Dynamic postural control during (in)visible curb descent at fast versus comfortable walking velocity

Upward perturbations trigger a stumbling effect

BACKGROUND

Vertical perturbations are one major cause of falling. Incidentally, while conducting a comprehensive study comparing effects of vertical versus horizontal perturbations, we commonly observed a stumbling-like response induced by upward perturbations. The present study describes and characterizes this stumbling effect.

METHODS

Fourteen individuals (10 male; 27 ± 4 yr) walked self-paced on a treadmill embedded in a moveable platform and synchronized to a virtual reality system. Participants experienced 36 perturbations (12 types). Here, we report only on upward perturbations. We determined stumbling based on visual inspection of recorded videos, and calculated stride time and anteroposterior, whole-body center of mass (COM) distance relative to the heel, i.e., COM-to-heel distance, extrapolated COM (xCOM) and margin of stability (MOS) before and after perturbation.

RESULTS

From 68 upward perturbations across 14 participants, 75% provoked stumbling. During the first gait cycle post-perturbation, stride time decreased in the perturbed foot and the unperturbed foot (perturbed = 1.004 s vs. baseline = 1.119 s and unperturbed = 1.017 s vs. baseline = 1.125 s, p < 0.001). In the perturbed foot, the difference was larger in stumbling-provoking perturbations (stumbling: 0.15 s vs. non-stumbling: 0.020 s, p = 0.004). In addition, the COM-to-heel distance decreased during the first and second gait cycles after perturbation in both feet (first cycle: 0.58 m, second cycle: 0.665 m vs. baseline: 0.72 m, p-values<0.001). During the first gait cycle, COM-to-heel distance was larger in the perturbed foot compared to the unperturbed foot (perturbed foot: 0.61 m vs. unperturbed foot: 0.55 m, p < 0.001). MOS decreased during the first gait cycle, whereas the xCOM increased during the second through fourth gait cycles post-perturbation (maximal xCOM at baseline: 0.5 m, second cycle: 0.63 m, third cycle: 0.66 m, fourth cycle: 0.64 m, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that upward perturbations can induce a stumbling effect, which - with further testing - has the potential to be translated into balance training to reduce fall risk, and for method standardization in research and clinical practice.

Quantification of Gait Stability During Incline and Decline Walking: The Responses of Required Coefficient of Friction and Dynamic Postural Index

This study aims to investigate the gait stability response during incline and decline walking for various surface inclination angles in terms of the required coefficient of friction (RCOF), postural stability index (PSI), and center of pressure (COP)-center of mass (COM) distance. A customized platform with different surface inclinations (0°, 5°, 7.5°, and 10°) was designed. Twenty-three male volunteers participated by walking on an inclined platform for each inclination. The process was then repeated for declined platform as well. Qualysis motion capture system was used to capture and collect the trajectories motion of ten reflective markers that attached to the subjects before being exported to a visual three-dimensional (3D) software and executed in Matlab to obtain the RCOF, PSI, as well as dynamic PSI (DPSI) and COP-COM distance parameters. According to the result for incline walking, during initial contact, the RCOF was not affected to inclination. However, it was affected during peak ground reaction force (GRF) starting at 7.5° towards 10° for both walking conditions. The most affected PSI was found at anterior-posterior PSI (APSI) even as low as 5° inclination during both incline and decline walking. On the other hand, DPSI was not affected during both walking conditions. Furthermore, COP-COM distance was most affected during decline walking in anterior-posterior direction. The findings of this research indicate that in order to decrease the risk of falling and manage the inclination demand, a suitable walking strategy and improved safety measures should be applied during slope walking, particularly for decline and anterior-posterior orientations. This study also provides additional understanding on the best incline walking technique for secure and practical incline locomotion.

Evaluating anticipatory control strategies for their capability to cope with step-down perturbations in computer simulations of human walking

Previous simulation studies investigated the role of reflexes and central pattern generators to explain the kinematic and dynamic adaptations in reaction to step-down perturbations. However, experiments also show preparatory adaptations in humans based on visual anticipation of a perturbation. In this study, we propose a high-level anticipatory strategy augmenting a low-level muscle-reflex control. This strategy directly changes the gain of the reflex control exclusively during the last contact prior to a drop in ground level. Our simulations show that especially the anticipatory reduction of soleus activity and the increase of hamstrings activity result in higher robustness. The best results were obtained when the change in stimulation of the soleus muscle occurred 300 ms after the heel strike of the contralateral leg. This enabled the model to descend perturbation heights up to - 0.21 m and the resulting kinematic and dynamic adaptations are similar to the experimental observations. This proves that the anticipatory strategy observed in experiments has the purpose of increasing robustness. Furthermore, this strategy outperforms other reactive strategies, e.g., pure feedback control or combined feedback and feed-forward control, with maximum perturbation heights of - 0.03 and - 0.07 m, respectively.

Biomechanical and cognitive interactions during Visuo Motor Targeting Task

BACKGROUND

Biomechanical analyses primarily focus on physical aspects of human movement; however, it is not understood how walking is affected while simultaneously performing a demanding cognitive task - a form of Cognitive-Motor Interference (CMI). CMI occurs when performance of a primary task (e.g. walking) is affected following the introduction of a cognitive task (e.g. visual search).

RESEARCH QUESTION

Would Visuo Motor Targeting Task (VMTT) impair visual search performance and reduce the margin of stability (MoS) at higher gait speeds?

