Pregnancy walking cadence does not vary by trimester

A systematic review on the physical, mental, and occupational effects of exercise on pregnant women

Complications in pregnancy have been proven to be less frequent with exercise. The American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology suggests pregnant women should exercise an average of 20 to 30 min a day; however, only 13% of pregnant women exercise throughout their pregnancy. This amount could be improved if women are aware that exercise: 1. Can help avoid pregnancy complications or death and 2. Comes in various forms with different health outcomes associated with it. For this reason, this systematic literature review was conducted to review different types of exercise for pregnant women. Peer-reviewed articles were selected to discuss the benefits of the most researched exercises for pregnant women, which included yoga, resistance training, aquatic exercises, dance, and aerobic exercise such as running, walking, and cycling. Data from the review revealed that different types of exercises led to various benefits at different stages of pregnancy. Aquatic activities and yoga helped pregnant women toward the end of their pregnancies, whereas resistance training, dance, and aerobic exercises provided the most benefits during the first trimester. Other studies found that any form of exercise for 30 min a day or every other day for 60 min provided extensive beneficial results. Ultimately, this information could be used to create individualized exercise plans for pregnant women to adhere to throughout their pregnancy.

Update and Novel Validation of a Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire

The aim of this study was to update and validate the Pregnancy Physical Activity Questionnaire (PPAQ), using novel and innovative accelerometer and wearable camera measures in a free-living setting, to improve the measurement performance of this method for self-reporting physical activity. A prospective cohort of 50 eligible pregnant women were enrolled in early pregnancy (mean = 14.9 weeks' gestation). In early, middle, and late pregnancy, participants completed the updated PPAQ and, for 7 days, wore an accelerometer (GT3X-BT; ActiGraph, Pensacola, Florida) on the nondominant wrist and a wearable camera (Autographer; OMG Life (defunct)). At the end of the 7-day period, participants repeated the PPAQ. Spearman correlations between the PPAQ and accelerometer data ranged from 0.37 to 0.44 for total activity, 0.17 to 0.53 for moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity, 0.19 to 0.42 for light-intensity activity, and 0.23 to 0.45 for sedentary behavior. Spearman correlations between the PPAQ and wearable camera data ranged from 0.52 to 0.70 for sports/exercise and from 0.26 to 0.30 for transportation activity. Reproducibility scores ranged from 0.70 to 0.92 for moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity and from 0.79 to 0.91 for sports/exercise, and were comparable across other domains of physical activity. The PPAQ is a reliable instrument and a valid measure of a broad range of physical activities during pregnancy.

Comparison of habitual stepping cadence analysis methods: Relationship with step counts

BACKGROUND

Different approaches have been implemented to calculate stepping cadence (steps/min) that vary in the time demominator used. Given the differences in how stepping intensity are calculated, it is unclear if they are more so associated with total step counts.

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE

This study compared three methods of calculating stepping cadence and determined their relationship with total step counts.

METHODS

132 participants (74♀; 35 ± 20 years; body mass index: 24.9 ± 4.0 kg•m^-2) wore an activPAL monitor 24-hr/day for up to 8-d (total: 869-d). The total steps/day, time spent stepping (0.1 s resolution; to calculate bout stepping rate), time spent stepping in 60 s epochs (step accumulation), and awake time (awake cadence) were determined. Each cadence method (in steps/min) were compared via Spearman's rank correlation. The relationships versus total step count were determined, and the strength of these relationships compared between cadence measures (95% confidence interval of correlation differences).

RESULTS

Bout stepping rate (85 ± 14 steps/min) was larger than step accumulation (34 ± 12 steps/min) and awake cadence (10 ± 5 steps/min, both: P < 0.001). Step accumulation was positively strongly related to bout stepping rate (ρ = 0.813; P < 0.001) whereas awake cadence was weakly related to bout stepping rate (ρ = 0.496; P < 0.001). Step accumulation (ρ = 0.634; P < 0.001) and awake cadence (ρ = 0.964; P < 0.001) were more related to step counts than bout stepping rate (ρ = 0.497; P < 0.001; 95% confidence intervals of correlation differences: step accumulation=0.10-0.17, awake cadence: 0.42-0.52).

