Reduction in depressive symptoms in primary prevention ICD scheduled patients - One year prospective study

Anxiety and depression as risk factors for ICD shocks and mortality in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator - A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations between baseline anxiety and depression and occurrence of ICD shocks and risk of mortality in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD).

METHOD

We systematically searched EMBASE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL for eligible studies fulfilling the predefined criteria.

RESULTS

We included 37 studies based on 25 different cohorts following 35,003 participants for up to seven years. We observed no association between baseline anxiety nor depression and the occurrence of ICD shocks. More than half of the identified studies (respectively 56% and 60%) indicated a significant association between baseline anxiety or depression and increased risk of mortality (anxiety: n = 5, ranging from Hazard ratios (HR):1.02 [Confidence intervals (CI) 95% 1.00-1.03] to HR:3.45 [CI 95% 1.57-7.60]; depression: n = 6, ranging from HR:1.03 [CI 95% 1.00-1.06] to HR:2.10 [CI 95% 1.44-3.05]). We found a significant association between high methodological quality of the primary study and the detection of a significant association (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline anxiety and depression are associated with increased risk of mortality in patients with an ICD, but not with occurrence of ICD shocks. Inclusion of baseline anxiety and depression in risk stratification of mortality may be warranted.

Depressive symptoms in patients after primary and secondary prophylactic ICD implantation

OBJECTIVE

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) are successfully used to treat life-threatening arrhythmias and prevent sudden cardiac death. However, they are also known to have a major psychological impact leading to higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in a substantial proportion of patients. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of depressive symptoms in a large cohort of ICD carriers with a different clinical background and to compare prevalence and risk factors between patients with primary and secondary prophylactic indication for ICD implantation.

METHODS

315 out of 622 patients (50.6%), who regularly attended ICD assessments at the University Hospital Zurich completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI I-II) to estimate current depressive symptoms.

RESULTS

Overall, depressive symptoms were common in ICD patients, with 20.3% of the patients showing clinically relevant depression (12.4% mild depressive symptoms, 6.0% moderate, 1.9% severe). Moderate to severe depressive symptoms seem to be more likely in patients with secondary prophylactic indication of the ICD as compared to a group of patients with primary prophylactic implantation. Patients that received more than 5 ICD shocks since implantation reveal more depressive symptoms than those with less events. Mean BDI Score in total (n = 315) was at 8.44 ± 7.56 without a statistically significant difference between the primary (M = 8.04 ± 7.10, n = 153) and secondary (M = 8.81 ± 7.98, n = 162) preventive group (p value = 0.362), even after adjustment for various clinical characteristics. ICD patients should therefore be well supported and advised concerning the psychological impact of their device and particular aspects of daily life concerns (e.g. physical activity), with a special focus on patients, who have received multiple shocks.