Lower extremity joint power and work during recovery following trip-induced perturbations

Balance recovery after trips is affected by the type of tripping obstacles

Occupational falls are often initiated by trips. Mechanical perturbations applied onto the tripped foot are different for different types of tripping obstacles. The present study aimed to determine how different types of tripping obstacles affect balance recovery after trips. Sixty-four healthy adults participated in an experimental study. They were instructed to perform several walking trials, during which two trips were randomly induced, one by a pole-like obstacle and the other by a board-like obstacle. Balance recovery after trips was measured and compared between the two obstacles. Results showed that the board-like obstacle led to longer step-off time, shorter recovery step duration, and smaller minimum hip height, suggesting that the risk of trip-initiated falls could be higher with the board-like obstacle vs. the pole-like obstacle. This finding presents the need for future research to consider the influence of obstacle type when exploring mechanisms for trips and falls.

Wearing a back-support exoskeleton alters lower-limb joint kinetics during single-step recovery following a forward loss of balance

We assessed the effects of a passive, back-support exoskeleton (BSE) on lower-limb joint kinetics during the initiation and swing phases of recovery from a forward loss of balance. Sixteen (8M, 8F) young, healthy participants were released from static forward-leaning postures and attempted to recover their balance with a single-step while wearing a BSE (backXTM) with different levels of support torque and in a control condition. The BSE provided ∼ 15-20 Nm of external hip extension torque on the stepping leg at the end of initiation and beginning of swing phases. Participants were unable to generate sufficient hip flexion torque, power, and work to counteract this external torque, although they sustained hip flexion torque for a more prolonged period, resulting in slightly increased hip contribution to positive leg work (compared to control). However, net positive leg work, and the net contribution of hip joint (human + BSE) to total leg work decreased with BSE use. While all participants had changes in hip joint kinetics, a significant compensatory increase in ankle contribution to positive leg work was observed only among females. Our results suggest that BSE use adversely affects reactive stepping by decreasing the stepping leg kinetic energy for forward propulsion, and that the relative contributions of lower-limb joints to total mechanical work done during balance recovery are altered by BSE use. BSEs may thus need to be implemented with caution for dynamic tasks in occupational settings, as they may impair balance recovery following a forward loss of balance.

Recovering whole-body angular momentum and margin of stability after treadmill-induced perturbations during sloped walking in healthy young adults

Although humans are well-adapted to negotiating sloped terrain, balance recovery after a disturbance on slopes is poorly understood. This study investigated how slope affects recovery from unanticipated simulated trips and slips. Eighteen healthy young adults walked on a split-belt treadmill at 1.25 m/s and three slope angles (downhill: - 8°; level: 0°; uphill: + 8°), with slip- and trip-like perturbations applied randomly at heel-strike. We evaluated balance recovery using whole-body angular momentum (WBAM) and perturbation response (PR), for which larger PR values indicate greater deviation of the margin of stability from baseline, therefore, greater destabilisation after perturbation. Overall, trips were more destabilising than slips, producing larger PR and greater range and integral of WBAM across all tested slopes, most significantly in the sagittal plane. Contrary to expectation, sagittal-plane PR post-trip was greatest for level walking and smallest for downhill walking. Heightened vigilance during downhill walking may explain this finding. Recovery strategy in both frontal and sagittal planes was consistent across all slopes and perturbation types, characterized by a wider and shorter first recovery step, with trips requiring the greatest step adjustment. Our findings advance understanding of the robustness of human locomotion and may offer insights into fall prevention interventions.