An alternative whole-body marker set to accurately and reliably quantify joint kinematics during load carriage

Walking Slope and Heavy Backpacks Affect Peak and Impulsive Lumbar Joint Contact Forces

Heavy load carriage is associated with musculoskeletal overuse injury, particularly in the lumbar spine. In addition, steep walking slopes and heavy backpacks separately require adaptation of torso kinematics, but the combined effect of sloped walking and heavy backpack loads on lumbar joint contact forces is unclear. Backpacks with hip belt attachments can reduce pressure under the shoulder straps; however, it is unknown if wearing a hip belt reduces lumbar spine forces. We used a musculoskeletal modeling and simulation approach to quantify peak and impulsive L1L2 and L4L5 lumbar joint contact forces in the anterior/posterior shear and compressive directions during walking on 0 deg and ±10 deg slopes, with no backpack and with 40% body weight backpack load using two different backpack configurations (hip belt assisted and shoulder-borne). Both walking slope and backpack load significantly affected shear and compressive peak and impulsive forces. The largest peak shear and compressive forces of 1.57 and 5.23 body weights, respectively, exceed recommended limits and were observed during uphill walking with shoulder-borne loads. However, only impulsive force results revealed differences due to the backpack configuration, and this effect depended on walking slope. During downhill walking only, the hip belt-assisted configuration resulted compressive impulses lower than during shoulder borne by 0.25 body weight seconds for both L1L2 and L4L5. These results indicate that walking uphill with heavy loads causes high shear and compressive lumbar forces that may increase overuse injury risk. In addition, our results suggest it is especially important to wear a hip belt when walking downhill.

Psoas force recruitment in full-body musculoskeletal movement simulations is restored with a geometrically informed cost function weighting

Simulations of musculoskeletal models are useful for estimating internal muscle and joint forces. However, predicted forces rely on optimization and modeling formulations. Geometric detail is important to predict muscle forces, and greater geometric complexity is required for muscles that have broad attachments or span many joints, as in the torso. However, the extent to which optimized muscle force recruitment is sensitive to these geometry choices is unclear. We developed level, uphill and downhill sloped walking simulations using a standard (uniformly weighted, "fatigue-like") cost function with lower limb and full-body musculoskeletal models to evaluate hip muscle recruitment with different geometric representations of the psoas muscle under walking conditions with varying hip moment demands. We also tested a novel cost function formulation where muscle activations were weighted according to the modeled geometric detail in the full-body model. Total psoas force was less and iliacus, rectus femoris, and other hip flexors' force was greater when psoas was modeled with greater geometric detail compared to other hip muscles for all slopes. The proposed weighting scheme restored hip muscle force recruitment without sacrificing detailed psoas geometry. In addition, we found that lumbar, but not hip, joint contact forces were influenced by psoas force recruitment. Our results demonstrate that static optimization dependent simulations using models comprised of muscles with different amounts of geometric detail bias force recruitment toward muscles with less geometric detail. Muscle activation weighting that accounts for differences in geometric complexity across muscles corrects for this recruitment bias.

WALKING SLOPE AND HEAVY BACKPACK LOADS AFFECT TORSO MUSCLE ACTIVITY AND KINEMATICS

The independent effects of sloped walking or carrying a heavy backpack on posture and torso muscle activations have been reported. While the combined effects of sloped walking and backpack loads are known to be physically demanding, how back and abdominal muscles adapt to walking on slopes with heavy load is unclear. This study quantified three-dimensional pelvis and torso kinematics and muscle activity from longissimus, iliocostalis, rectus abdominis, and external oblique during walking on 0° and ± 10° degree slopes with and without backpack loads using two different backpack configurations (hip-belt assisted and shoulder-borne). Iliocostalis activity was greater during downhill and uphill compared to level walking, but longissimus was only greater during uphill. Rectus abdominis activity was greater during downhill and uphill compared to level, while external oblique activity decreased as slopes progressed from down to up. Longissimus, but not iliocostalis, activity was reduced during both backpack configurations compared to walking with no pack. Hip-belt assisted load carriage required less rectus abdominis activity compared to using shoulder-borne only backpacks; however, external oblique was not influenced by backpack condition. Our results revealed different responses between iliocostalis and longissimus, and between rectus abdominis and external obliques, suggesting different motor control strategies between anatomical planes.

