Replication timing and transcriptional control: beyond cause and effect - part IV

Replicating chromatin in the nucleus: A histone variant perspective

In eukaryotes, chromatin and DNA replication are intimately linked, whereby chromatin impacts DNA replication control while genome duplication involves recovery of chromatin organisation. Here, we review recent advances in this area using a histone variant lens. We highlight how nucleosomal features interplay with origin definition and how the order of origin firing links with chromatin states in early mammalian development. We next discuss histone recycling and de novo deposition at the fork to finally open on the post-replicative recovery of the chromatin landscape to promote maintenance of cell identity.

Quantifying DNA replication speeds in single cells by scEdU-seq

In a human cell, thousands of replication forks simultaneously coordinate duplication of the entire genome. The rate at which this process occurs might depend on the epigenetic state of the genome and vary between, or even within, cell types. To accurately measure DNA replication speeds, we developed single-cell 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine sequencing to detect nascent replicated DNA. We observed that the DNA replication speed is not constant but increases during S phase of the cell cycle. Using genetic and pharmacological perturbations we were able to alter this acceleration of replication and conclude that DNA damage inflicted by the process of transcription limits the speed of replication during early S phase. In late S phase, during which less-transcribed regions replicate, replication accelerates and approaches its maximum speed.

Reduced Levels of Lagging Strand Polymerases Shape Stem Cell Chromatin

Stem cells display asymmetric histone inheritance while non-stem progenitor cells exhibit symmetric patterns in the Drosophila male germline lineage. Here, we report that components involved in lagging strand synthesis, such as DNA polymerase α and δ (Polα and Polδ), have significantly reduced levels in stem cells compared to progenitor cells. Compromising Polα genetically induces the replication-coupled histone incorporation pattern in progenitor cells to be indistinguishable from that in stem cells, which can be recapitulated using a Polα inhibitor in a concentration-dependent manner. Furthermore, stem cell-derived chromatin fibers display a higher degree of old histone recycling by the leading strand compared to progenitor cell-derived chromatin fibers. However, upon reducing Polα levels in progenitor cells, the chromatin fibers now display asymmetric old histone recycling just like GSC-derived fibers. The old versus new histone asymmetry is comparable between stem cells and progenitor cells at both S-phase and M-phase. Together, these results indicate that developmentally programmed expression of key DNA replication components is important to shape stem cell chromatin. Furthermore, manipulating one crucial DNA replication component can induce replication-coupled histone dynamics in non-stem cells in a manner similar to that in stem cells.

Chromosome compartmentalization: causes, changes, consequences, and conundrums

The spatial segregation of the genome into compartments is a major feature of 3D genome organization. New data on mammalian chromosome organization across different conditions reveal important information about how and why these compartments form and change. A combination of epigenetic state, nuclear body tethering, physical forces, gene expression, and replication timing (RT) can all influence the establishment and alteration of chromosome compartments. We review the causes and implications of genomic regions undergoing a 'compartment switch' that changes their physical associations and spatial location in the nucleus. About 20-30% of genomic regions change compartment during cell differentiation or cancer progression, whereas alterations in response to a stimulus within a cell type are usually much more limited. However, even a change in 1-2% of genomic bins may have biologically relevant implications. Finally, we review the effects of compartment changes on gene regulation, DNA damage repair, replication, and the physical state of the cell.

The Origin Recognition Complex: From Origin Selection to Replication Licensing in Yeast and Humans

Understanding human DNA replication through the study of yeast has been an extremely fruitful journey. The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) 2-7 genes that encode the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replisome were initially identified through forward yeast genetics. The origin recognition complexes (ORC) that load the MCM hexamers at replication origins were purified from yeast extracts. We have reached an age where high-resolution cryoEM structures of yeast and human replication complexes can be compared side-by-side. Their similarities and differences are converging as alternative strategies that may deviate in detail but are shared by both species.

Brd2 is dispensable for genome compartmentalization and replication timing

Replication Timing (RT) refers to the temporal order in which the genome is replicated during S phase. Early replicating regions correlate with the transcriptionally active, accessible euchromatin (A) compartment, while late replicating regions correlate with the heterochromatin (B) compartment and repressive histone marks. Previously, widespread A/B genome compartmentalization changes were reported following Brd2 depletion. Since RT and A/B compartmentalization are two of the most highly correlated chromosome properties, we evaluated the effects of Brd2 depletion on RT. We performed E/L Repli-Seq following Brd2 depletion in the previously described Brd2 conditional degron cell line and found no significant alterations in RT after Brd2 KD. This finding prompted us to re-analyze the Micro-C data from the previous publication. We report that we were unable to detect any compartmentalization changes in Brd2 depleted cells compared to DMSO control using the same data. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that Brd2 depletion alone does not affect A/B compartmentalization or RT in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Choreography of lamina-associated domains: structure meets dynamics

Lamina-associated domains are large regions of heterochromatin positioned at the nuclear periphery. These domains have been implicated in gene repression, especially in the context of development. In mammals, LAD organization is dependent on nuclear lamins, inner nuclear membrane proteins, and chromatin state. In addition, chromatin readers and modifier proteins have been implicated in this organization, potentially serving as molecular tethers that interact with both nuclear envelope proteins and chromatin. More recent studies have focused on teasing apart the rules that govern dynamic LAD organization and how LAD organization, in turn, relates to gene regulation and overall 3D genome organization. This review highlights recent studies in mammalian cells uncovering factors that instruct the choreography of LAD organization, re-organization, and dynamics at the nuclear lamina, including LAD dynamics in interphase and through mitotic exit, when LAD organization is re-established, as well as intra-LAD subdomain variations.