Efectividad de una estrategia de apoyo individualizado al empleo para personas con trastornos mentales graves

Fit for Work and Life—an eight-week program for improvement of functionality and quality of life

Background

The current two-stage study focused on work integration and quality of life of patients in an acute psychiatric day care unit. There is evidence that a longer absence from work due to illness negatively affects job retention, life satisfaction and clinical prognosis. Furthermore, there are individual supportive methods that proved to be effective in work integration. We therefore developed a specific group program Fit for Work and Life (FWL) for patients in an acute psychiatric day care unit focusing on work integration in the first labor market (in contrast to work in institutions for people with disabilities/second labor market).

Methods

Between 2018 and 2020, 62 patients (intervention group; IG) were enrolled in an 8‑week prospective job integration program and compared to 74 patients (control group; CG) who received treatment as usual (partly retrospective survey). Patients of both groups held a job when entering treatment. Main outcome was defined as their working status 4 weeks after the end of treatment as well as self-reported life satisfaction.

Results

At the end of treatment (i.e. the week prior to discharge), the IG participants reported higher overall life satisfaction as well as higher health-, self- and living condition-related satisfaction than controls. Functional and clinical improvement during treatment was linked to subsequently returning to work. Functional improvement was further linked to higher life satisfaction. Mediational analysis revealed an indirect path from functional improvement on life satisfaction via working status, i.e. the higher functional improvement during treatment, the higher the chance of successfully returning to work, which in turn increased life satisfaction.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that programs such as FWL are useful interventions for employed patients to improve reintegration into work and life and to help to increase life satisfaction.

[Health assets and quality of life in people diagnosed with severe mental disorder]

OBJECTIVE

To identify health assets and describe quality of life for people diagnosed with severe mental disorder through their own testimonies; to understand the necessities and barriers that affect their quality of life; and offer improvement recommendations.

METHOD

A qualitative, descriptive analysis based on the information obtained through semi-structured interviews and asset mapping.

RESULTS

Assets are similar to those found in undiagnosed people, while needs and barriers differ in both groups. The main assets include social relationships, socioeconomic assets, personal development, leisure and free time assets, places, art, daily activities, which usually take place within the mental health network, sense of belonging, and autonomy. To improve their health and life quality, they need access to employment and studies, more and better social relationships, and more control over their lives. Side effects of medication and socio-economic exclusion, and the lack of autonomy derived from it are the main existing barriers, which have a negative effect in self-esteem and social interactions. An important measure to improve health and quality of life is the increase of economic and social assets for a more autonomous personal development.

CONCLUSIONS

This community action for health care has served to reveal the similarities between health and quality of life assets for severe mental disorder diagnosed and undiagnosed people, as well as the differences in the needs and difficulties to achieve them.

Cognitive remediation to improve the vocational outcomes of people with severe mental illness

The present study investigates the effects of cognitive remediation (CR) training with Individual Placement and Support (IPS) in people suffering from severe mental illness in European population (Spanish). Sixty-five participants (83% with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) were recruited from community mental health teams. Fifty-seven met the criteria and agreed to participate in the study. The conditions of cognitive rehabilitation were assigned randomly with support employment CR + IPS (n = 28) and IPS alone (n = 29). Two groups were followed at 8 and 12 months after the baseline. Participants in the CR + IPS group improved more than the IPS only group during the follow-up period in measures of cognitive functioning (significantly higher in executive functions, verbal learning and memory) and obtained higher employment percentages during the follow-up period, including people who got a job after 8 months (52.2% versus 29.2%, p = .023) and after 1 year (60.9% versus 37.5%, p = .025), as well as, in the weekly hours worked (37.2 versus 26.7 h, p = .023). Retention in the CR + IPS program was high (82.14%). The calculated global cognitive score showed that the evolution over time differed significantly between groups (p < .001).