedure for rhinoplasty. There are several techniques for short nose correction; however, it is difficult to evaluate the outcomes in the absence of a standard tool of assessment. Further analytical studies are warranted to fully evaluate surgical techniques.

Effect of Le Fort I Maxillary Repositioning on Three-Dimensional Nasal Tip Rotation: A Comparative Study with Implication for the Asian Nose

BACKGROUND

Le Fort I maxillary repositioning influences nasal morphology. In Asian cultures, upward nasal tip rotation with increased nostril exposure is considered aesthetically unpleasant and can have psychosocial consequences. This three-dimensional imaging-based study evaluated the effect of different Le Fort I maxillary movements on nasal tip rotation.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent two-jaw orthognathic surgery (n = 107) were enrolled. To achieve a standard head orientation, preoperative and 1-week and 12-month postoperative cone-beam computed tomography-derived three-dimensional craniofacial models were superimposed. Tip rotation angle was calculated according to the Frankfort horizontal plane for all three-dimensional digital models. The final tip rotation angle change was defined as 12-month postoperative value minus preoperative value. Translational maxillary movement types (advancement versus setback and intrusion versus extrusion), postoperative maxillary segment locations (anterosuperior, anteroinferior, posterosuperior, or posteroinferior), and actual linear maxillary changes were noted.

RESULTS

Advancement (1.79 ± 5.20 degrees) and intrusion (2.23 ± 4.96 degrees) movements demonstrated significantly larger final tip rotation angle changes than setback (-0.88 ± 5.15 degrees) and extrusion (0.09 ± 5.44 degrees) movements (all p < 0.05). Postoperative anterosuperior location (2.95 ± 4.52 degrees) of the maxillary segment demonstrated a significantly larger final tip rotation angle change than anteroinferior (0.48 ± 5.65 degrees), posterosuperior (-1.08 ± 4.77 degrees), and posteroinferior (-0.64 ± 5.80 degrees) locations (all p < 0.05). Translational maxillary movement and actual linear maxillary change were not correlated with final tip rotation angle change.

CONCLUSION

Effects of Le Fort I maxillary repositioning on nasal tip rotation depend on movement types and maxillary segment location.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, III.

Patient- and 3D morphometry-based nose outcomes after skeletofacial reconstruction

Patient satisfaction with the shape and appearance of their nose after orthognathic surgery-based skeletofacial reconstruction is an important, but often overlooked, outcome. We assessed the nose-related outcomes through a recently developed patient-reported outcome instrument and a widely adopted 3D computer-based objective outcome instrument, to verify any correlation in the results produced by these tools. We collected FACE-Q nose appearance reports (2 scales) and 3D nasal morphometry (10 parameters) from patients with class III skeletal pattern and congenital cleft lip palate deformity (n = 23) or developmental dentofacial deformity (n = 23) after (>12 months) skeletofacial reconstruction. The cleft and dentofacial cohorts demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) poorer satisfaction scores with regard to the FACE-Q nostrils scale than the normal age-, gender-, and ethnicity-matched subjects (n = 107), without any significant difference in FACE-Q nose scale. The cleft cohort had significantly (p < 0.001) smaller nasal length, nasal tip projection, and columellar angle and greater nasal protrusion, alar width, and columellar-labial angle values than the dentofacial and normal cohorts; however, there were no significant differences between the dentofacial versus normal cohorts. The FACE-Q nose and nostrils scales were significantly (p < 0.001; r = -0.26-0.27) correlated to the results of the 3D morphometric analysis, with regard to nasal length, alar width, columella angle, and columellar-labial angle parameters. This study revealed differences in satisfaction with the appearance of the nose according to the type of underlying deformity, and demonstrated a significant correlation (low correlation coefficients) between the patient-reports and 3D image-based outcome measure tools, which has implications for multidisciplinary-centered research, auditing, and clinical care.