Corrigendum to "Susceptibility of domestic animals to pseudotype virus bearing RD-114 virus envelope protein" [Gene 567(2) (2015) 189-195]

Chorioallantoic membrane assay revealed the role of TIPARP (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin-inducible poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase) in lung adenocarcinoma-induced angiogenesis

BACKGROUND

The chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay is a well-established technique to evaluate tumor invasion and angiogenesis and may overcome the shortcoming of the patient-derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model. Currently, few reports have described lung cancer invasion and angiogenesis in the CAM assay. We therefore used the CAM assay in the evaluation of lung cancer.

METHOD

Lung cancer cell line-derived organoids or lung cancer cell lines were transplanted into the CAM on embryonic development day (EDD) 10, and an analysis was performed on EDD 15. Microscopic and macroscopic images and movies of the grafts on the CAM were captured and analyzed. The relationships between the graft and chick vessels were evaluated using immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

We transplanted lung cancer cell lines and cell line-derived organoid into a CAM to investigate angiogenesis and invasion. They engrafted on the CAM at a rate of 50-83%. A549-OKS cells showed enhanced cell invasion and angiogenesis on the CAM in comparison to A549-GFP cells as was reported in vitro. Next, we found that A549-TIPARP cells promoted angiogenesis on the CAM. RNA-seq identified 203 genes that were upregulated more than twofold in comparison to A549-GFP cells. A pathway analysis revealed many upregulated pathways related to degradation and synthesis of the extracellular matrix in A549-TIPARP cells.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAM assay can be used to evaluate and research invasion and angiogenesis in lung cancer. The elevated expression of TIPARP in lung cancer may induce angiogenesis by remodeling the extracellular matrix.

Nanomedicine-Combined Immunotherapy for Cancer

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy for cancer includes Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)-T cells, CAR-natural Killer (NK) cells, PD1, and the PD-L1 inhibitor. However, the proportion of patients who respond to cancer immunotherapy is not satisfactory. Concurrently, nanotechnology has experienced a revolution in cancer diagnosis and therapy. There are few clinically approved nanoparticles that can selectively bind and target cancer cells and incorporate molecules, although many therapeutic nanocarriers have been approved for clinical use. There are no systematic reviews outlining how nanomedicine and immunotherapy are used in combination to treat cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to illustrate how nanomedicine and immunotherapy can be used for cancer treatment to overcome the limitations of the low proportion of patients who respond to cancer immunotherapy and the rarity of nanomaterials in clinical use.

METHODS

A literature review of MEDLINE, PubMed / PubMed Central, and Google Scholar was performed. We performed a structured search of literature reviews on nanoparticle drug-delivery systems, which included photodynamic therapy, photothermal therapy, photoacoustic therapy, and immunotherapy for cancer. Moreover, we detailed the advantages and disadvantages of the various nanoparticles incorporated with molecules to discuss the challenges and solutions associated with cancer treatment.

CONCLUSION

This review identified the advantages and disadvantages associated with improving health care and outcomes. The findings of this review confirmed the importance of nanomedicinecombined immunotherapy for improving the efficacy of cancer treatment. It may become a new way to develop novel cancer therapeutics using nanomaterials to achieve synergistic anticancer immunity.