1
|
Bourret TB, Fajardo SN, Frankel SJ, Rizzo DM. Cataloging Phytophthora Species of Agriculture, Forests, Horticulture, and Restoration Outplantings in California, U.S.A.: A Sequence-Based Meta-Analysis. PLANT DISEASE 2023; 107:67-75. [PMID: 35724315 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-01-22-0187-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
California contains a diverse flora, and knowledge of the pathogens that threaten those plants is essential to managing their long-term health. To better understand threats to California plant health, a meta-analysis of Phytophthora detections within the state was conducted using publicly available sequences as a primary source of data rather than published records. Accessions of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) ribosomal DNA were cataloged from 800 Californian Phytophthora isolates, analyzed, and determined to correspond to 80 taxa, including several phylogenetically distinct provisional species. A number of Phytophthora taxa not previously reported from California were identified, including 20 described species. Pathways of introduction and spread were analyzed by categorizing isolates' origins, grouped by land-use: (i) agriculture, (ii) forests and other natural ecosystems, (iii) horticulture and nurseries, or (iv) restoration outplantings. The pooled Phytophthora metacommunities of the restoration outplantings and horticulture land-use categories were the most similar, whereas the communities pooled from forests and agriculture were least similar. Phytophthora cactorum, P. pini, P. pseudocryptogea, and P. syringae were identified in all four land-use categories, while 13 species were found in three. P. gonapodyides was the most common species by number of ITS accessions and exhibited the greatest diversity of ITS haplotypes. P. cactorum, P. ramorum, and P. nicotianae were associated with the greatest number of host genera. In this analysis, the Phytophthora spp. most prevalent in California differ from those compiled from the scientific literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler B Bourret
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616
| | - Sebastian N Fajardo
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616
| | - Susan J Frankel
- Pacific Southwest Research Station, United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Albany, CA 94710
| | - David M Rizzo
- Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burgess T, Edwards J, Drenth A, Massenbauer T, Cunnington J, Mostowfizadeh-Ghalamfarsa R, Dinh Q, Liew E, White D, Scott P, Barber P, O’Gara E, Ciampini J, McDougall K, Tan Y. Current status of Phytophthora in Australia. PERSOONIA 2021; 47:151-177. [PMID: 37693794 PMCID: PMC10486634 DOI: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Among the most economically relevant and environmentally devastating diseases globally are those caused by Phytophthora species. In Australia, production losses in agriculture and forestry result from several well-known cosmopolitan Phytophthora species and infestation of natural ecosystems by Phytophthora cinnamomi have caused irretrievable loss to biodiversity especially in proteaceous dominated heathlands. For this review, all available records of Phytophthora in Australia were collated and curated, resulting in a database of 7 869 records, of which 2 957 have associated molecular data. Australian databases hold records for 99 species, of which 20 are undescribed. Eight species have no records linked to molecular data, and their presence in Australia is considered doubtful. The 99 species reside in 10 of the 12 clades recognised within the complete phylogeny of Phytophthora. The review includes discussion on each of these species' status and additional information provided for another 29 species of concern. The first species reported in Australia in 1900 was Phytophthora infestans. By 2000, 27 species were known, predominantly from agriculture. The significant increase in species reported in the subsequent 20 years has coincided with extensive surveys in natural ecosystems coupled with molecular taxonomy and the recognition of numerous new phylogenetically distinct but morphologically similar species. Routine and targeted surveys within Australian natural ecosystems have resulted in the description of 27 species since 2009. Due to the new species descriptions over the last 20 years, many older records have been reclassified based on molecular identification. The distribution of records is skewed toward regions with considerable activity in high productivity agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and native vegetation at risk from P. cinnamomi. Native and exotic hosts of different Phytophthora species are found throughout the phylogeny; however, species from clades 1, 7 and 8 are more likely to be associated with exotic hosts. One of the most difficult challenges to overcome when establishing a pest status is a lack of reliable data on the current state of a species in any given country or location. The database compiled here for Australia and the information provided for each species overcomes this challenge. This review will aid federal and state governments in risk assessments and trade negotiations by providing a comprehensive resource on the current status of Phytophthora species in Australia. Citation: Burgess TI, Edwards J, Drenth A, et al. 2021. Current status of Phytophthora in Australia. Persoonia 47: 151-177. https://doi.org/10.3767/persoonia.2021.47.05.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T.I. Burgess
- Phytophthora Science and Management, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - J. Edwards
- Agriculture Victoria, Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - A. Drenth