METHODS

A protocol was developed to investigate responses of the neuromuscular system while performing a complex visual search task. The Computer Assisted Rehabilitation ENvironment (CAREN, Motekforce Link, Netherlands) system was used for the experimental design. Twenty male participants (Age = 24.2 ± 2.5yrs, Weight = 70.3 ± 10.6 kg, Height = 178.0 ± 9.1 cm) located and pointed towards targets in complex scenes while walking at different gait speeds (0.55, 1.11 and 1.67 m/s.) or while stationary. The cost of visual search during a Visuo Motor Targeting Task (VMTT) was based on the pointing accuracy during the visual search task.

RESULTS

A two-way repeated measure ANOVA showed that MoS in the ML direction significantly improved with increased gait speed and during the visual search task. There was also a significant interaction with MoS improvement being greater during the visual search task at high gait speeds. MoS in the AP was only affected by gait speed. Visual performance and cost of visual search were enhanced during walking versus standing up to 25 %.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study investigated CMI at different gait speeds, which may have implications in postural control, falls and other neurological disorders.

Negotiating ground level perturbations in walking: Visual perception and expectation of curb height modulate muscle activity

To negotiate visible and unpredictable changes in ground level, humans use different control strategies depending on the visibility. In case of fully visible perturbations, humans can anticipate the occurrence and the magnitude of the perturbation. In case of a camouflaged perturbation, they can anticipate the occurrence based on the camouflage cover but need to predict the magnitude from experience, as it is not visible. The purpose of this study was to investigate the anticipatory muscular control strategy humans employ when walking down curbs of different height and to investigate how this strategy differs if the step down is fully visible or camouflaged. The activity of five bilateral lower limb muscles (M. gastrocnemius medialis, M. soleus, M. tibialis anterior, M. biceps femoris and M. vastus medialis) of eight healthy subjects was recorded during walking down visible (0, -10 and -20 cm) and camouflaged curbs (0 and -10 cm). The results reveal that the M. gastrocnemius shows a clear anticipatory adaptation to visible curbs in the contralateral and partly also the ipsilateral leg, which further depends on the curb height. Furthermore, in case of a camouflaged perturbation, M. gastrocnemius activity of the contralateral leg shows an adaptation that indicates an average prediction of the curb height, presumably based on previous experience.

Reactive gait and postural adjustments following the first exposures to (un)expected stepdown

This study evaluated the reactive biomechanical strategies associated with both upper- and lower-body (lead and trail limbs) following the first exposures to (un)expected stepdown at comfortable (1.22 ± 0.08 m/s) and fast (1.71 ± 0.11 m/s) walking velocities. Eleven healthy adults completed 34 trails per walking velocity over an 8-m, custom-built track with two forceplates embedded in its center. For the expected stepdown, the track was lowered by 0-, -10- and -20-cm from the site of the second forceplate, whereas the unexpected stepdown was created by camouflaging the second forceplate (-10-cm). Two-way repeated-measurement ANOVAs detected no velocity-related effects of stepdown on kinematic and kinetic parameters during lead limb stance-phase, and on the trail limb stepping kinematics. However, analyses of significant interactions revealed greater peak flexion angles across the trunk and the trail limb joints (hip, knee and ankle) in unexpected versus expected stepdown conditions at a faster walking velocity. The -10-cm unexpected stepdown (main effect) had a greater influence on locomotor behavior compared to expected conditions due mainly to the absence of predictive adjustments, reflected by a significant decrease in peak knee flexion, contact time and vertical impulse during stance-phase. Walking faster (main effect) was associated with an increase in hip peak flexion and net anteroposterior impulse, and a decrease in contact time and vertical impulse during stepdown. The trail limb, in response, swung forward faster, generating a larger and faster recovery step. However, such reactive stepping following unexpected stepdown was yet a sparse compensation for an unstable body configuration, assessed by significantly smaller step width and anteroposterior margin-of-stability at foot-contact in the first-recovery-step compared with expected conditions. These findings depict the impact of the expectedness of stepdown onset on modulation of global dynamic postural control for a successful accommodation of (un)expected surface elevation changes in young, healthy adults.

Ground reaction forces intersect above the center of mass even when walking down visible and camouflaged curbs

A main objective in bipedal walking is controlling the whole body to stay upright. One strategy that promotes this objective is to direct the ground reaction forces (GRF) to a point above the center of mass (COM). In humans such force patterns can be observed for unperturbed walking, but it is not known if the same strategy is used when humans walk across a change in walkway height. In this study, eleven volunteers stepped down off a visible (0, 10, and 20 cm) and a camouflaged (0 or 10 cm) curb while walking at two different speeds (1.2±0.1 m s−1 and 1.7±0.1 m s−1). The results showed that in all conditions the GRF pointed predominantly above the COM. Vectors directed from the center of pressure (COP) to the intersection point (IP) closely fitted the measured GRF direction not only in visible conditions (R2&gt;97.5%), but also in camouflaged curb negotiation (R2&gt;89.8%). Additional analysis of variables included in the calculation of the IP location showed considerable differences for the camouflaged curb negotiation: Compared to level walking, the COP shifted posterior relative to the COM and the vertical GRF were higher in the beginning and lower in later parts of the stance phase of the perturbed contact. The results suggest that IP behavior can be observed for both visible and camouflaged curb negotiation. For further regulation of the whole body angle the asymmetrical vertical GRF could counteract the effect of a posterior shifted step.