Kinematic Evaluation of the Sagittal Posture during Walking in Healthy Subjects by 3D Motion Analysis Using DB-Total Protocol

Posture can be evaluated by clinical and instrumental methods. Three-dimensional motion analysis is the gold standard for the static and dynamic postural assessment. Conventional stereophotogrammetric protocols are used to assess the posture of pelvis, hip, knee, ankle, trunk (considered as a single segment) and rarely head and upper limbs during walking. A few studies also analyzed the multi-segmental trunk and whole-body kinematics. Aim of our study was to evaluate the sagittal spine and the whole-body during walking in healthy subjects by 3D motion analysis using a new marker set. Fourteen healthy subjects were assessed by 3D-Stereophotogrammetry using the DB-Total protocol. Excursion Range, Absolute Excursion Range, Average, intra-subject Coefficient of Variation (CV) and inter-subject Standard Deviation Average (SD Average) of eighteen new kinematic parameters related to sagittal spine and whole-body posture were calculated. The analysis of the DB-Total parameters showed a high intra-subject (CV < 50%) and a high inter-subject (SD Average < 1) repeatability for the most of them. Kinematic curves and new additional values were reported. The present study introduced new postural values characterizing the sagittal spinal and whole-body alignment of healthy subjects during walking. DB-Total parameters may be useful for understanding multi-segmental body biomechanics and as a benchmark for pathological patterns.

A Thorax Marker Set Model to Analyse the Kinematics of Walking Without the Need to Place Markers on the Back

BACKGROUND

Previous thorax models have been proposed for gait analysis, however these require markers to be placed on the back. This presents a limitation in the kinematic analysis of the thorax under load carriage conditions.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study evaluated the validity and reliability of a thorax marker set that does not require markers to be placed on the back (HubemaLab model) when compared to 3 previously published marker set models.

METHODS

17 young adults were evaluated while walking at their self-selected speed. A 12 camera motion capture system was used to acquire the marker position data which was then processed using the respective models using Visual-3D. The level of agreement for the flexion/extension peak, right/left lateral peak and right/left rotation peak of the thorax angle and angular velocity; together with the range of motion and thorax angular velocities in the three planes was found between each thorax marker set, while the reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The ICC results for the thorax angle ROM and the range of thorax angular velocity between the HubemaLab model and the other models showed excellent to good reliability in all three planes. While the ICCs for the peak flexion/extension, peak right/left lateral flexion and peak right/left rotation showed excellent to moderate reliability in all three planes.

CONCLUSION

The new model could be potentially valuable for kinematic gait analysis under load carriage conditions which obscure markers placed on the back.

Lower Limb Biomechanical Responses During a Standardized Load Carriage Task are Sex Specific

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to investigate sex-specific lower limb biomechanical adaptations during a standardized load carriage task in response to a targeted physical training program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-five healthy civilians (males [n = 13] and females [n = 12]) completed a load carriage task (5 km at 5.5 km·h-1, wearing a 23 kg vest) before and after a 10-week lower-body-focused training program. Kinematics and ground reaction force data were collected during the task and were used to estimate lower limb joint kinematics and kinetics (i.e., moments and powers). Direct statistical comparisons were not conducted due to different data collection protocols between sexes. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA tested for significant interactions between, and main effects of training and distance marched for male and female data, respectively.

RESULTS

Primary kinematic and kinetic changes were observed at the knee and ankle joints for males and at the hip and knee joints for females. Knee joint moments increased for both sexes over the 5 km distance marched (P > .05), with males demonstrating significant reductions in peak knee joint extension after training. Hip adduction, internal rotation, and knee internal rotation angles significantly increased after the 5 km load carriage task for females but not males.

CONCLUSION

Differences in adaptive gait strategies between sexes indicate that physical training needs to be tailored to sex-specific requirements to meet standardized load carriage task demands. The findings highlighted previously unfound sex-specific responses that could inform military training and facilitate the integration of female soldiers into physically demanding military roles.

Effect of a load distribution system on mobility and performance during simulated and field hiking while under load

This study was conducted to test a modular scalable vest-load distribution system (MSV-LDS) against the plate carrier system (PC) currently used by the United States Marine Corps. Ten Marines engaged in 1.6 km load carriage trials in seven experimental conditions in a laboratory study. Kinematic, kinetic, and spatiotemporal gait parameters, muscle activity (electromyography), heart rate, caloric expenditure, shooting reaction times, and subjective responses were recorded. There was lower mean trapezius recruitment for the PC compared with the MSV-LDS for all conditions, and muscle activity was similar to baseline for the MSV-LDS. Twenty-seven Marines carrying the highest load were evaluated in the field, which measured an increase in energy expenditure with MSV-LDS; however, back discomfort was reduced. The field evaluation showed significantly reduced estimated ground reaction force on flat-ground segments with the MSV-LDS, and the data suggest both systems were comparable with respect to mobility and energy cost. Practitioner summary: This study found that a novel load distribution system appears to redistribute load for improved comfort as well as reduce estimated ground reaction force when engaged in hiking activities. Further, hiking with a load distribution system enables more neutral walking posture. Implications of load differences in loads carried are examined. Abbreviations: AGRF: anterior-posterior ground reaction forces; CAREN: Computer Assisted Rehabilitation Environment; GRF: ground reaction forces; HR: heart rate; ML-GRF: mediolateral ground reaction forces; MOLLE: Modular Lightweight Load-carrying Equipment; MSV-LDS: modular scalable vest-load distribution system; NHRC: Naval Health Research Center; PC: plate carrier; PPE: personal protective equipment; RPE: rating of perceived exertion; SAPI: small arms protective insert; sEMG: surface electromyography; USMC: United States Marine Corps; VGRF: Ground reaction forces in the vertical.