- Centre for Horticultural Science, The University of Queensland, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park QLD, 4102, Brisbane, Australia
| | - T. Massenbauer
- TiloMass Environmental Services, PO Box 1148, Esperance WA, 6450, Australia
| | - J. Cunnington
- Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, 7 London Circuit, Canberra ACT 2600 Australia
| | | | - Q. Dinh
- Agriculture Victoria, Department of Jobs, Precincts and Regions, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia; La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3083, Australia
| | - E.C.Y. Liew
- Research Centre for Ecosystem Resilience, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, Mrs Macquaries Rd, Sydney NSW 2000, Australia
| | - D. White
- Phytophthora Science and Management, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
| | - P. Scott
- Phytophthora Science and Management, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Plant Pathologist, DPIRD Diagnostics and Laboratory Services, Sustainability and Biosecurity, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, 3 Baron-Hay Court, Kennsington WA 6151, Australia
| | - P.A. Barber
- Phytophthora Science and Management, Harry Butler Institute, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia
- Arbor Carbon P/L, ROTA Compound off Discovery Way, Murdoch University, Murdoch 6150, Australia
| | - E. O’Gara
- Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 17 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia
| | - J. Ciampini
- Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, 17 Dick Perry Ave, Kensington WA 6151, Australia
| | - K.L. McDougall
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, School of Life Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Y.P. Tan
- Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Ecosciences Precinct, Dutton Park QLD 4102; Centre for Crop Health, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Abstract
Paulownia species are fast growing trees native to China, which are being grown in managed plantings in several European countries for the production of wood and biomasses. In 2018, wilting, stunting, leaf yellowing, and collapse, as a consequence of root and crown rot, were observed in around 40% of trees of a 2-year-old planting of Paulownia elongata × P. fortunei in Calabria (Southern Italy). Two species of Phytophthora were consistently recovered from roots, basal stem bark, and rhizosphere soil of symptomatic trees and were identified as Ph. nicotianae and Ph. palmivora on the basis of both morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of rDNA ITS sequences. Koch’s postulates were fulfilled by reproducing the symptoms on potted paulownia saplings transplanted into infested soil or stem-inoculated by wounding. Both Phytophthora species were pathogenic and caused root rot and stem cankers. Even though P. palmivora was the only species recovered from roots of naturally infected plants, in pathogenicity tests through infested soil P. nicotianae was more virulent. This is the first report of Phytophthora root and crown rot of a Paulownia species in Europe. Strategies to prevent this emerging disease include the use of healthy nursery plants, choice of well-drained soils for new plantations, and proper irrigation management.
Collapse
|
5
|
Diversity of Phytophthora Communities across Different Types of Mediterranean Vegetation in a Nature Reserve Area. FORESTS 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/f11080853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Research Highlights: Protected natural areas are a reservoir of Phytophthora species and represent the most suitable sites to study their ecology, being less disturbed by human activities than other environments. Background and Objectives: The specific objective of this study was to correlate the diversity and distribution of Phytophthora species with the vegetation in aquatic, riparian and terrestrial habitats within a protected area in Eastern Sicily, Southern Italy. Materials and Methods: Environmental samples (water and soil) were sourced from two streams running through the reserve and six different types of vegetation, including Platano-Salicetum pedicellatae, the Sarcopoterium spinosum community, Myrto communis-Pistacietum lentisci, Pistacio-Quercetum ilicis,Oleo-Quercetum virgilianae and a gallery forest dominated by Nerium oleander (Natura 2000 classification of habitats). Phytophthora species were recovered from samples using leaf baiting and were classified on the basis of morphological characteristics and sequencing of internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of ribosomal DNA (rDNA). Results: As many as 11 Phytophthora species, within five different ITS clades, were identified, including P. asparagi, P. bilorbang, P. cryptogea, P. gonapodyides, P. lacustris, P. multivora, P. nicotianae, P. oleae, P. parvispora, P. plurivora and P. syringae. No Phytophthora species were found in the Sarcopoterium spinosum comm. Phytophthora asparagi, P. lacustris and P. plurivora were the prevalent species in the other five plant communities, but only P. plurivora was present in all of them. Overall aquatic species from clade 6 (100 out of 228 isolates) were the most common; they were recovered from all five types of vegetation, streams and riparian habitats. Phytophthora populations found in the Platano-Salicetum pedicellatae and Oleo-Quercetum virgilianae show the highest diversity, while no correlation was found with the physicochemical characteristics of the soil. Conclusions: The vegetation type and the aquatic or terrestrial habitat were identified as major environmental factors correlated with the diversity of Phytophthora communities in this reserve.
Collapse
|