1
|
Beauchamp MH, Dégeilh F, Rose SC. Improving outcome after paediatric concussion: challenges and possibilities. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2023; 7:728-740. [PMID: 37734775 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00193-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023]
Abstract
The term concussion has permeated mainstream media and household vocabulary mainly due to awareness regarding the risks of concussion in professional contact sports, yet it occurs across a variety of settings and ages. Concussion is prevalent in infants, preschoolers, children, and adolescents, and is a common presentation or reason for referral to primary care providers, emergency departments, and specialised trauma clinics. Its broad range of symptoms and sequelae vary according to multiple individual, environmental, and clinical factors and can lead to health and economic burden. More than 20 years of research into risk factors and consequences of paediatric concussion has revealed as many questions as answers, and scientific work and clinical cases continue to expose its complexity and heterogeneity. In this Review, we present empirical evidence for improving outcome after paediatric concussion. We consider work pertaining to both sports and other injury mechanisms to provide a perspective that should be viewed as complementary to publications focused specifically on sports concussion. Contemporary challenges in prevention, diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention are discussed alongside pathways and future directions for improving outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam H Beauchamp
- Sainte-Justine Research Center, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada; Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
| | - Fanny Dégeilh
- Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inria, Inserm, IRISA UMR 6074, EMPENN ERL U-1228, Rennes, France
| | - Sean C Rose
- Pediatric Neurology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Campbell KR, Scanlan KT, Wilhelm JL, Brumbach BH, Pettigrew NC, Neilson A, Parrington L, King LA. Assessment of balance in people with mild traumatic brain injury using a balance systems model approach. Gait Posture 2023; 100:107-113. [PMID: 36516644 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Measuring persistent imbalance after mTBI is challenging and may include subjective symptom-reporting as well as clinical scales. Clinical assessments for quantifying balance following mTBI have focused on sensory orientation. It is theorized that balance control goes beyond sensory orientation and also includes subdomains of anticipatory postural adjustments, reactive postural control, and dynamic gait. The Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) is a validated balance test that measures balance according to these subdomains for a more comprehensive assessment. The purpose of this study was to compare Mini-BESTest total and subdomain scores after subacute mTBI with healthy controls. METHODS Symptomatic mTBI (n = 90, 20 % male, age=36.0 ± 12.0, 46.3.4 ± 22.1 days since injury) and healthy control (n = 45, 20 % male, age=35.4 ± 12.5) participants completed the Mini-BESTest for balance. Mini-BESTest between-group differences were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS The mTBI group (Median[minimum,maximum]) had a significantly worse Mini-BESTest total score than the healthy controls (24[18,28] vs 27[23-28], p < 0.001). The mTBI group performed significantly worse in 3 of the 4 subdomains compared to the healthy controls: reactive postural control: 5[2-6] vs 6[3-6], p = 0.003; sensory orientation: 6[5,6] vs 6[6], p = 0.005; dynamic gait: 8[5-10] vs 9[8-10], p < 0.001. There was no significance difference between groups in the anticipatory postural adjustments domain (5[3-6] vs 5[3-6], p = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS The Mini-BESTest identified deficits in people with subacute mTBI in the total score and 3 out of 4 subdomains, suggesting it may be helpful to use in the clinic to identify balance subdomain deficits in the subacute mTBI population. In combination with self-reported assessments, the mini-BESTest may identify balance domain deficits in the subacute mTBI population and help guide treatment for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kody R Campbell
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA; National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, USA.
| | - Kathleen T Scanlan
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wilhelm
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA; National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, USA
| | - Barbara H Brumbach
- Biostatistics & Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Natalie C Pettigrew
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA; National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, USA; Department of Neurology, Center for Regenerative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Akira Neilson
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Lucy Parrington
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA; Department of Dietetics, Human Nutrition and Sport, School of Sport and Exercise Science, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Laurie A King
- Department of Neurology, Balance Disorders Laboratory, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA; National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The global prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:2663-2674. [PMID: 36715738 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07842-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vestibular dysfunction has been extensively studied amongst the older population. Recently, conditions and management of vestibular dysfunction among children and adolescent has gained attention. Yet, a lack of awareness and expertise in managing children and adolescents with vestibular dysfunction has led to a delay in diagnosis as well as a trifling prevalence rate. AIM To conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses to estimate the overall pooled prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in children and adolescents. METHODS PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify studies published until 29 April 2022. We used a random-effects model to estimate the pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and Cochran's Q test. The robustness of the pooled estimates was checked by different subgroups and sensitivity analyses. RESULTS We identified 1811 studies, of which 39 studies (n = 323,663) were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of children and adolescents with VD was 30.4% [95% CI 28.5-32.3%]. The age of the participants ranged from 1 to 19 years. Participants of the included 39 studies were from 15 countries. Among the studies, 34 were cross-sectional, and five were case-control designed. There were discrepancies found in the studies with objective (higher prevalence) versus subjective (lower prevalence) evaluations. CONCLUSION The prevalence of VD among children and adolescents was found to be 30.4% based on high-quality evidence. Due to the subjective assessment of most studies pooled in the analysis, the results should be interpreted cautiously until future comparative studies with objective assessments are carried out.
Collapse
|
4
|
DuPlessis D, Lam E, Xie L, Reed N, Wright FV, Biddiss E, Scratch SE. Multi-domain assessment of sports-related and military concussion recovery: A scoping review. Phys Ther Sport 2023; 59:103-114. [PMID: 36528003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review explores the literature on multi-domain assessments used in concussion recovery, to inform evidence-based and ecologically valid return-to-play. It asks: What simultaneous, dynamic multi-domain paradigms are used to assess recovery of youth and adults following concussion? METHODS Five databases were searched (CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus) until September 30, 2021. Records were limited to those published in peer-reviewed journals, in English, between 2002 and 2021. Included studies were required to describe the assessment of concussion recovery using dynamic paradigms (i.e., requiring sport-like coordination) spanning multiple domains (i.e., physical, cognitive, socio-emotional functioning) simultaneously. RESULTS 7098 unique articles were identified. 64 were included for analysis, describing 36 unique assessments of 1938 concussed participants. These assessments were deconstructed into their constituent tasks: 13 physical, 17 cognitive, and one socio-emotional. Combinations of these "building blocks" formed the multi-domain assessments. Forty-six studies implemented level walking with a concurrent cognitive task. The most frequently implemented cognitive tasks were 'Q&A' paradigms requiring participants to answer questions aloud during a physical task. CONCLUSIONS A preference emerged for dual-task assessments, specifically combinations of level walking and Q&A tasks. Future research should balance ecological validity and clinical feasibility in multi-domain assessments, and work to validate these assessments for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle DuPlessis
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Emily Lam
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Lucy Xie
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nick Reed
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - F Virginia Wright
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Elaine Biddiss
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shannon E Scratch
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada; Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|