Individuals with mild-to-moderate hip osteoarthritis exhibit altered pelvis and hip kinematics during sit-to-stand

BACKGROUND

Performance of the sit-to-stand (STS) task is compromised in individuals with advanced hip osteoarthritis (OA). Understanding how STS performance is altered in individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA may inform interventions to improve function and slow disease progression.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do trunk, pelvis, and hip biomechanics differ during a STS task between individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA and a healthy, age-matched control group?

METHODS

Thirteen individuals with mild-to-moderate symptomatic and radiographic hip OA and seventeen healthy, age-matched controls performed a standardized STS task. Data were acquired using a three-dimensional motion capture system. The primary outcome measures were task duration, sagittal and frontal plane trunk, pelvis, and hip joint angles, and sagittal and frontal plane trunk and hip joint moments. Comparisons of lower-limb measures were between the most affected side in the hip OA group and a randomly chosen limb for the control group, termed the index limb, prior to and following lift-off from the chair.

RESULTS

Participants with mild-to-moderate hip OA took longer to perform the STS task compared to controls. Prior to lift-off, the hip OA group exhibited greater posterior pelvic tilt, greater pelvic rise on the index side and less hip joint flexion relative to controls. Following lift-off, the hip OA group exhibited greater pelvic rise on the index side compared to controls.

SIGNIFICANCE

Individuals with mild-to-moderate hip OA exhibit subtle alterations in movement strategy compared to healthy controls when completing a STS task similar, to a small extent, to adaptations reported in advanced stages of the disease. Interventions to target these features and prevent further decline in physical function may be warranted in the management of mild-to-moderate hip OA while the opportunity remains.

Lower-limb joint work and power are modulated during load carriage based on load configuration and walking speed

Soldiers regularly transport loads weighing >20 kg at slow speeds for long durations. These tasks elicit high energetic costs through increased positive work generated by knee and ankle muscles, which may increase risk of muscular fatigue and decrease combat readiness. This study aimed to determine how modifying where load is borne changes lower-limb joint mechanical work production, and if load magnitude and/or walking speed also affect work production. Twenty Australian soldiers participated, donning a total of 12 body armor variations: six different body armor systems (one standard-issue, two commercially available [cARM1-2], and three prototypes [pARM1-3]), each worn with two different load magnitudes (15 and 30 kg). For each armor variation, participants completed treadmill walking at two speeds (1.51 and 1.83 m/s). Three-dimensional motion capture and force plate data were acquired and used to estimate joint angles and moments from inverse kinematics and dynamics, respectively. Subsequently, hip, knee, and ankle joint work and power were computed and compared between armor types and walking speeds. Positive joint work over the stance phase significantly increased with walking speed and carried load, accompanied by 2.3-2.6% shifts in total positive work production from the ankle to the hip (p < 0.05). Compared to using cARM1 with 15 kg carried load, carrying 30 kg resulted in significantly greater hip contribution to total lower-limb positive work, while knee and ankle work decreased. Substantial increases in hip joint contributions to total lower-limb positive work that occur with increases in walking speed and load magnitude highlight the importance of hip musculature to load carriage walking.

Tibiofemoral joint contact forces increase with load magnitude and walking speed but remain almost unchanged with different types of carried load

Musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) in the military reduce soldier capability and impose substantial costs. Characterizing biomechanical surrogates of MSI during commonly performed military tasks (e.g., load carriage) is necessary for evaluating the effectiveness of possible interventions to reduce MSI risk. This study determined the effects of body-borne load distribution, load magnitude, and walking speed on tibiofemoral contact forces. Twenty-one Australian Army Reserve soldiers completed a treadmill walking protocol in an unloaded condition and wearing four armor types (standard-issue and three prototypes) with two load configurations (15 and 30 kg) for a total of 8 armor x load ensembles. In each ensemble, participants completed a 5-minute warm-up, and then walked for 10 minutes at both moderate (1.53 m⋅s^-1) and fast (1.81 m⋅s^-1) speeds. During treadmill walking, three-dimensional kinematics, ground reaction forces, and muscle activity from nine lower-limb muscles were collected in the final minute of each speed. These data were used as inputs into a neuromusculoskeletal model, which estimated medial, lateral and total tibiofemoral contact forces. Repeated measures analyses of variance revealed no differences for any variables between armor types, but peak medial compartment contact forces increased when progressing from moderate to fast walking and with increased load (p<0.001). Acute exposure to load carriage increased estimated tibiofemoral contact forces 10.1 and 19.9% with 15 and 30kg of carried load, respectively, compared to unloaded walking. These results suggest that soldiers carrying loads in excess of 15 kg for prolonged periods could be at greater risk of knee MSI than those with less exposure.