Influence of coronal and sagittal prosthetic foot alignment on socket reaction moments in transtibial prostheses during walking

A systematic review of methods used to assist transtibial prosthetic alignment decision-making

Prosthetic alignment is a highly subjective process that is still based on clinical judgments. Thus, researchers have aimed their effort to quantify prosthetic alignment by providing an objective method that can assist and guide prosthetists in achieving transtibial (TT) prosthetic alignment. This systematic review aimed to examine the current literature on TT prosthetic alignment to scope the qualitative and quantitative methods designed to guide prosthetists throughout the TT prosthetic alignment process as well as evaluate the reported instruments and devices that are used to align TT prostheses and their clinical feasibility. A literature search, completed in June 2022, was performed using the following databases: Web of Science (Clarivate), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Pub Med (Medline) with searching terms focusing on TT, prosthesis, prosthetist, prosthetic alignment, and questionnaires, resulting in 2790 studies being screened. Twenty-four studies have used quantitative methodologies, where sensor technologies were found to be the most frequently proposed technology combined with gait analysis tools and/or subjective assessments. A qualitative method that assists prosthetists throughout the alignment process was not found. In this systematic review, we presented diverse methods for guiding and assisting clinical decision-making regarding TT prosthetic alignment. However, most of these methods considered varied parameters, and there is a need for elaboration toward standardized methods, which would improve the prosthetic alignment clinical outcome.

A proper sequence of dynamic alignment in transtibial prosthesis: insight through socket reaction moments

Dynamic alignment in prosthetic fitting is important because it affects the user's stability, kinematics, and kinetics such as socket reaction moments. It is performed by tuning the spatial relationship between the transtibial prosthetic socket and the foot following sequential observational gait analysis in the three anatomical planes. However, the order of planes in which the adjustment should be performed is still unclear. To investigate the appropriate sequence of dynamic alignment adjustment, ten participants with transtibial amputation were asked to walk in different alignment conditions (flexion, extension, adduction, abduction; lateral, medial, anterior, and posterior translation of the socket, and plantarflexion, dorsiflexion, inversion, and eversion of the foot) to measure socket reaction moments in the out-of-planes (e.g., the effect of sagittal alignment on the coronal moment). A significant difference was found only among socket posterior translation, socket flexion, and baseline alignment in the coronal moment (P = 0.02). The results of the current and previous studies suggest that moments in the coronal plane are affected by alignment changes in all three planes, whereas moments in the sagittal plane are affected only by sagittal alignment changes. It is suggested that the procedure of alignment adjustments should be finalized in the coronal plane.

Angulation vs translation of transtibial prosthetic socket: their difference analyzed by socket reaction moments

BACKGROUND

Previous studies investigated the effects of alignment changes in transtibial prostheses on socket reaction moments. However, the effects of angular and translational alignment changes with equal displacement between the foot and the socket were not directly compared.

RESEARCH QUESTIONS

What are the different effects of angular and translational alignment changes in transtibial prostheses?

METHODS

Ten individuals with transtibial prostheses participated in the measurement of temporo-spatial parameters, socket reaction moments, and their timings under nine alignment conditions (3° flexion/extension, anterior/posterior translation, 6° adduction/abduction, medial/lateral translation, and baseline). The displacement of the prosthetic feet was set to be equal between the angular and translational changes.

RESULTS

No significant changes in walking speed were found. Similar effects were observed in the magnitudes, but not in timing, of the moments under angular and translational changes in the sagittal plane (p < 0.01 for the differences in peak extension moment among anterior translation, baseline, and extension conditions, and in peak flexion moment among anterior translation, baseline, and extension conditions). In the coronal plane, similar effects were found in the magnitudes of the moments in the early stance (p < 0.01 at 5 %, 20 %, and 75 % stance). A significant difference in magnitude was observed in the late stance (p < 0.01 between adduction and medial translation conditions).

SIGNIFICANCE

The timing of the socket reaction moment may be different in the sagittal plane, while the magnitudes of the socket reaction moment in the late stance may be different in the coronal plane between the angular and translational alignment changes.