Exploring the role of applied force eccentricity after foot-contact in managing anterior instability among older adults during compensatory stepping responses

Compensatory stepping responses during real-life falls in older adults

BACKGROUND

Laboratory studies of postural responses suggest that stepping is a common strategy for balance recovery. Yet little is known about the frequency and characteristics of stepping responses during real-life falls in older adults.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

(1) Among falls experienced by older adults in long-term care (LTC), what is the prevalence of attempts to recover balance by stepping? (2) How often are steps aligned to the direction of the fall? (3) Do the prevalence and characteristics of steps associate with intrinsic and situational factors?

METHODS

We collected and analyzed video footage of 1516 falls experienced by 515 residents of LTC (of mean age 82.7 years). Using generalized estimating equations, we tested whether the prevalence, direction and size of steps associated with sex, age, fall direction, activity at the time of falling, cause of imbalance, and holding or grasping objects.

RESULTS

Stepping after imbalance was observed in 76% of falls, and 80% of these cases involved multiple steps. The direction of steps aligned with the initial fall direction in 81% of cases. The size of the first step was less than one-half foot length in 64% of cases. Secondary steps tended to be similar in size to the first step. Steps were more common for falls during walking than standing, and for sideways falls. Steps were less common in falls involving held objects, and steps were less likely to be aligned with the fall direction when reach-to-grasp responses were observed.

SIGNIFICANCE

Older adults in LTC tended to respond to falls with multiple compensatory steps. Steps were tailored to the direction of the fall, but small in size (less than one-half foot length in size). Exercise programs for fall prevention in older adults should focus on increasing step size to enhance the effectiveness of step recovery responses.

The influence of net ground reaction force orientation on mediolateral stability during walking

BACKGROUND

Previous work has linked the eccentricity of the net ground reaction force (GRF_net) to increased mediolateral instability during single-step voluntary and compensatory stepping responses. The present work sought to understand the extent to which such control mechanisms for mediolateral stability are present during gait.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How do gait velocity and step width constraints influence the kinetic control of mediolateral stability control among healthy participants?

METHODS

25 participants performed three walking conditions - normal walking with self-selected speed and foot-placement, fast walking with self-selected foot-placement, and narrowbase walking - across a 10-meter walkway. Lateral instability was quantified by the mediolateral margin of stability (MoS_ML). The frontal-plane eccentricity of the GRF_net was calculated as the difference between GRF_net vector orientation and that of a line joining the coordinates of COP_net and COM. Two discrete time-points (P1 and P2) following foot-contact were examined, as they have been suggested to be indicative of proactive and reactive COM control, respectively. Task-related differences in the magnitude and timing of kinematic and kinetic outcome variables were analysed using one-way ANOVAs with repeated-measures.

RESULTS

With constraints on step-width in narrow-base walking, participants exhibited reduced stability as evidenced by reduced MoS_ML, alongside reductions in the peak GRF_net eccentricity (θ_d) at P1. Participants exhibited no reduction in stability during fast walking, as revealed by the MoS_ML in part because of a similar onset of P1 within the gait cycle. P2 magnitude was larger in narrow-base walking relative to fast-walking, and occurred at an earlier point in the gait cycle.

SIGNIFICANCE

Findings suggest proactive mechanisms (i.e. P1) may predominantly regulate mediolateral stability during walking. Reactive mechanisms (i.e. P2), however, may be capable of offsetting instability in situations where proactive mechanisms are insufficient.

Test-retest reliability of force plate-derived measures of reactive stepping

Characterizing reactive stepping is important to describe the response's effectiveness. Timing of reactive step initiation, execution, and termination have been frequently reported to characterize reactive balance control. However, the test-retest reliabilities of these measures are unknown. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to determine the between- and within-session test-retest reliabilities of various force plate-derived measures of reactive stepping. Nineteen young, healthy adults responded to 6 small (~8-10% of body weight) and 6 large perturbations (~13-15% of body weight) using an anterior lean-and-release system. Tests were conducted during two visits separated by at least two days. Participants were instructed to recover balance in as few steps as possible. Step onset, foot-off, swing, and restabilization times were extracted from force plates. Relative test-retest reliability was determined through intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Absolute test-retest reliability was assessed using the standard error of the measurement (SEM). Foot-off and swing times had the highest between- and within-session test-retest reliabilities regardless of perturbation size (between-session ICC = 0.898-0.942; within-session ICC = 0.455-0.753). Conversely, step onset and restabilization times had lower ICCs and wider CIs (between-session ICC = 0.495-0.825; within-session ICC = -0.040-0.174). Between-session test-retest reliability was higher (ICC = 0.495-0.942) for all measures than within-session test-retest reliability (ICC = -0.040-0.753). Time to restabilization had the highest SEM, indicating the worst absolute reliability of the measures. These findings suggest multiple baseline sessions are needed for measuring restabilization and step onset times. The minimal detectable changes reported provide an index for measuring meaningful change due to an intervention.