The effect of moderate Parkinson's disease on compensatory backwards stepping

A backward cycling programme for people with Parkinson's disease: a feasibility and preliminary results study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility of backward cycling for people with Parkinson's disease. Secondary objectives were to assess changes in gait and balance following a 6-week program.

DESIGN

A single-group prospective pre-test, post-test study with 1-month follow-up.

SUBJECTS/PATIENTS

Twenty-six people with Parkinson's disease (mean age: 69 (7.74) years, gender: 83% males, time since diagnosis: 6 (4.44) years).

METHODS

Participants pedaled backward on a stationary bicycle for 30 minutes at moderate intensity twice a week for 6 weeks. Feasibility was assessed by acceptability, suitability, and burden. Data collected at pre- and post-intervention with 1-month follow-up included backward stepping response variables, forward/backward gait variables, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MBT), and 6 Minute Walk Test.

RESULTS

There was a high retention rate (95.8%) and adherence rate (100%) with one adverse event and minimal burden. Significant improvements were seen in step count and excursion distance during backward stepping responses, forward and backward gait velocity, forward step length, and the Mini-BESTest.

CONCLUSION

Backward cycling was a feasible intervention for people with Parkinson's disease, demonstrating low burden with high retention and adherence rates, and it is a safe exercise with the potential for benefits in gait and balance variables.

3D octopus kinematics of complex postures: Translation to long, thin, soft devices and their potential for clinical use

INTRO/BACKGROUND

Octopuses are capable of complex arm movements. Unfortunately, experimental barriers and lack of a robust analysis method made it difficult to quantify the three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of soft, flexible bodies, such as the octopus arm. This information is not only crucial for understanding the posture of the animal's arm but also for the development of similarly designed soft, flexible devices.

OBJ/GOAL

The primary goal of this work was to create a method to comprehensively quantify complex, 3D postures of octopus (Octopus Bimaculoides) arms in a manner that is conducive and translatable to octopus arm-inspired devices for health monitoring and rehabilitation.

METHODS

In this study, 3D underwater motion capture was used to collect kinematic data on both live octopuses and disembodied arms that still had neural activity. A new method was developed to define how arm curvature and regional segments were oriented relative to each other in 3D. This included identification of the bend within a segment along with the computation of the relative orientation between segments, thus permitting the complete quantification of complex arm motions.

RESULTS

By comparing vector-based and radius of curvature-based approaches to magnitude of curvature, it was clear that the vector-based approach was less dependent on the length of a segment and that its reported ranges of motion were translatable for outcome measures associated with clinical use. The new approach for the relative orientation of each segment of the octopus arm resulted in the capability of describing the octopus arm in many unique postures, such as straight, simple bending, and complex bending as it utilized the three rotational angles.

OUTCOME/IMPACT

This method and its application to octopus arms will yield new information that can be used to better communicate and track not only octopus arm movements but in the development of complex, segmented, soft-bodied devices that can be used in health monitoring and rehabilitation.

Psychometric properties of 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in people with Parkinson disease

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in individuals with Parkinson Disease (PD) to determine the following: (1) concurrent validity with other gait velocity measures and (2) interrater and intrarater reliability of in-person and video assessment.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 25 people with PD participated. Forward gait velocity was measured using a computerized walkway (Zeno Walkway System), the 10-meter walk test (10MWT), and 4-meter walk test (4MWT). Backward gait velocity was measured using the 3MBWT. Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson's correlations. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC(2,1)).

RESULTS

All relationships between the 3MBWT and gait outcome measures were significant. The 3MBWT demonstrated strong correlations with the 4MWT dual task (r = .795, p=<.001) and moderate correlations with 4MWT comfortable walking speed (r = .658, p < .001), 4MWT fast walking speed (r = .601,p=.002), 10MWT comfortable walking speed (r = .512, p = .009), and 10MWT dual task (r = .535, p = .006). A low yet significant correlation was noted with the 10MWT fast walking speed (r = .398, p = .049). Association between the 3MBWT and the Zeno Walkway System revealed moderate correlations. All reliability tests were significant at p < .001. Interrater reliability ICC(2,1) values were very high for 3MBWT (ICC(2,1) = 0.93, [0.83-0.91]). Intrarater reliability was also very high (ICC(2,1) = 0.96 [0.90-0.98]).

CONCLUSION

The 3MBWT demonstrates validity and reliability as a tool for assessing gait speed in the posterior direction in people with PD.

Extraction of the pull force from inertial sensors during the pull test for Parkinson's disease: A reliability study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pull test in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) using the extracted pull force.

