Reduced knee adduction moments for management of knee osteoarthritis:: A three month phase I/II randomized controlled trial

The impact of ankle-foot orthosis's plantarflexion resistance on knee adduction moment in people with chronic stroke

BACKGROUND

An ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) is used to assist gait of people with chronic stroke. It is widely accepted that AFO's plantarflexion resistance affects sagittal knee moments during their gait. However, its effect on the coronal knee moment remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of varying articulated AFO's plantarflexion resistance on knee adduction moment in people with chronic stroke.

METHODS

Ten people with chronic stroke participated in this study. Gait performance was measured using a Vicon 3-dimensional motion capture system and a Bertec split-belt instrumented treadmill. The participants walked on the treadmill wearing an articulated AFO whose plantarflexion resistance could be systematically adjusted. The ankle joints were set to four distinct levels of plantarflexion resistance (S1 < S2 < S3 < S4). The coronal ankle and knee joint moment, center of pressure, and ground reaction force were analyzed using Visual3D.

RESULTS

The external knee adduction moment increased significantly ( P < .001) and the position of the center of pressure trajectory shifted significantly ( P = .003) in the medial direction as the plantarflexion resistance of the AFO was increased from the least resistive condition (S1) to the most resistive condition (S4). The maximum knee adduction moment (median [interquartile range]) was S1: 0.097 (-0.012 to 0.265) Nm/kg; S2: 0.136 (0.040 to 0.287) Nm/kg; S3: 0.160 (0.465 to 0.289) Nm/kg; and S4: 0.192 (0.080 to 0.288) Nm/kg.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that varying AFO's plantarflexion resistance altered the knee adduction moment, likely by altering the center of pressure trajectory while walking, in people with chronic stroke.

Conservative treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A review of the literature

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common chronic debilitating disease with an estimated prevalence of 23.9% in the general adult population. The condition is characterised by joint pain, functional impairment and significant reduction in quality of life. Management for KOA can generally be divided into conservative (non-operative) and surgical (operative) measures. Conservative management broadly compromises pharmacological and non-pharmacological options and is conventionally the first line treatment to avoid or delay the need for surgical management. The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current recommendations, efficacy and safety profile of different conservative treatments through a review of the literature.

The future of in-field sports biomechanics: wearables plus modelling compute real-time in vivo tissue loading to prevent and repair musculoskeletal injuries

This paper explores the use of biomechanics in identifying the mechanistic causes of musculoskeletal tissue injury and degeneration. It appraises how biomechanics has been used to develop training programmes aiming to maintain or recover tissue health. Tissue health depends on the functional mechanical environment experienced by tissues during daily and rehabilitation activities. These environments are the result of the interactions between tissue motion, loading, biology, and morphology. Maintaining health of and/or repairing musculoskeletal tissues requires targeting the "ideal" in vivo tissue mechanics (i.e., loading and deformation), which may be enabled by appropriate real-time biofeedback. Recent research shows that biofeedback technologies may increase their quality and effectiveness by integrating a personalised neuromusculoskeletal modelling driven by real-time motion capture and medical imaging. Model personalisation is crucial in obtaining physically and physiologically valid predictions of tissue biomechanics. Model real-time execution is crucial and achieved by code optimisation and artificial intelligence methods. Furthermore, recent work has also shown that laboratory-based motion capture biomechanical measurements and modelling can be performed outside the laboratory with wearable sensors and artificial intelligence. The next stage is to combine these technologies into well-designed easy to use products to guide training to maintain or recover tissue health in the real-world.

Effects of tailored lateral wedge insoles on medial knee osteoarthritis based on biomechanical analysis: 12-week randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lateral wedge insoles adjusted by biomechanical analysis may improve the condition of patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial.

SETTING

The study was conducted in a biomechanics laboratory.

SUBJECTS

A total of 38 patients with medial knee osteoarthritis were allocated to either an experimental group (lateral wedge insoles) or a control group (neutral insoles).

INTERVENTIONS

Experimental group (n = 20) received an adjusted lateral wedge insole of 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 degrees, after previous biomechanical analysis. Control group (n = 18) received a neutral insole (0 degrees). All patients used the insoles for 12 weeks.

MAIN MEASURES

Visual analogue scale, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire, biomechanical parameters: first and second peak of the external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse, and physical performance tests: 30-second sit-to-stand test, the 40-m fast-paced walk test, and the 12-step stair-climb test.

