1
|
Liu Z, Wu E, Li R, Liu J, Zang Y, Cong B, Wu R, Xie B, Sun H. Improved individual identification in DNA mixtures of unrelated or related contributors through massively parallel sequencing. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2024; 72:103078. [PMID: 38889491 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024]
Abstract
DNA mixtures are a common sample type in forensic genetics, and we typically assume that contributors to the mixture are unrelated when calculating the likelihood ratio (LR). However, scenarios involving mixtures with related contributors, such as in family murder or incest cases, can also be encountered. Compared to the mixtures with unrelated contributors, the kinship within the mixture would bring additional challenges for the inference of the number of contributors (NOC) and the construction of probabilistic genotyping models. To evaluate the influence of potential kinship on the individual identification of the person of interest (POI), we conducted simulations of two-person (2 P) and three-person (3 P) DNA mixtures containing unrelated or related contributors (parent-child, full-sibling, and uncle-nephew) at different mixing ratios (for 2 P: 1:1, 4:1, 9:1, and 19:1; for 3 P: 1:1:1, 2:1:1, 5:4:1, and 10:5:1), and performed massively parallel sequencing (MPS) using MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep Kit on MGI platform. In addition, in silico simulations of mixtures with unrelated and related contributors were also performed. In this study, we evaluated 1): the MPS performance; 2) the influence of multiple genetic markers on determining the presence of related contributors and inferring the NOC within the mixture; 3) the probability distribution of MAC (maximum allele count) and TAC (total allele count) based on in silico mixture profiles; 4) trends in LR values with and without considering kinship in mixtures with related and unrelated contributors; 5) trends in LR values with length- and sequence-based STR genotypes. Results indicated that multiple numbers and types of genetic markers positively influenced kinship and NOC inference in a mixture. The LR values of POI were strongly dependent on the mixing ratio. Non- and correct-kinship hypotheses essentially did not affect the individual identification of the major POI; the correct kinship hypothesis yielded more conservative LR values; the incorrect kinship hypothesis did not necessarily lead to the failure of POI individual identification. However, it is noteworthy that these considerations could lead to uncertain outcomes in the identification of minor contributors. Compared to length-based STR genotyping, using sequence-based STR genotype increases the individual identification power of the POI, concurrently improving the accuracy of mixing ratio inference using EuroForMix. In conclusion, the MGIEasy Signature Identification Library Prep kit demonstrated robust individual identification power, which is a viable MPS panel for forensic DNA mixture interpretations, whether involving unrelated or related contributors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhiyong Liu
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Enlin Wu
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Ran Li
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; School of Medicine, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015, China
| | - Jiajun Liu
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Yu Zang
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Bin Cong
- College of Forensic Medicine, Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Forensic Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050017, China
| | - Riga Wu
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Bo Xie
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Hongyu Sun
- Faculty of Forensic Medicine, Zhongshan School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China; Guangdong Province Translational Forensic Medicine Engineering Technology Research Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kruijver M, Kelly H, Taylor D, Buckleton J. Addressing uncertain assumptions in DNA evidence evaluation. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2023; 66:102913. [PMID: 37453205 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
Evidential value of DNA mixtures is typically expressed by a likelihood ratio. However, selecting appropriate propositions can be contentious, because assumptions may need to be made around, for example, the contribution of a complainant's profile, or relatedness between contributors. A choice made one way or another disregards any uncertainty that may be present about such an assumption. To address this, a complex proposition that considers multiple sub-propositions with different assumptions may be more appropriate. While the use of complex propositions has been advocated in the literature, the uptake in casework has been limited. We provide a mathematical framework for evaluating DNA evidence given complex propositions and discuss its implementation in the DBLR™ software. The software simultaneously handles multiple mixed samples, reference profiles and relationships as described by a pedigree, which unlocks a variety of applications. We provide several examples to illustrate how complex propositions can efficiently evaluate DNA evidence. The addition of this feature to DBLR™ provides a tool to approach the long-accepted, but often impractical suggestion that propositions should be exhaustive within a case context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Kruijver
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland 1142 New Zealand.