METHODS

In this inter- and intra-rater reliability study, two raters performed a pull test on 30 patients with PD. The pull force was quantified using inertial sensors attached to the rater's right hand and the patient's lower trunk. In this study, the pull force was calculated as an extracted three-dimensional vector quantity, the resultant acceleration, and was expressed in m/s2. Inter- and intra-rater reliabilities were analyzed using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the pull force and Cohen's weighted kappa (κw) for the pull test score. Furthermore, Bland-Altman analysis was used to investigate systematic errors.

RESULTS

The inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pull force was very poor (ICC = 0.033-0.214). Bland-Altman analysis revealed no systematic errors in the pull forces between the two test points. Conversely, κw for the pull test scores ranged from 0.763 to 0.920, indicating substantial to almost perfect agreement.

CONCLUSION

The pull test score was reliable despite variations in the quantified pull force for inter- and intra-rater reliability. Our findings suggest that the pull test is a robust tool for evaluating postural instability in patients with PD and that the pull force probably does not affect scoring performance.

A non-expensive bidimensional kinematic balance assessment can detect early postural instability in people with Parkinson's disease

Background

Postural instability is a debilitating cardinal symptom of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Its onset marks a pivotal milestone in PD when balance impairment results in disability in many activities of daily living. Early detection of postural instability by non-expensive tools that can be widely used in clinical practice is a key factor in the prevention of falls in widespread population and their negative consequences.

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a two-dimensional balance assessment to identify the decline in postural control associated with PD progression.

Methods

This study recruited 55 people with PD, of which 37 were men. Eleven participants were in stage I, twenty-three in stage II, and twenty-one in stage III. According to the Hoehn and Yahr (H&amp;Y) rating scale, three clinical balance tests (Timed Up and Go test, Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and Push and Release test) were carried out in addition to a static stance test recorded by a two-dimensional movement analysis software. Based on kinematic variables generated by the software, a Postural Instability Index (PII) was created, allowing a comparison between its results and those obtained by clinical tests.

Results

There were differences between sociodemographic variables directly related to PD evolution. Although all tests were correlated with H&amp;Y stages, only the PII was able to differentiate the first three stages of disease evolution (H&amp;Y I and II: p = 0.03; H&amp;Y I and III: p = 0.00001; H&amp;Y II and III: p = 0.02). Other clinical tests were able to differentiate only people in the moderate PD stage (H&amp;Y III).

Conclusion

Based on the PII index, it was possible to differentiate the postural control decline among the first three stages of PD evolution. This study offers a promising possibility of a low-cost, early identification of subtle changes in postural control in people with PD in clinical practice.

Objective quantification of responses to the clinical pull-test in people with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Postural instability can occur in the later-stages of Parkinson's disease (PD). The clinical pull-test is scored on a 0-4 scale on the Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS), with postural instability scored 2 or higher. This ordinal scale does not adequately track progression in early-PD or predict development of postural instability.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To develop a test that quantifiably measured the backward stepping response on the pull-test in early-PD.

METHODS

Participants (35 controls and 79 PD participants) were prospectively enrolled in this study. Participants stepped backwards with each shoulder pull at four strengths on an instrumented gait mat. Four spatiotemporal parameters (reaction-time, step-back-time, step-back-distance, step-back-velocity) were quantified using Protokinetics Movement Analysis Software. Spatiotemporal pull-test parameters were compared to standard PD measures using linear regression and correlation coefficients. Repeated measures analysis was used to determine group differences in pull-test parameters. In a subset of participants repeated testing was performed and Bland-Altman plots were used to determine reproducibility of the pull-test parameters.

RESULT

Step-back-distance and step-back-velocity were inversely related to motor UPDRS and freezing of gait questionnaire scores. PD participants had shorter step-back-distance than controls adjusted for age and sex. Repeat assessments in 16 participants, on average 0.7 years apart, showed good agreement on most of the quantified parameters.

SIGNIFICANCE

The backward stepping response in PD participants was quantifiable, reproducible, and related to disease severity and could be used to quantify progression towards postural instability in early-PD.

Postural instability in Parkinson's disease assessed with clinical "pull test" and standardized postural perturbations: effect of medication and body weight support

OBJECTIVE

This experiment tested if balance performance differed between a standardized treadmill surface perturbation task and a clinical pull test and was affected by medication or the presence of body weight support in people with Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

Twenty-seven individuals were tested (14 PD in both ON- and OFF-medication states). Clinical pull test and rapid forward (backward fall) translations of the support surface were applied to induce postural reactions requiring at least 1 step to restore balance. The effects of pull type (clinical vs. treadmill), partial bodyweight support (0 vs 20% body weight) and group (control, PD ON-meds and PD OFF-meds) on reactive stepping as well as practice/learning effect were examined. The number of steps taken and the first step duration were entered in linear repeated-measures mixed-effect models separately.