RESULTS

After 12 weeks, between-group differences did not differ significantly for pain intensity (-12.5 mm, (95% CI -29.4-4.4)), biomechanical parameters (p = 0.05), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and physical performance tests, except on the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscale other symptoms (p = 0.002; 13.8 points, (95% CI 5.6-22.0)).

CONCLUSION

Tailored wedge insoles were no more effective at improving biomechanical or clinically meaningful outcomes than neutral insoles, except on symptoms. More participants from the experimental group reported they felt some improvement. However, these effects were minimal and without clinical significance.

Effect of knee braces and insoles on clinical outcomes of individuals with medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Knee osteoarthritis is a disabling disease, causing pain and reduced function.Orthoses are used to manage this problem, including knee braces and lateral wedge insoles. However, there is still controversy on which type of intervention is more effective. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed toevaluate the effect of knee braces and lateral wedge insoles and compare their clinical outcomes onindividuals with medial knee osteoarthritis. We conducted the search strategy based on the population, intervention, comparison, andoutcome (PICO) method. We searched with PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for the related studies. The articles quality assessment was done based on the modified Downs and Black checklist. Totally, we chose 32 controlled trials, including 1.849 participants, for the final evaluation. Almosttwo-thirds of the studies had a moderate quality. The overall outcome suggested that both interventionshad improved pain and function. The difference between both interventions on pain reduction was not significant (standardized mean difference = 0.12, 95% confidence interval = 0.34 to 0.1) based on meta-analysis. Both knee brace and lateral wedge insole can improve pain and function in people with knee osteoarthritis. Using either separately or both of them together are effective.

The effectiveness of foot orthoses in the treatment of medial knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Knee osteoarthritis is a disease of the joint causing decreased function and pain. Currently, treatments range from medication to surgery, with the use of different insoles and footwear recommended. These methods are effective by either correcting the position of the knee or providing shock absorption. However, there is little understanding of the effective characteristics of these devices.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This paper aims to investigate this question and provide future areas of research to help better define treatment guidelines. Foot orthoses are an example of non-pharmacological conservative treatments mentioned in National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines to treat knee osteoarthritis (OA). These include lateral wedge insoles (LWI), developed with the intention of load reduction of the knee. Different footwear has also been shown to affect pain, biomechanical and functional outcomes in knee OA patients.

METHODS

To address what features of LWIs and footwear make them effective in the treatment of knee OA, scientific databases were used to search for papers on this topic and then selected to be included based on pre-defined criteria. Data were extracted and analysed from these studies to provide a basis for possible areas for future development of these foot orthoses, and research required to improve clinical treatment guidelines. Databases used were PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science.

RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Thirty-four out of 226 papers were included after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Regarding LWIs, the characteristics showing the most beneficial effect on either biomechanical, functional or pain outcomes were customisation, full-length, 5° elevation, shock absorption and arch support. For footwear, barefoot mimicking soles produced the most favourable biomechanics. Results also showed that insoles work in correcting the position of the knee, but it may or may not affect patients' pain and function.

The optimal degree of lateral wedge insoles for reducing knee joint load: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Lateral wedge insoles are traditionally used to reduce the adduction moment that crosses the knee during walking in people with medial knee osteoarthritis. However, the best degree to reduce knee joint load is not yet well established.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched from their inception until May 2017. Included studies reported on the immediate biomechanical effects of different degrees of lateral wedge insoles during walking in people with knee osteoarthritis. The main measures of interest relating to the biomechanics were the first and second peak of external knee adduction moment and knee adduction angular impulse. For the comparison of the biomechanical effects of different degrees of insoles, the studies were divided in three subgroups: insoles with a degree higher than 0° and equal to or lower than 5°; insoles higher than 5° and equal to or lower than 9°; and insoles higher than 9°. Eligible studies were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

Results

Fifteen studies with a total of 415 participants met all eligibility criteria and were included in the final review and meta-analysis. The overall effect suggests that lateral wedge insoles resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the first peak (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.36, - 0.13; P < 0.001), second peak (SMD -0.26 [95% CI -0.48, - 0.04]; P = 0.02) and knee adduction angular impulse (SMD -0.17 [95% CI -0.31, - 0.03]; P = 0.02). The test of subgroups found no statistically significant differences.