| | - Hannah Kelly
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland 1142 New Zealand
| | - Duncan Taylor
- Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - John Buckleton
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland 1142 New Zealand; University of Auckland, Department of Statistics, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhu Q, Wang H, Cao Y, Huang Y, Wei Y, Hu Y, Dai X, Shan T, Wang Y, Zhang J. Evaluation of large-scale highly polymorphic microhaplotypes in complex DNA mixtures analysis using RMNE method. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2023; 65:102874. [PMID: 37075688 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2022] [Revised: 03/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/21/2023]
Abstract
DNA mixture interpretation is one of the most challenging problems in forensics. Complex DNA mixtures are more difficult to analyze when there are more than two contributors or related contributors. Microhaplotypes (MHs) are polymorphic genetic markers recently discovered and employed in DNA mixture analysis. However, the evidentiary interpretation of the MH genotyping data needs more debate. The Random Man Not Excluded (RMNE) method analyzes DNA mixtures without using allelic peak height data or the number of contributors (NoC) assumptions. This study aimed to assess how well RMNE interpreted mixed MH genotyping data. We classified the MH loci from the 1000 Genomes Project database into groups based on their Ae values. Then we performed simulations of DNA mixtures with 2-10 unrelated contributors and DNA mixtures with a pair of sibling contributors. For each simulated DNA mixture, incorrectly included ratios were estimated for three types of non-contributors: random men, parents of contributors, and siblings of contributors. Meanwhile, RMNE probability was calculated for contributors and three types of non-contributors, allowing loci mismatch. The results showed that the MH number, the MH Ae values, and the NoC affected the RMNE probability of the mixture and the incorrectly included ratio of non-contributors. When there were more MHs, MHs with higher Ae values, and a mixture with less NoC, the RMNE probability, and the incorrectly included ratio decreased. The existence of kinship in mixtures complicated the mixture interpretation. Contributors' relatives as non-contributors and related contributors in the mixture increased the demands on the genetic markers to identify the contributors correctly. When 500 highly polymorphic MHs with Ae values higher than 5 were used, the four individual types could be distinguished according to the RMNE probabilities. This study reveals the promising potential of MH as a genetic marker for mixed DNA interpretation and the broadening of RMNE as a parameter indicating the relationship of a specific individual with a DNA mixture in the DNA database search.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiang Zhu
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Haoyu Wang
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Yueyan Cao
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Yuguo Huang
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Yifan Wei
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Yuhan Hu
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Xuan Dai
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Tiantian Shan
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China
| | - Yunfeng Wang
- College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, PR China.
| | - Ji Zhang
- West China School of Basic Medical Sciences & Forensic Medicine, Sichuan University, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gill P, Benschop C, Buckleton J, Bleka Ø, Taylor D. A Review of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems: EuroForMix, DNAStatistX and STRmix™. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:1559. [PMID: 34680954 PMCID: PMC8535381 DOI: 10.3390/genes12101559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Probabilistic genotyping has become widespread. EuroForMix and DNAStatistX are both based upon maximum likelihood estimation using a γ model, whereas STRmix™ is a Bayesian approach that specifies prior distributions on the unknown model parameters. A general overview is provided of the historical development of probabilistic genotyping. Some general principles of interpretation are described, including: the application to investigative vs. evaluative reporting; detection of contamination events; inter and intra laboratory studies; numbers of contributors; proposition setting and validation of software and its performance. This is followed by details of the evolution, utility, practice and adoption of the software discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Gill
- Forensic Genetics Research Group, Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway
| | - Corina Benschop
- Division of Biological Traces, Netherlands Forensic Institute, P.O. Box 24044, 2490 AA The Hague, The Netherlands;
| | - John Buckleton
- Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand;
- Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Private Bag 92021, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - Øyvind Bleka
- Forensic Genetics Research Group, Department of Forensic Sciences, Oslo University Hospital, 0372 Oslo, Norway;
| | - Duncan Taylor
- Forensic Science SA, GPO Box 2790, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
- School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| |
Collapse
|