Horizontal gene transfer in yeasts

Reticulate evolution: Detection and utility in the phylogenomics era

Phylogenomics has enriched our understanding that the Tree of Life can have network-like or reticulate structures among some taxa and genes. Two non-vertical modes of evolution - hybridization/introgression and horizontal gene transfer - deviate from a strictly bifurcating tree model, causing non-treelike patterns. However, these reticulate processes can produce similar patterns to incomplete lineage sorting or recombination, potentially leading to ambiguity. Here, we present a brief overview of a phylogenomic workflow for inferring organismal histories and compare methods for distinguishing modes of reticulate evolution. We discuss how the timing of coalescent events can help disentangle introgression from incomplete lineage sorting and how horizontal gene transfer events can help determine the relative timing of speciation events. In doing so, we identify pitfalls of certain methods and discuss how to extend their utility across the Tree of Life. Workflows, methods, and future directions discussed herein underscore the need to embrace reticulate evolutionary patterns for understanding the timing and rates of evolutionary events, providing a clearer view of life's history.

The priority of yeast to select among various DNA options to repair genome breaks by homologous recombination

BACKGROUND

Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is considered an important mechanism to contribute to the evolution of bacteria, plants, and animals by allowing the movement of genetic material between organisms, in difference to vertical inheritance. Thereby it can also play a significant role in spreading traits like antibiotic resistance among bacteria and virulence factors between pathogens. During the HGT, organisms take up free DNA from the environment and incorporate it into their genomes. Although HGT is known to be carried out by many organisms, there is limited information on how organisms select which genetic material for horizontal transfer. Here we have investigated the preference priority of Saccharomyces cerevisiae between different options of gene source presented under certain stress conditions to repair a double-strand break (DSB) in DNA via HR.

RESULTS

Each genetic module was designed with appropriate sequences being homologous for two sides of the DSB, which is important for yeast to repair the fracture with HR. S. cerevisiae made a random selection between two heterologous T1 (44%) and T2 (56%) modules to repair DSB. Interestingly, yeast corrected the DNA break only with the T3 module (almost 100%) when the homologous T3 module was an option for the selection. It seems that S. cerevisiae tends to prefer T3 over alternatives to fix DSBs when it exists among the options.

CONCLUSIONS

It seems that S. cerevisiae have a preference for priority to select a particular one under certain conditions when it has various DNA options to repair a DSB in its genome, further studies are required to support our findings.

Biocontainment Techniques and Applications for Yeast Biotechnology

Biocontainment techniques for genetically modified yeasts (GMYs) are pivotal due to the importance of these organisms for biotechnological processes and also due to the design of new yeast strains by using synthetic biology tools and technologies. Due to the large genetic modifications that many yeast strains display, it is highly desirable to avoid the leakage of GMY cells into natural environments and, consequently, the spread of synthetic genes and circuits by horizontal or vertical gene transfer mechanisms within the microorganisms. Moreover, it is also desirable to avoid patented yeast gene technologies spreading outside the production facility. In this review, the different biocontainment technologies currently available for GMYs were evaluated. Interestingly, uniplex-type biocontainment approaches (UTBAs), which rely on nutrient auxotrophies induced by gene mutation or deletion or the expression of the simple kill switches apparatus, are still the major biocontainment approaches in use with GMY. While bacteria such as Escherichia coli account for advanced biocontainment technologies based on synthetic biology and multiplex-type biocontainment approaches (MTBAs), GMYs are distant from this scenario due to many reasons. Thus, a comparison of different UTBAs and MTBAs applied for GMY and genetically engineered microorganisms (GEMs) was made, indicating the major advances of biocontainment techniques for GMYs.

Opportunities and Challenges of Understanding Community Assembly in Spontaneous Food Fermentation

Spontaneous fermentations that do not rely on backslopping or industrial starter cultures were especially important to the early development of society and are still practiced around the world today. While current literature on spontaneous fermentations is observational and descriptive, it is important to understand the underlying mechanism of microbial community assembly and how this correlates with changes observed in microbial succession, composition, interaction, and metabolite production. Spontaneous food and beverage fermentations are home to autochthonous bacteria and fungi that are naturally inoculated from raw materials, environment, and equipment. This review discusses the factors that play an important role in microbial community assembly, particularly focusing on commonly reported yeasts and bacteria isolated from spontaneously fermenting food and beverages, and how this affects the fermentation dynamics. A wide range of studies have been conducted in spontaneously fermented foods that highlight some of the mechanisms that are involved in microbial interactions, niche adaptation, and lifestyle of these microorganisms. Moreover, we will also highlight how controlled culture experiments provide greater insight into understanding microbial interactions, a modest attempt in decoding the complexity of spontaneous fermentations. Further research using specific in vitro microbial models to understand the role of core microbiota are needed to fill the knowledge gap that currently exists in understanding how the phenotypic and genotypic expression of these microorganisms aid in their successful adaptation and shape fermentation outcomes. Furthermore, there is still a vast opportunity to understand strain level implications on community assembly. Translating these findings will also help in improving other fermentation systems to help gain more control over the fermentation process and maintain consistent and superior product quality.