SIGNIFICANCE

Without a precise measure of time spent stepping, stepping cadence is lower using the step accumulation and awake cadence methods. Step accumulation and awake cadence are more related to total step counts than bout stepping rate. Bout stepping rate outcomes reflect continuous stepping rate, does not rely on a preset epoch, and may have less overlap with step counts, which may have implications for determining the unique contributions of step count versus stepping cadence on health outcomes.

Location, Location, Location: Accelerometer Placement Affects Steps-Based Physical Activity Outcomes During Pregnancy and Postpartum

As pregnancy progresses, physical changes may affect physical activity (PA) measurement validity. n = 11 pregnant women (30.1 ± 3.8 years) wore ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometers on the right hip, right ankle, and non-dominant wrist for 3-7 days during the second and third trimesters (21 and 32 weeks, respectively) and 12 weeks postpartum. Data were downloaded into 60-second epochs from which stepping cadence was calculated; repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine significant differences among placements. At all time points, the wrist accelerometer measured significantly more daily steps (9930-10 452 steps/d) and faster average stepping cadence (14.5-14.6 steps/min) than either the hip (4972-5944 steps/d, 7.1-8.6 steps/min) or ankle (7161-8205 steps/d, 10.3-11.9 steps/min) placement, while moderate- to vigorous-intensity activity at the wrist (1.2-1.7 min/d) was significantly less than either hip (3.0-5.9 min/d) or ankle (6.1-7.3 min/d). Steps, cadence, and counts were significantly lower for the hip than the ankle at all time points. Kappa calculated for agreement in intensity classification between the various pairwise comparisons ranged from .06 to .41, with Kappa for hip-ankle agreement (.34-.41) significantly higher than for wrist-ankle (.09-.11) or wrist-hip (.06-.16). These data indicate that wrist accelerometer placement during pregnancy likely results in over counting of PA parameters and should be used with caution.

Flash glucose monitoring in gestational diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a glucose intolerance occurring in 3%-10% of pregnant women and being a risk factor for multiple maternal and fetal complications. The risk of perinatal complications is proportional to the level of maternal hyperglycaemia. Proper glycaemic control is therefore one of the key elements of GDM therapy. Until recently, determination of blood glucose concentration was performed using glucose meters, which involved multiple fingerpricks. Nowadays, due to the flash glucose monitoring (FGM) availability, it is possible to collect measurements at any time without routine puncturing. The aim of the presented study is to assess the impact of FGM on the efficacy of treatment in population of patients diagnosed with GDM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, randomised study, that will recruit 100 women at 24-28 weeks of gestation at the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland. Women diagnosed with GDM, who will meet the inclusion criteria, will be individually randomised to the FGM or self-monitoring of blood glucose groups. Further on, clinical and laboratory results of the mother and their newborns will be collected for analysis during the course of pregnancy. Primary outcome is mean glycaemia result in each group after 1 month analysis and percentage of results in the target glycaemic range. The secondary objectives will be to compare the two groups for maternal and neonatal outcomes in conjunction with long-term glycaemic control using blood glycated haemoglobin and fructosamine serum concentrations.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study is exempt from regional ethics review due to its nature of quality improvement in patient care. The study has been approved by the Bioethics Committee at the Medical University of Warsaw and the patient privacy protection boards governing over the recruitment sites. Results of the study will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04422821.

Objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity levels in Spanish pregnant women. Factors affecting the compliance with physical activity guidelines

The aims of this cross-sectional study were to describe objectively measured sedentary time (ST) and physical activity (PA) levels in Spanish pregnant women, to analyze the degree of compliance with PA guidelines during the early second trimester of pregnancy and to explore sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with meeting these PA guidelines. One hundred and thirty-four Caucasian pregnant women were recruited between October 2015 and October 2017 to participate in this study. Triaxial accelerometers were used to analyze ST andPA levels for seven consecutive valid days. Womenspent512 ± 92.1 minutes daily in sedentary behaviors, and 85 ± 108.2 minutes in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in bouts of at least 10 minutes. They walked on average 7436 ± 2410steps per day. Only 22% of the study sample complied with the PA guidelines. Having an University degree was related with threefold higher odds of compliance with the PA guidelines (95% confidence interval: 0.096-0.913, p < .05). Binary logistic regressions showed that being primiparous was associated with fivefold higher odds of compliance with the PA guidelines (95% confidence interval 1.658-18.039, respectively, p < .01). Maternal age, BMI, marital status, working status, and previous miscarriages were not associated with compliance with PA guidelines. Pregnant women spent more than a third of the day in sedentary behaviors and the compliance with PA guidelines was less than desirable. Finally, not having an university degree or having children could be factors related to lower odds of compliance with these guidelines, and therefore require special attention from healthcare professionals.

