A truncated acidic domain in Xenopus TRF1

Conservation of telomere protein complexes: shuffling through evolution

The rapid evolution of telomere proteins has hindered identification of orthologs from diverse species and created the impression that certain groups of eukaryotes have largely non-overlapping sets of telomere proteins. However, the recent identification of additional telomere proteins from various model organisms has dispelled this notion by expanding our understanding of the composition, architecture and range of telomere protein complexes present in individual species. It is now apparent that versions of the budding yeast CST complex and mammalian shelterin are present in multiple phyla. While the precise subunit composition and architecture of these complexes vary between species, the general function is often conserved. Despite the overall conservation of telomere protein complexes, there is still considerable species-specific variation, with some organisms having lost a particular subunit or even an entire complex. In some cases, complex components appear to have migrated between the telomere and the telomerase RNP. Finally, gene duplication has created telomere protein paralogs with novel functions. While one paralog may be part of a conserved telomere protein complex and have the expected function, the other paralog may serve in a completely different aspect of telomere biology.

Developmental studies of Xenopus shelterin complexes: the message to reset telomere length is already present in the egg

The 6-protein complex shelterin protects the telomeres of human chromosomes. The recent discovery that telomeres are important for epigenetic gene regulation and vertebrate embryonic development calls for the establishment of model organisms to study shelterin and telomere function under normal developmental conditions. Here, we report the sequences of the shelterin-encoding genes in Xenopus laevis and its close relation Xenopus tropicalis. In vitro expression and biochemical characterization of the Xenopus shelterin proteins TRF1, TRF2, POT1, TIN2, RAP1, TPP1, and the shelterin accessory factor PINX1 indicate that all main functions of their human orthologs are conserved in Xenopus. The XlTRF1 and XtTRF1 proteins bind double-stranded telomeric DNA sequence specifically and interact with XlTIN2 and XtTIN2, respectively. Similarly, the XlTRF2 and XtTRF2 proteins bind double-stranded telomeric DNA and interact with XlRAP1 and XtRAP1, respectively, whereas the XlPOT1 and XtPOT1 proteins bind single-stranded telomeric DNA. Real-time PCR further reveals the gene expression profiles for telomerase and the shelterin genes during embryogenesis. Notably, the composition of shelterin and the formation of its subcomplexes appear to be temporally regulated during embryonic development. Moreover, unexpectedly high telomerase and shelterin gene expression during early embryogenesis may reflect a telomere length-resetting mechanism, similar to that reported for induced pluripotent stem cells and for animals cloned through somatic nuclear transfer.

Trf1 is not required for proliferation or functional telomere maintenance in chicken DT40 cells

The telomere end-protection complex prevents the ends of linear eukaryotic chromosomes from degradation or inappropriate DNA repair. The homodimeric double-stranded DNA-binding protein, Trf1, is a component of this complex and is essential for mouse embryonic development. To define the requirement for Trf1 in somatic cells, we deleted Trf1 in chicken DT40 cells by gene targeting. Trf1-deficient cells proliferated as rapidly as control cells and showed telomeric localization of Trf2, Rap1, and Pot1. Telomeric G-strand overhang lengths were increased in late-passage Trf1-deficient cells, although telomere lengths were unaffected by Trf1 deficiency, as determined by denaturing Southern and quantitative FISH analysis. Although we observed some clonal variation in terminal telomere fragment lengths, this did not correlate with cellular Trf1 levels. Trf1 was not required for telomere seeding, indicating that de novo telomere formation can proceed without Trf1. The Pin2 isoform and a novel exon 4, 5-deleted isoform localized to telomeres in Trf1-deficient cells. Trf1-deficient cells were sensitive to DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation. Our data demonstrate that chicken DT40 B cells do not require Trf1 for functional telomere structure and suggest that Trf1 may have additional, nontelomeric roles involved in maintaining genome stability.

Tankyrase function at telomeres, spindle poles, and beyond

Telomeres have special needs; they require distinct mechanisms for their protection, replication, and separation at mitosis. A dedicated six-subunit protein complex termed shelterin attends to these needs. But shelterin cannot do it alone and often relies on recruits from other cellular locales. One such recruit is tankyrase 1, a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase that is brought to telomeres by the shelterin DNA binding subunit TRF1, where it functions in telomere length regulation and sister chromatid separation. An understanding of how tankyrase 1 functions at telomeres has been confounded by its complexity; it localizes to multiple subcellular sites, it has many diverse binding partners, and it has a closely related homolog (tankyrase 2) with which it may functionally overlap. This review summarizes our current knowledge of tankyrases focusing on their localization, binding partners, and function.