RESULTS

The effects of pull type, group, and bodyweight support were all significant in both metrics, as was ON- vs. OFF-medication. A significant interaction term (group x pull type) was found in the first step duration, showing that the group difference was greater in treadmill compared to the clinical pull test. A significant practice effect was also observed within and across testing sessions.

CONCLUSIONS

A standardized treadmill perturbation performed slightly better than the classical pull test in distinguishing between groups, and partial weight support did not substantially degrade the test's performance to detect the balance deficits in people with PD.

Compensatory postural responses to backward loss of balance in patients with cerebellar disease

BACKGROUND

Impaired control of balance and coordinated reactions are a primary deficit of cerebellar dysfunction. As compared to other neurological patients with balance impairments, there has been little research assessing the characteristics of compensatory responses associated with falls in patients with cerebellar disease (CD).

RESEARCH QUESTION

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of cerebellar disease on compensatory balance control in response to postural perturbation. Do CD patients increase the number of steps when responding to instability because of inappropriate initial step reactions or poor control of trunk motion or both?

METHODS

In this explorative study, 10 patients suffering from degenerative cerebellar ataxia and 10 age-matched healthy controls were examined. The balance recovery reactions were assessed using a lean-and-release postural perturbation method. Spatiotemporal characteristics of stepping movement and COM variables associated with torso motion were analyzed using 3D motion capture system.

RESULTS

CD patients took multiple steps whereas matched controls generally took single steps to recover balance following perturbation. The characteristics of the initial step at the time of the fall revealed that foot reaction time, foot response time, and step distance of the initial step were similar between CD patients and matched controls. However, CD patients exhibited a shorter foot-to-COM distance, higher COM velocity, and less trunk flexion with which to attenuate their body momentum after the landing of the first step than did matched controls.

SIGNIFICANCE

Although initial step responses were probably adequate, poor control of torso motion appears to be a particular problem that causes multiple-step reactions in CD patients. This observation would help to guide the development of tailored fall intervention strategies in CD patients aimed at promoting their recovery capacity in response to a pronounced balance challenge.

Postural Instability in Parkinson's Disease: A Review

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a heterogeneous progressive neurodegenerative disorder, which typically affects older adults; it is predicted that by 2030 about 3% of the world population above 65 years of age is likely to be affected. At present, the diagnosis of PD is clinical, subjective, nonspecific, and often inadequate. There is a need to quantify the PD factors for an objective disease assessment. Among the various factors, postural instability (PI) is unresponsive to the existing treatment strategies resulting in morbidity. In this work, we review the physiology and pathophysiology of postural balance that is essential to treat PI among PD patients. Specifically, we discuss some of the reported factors for an early PI diagnosis, including age, nervous system lesions, genetic mutations, abnormal proprioception, impaired reflexes, and altered biomechanics. Though the contributing factors to PI have been identified, how their quantification to grade PI severity in a patient can help in treatment is not fully understood. By contextualizing the contributing factors, we aim to assist the future research efforts that underpin posturographical and histopathological studies to measure PI in PD. Once the pathology of PI is established, effective diagnostic tools and treatment strategies could be developed to curtail patient falls.

Neurophysiological analysis of the clinical pull test

Postural reflexes are impaired in conditions such as Parkinson's disease, leading to difficulty walking and falls. In clinical practice, postural responses are assessed using the "pull test," where an examiner tugs the prewarned standing patient backward at the shoulders and grades the response. However, validity of the pull test is debated, with issues including scaling and variability in administration and interpretation. It is unclear whether to assess the first trial or only subsequent repeated trials. The ecological relevance of a forewarned backward challenge is also debated. We therefore developed an instrumented version of the pull test to characterize responses and clarify how the test should be performed and interpreted. In 33 healthy participants, "pulls" were manually administered and pull force measured. Trunk and step responses were assessed with motion tracking. We probed for the StartReact phenomenon (where preprepared responses are released early by a startling stimulus) by delivering concurrent normal or "startling" auditory stimuli. We found that the first pull triggers a different response, including a larger step size suggesting more destabilization. This is consistent with "first trial effects," reported by platform translation studies, where movement execution appears confounded by startle reflex-like activity. Thus, first pull test trials have clinical relevance and should not be discarded as practice. Supportive of ecological relevance, responses to repeated pulls exhibited StartReact, as previously reported with a variety of other postural challenges, including those delivered with unexpected timing and direction. Examiner pull force significantly affected the postural response, particularly the size of stepping. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We characterized postural responses elicited by the clinical "pull test" using instrumentation. The first pull triggers a different response, including a larger step size suggesting more destabilization. Thus, first trials likely have important clinical and ecological relevance and should not be discarded as practice. Responses to repeated pulls can be accelerated with a startling stimulus, as reported with a variety of other challenges. Examiner pull force was a significant factor influencing the postural response.