Conclusion

Systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that lateral wedge insoles cause an overall slight reduction in the biomechanical parameters. Higher degrees do not show higher reductions than lower degrees. Prior analysis of biomechanical parameters may be a valid option for selecting the optimal angle of wedge that best fits in knee osteoarthritis patients with the lowest possible degree.

Gait alteration strategies for knee osteoarthritis: a comparison of joint loading via generic and patient-specific musculoskeletal model scaling techniques

Gait modifications and laterally wedged insoles are non-invasive approaches used to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. However, the outcome of these alterations is still a controversial topic. This study investigates how gait alteration techniques may have a unique effect on individual patients; and furthermore, the way we scale our musculoskeletal models to estimate the medial joint contact force may influence knee loading conditions. Five patients with clinical evidence of medial knee osteoarthritis were asked to walk at a normal walking speed over force plates and simultaneously 3D motion was captured during seven conditions (0°-, 5°-, 10°-insoles, shod, toe-in, toe-out, and wide stance). We developed patient-specific musculoskeletal models, using segmentations from magnetic resonance imaging to morph a generic model to patient-specific bone geometries and applied this morphing to estimate muscle insertion sites. Additionally, models were created of these patients using a simple linear scaling method. When examining the patients' medial compartment contact force (peak and impulse) during stance phase, a 'one-size-fits-all' gait alteration aimed to reduce medial knee loading did not exist. Moreover, the different scaling methods lead to differences in medial contact forces; highlighting the importance of further investigation of musculoskeletal modeling methods prior to use in the clinical setting.

The Efficacy of a Lateral Wedge Insole for Painful Medial Knee Osteoarthritis After Prescreening: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

Lateral wedge shoe insoles decrease medial knee loading, but trials have shown no effect on pain in medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, loading effects of insoles are inconsistent, and they can increase patellofemoral loading. We undertook this study to investigate the hypothesis that insoles would reduce pain in preselected patients.

METHODS

Among patients with painful medial knee OA, we excluded those with patellofemoral OA and those with a pain rating of <4 of a possible 10. We further excluded participants who, in a gait analysis using lateral wedges, did not show at least a 2% reduction in knee adduction moment (KAM), compared to wearing their shoes and a neutral insole. We then randomized subjects to lateral wedge versus neutral insole for 8-week periods, separated by an 8-week washout. The primary outcome measure was knee pain (0-10 scale) during the past week, and secondary outcome measures included activity pain and pain rated in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire. We carried out mixed model analyses adjusted for baseline pain.

RESULTS

Of 83 participants, 21 (25.3%) were excluded from analysis because of insufficient reduction in KAM. In the 62 patients included in analysis, the mean ± SD age was 64.2 ± 9.1 years, and 37.1% were women. Lateral wedge insoles produced a greater reduction in knee pain than neutral insoles (mean difference of 0.7 on 0-10 scale [95% confidence interval 0.1, 1.2]) (P = 0.02). Findings for secondary outcome measures were mixed.

CONCLUSION

In participants prescreened to eliminate those with patellofemoral OA and biomechanical nonresponders, lateral wedge insoles reduced knee pain, but the effect of treatment was small and is likely of clinical significance in only a minority of patients. Targeting patients may identify those who respond to this treatment.

Is the Wedged Insole an Effective Treatment Option When Compared with a Flat (Placebo) Insole: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Using the lateral wedge insole is a conservative management strategy for knee osteoarthritis. The theoretical basis for this intervention is to correct femorotibial angle, thereby reducing pain and optimising function.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the effectiveness of wedge insole compared with flat insole for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, searching published (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) and unpublished literature from their inception to April 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the use of wedge insole with a flat insole were included. Risk of bias and clinical relevance were assessed, and outcomes were analysed through meta-analysis.

RESULT

From a total of 413 citations, 8 studies adhered to the a priori eligibility criteria. The WOMAC pain was shown to be statistically nonsignificant change with the use of wedge insole (SMD=0.07), and low heterogeneity (I2=22%) and a 95% CI that crossed zero (95% CI: -0.09 to 0.24). The 5 independent trials were not significant in improving pain score (SMD = -0.02, 95% CI: -0.19 to 0.16). This review also revealed no significance in improving Lequesne index (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI: -0.72 to 0.19). The meta-analysis from the 2 independent trials was significant in improving femorotibial angle (SMD = -0.41, 95% CI: -0.73 to -0.09). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggested that lateral wedge insoles can improve femorotibial angle but are of no benefit with pain and functions in knee osteoarthritis.

