Three-dimensional ankle kinematics and kinetics during running in women

Risk factors of metatarsal stress fracture associated with repetitive sports activities: a systematic review

Background

Metatarsal stress fracture is common in people engaged in repetitive weight-bearing activities, especially athletes and recruits. Identifying risk factors in these contexts is crucial for effective prevention.

Methods

A systematic search on Web of Science, PubMed, EBSCO, SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library was conducted and the date range for the retrieval was set from January 1984 to April 2024.

Results

32 eligible studies were selected from 1,728 related research. Anatomical and biomechanical factors, such as higher foot arch, abnormal inversion/eversion of foot, and longer metatarsal length or larger angles, relatively influence stress fracture risk. However, given that there is no standardized measurement, the results remain to be examined. Soccer is associated with fifth metatarsal fractures, while long-distance running and recruit training often lead to fractures of the second or third metatarsals. High exercise intensity, non-adaptive training, and inadequate equipment heighten fracture risk.

Conclusion

This review highlights the complex interplay of anatomical, biomechanical, and sports-related factors in the risk of metatarsal stress fractures. Relatively, high arches, specific metatarsal morphologies, and foot inversion/eversion patterns are significant risk factors, particularly among athletes. Sports type also correlates with metatarsal stress fracture locations. Despite extensive research, study heterogeneity and inherent biases necessitate cautious interpretation. Comprehensive, multifactorial approaches and personalized injury prevention strategies are essential for reducing the incidence of these injuries and improving the health and performance of athletes.

Are alterations in running biomechanics associated with running injuries? A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

No systematic review has investigated the main biomechanical variables as predictors of running-related injuries.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the main biomechanical variables associated with running-related injuries.

METHODS

Medline via PubMed, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and CINAHL were searched from inception until 1 November 2021. Each study included must have investigated the association of at least one biomechanical variable (kinetics, kinematics, electromyography, or pressure distribution) with running injuries. The meta-analysis was conducted, and a modified version of the Downs and Black Quality Index was used for methodological quality evaluation.

RESULTS

Across the 82 studies included, 5465 runners were investigated. The meta-analysis was conducted with 11 biomechanical variables from 51 articles (n=2395). The peak hip adduction angle was the sole biomechanical variable associated with running injury and was found to be higher in injured runners (0.57, 95% CI 0.21, 0.94) compared to uninjured runners. However, this result was highly influenced by two studies (out of five studies) conducted by the same group of authors.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians, coaches, and runners should be aware that minimal evidence supports that alterations of running biomechanics are associated with running-related injuries. Heterogeneity in evaluation conditions and inconsistency in the naming and definitions of biomechanical variables make definitive conclusions challenging.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

PROSPERO, CRD42017068839.

Effect of end-stage hip, knee, and ankle osteoarthritis on walking mechanics

This study tested the hypothesis that the presence of isolated ankle (A-OA; N=30), knee (K-OA; N=20), or hip (H-OA; N=30) osteoarthritis (OA) compared to asymptomatic controls (N=15) would lead to mechanical changes in the affected joint but also in all other lower limb joints and gait overall. Stride length, stance and swing times, as well as joint angles and moments at the hip, knee, and ankle were derived from 3-D kinematic and kinetic data collected from seven self-selected speed walking trial. Values were compared across groups using a 1×4 ANCOVA, covarying for walking speed. With walking speed controlled, the results indicated a reduction in hip and knee extension and ankle plantar flexion in accordance with the joint affected. In addition, OA in one joint had strong effects on other joints. In both H-OA and K-OA groups the hip never passed into extension, and A-OA subjects significantly changed hip kinematics to compensate for lack of plantar flexion. Finally, OA in any joint led to lower peak vertical forces as well as extension and plantar flexion moments compared to controls. The presence of end-stage OA at various lower extremity joints results in compensatory gait mechanics that cause movement alterations throughout the lower extremity. This work reinforces our understanding of the complex interaction of joints of the lower limb and the importance of focusing on the mechanics of the entire lower limb when considering gait disability and potential interventions in patients with isolated OA.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of dynamic tests and related force plate parameters used to evaluate neuromusculoskeletal function in foot and ankle pathology

BACKGROUND

Force plates are commonly used to register ground reaction forces in order to assess neuromusculoskeletal function of the ankle joint. There exists a great variety in dynamic tests on force plates and in parameters calculated from ground reaction forces in order to evaluate neuromusculoskeletal function of the ankle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate which dynamic tests and force plate parameters are most sensitive to differences between and within groups with regard to foot and ankle pathology.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed evaluating studies that compared force plate parameters of dynamic tests between patients with foot and ankle pathology, and healthy controls. Data were pooled per parameter and test category. Given the clinical heterogeneity, we constructed comprehensive recommendation criteria to indicate a 'proven relevant parameter' or 'candidate relevant parameter'.