Maximum Step Length Test Performance in People With Parkinson Disease: A Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Maximum Step Length Test (MSLT), a measure of one's capacity to produce a large step, has been studied in older adults, but not in people with Parkinson disease (PD). We characterized performance and construct validity of the MSLT in PD.

METHODS

Forty participants (mean age: 65.12 ± 8.20 years; 45% female) with idiopathic PD completed the MSLT while "OFF" and "ON" anti-PD medication. Construct validity was investigated by examining relationships between MSLT and measures of motor performance. The following measures were collected: Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest), Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale, gait velocity, 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale subsection III (MDS-UPDRS III), and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. A repeated-measures analysis of variance tested for main effects of medication and stepping direction and the interaction between the 2. Pearson or Spearman correlations were used to assess the relationships between MSLT and motor performance measures (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Regardless of medication status, participants stepped further in the forward direction compared with the backward and lateral directions (P < 0.001). Participants increased MSLT performance when ON-medication compared with OFF-medication (P = 0.004). Regardless of medication status, MSLT was moderately to strongly related to Mini-BESTest, TUG, and 6MWT.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

People with PD stepped furthest in the forward direction when performing the MSLT. Increased MSLT performance was observed in the ON-medication state compared with OFF-medication; however, the small increase may not be clinically meaningful. Given the relationships between the MSLT and the Mini-BESTest, 6MWT, and TUG, MSLT performance appears to be associated with balance and gait hypokinesia in people with PD.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A186).

Qualitative postural control differences in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease vs. Progressive Supranuclear Palsy with dynamic-on-static platform tilt

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess whether postural abnormalities in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) and Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease (IPD) are qualitatively different by analysing spontaneous and reactive postural control.

METHODS

We assessed postural control upon platform tilts in 17 PSP, 11 IPD patients and 18 healthy control subjects using a systems analysis approach.

RESULTS

Spontaneous sway abnormalities in PSP resembled those of IPD patients. Spontaneous sway was smaller, slower and contained lower frequencies in both PSP and IPD as compared to healthy subjects. The amount of angular body excursions as a function of platform angular excursions (GAIN) in PSP was qualitatively different from both IPD and healthy subjects (GAIN cut-off value: 2.9, sensitivity of 94%, specificity of 72%). This effect was pronounced at the upper body level and at low as well as high frequencies. In contrast, IPD patients' stimulus-related body excursions were smaller compared to healthy subjects. Using a systems analysis approach, we were able to allocate these different postural strategies to differences in the use of sensory information as well as to different error correction efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

While both PSP and IPD patients show abnormal postural control, the underlying pathology seems to be different.

SIGNIFICANCE

The identification of disease-specific postural abnormalities shown here may be helpful for diagnostic as well as therapeutic discriminations of PSP vs. IPD.

Postural Stabilization Differences in Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy during Self-Triggered Fast Forward Weight Lifting

Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and late-stage idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) are neurodegenerative movement disorders resulting in different postural instability and falling symptoms. IPD falls occur usually forward in late stage, whereas PSP falls happen in early stages, mostly backward, unprovoked, and with high morbidity. Self-triggered, weighted movements appear to provoke falls in IPD, but not in PSP. Repeated self-triggered lifting of a 0.5–1-kg weight (<2% of body weight) with the dominant hand was performed in 17 PSP, 15 IPD with falling history, and 16 controls on a posturography platform. PSP showed excessive force scaling of weight and body motion with high-frequency multiaxial body sway, whereas IPD presented a delayed-onset forward body displacement. Differences in center of mass displacement apparent at very small weights indicate that both syndromes decompensate postural control already within stability limits. PSP may be subject to specific postural system devolution. IPD are susceptible to delayed forward falling. Differential physiotherapy strategies are suggested.

Maintaining balance against force perturbations: impaired mechanisms unresponsive to levodopa in Parkinson's disease

We introduce a new method to investigate postural instability in Parkinson's disease (PD) using computer-controlled motors to deliver precise pulls to the shoulders of subjects while standing. It mimics the clinical pull test but uses forces with unpredictable timing, direction, and magnitude. It revealed a number of balance control deficits in PD. Notably, the identified deficits were not significantly altered by levodopa medication, suggesting that disruption to nondopaminergic systems contributes to postural instability in PD.