Foot structure and knee joint kinetics during walking with and without wedged footwear insoles

The relationship between static foot structure characteristics and knee joint biomechanics during walking, or the biomechanical response to wedged insoles are currently unknown. In this study, 3D foot scanning, dual X-ray absorptiometry and gait analysis methods were used to determine structural parameters of the foot and assess their relation to knee joint loading and biomechanical response to wedged insoles in 30 patients with knee osteoarthritis. In multiple linear regression models, foot fat content, height of the medial longitudinal arch and static hind foot angle were not associated with the magnitude of the knee adduction moment (R² = 0.24, p = 0.060), knee adduction angular impulse (R² = 0.21, p = 0.099) or 3D resultant knee moment (R² = 0.23, p = 0.073) during gait. Furthermore, these foot structure parameters were not associated with the patients' biomechanical response to medial or lateral wedge footwear insoles (all p < 0.01). These findings suggest that static foot structure is not associated with gait mechanics at the knee, and that static foot structure alone cannot be utilized to predict an individual's biomechanical response to wedged footwear insoles in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2017: rehabilitation and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this systematic review was to describe studies examining rehabilitation for people with osteoarthritis (OA) and to summarize findings from selected key systematic reviews (SRs) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

DESIGN

A systematic search was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases from April 1^st 2016 to May 15^th 2017 using the terms 'osteoarthritis', 'randomized controlled trial', and 'systematic review'. Inclusion criteria were: clinically or radiologically diagnosed patients with OA, rehabilitation treatment, RCT or SRs. A selection of the included studies is discussed based on study quality and perceived importance to the field; including those that are innovative, inform the direction of the field or generate controversy. Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the PEDro-scale for RCTs and the Amstar guideline for SRs.

RESULTS

From 1211 articles, 80 articles met the eligibility criteria including 21 SRs and 61 RCTs. The median of the methodological quality of the SRs and RCTs was 7 (2-9) and 6 (3-10), respectively. The studies were grouped into several themes, covering the most important rehabilitation fields.

CONCLUSIONS

Striking is the small number of studies investigating another joint (18%) than the knee (82%). Exercise is the most common treatment evaluated and should be accompanied with education to effectuate a behavioural change in physical activity of people with OA. No new insights in the field of braces (or orthoses) and in the field of acupuncture were found.

Moderators and mediators of effects of unloading shoes on knee pain in people with knee osteoarthritis: an exploratory analysis of the SHARK randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To investigate moderators and biomechanical mediators of effects of unloading shoes on knee pain in people with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Exploratory analysis from 164 participants in a clinical trial comparing unloading (ASICS GEL-Melbourne OA) to conventional walking shoes. The primary outcome was 6-month change in knee pain (11-point numerical rating scale (NRS)). Moderators included baseline peak knee adduction moment (KAM), radiographic severity (Kellgren & Lawrence (KL) scale), body mass, foot posture, neuropathic pain and diffuse knee pain. Mediators included change in peak KAM and KAM impulse.

RESULTS

Radiographic severity was the only moderator to interact with footwear group (P = 0.02). Participants with KL = 2 experienced greater pain reductions with conventional compared to unloading shoes (mean difference in change in pain -1.64 units, 95% CI -3.07, -0.21), while unloading shoes tended to result in greater pain reductions than conventional shoes in KL = 3 (0.98, 95% CI -0.44, 2.39) and KL = 4 (0.64, 95% CI -0.64, 1.93). No variable showed any significant mediating effect in the entire cohort. However, there was some evidence that unloading shoes may reduce pain through reductions in peak KAM (indirect effect -0.31, 95% CIs -0.65, 0.03; P = 0.07) in people with KL ≥ 3, compared to conventional shoes.

CONCLUSION

Unloading shoes conferred additional symptomatic benefits over conventional shoes in people with moderate to severe knee OA. There was some evidence effects may be mediated by a reduction in peak KAM. However, we were underpowered for subgroup analyses. These patients may represent a subgroup to which biomechanical interventions designed to reduce the KAM may be more effectively targeted.