Therapeutic requirements in active ulcerative proctitis: A single-centre study

Natural History and Longitudinal Outcomes of Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Proctitis or Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: A Single-Center, Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative proctitis (UP) and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis (UPS) are special forms of ulcerative colitis. The disease burdens of UP and UPS are increasing. However, the natural history and prognosis of patients with mild-to-moderate UP or UPS have been poorly studied.

AIMS

The aim of this study is to evaluate the characteristics, short-term and long-term outcomes of patients with mild-to-moderate UP or UPS followed at a single center over a period of 3 years.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with UP and UPS followed at a single center from 2021 to 2023 was performed. After scanning for inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient demographics and clinical data were collected. Disease severity was accessed by Myao endoscopy scores and ulcerative colitis endoscopic index of severity. Endoscopic improvement was defined as decreased scores at the last follow-up. Disease extension was defined as endoscopic evidence of a greater extent of disease at the last follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 414 patients were included for evaluation, of which 292 patients (70.53%) were at mild disease stage, and 122 patients (29.47%) had moderate diseases. At the last follow-up, 315 patients (76.09%) showed endoscopic improvement, and 247 patients (59.66%) showed endoscopic remission. An overall extension rate of 11.11% was observed at the last follow-up. Subgroup analysis revealed a better prognosis in younger patients. The disease extension rate was higher in moderate group and symptomatic patients.

CONCLUSION

Promising outcomes were observed in patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. Disease severity and symptoms are correlated with the risk of extension.

Need for therapeutic escalation in patients with refractory ulcerative proctitis: Results from the PROCU study of the ENEIDA registry

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative proctitis (UP) can have a milder, less aggressive course than left-sided colitis or extensive colitis. Therefore, immunosuppressants tend to be used less in patients with this condition. Evidence, however, is scarce because these patients are excluded from randomised controlled clinical trials. Our aim was to describe the characteristics of patients with refractory UP and their disease-related complications, and to identify the need for immunosuppressive therapies.

METHODS

We identified patients with UP from the prospective ENEIDA registry sponsored by the GETECCU. We evaluated socio-demographic data and complications associated with immunosuppression. We defined immunosuppression as the use of immunomodulators, biologics and/or small molecules. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with immunosuppressive therapy.

RESULTS

From a total of 34,716 patients with ulcerative colitis, we identified 6281 (18.1%) with UP; mean ± SD age 53 ± 15 years, average disease duration of 12 ± 9 years. Immunosuppression was prescribed in 11% of patients, 4.2% needed one biologic agent and 1% needed two; 2% of patients required hospitalisation, and 0.5% underwent panproctocolectomy or subtotal colectomy. We identified 0.2% colorectal tumours and 5% extracolonic tumours. Patients with polyarthritis (OR 3.56, 95% CI 1.86-6.69; p < 0.001) required immunosuppressants.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with refractory UP, 11% required immunosuppressant therapy, and 4.2% required at least one biologic agent.

Long-term outcomes of patients with ulcerative proctitis: Analysis from a large referral centre cohort

INTRODUCTION

Long-term outcomes of patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP) have been poorly investigated, since these patients are excluded from participation in randomized controlled clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic and therapeutic long-term outcomes of patients with UP.

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients with UP followed at our referral centre between 1 January 1998 and 1 January 2019 was performed. Treatment success was defined as clinical response (significant improvement in UP-related symptoms) and endoscopic response (mayo endoscopic sub-score of 0 or 1) if available at last follow-up.

RESULTS

From a total of 1561 patients with ulcerative colitis, 118 patients with UP were identified. A total of 36 (31%) patients were refractory to rectal and oral therapy with 5-ASA and corticosteroids, necessitating azathioprine as monotherapy in 19 (16%) patients and/or biological therapies in 33 (28%) patients. After a median follow-up of 71 months (interquartile range 29-149 months), treatment success was observed in 103/118 (87%) UP patients and in 25/36 (69%) patients with refractory UP. Clinical response rates were significantly higher for refractory UP patients treated with biologicals (23/33; 70%) compared to ones treated with azathioprine (2/19; 11%; p  =  0.001).

CONCLUSION

Good clinical outcomes were recorded in UP, with treatment success in 87% of patients. Nevertheless, 28% needed escalation to biologicals. Long-term outcome in patients on biologicals was superior to azathioprine.

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on topical therapy in ulcerative colitis

Although most patients with ulcerative colitis should be given topical treatment, different studies have shown that they are underused in clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to answer 10 specific questions about which drugs are available for topical use in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, and their characteristics in terms of formulation, dosage, presentation, application and proximal distribution of rectal-administered drugs. The efficacy of available topical drugs and the benefits of combining different formulations and routes of administration, and their usefulness during disease remission are evaluated. Finally, a series of recommendations addressed to patients are given on the correct application of topical treatment.

Endoscopic progression of ulcerative proctitis to proximal disease. Can we identify predictors of progression?

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative proctitis is a type of ulcerative colitis circumscribed to the rectum. Proximal progression rates of the disease have been reported as between 27% and 54%. Several predictive factors have been identified for its progression; however, none has been established as definitive.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients diagnosed with ulcerative proctitis with at least 12 months of follow-up. Patients diagnosed between January 1992 and March 2017. Variables were collected at the time of diagnosis and during the first year of follow-up. The extent of the progression was evaluated endoscopically during follow-up. The endoscopic progression rate was determined and possible risk factors related to this progression were evaluated.

RESULTS

The analysis involved 137 patients. In 77 of the patients, we performed a second colonoscopy during follow-up to evaluate endoscopic progression. The average time before the second colonoscopy performed was 5 years (SD 3.9). Of the 77 patients, 32 (41.6%) presented proximal progression to the rectosigmoid junction. Logistic regression analysis showed a statistically significant association for progression in patients who had suffered one or more flares in the first year following diagnosis. Significant progression was also observed in those with the longest time of progression at the final colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Ulcerative proctitis is not a stable disease over time. In addition, during the first year of the disease progression, it is possible to predict in which patients the disease will progress to more extensive forms.