Assessment of Free-Living Cadence Using ActiGraph Accelerometers Between Individuals With and Without Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and gait speed are risk factors for developing knee osteoarthritis (OA). Measuring minute-level cadence during free-living activities may aid in identifying individuals at elevated risk of developing slow habitual gait speed and, in the long term, OA.

OBJECTIVE

To assess differences in peak 1-minute cadence and weekly time in different cadence intensities between individuals with and without ACLR.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Short-term, free-living conditions.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 57 participants with ACLR (34 women, 23 men; age = 20.9 ± 3.2 years, time since surgery = 28.7 ± 17.7 months) and 42 healthy control participants (22 women, 20 men; age = 20.7 ± 1.7 years).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Each participant wore a physical activity monitor for 7 days. Data were collected at 30 Hz, processed in 60-second epochs, and included in the analyses if the activity monitor was worn for at least 10 hours per day over 4 days. Mean daily steps, peak 1-minute cadence, and weekly minutes spent at 60 to 79 (slow walking), 80 to 99 (medium walking), 100 to 119 (brisk walking), ≥100 (moderate- to vigorous-intensity ambulation), and ≥130 (vigorous-intensity ambulation) steps per minute were calculated. One-way analyses of covariance were conducted to determine differences between groups, controlling for height and activity-monitor wear time.

RESULTS

Those with ACLR took fewer daily steps (8422 ± 2663 versus 10 033 ± 3046 steps; P = .005) and spent fewer weekly minutes in moderate- to vigorous-intensity cadence (175.8 ± 116.5 minutes versus 218.5 ± 137.1 minutes; P = .048) than participants without ACLR. We observed no differences in minutes spent at slow (ACLR = 77.4 ± 40.5 minutes versus control = 83.9 ± 34.3 minutes; P = .88), medium (ACLR = 71.6 ± 40.2 minutes versus control = 82.9 ± 46.8 minutes; P = .56), brisk (ACLR = 115.3 ± 70.3 minutes versus control = 138.3 ± 73.3 minutes; P = .18), or vigorous-intensity (ACLR = 24.3 ± 36.5 minutes versus control = 38.1 ± 60.9 minutes; P = .10) cadences per week.

CONCLUSIONS

Participants with ACLR walked approximately 40 fewer minutes per week in moderate- to vigorous-intensity cadence than participants without ACLR. Increasing the time spent at cadence ≥100 steps per minute and overall volume of physical activity may be useful as interventional targets to help reduce the risk of early development of OA after ACLR.

Longitudinal changes in walking cadence across pregnancy and postpartum

BACKGROUND

Physical activity during pregnancy has many health benefits yet few pregnant women meet US guidelines for physical activity. Traditionally, physical activity has been measured as time spent in moderate and/or vigorous intensity activity, but quantifying intensity is challenging. There is increasing interest in measuring both daily steps and stepping rate, or cadence, as an indicator of physical activity overall and intensity of that activity.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does free-living step cadence change across pregnancy (from 20 weeks to 32 weeks) and postpartum (12 weeks postpartum) when data is collected via hip-worn ActiGraph (ActiGraph Corp., Pensacola, FL) accelerometers?

METHODS

A total of n = 32 pregnant women were enrolled in a longitudinal study of physical activity during pregnancy; these women wore accelerometers on their right hip for one week at 20 weeks gestation, again at 32 weeks gestation, and at 12 weeks postpartum. Data were used to determine total daily steps, time spent (min/day) in various cadence ranges, minutes spent at >100 and >130 steps/min as well as mean, median, maximum, and peak cadences.

RESULTS

Pregnant women accumulated significantly fewer steps per day in the third trimester compared to second (1164 steps/day less) or postpartum (1397 steps/day less) time points. Third trimester women also spent significantly fewer minutes/day in MVPA (cadences ≥100 steps/minute; 4.1 min/day less) and had a significantly lower peak cadence (10.6 steps/min less), compared to second trimester only.

SIGNIFICANCE

These data indicate that pregnant women take fewer steps and walk at slower cadences in the third trimester compared to second and to postpartum, which indicates that total PA as well as absolute intensity of PA are altered during pregnancy.