There is evidence that postural instability associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) is not adequately improved by levodopa, implying involvement of nondopaminergic pathways. However, the mechanisms contributing to postural instability have yet to be fully identified and tested for their levodopa responsiveness. In this report we investigate balance processes that resist external forces to the body when standing. These include in-place responses and the transition to protective stepping. Forward and backward shoulder pulls were delivered using two force-feedback-controlled motors and were randomized for direction, magnitude, and onset. Sixteen patients with PD were tested OFF and ON levodopa, and 16 healthy controls were tested twice. Response behavior was quantified from 3-dimensional ground reaction forces and kinematic measurements of body segments and total body center-of-mass (CoM) motion. In-place responses resisting the pull were significantly smaller in PD as reflected in reduced horizontal anteroposterior ground reaction force and increased CoM displacement. Ankle, knee, and hip moments contributing to this resistance were smaller in PD, with the knee extensor moment to backward pulls being the most affected. The threshold force needed to evoke a step was also smaller for PD in the forward direction. Protective steps evoked by suprathreshold pulls showed deficits in PD in the backward direction, with steps being shorter and more steps being required to arrest the body. Levodopa administration had no significant effect on either in-place or protective stepping deficits. We conclude that processes employed to maintain balance in the face of external forces show impairment in PD consistent with disruption to nondopaminergic systems.

Comparing the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale with the Mini-BESTest and Berg Balance Scale to assess postural control in patients with Parkinson disease

OBJECTIVES

To validate the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) Scale for patients with idiopathic Parkinson disease (PD); and to compare the FAB Scale with the Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS).

DESIGN

Observational study to assess concurrent validity, test-retest, and interrater reliability of the FAB Scale in patients with PD and to compare the distribution of the scale with the Mini-BESTest and BBS.

SETTING

University hospital in an urban community.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with idiopathic PD (N=85; Hoehn and Yahr stages 1-4).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

FAB Scale, Mini-BESTest, BBS, timed Up and Go test, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Interrater (3 raters) and test-retest (3±1 d) reliability were high for all scales (ICCs≥.95). The FAB Scale was highly correlated with the Mini-BESTest (Spearman ρ=.87) and timed Up and Go test item of the Mini-BESTest (Spearman ρ=.83). In contrast with the BBS, the FAB Scale and Mini-BESTest have only minimal ceiling effects. The FAB Scale demonstrated the most symmetric distribution when compared with the Mini-BESTest and BBS (skewness: FAB scale: -.54; Mini-BESTest: -1.07; BBS: -2.14).

CONCLUSIONS

The FAB Scale is a valid and reliable tool to assess postural control in patients with PD. No ceiling effect was noted for the FAB Scale. Although the items of the FAB Scale are more detailed when compared with the Mini-BESTest, interrater and test-retest reliability were excellent. The scale is a promising tool to detect small changes of the postural control system in individuals with PD.

The intra-rater reliability and agreement of compensatory stepping thresholds of healthy subjects

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the test-retest, intra-rater reliability and agreement of compensatory stepping thresholds. A protocol was developed to establish anteroposterior single-stepping thresholds, anteroposterior multiple-stepping thresholds, and lateral single-stepping thresholds. Healthy, young subjects stood on a microprocessor-controlled treadmill, and responded to three series of progressively challenging surface translations. Subjects were instructed to "try not to step" when establishing single-stepping thresholds or "try to take only one step" when establishing multiple-stepping thresholds. Stepping thresholds were defined as the minimum disturbance magnitude that consistently elicited a single or second compensatory step. Thresholds were expressed as the ankle torque necessary to maintain upright posture. Thresholds studied included anterior single-stepping thresholds (τ = 273.0 ± 82.3 N m), posterior single-stepping, thresholds (τ = 235.5 ± 98.0 N m), anterior multiple-stepping thresholds (τ = 977.0 ± 416.3 N m), posterior multiple-stepping thresholds (τ = 701.9 ± 237.5 N m), stability-side lateral single-stepping thresholds (τ = 225.7 ± 77.7 Nm), and mobility-side lateral single-stepping thresholds (τ = 236.8 ± 85.4 N m). Based on intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots, all thresholds demonstrated excellent reliability (ICC(2,1) = 0.87-0.97) and agreement. These results suggest that compensatory stepping thresholds have sufficient repeatability to be used in clinical and research-related assessments of fall-risk. Additional study is needed to determine the intra- and inter-rater reliabilities and validity of thresholds specific to the patient populations of interest.