A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis on association between X-ray repair cross complementing (XRCC1, XRCC2, and XRCC3) polymorphisms and oral cancer susceptibility

BER genes expression in oral and pre-oral cancer: Combinatorial approach to propose potential biomarker

OBJECTIVE

DNA repair genes and their variants have been found to alter the risk of oral cancer.

METHOD

The level of expression of XRCC3, NBS1, and OGG1 genes among 20 cases of oral cancer, 6 pre-oral cancer, and 50 healthy control subjects was measured with RT-PCR. All the subjects were also genotyped for XRCC3 rs861539 C>T, NBS1 rs1805794 C>G, and OGG1 rs1052133 C>G polymorphisms by the PCR-RFLP method; their genotypes were correlated with their level of expression. Further, a localized fold structure analysis of the mRNA sequence surrounding the studied SNPs was performed with RNAfold.

RESULTS

Results showed increased expression of XRCC3, NBS1, and OGG1 transcripts among oral cancer (4.49 fold, 3.45 fold, and 3.27 fold) as well as pre-oral cancer (3.04 fold, 5.32 fold, and 1.74 fold) as compared to control subjects. The transcript level of OGG1 was found to be significantly increased (6.68 fold, p-value 0.009) with the GG genotype compared to the CC genotype. The C>T polymorphism of XRCC3 and the C>G polymorphism of OGG1 result in an apparent change in its mRNA secondary structure. Folding energy with the C allele for XRCC3 C>T polymorphism was lower than that of the T allele (MFE C vs T: -50.20 kcal/mol vs -48.70 kcal/mol). In the case of OGG1 C>G polymorphism MFE for the C allele was higher (-23.30 kcal/mole) than with the G allele (-24.80 kcal/mol).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed elevated levels of XRCC3, NBS1, and OGG1 both in oral cancer and pre-oral cancer conditions, which indicates their role as prospective biomarkers of oral cancer and pre-cancerous lesions. SNPs in these genes alter their level of expression, possibly by altering the secondary structure of their transcript. However, due to the small sample size our study can only provide a suggestive conclusion and warned future study with large sample size to verify our findings.

Relationship between ERCC1 and XPC polymorphisms and the susceptibility to head and neck carcinoma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between ERCC1 and XPC polymorphisms and the risk of head and neck cancer (HNC), incorporating more studies and additional analyses.

DESIGN

An exhaustive search of various databases, including PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was carried out, up until November 18, 2023, to identify pertinent studies. The Review Manager 5.3 software was employed to calculate the effect sizes, which were presented as the odds ratio (OR) along with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The study found that the T allele (OR = 1.11; p-value = 0.02; 95%CI: 1.02, 1.22) and the TT genotype rs2228000 polymorphism in both the homozygous model (OR = 1.61, p-value = 0.02; 95%CI: 1.07, 2.42) and the recessive model (OR = 1.53; p-value = 0.02; 95%CI: 1.06, 2.22) had statistically significant associations. However, no significant associations were found for rs11615, rs3212986, rs735482, rs2228001, and PAT polymorphisms in any genetic models.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis revealed significant associations for the T allele and TT genotype rs2228000 polymorphism, but not for rs11615, rs3212986, rs735482, rs2228001, and PAT polymorphisms. The results highlight the impact of factors such as ethnicity, cancer subtype, and control source on these associations, emphasizing the intricate nature of genetic interactions in disease risk.

The XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism was associated with the risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma development: Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is a DNA repair gene. Various studies have examined the association between XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) susceptibility with contradictory results. So, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether variants of this polymorphism increase the HNSCC risk or not.

RECENT FINDINGS

Thirty three studies consisting of 14282 subjects (6012 cases and 8270 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Variants of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism were associated with increased HNSCC risk and the associations were significant based on heterozygous and dominant models (heterozygous model: OR = 1.182, 95%CI = 1.015-1.377, P = 0.032; homozygous model: OR = 1.274, 95%CI = 0.940-1.727, P = 0.119; dominant model: OR = 1.194, 95%CI = 1.027-1.388, P = 0.021; recessive model: OR = 1.181, 95%CI = 0.885-1.576, P = 0.119). There were significant associations between variants of this polymorphism and HNSCC risk based on Asian ethnicity under dominant model, hospital control source under different genetic models, PCR-RFLP genotyping method under dominant model and oral cavity tumor site under heterozygous and dominant models.

