Standardröntgendiagnostik an Fuß und Sprunggelenk

Static posture weightbearing joint angle differences in patients with varus ankle osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Advanced varus ankle osteoarthritis is a debilitating disease that can present with limited physical function, severe pain, and diminished quality of life. Weightbearing computed tomography enables submillimeter 3-dimensional visualization, computational analyses, and enhanced diagnoses in reporting complex degenerative changes more accurately.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study set to compare static posture weightbearing joint angle differences in healthy and varus ankle osteoarthritis patients (compensated and non-compensated).

METHODS

Our retrospective assessment included 70 individuals, 44 of whom were diagnosed with advanced varus ankle osteoarthritis, and the remaining 26 were healthy participants to serve as controls. An automatic anatomic coordinate system was applied to each patient's 3-dimensional talus and calcaneus bone reconstructions from weightbearing computed tomography scans. Subtalar and midtarsal joint angles were calculated using Euler angles.

RESULTS

We report statistical differences between the healthy group and both advanced varus osteoarthritis groups for midtarsal inversion/eversion. Specifically, both osteoarthritis groups' midtarsal joints were more inverted and plantarflexed as compared to healthy participants. Compensated and non-compensated subtalar joints were statistically different with respect to inversion/eversion. Non-compensated ankles exhibited a similar mean to healthy ankles who were both less inverted than compensated ankles.

SIGNIFICANCE

Our study helps physicians to better understand underlying mechanisms of peritalar compensation in varus ankle osteoarthritis. Patients featuring hindfoot compensation on average had a greater subtalar joint angle indicating greater inversion than healthy and non-compensated patients.

[Injuries of the ankle ligaments]

Lateral ligament injuries are the most common injuries of the ankle joint and are usually treated with early weight bearing after a short period of immobilization. If the clinical presentation is suspicious, additional injuries to the deltoid ligament complex and the syndesmosis should be considered. The indications for additional diagnostics should be generously applied. Injuries to the deltoid ligament usually occur as part of a complex ankle injury and should also be addressed in the surgical treatment of accompanying injuries. Chronic instability in this area necessitates complex bony and soft tissue procedures. Syndesmotic injuries with insufficiency of the capsule-ligament apparatus are frequent in ankle fractures and are stabilized during fracture treatment. Isolated syndesmotic instability should also be surgically treated as chronic injuries are usually associated with poor clinical results and early osteoarthritis.

[Unstable injuries of the deltoid ligament complex in ankle fractures : How to diagnose, how to treat?]

Unstable injuries of the deltoid ligament complex can have a substantial negative effect on the prognosis and treatment of ankle injuries. Lesions of the deltoid ligament are often overlooked at the initial presentation, both as isolated ruptures and in combination with more complex injuries of the ankle. Neglected unstable injuries of medial ankle ligaments may result in chronic instability, especially following correct treatment of fractures and lateral ligament injuries. These are accompanied by reduced ankle mobility, persisting pain, reduced load bearing and osteoarthritis. Despite the possible subsequent damage, the need for surgical repair of the deltoid ligament in patients with ankle fractures is controversially discussed. Although in most cases of ligament injuries of the upper ankle joint conservative treatment leads to very good results, there is increased interest in acute surgical treatment particularly for unstable injuries in order to avoid secondary instability and the associated sequelae. When surgical treatment should be given priority over conservative treatment has not yet been sufficiently clarified. This article gives an overview of the diagnosis and treatment of injuries of the deltoid ligament complex in patients with ankle fractures based on the current literature.

Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a triple-bend intramedullary nail (A3)-2-year follow-up in 60 patients

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical aspects including 2-year follow-up of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis (TTCA) with a triple-bend retrograde intramedullary nail (A3, Stryker, Airview Boulevard, MN, USA).

