Movement compensations during a step ascent task are associated with stair climbing performance in people with multiple sclerosis

Clinical utility of the Trendelenburg Test in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

The clinical utility of the Trendelenburg Test remains unknown in people with multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE

To measure (1) intra-rater reliability, (2) agreement of goniometer-assessed Trendelenburg pelvis-on-femur angle (POF) with motion capture, and (3) concurrent validity of Trendelenburg POF and hip abduction strength with POF during walking and step negotiation.

METHODS

Trendelenburg POF was measured in 20 people with MS using goniometry and motion analysis. In addition, peak POF was measured using motion analysis during walking, step ascent, and step descent. Intra-rater reliability of goniometer-assessed Trendelenburg POF and agreement with motion analysis-assessed POF were analyzed. Pearson's r was used to determine the relationships between Trendelenburg POF and hip abduction strength with peak POF during each functional activity.

RESULTS

Goniometer-assessed Trendelenburg POF demonstrated very strong reliability (ICC: 0.948), strong agreement with 3D motion analysis (ICC: 0.792), correlated moderately with peak POF during walking (r = 0.519) and step ascent (r = 0.572), and weakly with step descent (r = 0.463). Hip abductor strength correlated weakly with peak POF during step ascent (r = -0.307) and negligibly during walking (r = -0.270) and step descent (r = -0.249).

CONCLUSIONS

Goniometer-assessed Trendelenburg POF was reliable, agreed with motion analysis, and may provide insight into hip abduction muscle performance during functional activities in people with MS.