OBJECTIVE

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) is a DNA repair gene. Various studies have examined the association between XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) susceptibility with contradictory results. So, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess whether variants of this polymorphism increase the HNSCC risk or not.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literatures published till April 2022 was conducted using Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases. The heterogeneity was assessed with the I-Square statistic. A random effects model or fixed effects model was used to analyze the data. Data were reported by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The p value was considered significant if p < .05.

RESULTS

Thirty three studies consisting of 14 282 subjects (6012 cases and 8270 controls) were included in this meta-analysis. Variants of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism were associated with increased HNSCC risk and the associations were significant based on heterozygous and dominant models (heterozygous model: OR = 1.182, 95%CI = 1.015-1.377, p = .032; homozygous model: OR = 1.274, 95%CI = 0.940-1.727, p = .119; dominant model: OR = 1.194, 95%CI = 1.027-1.388, p = .021; recessive model: OR = 1.181, 95%CI = 0.885-1.576, p = .119). There were significant associations between variants of this polymorphism and HNSCC risk based on Asian ethnicity under dominant model, hospital control source under different genetic models, PCR-RFLP genotyping method under dominant model and oral cavity tumor site under heterozygous and dominant models.

CONCLUSION

Variants of XRCC1 Arg194Trp polymorphism were significantly associated with increased risk of HNSCC development based on heterozygous and dominant genetic models.

Association between the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and risk of head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis

The studies recommended the relationship between lots of polymorphisms with the head and neck cancers (HNCs) risk. Herein, we reported the association between the CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and the risk of HNC in an updated meta-analysis. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched until March 31, 2021, without any restrictions. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to assess a relationship between CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and the HNC risk based on five applied genetic models by RevMan 5.3 software. Other analyses (sensitivity analysis, meta-regression, and bias analysis) were performed by CMA 2.0 software. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was done by TSA software (version 0.9.5.10 beta). Among the databases and other sources, 501 recorded were identified that at last, 29 studies were obtained for the analysis. The pooled ORs were 1.28 (95%CI 1.09, 1.51; P = 0.003), 1.68 (95%CI 1.16, 2.45; P = 0.007), 1.24 (95%CI 1.03, 1.50; P = 0.02), 1.26 (95%CI 1.07, 1.48; P = 0.005), and 1.66 (95%CI 1.27, 2.16; P = 0.0002) for allelic, homozygous, heterozygous, recessive, and dominant models, respectively. Therefore, the m2 allele and m1/m2 and m2/m2 genotypes had significantly increased risks in HNC patients. With regards to stable results and enough samples, the findings of the present meta-analysis recommended that there was an association between CYP1A1 MspI polymorphism and the HNC risk.

Association of N-acetyltransferases 1 and 2 Polymorphisms with Susceptibility to Head and Neck Cancers-A Meta-Analysis, Meta-Regression, and Trial Sequential Analysis

Background and objective:N-acetyltransferases 1 and 2 (NAT1 and NAT2) genes have polymorphisms in accordance with slow and rapid acetylator phenotypes with a role in the development of head and neck cancers (HNCs). Herein, we aimed to evaluate the association of NAT1 and NAT2 polymorphisms with susceptibility to HNCs in an updated meta-analysis. Materials and methods: A search was comprehensively performed in four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed/Medline, and Cochrane Library until 8 July 2021). The effect sizes, odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed. Trial sequential analysis (TSA), publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted. Results: Twenty-eight articles including eight studies reporting NAT1 polymorphism and twenty-five studies reporting NAT2 polymorphism were involved in the meta-analysis. The results showed that individuals with slow acetylators of NAT2 polymorphism are at higher risk for HNC OR: 1.22 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.46; p = 0.03). On subgroup analysis, ethnicity, control source, and genotyping methods were found to be significant factors in the association of NAT2 polymorphism with the HNC risk. TSA identified that the amount of information was not large enough and that more studies are needed to establish associations. Conclusions: Slow acetylators in NAT2 polymorphism were related to a high risk of HNC. However, there was no relationship between NAT1 polymorphism and the risk of HNC.