METHODS

All patients with TTCA with A3 between October 18, 2011 and April 29, 2013 were included. Visual Analogue Scale Foot and Anklenkle (VAS FA), indications for surgery, details of surgery, radiographic measurements, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients were included. The mean VAS FA was 29.6. Most common indications were arthrosis (n=43; 65%) and deformity (n=36; 55%). The accuracy of correction and implant position was 9.4 (maximum 10) on average. Infection rate was 3% (n=2). Sixty (91%) patients completed follow-up: VAS FA 59.9, fusion rate 100%, high accuracy of correction and implant position.

CONCLUSIONS

TTCA with the A3 implant system showed accurate correction and implant position. Two-year follow-up in 60 patients (91%) showed good clinical outcome scores and 100% fusion rate.

Intramedullary fixation in severe Charcot osteo-neuroarthropathy with foot deformity results in adequate correction without loss of correction - Results from a multi-centre study

BACKGROUND

Charcot osteo-neuroarthropathy (CN) of the foot can induce severe instability and deformity. Results of a consecutive clinical multi-centre study with Midfoot Fusion Bolt (MFB, Synthes GmbH, Oberdorf, Switzerland) are reported.

METHODS

All patients (aged 18 years and older) treated between 2009 and 2013 with surgical reconstruction of the midfoot with MFB for CN were included. Demographics, pre-surgical health status, details of foot pathology, details of surgery, postoperative treatment, treatment failure, and adverse events were registered. The following radiographic angles were measured on pre-op, post-op and last follow-up radiographs: talo-1st metatarsal (TMT) angle dorsoplantar and lateral view, and calcaneo-5th metatarsal angle.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (48 feet) were included in three centres. In 38 patients (80.1%) diabetes was diagnosed. Wound healing problems occurred in 21% of patients and recurrent ulceration in 13%. Revision surgery for loss of correction was performed in three cases (6%). Union rate at final follow-up was 98%. Major amputation for deep infection was performed in two patients (4%), minor amputation at the foot level in three cases (6%). Failure was more frequent when only one MFB (instead of 2 or 3) was used and no Gastrocnemius lengthening was performed. Radiographic alignment significantly improved pre- versus postoperatively and preoperatively versus follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Realignment and fixation with MFB in severe CN result in adequate correction with minimal loss of correction in the observed clinical course. The non-union rate was lower than previously reported. Stable fixation with MFB is a valuable treatment option for CN with minimal loss of correction and high union rates. The use of a minimum of two bolts is recommended to avoid recurrent deformity. Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01770639.

PedCAT for 3D-imaging in standing position allows for more accurate bone position (angle) measurement than radiographs or CT

BACKGROUND

PedCAT (Curvebeam, Warrington, USA) is a new technology that allows 3D-imaging with full weight bearing which is not influenced by projection and/or foot orientation (as radiographs). The aim of this study was to compare time spent of the image acquisition, and comparison of specific bone position (angle) measurements between three imaging methods (radiographs, CT, pedCAT), and to analyze and compare measurement differences and inter- and intraobserver reliability.

METHODS

In a prospective consecutive controlled study, 30 patients in which standard digital radiographs with full weight bearing in standing position (feet bilateral dorsoplantar and lateral views and Saltzman hindfoot view), CT without weight bearing, and pedCAT scan with full weight bearing in standing position were included, starting July 1, 2013. The following angles were measured for the right foot by three different investigators three times: 1st - 2nd intermetatarsal angle, talo-metatarsal 1-angle (TMT) both dorsoplantar and lateral projection, hindfoot angle, calcaneal pitch. The angles were digitally measured and compared (ANOVA with Post Hoc Scheffe test).

RESULTS

The angles differed between radiographs, CT and pedCAT (ANOVA, all p≤.01). The angles differed between pedCAT and both radiographs and CT (Post Hoc Scheffe test, each p≤.05 except for TMT dorsoplantar and calcaneal pitch angels versus radiographs).

CONCLUSIONS

The angles differed between radiographs, CT and pedCAT, indicating that only pedCAT is able to detect the correct angles. PedCAT includes weight bearing in contrast to CT. PedCAT prevents inaccuracies of projection and foot orientation in contrast to radiographs due to the 3D dataset which is principally independent from projection and foot orientation.