Comparison between the Rizzoli and Oxford foot models with independent and clustered tracking markers

Vertical stiffness and lower limb inter-joint coordination in older versus younger runners

Older runners (OR) are increasing their participation in races. Aging may impact the adopted running pattern. Hence, the analysis of stiffness and the inter-joint lower limb coordination in the sagittal plane could contribute to investigating this impact. This study aimed to compare the vertical stiffness (Kvert) and the inter-joint lower limb coordination in the sagittal plane between younger runners (YR) and OR. This cross-sectional study recruited 15 YR males and 15 OR males. The pelvis and lower limb motions were assessed while running on a treadmill at self-selected (range OR: 1.94-3.75 m.s-1, YR: 2.08-4.17 m.s-1) and fixed speeds (3.33 m.s-1). Hip-ankle, knee-ankle, and hip-knee coupling angle (CA) and its variability (CAV) were extracted using the vector coding method. Mann-Whitney U tests compared Kvert between groups at each running speed. Watson's U2 tests compared the mean CA between groups in three intervals of the contact phase at each running speed. Statistical Parametric Mapping independent t-test compared the CAV curve between groups at each running speed. OR showed greater Kvert than YR at both speeds. Hip-ankle CA pattern differed between groups during the early stance at both speed conditions. OR showed in-phase, distal dominancy in hip-ankle CA, whereas YR showed anti-phase, proximal dominancy. Knee-ankle CA was distinct only at self-selected speed, in which OR showed in-phase, proximal dominancy, while YR exhibited anti-phase, proximal dominancy. CAV did not differ between groups. The findings showed that OR adopted a stiffer pattern characterized by distinct inter-joint lower limb CA, at early stance, during self-selected and fixed speeds.

Do different multi-segment foot models detect the same changes in kinematics when wearing foot orthoses?

Background

Different multi-segment foot models have been used to explore the effect of foot orthoses. Previous studies have compared the kinematic output of different multi-segment foot models, however, no study has explored if different multi-segment foot models detect similar kinematic changes when wearing a foot orthoses. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of two different multi-segment foot models to detect kinematic changes at the hindfoot and forefoot during the single and double support phases of gait when wearing a foot orthosis.

Methods

Foot kinematics were collected during walking from a sample of 32 individuals with and without a foot orthosis with a medial heel bar using an eight-camera motion capture system. The Oxford Foot Model (OFM) and a multi-segment foot model using the Calibrated Anatomical System Technique (CAST) were applied simultaneously. Vector field statistical analysis was used to explore the kinematic effects of a medial heel bar using the two models, and the ability of the models to detect any changes in kinematics was compared.

Results

For the hindfoot, both models showed very good agreement of the effect of the foot orthosis across all three anatomical planes during the single and double support phases. However, for the forefoot, the level of agreement between the models varied with both models showing good agreement of the effect in the coronal plane but poorer agreement in the transverse and sagittal planes.

Conclusions

This study showed that while consistency exists across both models for the hindfoot and forefoot in the coronal plane, the forefoot in the transverse and sagittal planes showed inconsistent responses to the foot orthoses. This should be considered when interpreting the efficacy of different interventions which aim to change foot biomechanics.