1
|
León Moreno JF. ADR evaluation of screening colonoscopies during 2016 - 2017 in a private health clinic in Peru. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6:E1304-E1309. [PMID: 30410949 PMCID: PMC6221814 DOI: 10.1055/a-0672-1045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims High-quality colonoscopy is fundamental for preventing colorectal cancer (CRC). The adenoma detection rate (ADR) is a key colonoscopy quality measure. The aim of this study was to establish the screening colonoscopy ADR of a tertiary referral center in Peru, identify the relationship between the ADR and patient age, sex and the colonoscopist, and determine the endoscopic and histopathological characteristics of the lesions found. Patients and methods A retrospective observational longitudinal study was undertaken between January 2016 and June 2017. Results Eight colonoscopists performed screening colonoscopies on 620 patients scoring ≥ 6 points on the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS); cecal intubation was complete in 595 patients (cecal intubation rate [CIR] 95.9 %). The overall ADR was 29.7 % (females 25.4 %, males 33.1 %, P = 0.040, 95 %Cl). The ADR colonoscopist range was 25.0 % to 34.4 %. The highest ADR (41.2 %, P = 0.013, 95 %Cl) was for patients aged 65 to 75 years. Adenoma colon locations were: left 49 %, transverse 21.6 % and right 29.4 %. Adenoma dysplasia grades: low 98 %, high 2 %. Sixty-three percent of the lesions were 5 mm to 10 mm. Resections performed: 78.5 % cold biopsy forceps (CBF), 3.4 % cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and 18.1 % endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Conclusions The ADR established was in line with the joint American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)/American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) recommendations and related to patient age and gender but not to the colonoscopist. Colonoscopists should ensure rigorous application of the colonoscopy quality actions. ADR should be evaluated frequently.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio F. León Moreno
- Instituto de Enfermedades Digestivas, Department of Gastroenterology, Clínica Internacional, Lima, Perú
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rivero-Sánchez L, Grau J, Augé JM, Moreno L, Pozo A, Serradesanferm A, Díaz M, Carballal S, Sánchez A, Moreira L, Balaguer F, Pellisé M, Castells A. Colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy in fecal immunochemical test-positive participants from a colorectal cancer screening program. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6:E1140-E1148. [PMID: 30211305 PMCID: PMC6133669 DOI: 10.1055/a-0650-4296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk after a positive fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and negative colonoscopy is unknown. We aimed to ascertain the cumulative incidence of post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) and the manifestation of other lesions that could explain the test positivity in individuals with a negative colonoscopy in a population screening program. Patients and method Observational study in participants from the first round of a CRC screening program (2010 - 2012) with positive-FIT (≥ 20 μg/g of feces) and negative colonoscopy (without neoplasia). A 42- to 76-month follow-up was performed searching in the National Health Service database and by a brief structured telephonic interview. Results Of 2659 FIT-positive individuals who underwent colonoscopy, 811 (30.5 %) had a negative colonoscopy. Three PCCRC (0.4 %) were detected within 11 - 28 months and accelerated carcinogenesis was ruled out. Among those with normal colonoscopy, 32 (5 %) relevant lesions were detected at follow-up. One-third of them (11/32) were significant neoplasias: a gastric cancer, a small-bowel lymphoma, six advanced colorectal adenomas, and the three PCCRC. The 21 remaining lesions were inflammatory, vascular disorders, or non-advanced colorectal adenomas. Conclusions The vast majority (95 %) of individuals did not present any subsequent lesion that could explain the FIT positivity. The very low incidence (0.4 %) and characteristics of PCCRC observed in our cohort reinforce the concept that, although a positive FIT preselects high risk individuals, a high quality colonoscopy is the paramount factor in preventing PCCRC. Improving quality standards of colonoscopy are required to strengthen the current CRC screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liseth Rivero-Sánchez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jaume Grau
- Preventive Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep María Augé
- Biochemistry Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lorena Moreno
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angels Pozo
- Preventive Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna Serradesanferm
- Preventive Medicine and Hospital Epidemiology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mireia Díaz
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sabela Carballal
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ariadna Sánchez
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Leticia Moreira
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Balaguer
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain,Corresponding author Dr María Pellisé Department of GastroenterologyHospital ClínicVillarroel 17008036 BarcelonaCataloniaSpain+34-93-2275589
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|