RESULTS

A total of 34 studies were included, and 58 relevant comparisons were identified. Results were subdivided by test category: walking, running, landing (in anteroposterior direction), sideways (movement in mediolateral direction) and termination (movement in anteroposterior direction). The 'walking' test showed significant differences in a great variety of pathologies, with the magnitude and timing of the 'second peak vertical force' as proven relevant parameters. The 'landing' test detected differences due to ankle instability, with 'time to stabilization in anteroposterior direction' as proven relevant parameter.

INTERPRETATION

This study provides recommendations concerning the potential of various dynamic tests and force plate parameters as a tool to compare neuromusculoskeletal function between patients with foot and ankle pathology and healthy controls.

Mechanisms for improved running economy in beginner runners

Controversy surrounds whether running mechanics make good predictors of running economy (RE) with little known about the development of an economical running gait.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify if mechanical or physiological variables changed during 10 wk of running in beginners and whether these changes could account for any change in RE.

METHODS

A 10-wk running program (10 wkRP) was completed by 10 female beginner runners. A bilateral three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic analysis, in addition to RE and lower body flexibility measurements, was performed before and after the 10 wkRP. The Balke-Ware graded walking exercise test was performed before and after the 10 wkRP to determine VO2max.

RESULTS

Seven kinematic and kinetic variables significantly changed from before to after training, in addition to a significant decrease in calf flexibility (27.3° ± 6.3° vs 23.9° ± 5.6°, P < 0.05). A significant improvement was seen in RE (224 ± 24 vs 205 ± 27 mL · kg(-1) · km(-1), P < 0.05) and treadmill time to exhaustion (16.4 ± 3.2 vs 17.3 ± 2.8 min, P < 0.05); however, VO2max remained unchanged from before to after training (34.7 ± 5.1 vs 34.3 ± 5.6 mL · kg(-1) · min(-1)). Stepwise regression analysis showed three kinematic variables to explain 94.3% of the variance in change in RE. They were a less extended knee at toe off (P = 0.004), peak dorsiflexion occurring later in stance (P = 0.001), and a slower eversion velocity at touchdown (P = 0.042). The magnitude of change for each variable was 1.5%, 4.7%, and 34.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that beginner runners naturally developed their running gait as they became more economical runners.

Dimensionality of measures for severe unilateral ankle arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the dimensionality of 2 self-report outcome measures (Foot/Ankle Disability Index [FADI] and Short-Form [SF]-36), 3 biomechanical measures (stance and step symmetry measures, gait speed, and step width), 2 physical-performance measures (timed get-up and go [TUG] and 4-square step test [4SST]), and 1 clinician-report outcome measure (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [AOFAS] Hindfoot Scale) in a patient population with unilateral ankle arthritis. These measures captured the following functions: mobility and speed, pain and its relationship to function, social integration, and symmetry and efficiency of gait.

DESIGN

Case series design.

SETTING

Biomechanical research laboratory adjacent to a busy orthopedic clinical practice.

PATIENTS

Seventy-nine consecutive patients with unilateral traumatic arthritis who were candidates for a total ankle replacement.

METHODS

An exploratory factor analysis with oblimin rotation was performed to determine the dimensions of the physical performance, biomechanical, self-report, and clinician-report measures.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Outcomes measures included the SF-36 and pertinent subscales, gait speed, the 4SST, the TUG, the FADI, the AOFAS Hindfoot Scale, and biomechanical measures of step width, step symmetry, and stance symmetry.

RESULTS

Four distinct dimensions were captured during factor analysis. Factor 1 included the TUG, gait speed, the 4SST, and step width; factor 2 included the FADI, the SF-36 bodily pain score, and the SF-36 physical function score; factor 3 included the biomechanical scores of stance symmetry ratio and the step symmetry ratio; and factor 4 included SF-36 social functioning and the AOFAS Hindfoot Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that various outcome measures for the ankle capture different dimensions and should be considered when evaluating the presence of disability or long-term change in outcome.

The relationship between lower-extremity stress fractures and the ground reaction force: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

lower-limb stress fracture is one of the most common types of running injuries. There have been several studies focusing on the association between stress fractures and biomechanical factors. In the current study, the ground reaction force and loading rate are examined. There is disagreement in the literature about whether the history of stress fractures is associated with ground reaction forces (either higher or lower than control), or with loading rates.

METHODS

a systematic review of the literature was conducted on the relationship between the history of tibial and/or metatarsal stress fracture and the magnitude of the ground reaction force and loading rate. Fixed-effect meta-analysis techniques were applied to determine whether or not the ground reaction force and/or loading rate are different between the stress fracture and control groups.

FINDINGS

thirteen articles were identified through a systematic search of the literature. About 54% of these articles reported significantly different vertical ground reaction force and/or loading rate between the stress fracture and control groups. Other studies (~46%) did not observe any significant difference between the two groups. Meta-analysis results showed no significant differences between the ground reaction force of the lower-limb stress fracture and control groups (P>0.05). However, significant differences were observed for the average and instantaneous vertical loading rates (P<0.05).

INTERPRETATION

the currently available data does not support the hypothesis that there is a significant difference between the ground reaction force of subjects experiencing lower-limb stress fracture and control groups. Instead, the vertical loading rate was found to be significantly different between the two groups.