1
|
Graney BA, Portz JD, Bekelman DB. "I Felt Like I Mattered": Caring is a key ingredient of collaborative care for chronic illness. Chronic Illn 2024:17423953241264862. [PMID: 39043359 DOI: 10.1177/17423953241264862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To identify perceptions and experiences related to caring science and collaborative care in intervention participants of the Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA) study, a randomized, multi-site clinical trial for patients with chronic heart failure and reduced health status. METHODS Forty-five participants completed semi-structured, telephone interviews with a focus on intervention components, impact of the intervention on participants' lives, and recommendations for intervention change. Data were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach focusing on the presence and frequency of text to identify patterns, categories, and themes across participants without an a priori code book. The validity of the identified categories was enhanced through triangulation. RESULTS Three themes were identified: (1) intervention providers' caring/helping attitude and caring/helping communication; (2) care team availability to respond to concerns or questions; and (3) help with understanding and navigating the healthcare system. DISCUSSION Patients highly value caring attitudes and communication, availability, and empowerment to understand and navigate healthcare systems. These attitudes and behaviors may be important mediators of the success of collaborative care programs. These are consistent with the theory of caring science, a framework that is relevant more broadly to patient-centered and team-based care models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget A Graney
- Divison of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jennifer Dickman Portz
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - David B Bekelman
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Department of Medicine, Department of Veterans Affairs, Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Walløe S, Roikjær SG, Hansen SMB, Zangger G, Mortensen SR, Korfitsen CB, Simonÿ C, Lauridsen HH, Morsø L. Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:828. [PMID: 39039533 PMCID: PMC11265152 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 07/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024] Open
Abstract
No reviews so far have been conducted to define the constructs of patient-experienced quality in healthcare transitions or to identify existing generic measures of patients' experience of the quality within healthcare transitions. Our aim was to identify domains relevant for people experiencing healthcare transitions when evaluating the quality of care they have received, map the comprehensiveness of existing patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and evaluate the PREMs' content validity. The method was guided by the Joanna Briggs Institutes' guidance for scoping reviews. The search was performed on 07 December 2021 and updated 27 May 2024, in the electronic databases Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cinahl (EBSCO). The search identified 20,422 publications, and 190 studies were included for review. We identified 30 PREMs assessing at least one aspect of adults' experience of transitions in healthcare. Summarising the content, we consider a model with two domains, organisational and human-relational, likely to be adequate. However, a more comprehensive analysis and adequate definition of the construct is needed. None of the PREMs were considered content valid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sisse Walløe
- Department of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
- Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark.
| | - Stine Gundtoft Roikjær
- Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurological Research, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark
- Department of Health, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sebrina Maj-Britt Hansen
- Department of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Graziella Zangger
- Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Sofie Rath Mortensen
- Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit for Exercise Epidemiology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Bruun Korfitsen
- Department of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, Cochrane Denmark & Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Charlotte Simonÿ
- Department of Physio- and Occupational Therapy, Research- and Implmentation Unit PROgrez, Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals, Region Zealand, Denmark
- Department of Health, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Henrik Hein Lauridsen
- Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Lars Morsø
- Department of Clinical Research, Research Unit OPEN, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feng TL, Stoessl AJ, Harrison RA. Integrated Care in Neurology: The Current Landscape and Future Directions. Can J Neurol Sci 2024:1-9. [PMID: 38679923 DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2024.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
The rising burden of neurological disorders poses significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. There has been an increasing momentum to apply integrated approaches to the management of several chronic illnesses in order to address systemic healthcare challenges and improve the quality of care for patients. The aim of this paper is to provide a narrative review of the current landscape of integrated care in neurology. We identified a growing body of research from countries around the world applying a variety of integrated care models to the treatment of common neurological conditions. Based on our findings, we discuss opportunities for further study in this area. Finally, we discuss the future of integrated care in Canada, including unique geographic, historical, and economic considerations, and the role that integrated care may play in addressing challenges we face in our current healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanya L Feng
- Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - A Jon Stoessl
- Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Pacific Parkinson's Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rebecca A Harrison
- Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Muñoz-Cobos F, Aguiar-Leiva VP, Argüello-Suárez C, Colacicchi P, Calleja-Cartón LA, Leiva-Fernández F. Validation of an Inhaled Therapy Beliefs Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2281. [PMID: 38673555 PMCID: PMC11051114 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: To carry out a validation questionnaire that assesses beliefs about inhaled treatments in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), as knowing patients' beliefs could help to improve medication adherence and health outcomes. Methods: We evaluated data from 260 COPD patients from electronic medical record databases from five primary healthcare centers, in a descriptive, cross-sectional study with a sample size calculated for a 10-item questionnaire, with an estimated Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and a 95% confidence level. Study participants were selected via systematic random sampling. Variables: Ten-item Inhaled Therapy Beliefs Questionnaire, CCTI-Questionnaire v.2.0, time for completion, age, sex, educational level, spirometry severity (GOLD criteria), exacerbations (previous year), characteristics of inhaled treatment, and smoking habit. A two-year follow-up in a subsample of 77 patients from one health center was utilized. The Morisky-Green test, pharmacy dispensing data, test-retest (kappa coefficient), and an exploratory analysis of the adherence-belief relationship (ji-squared) were measured. Results: The 10-item questionnaire showed good viability (3 min completion time) when performed face-to-face or telephonically; its psychometric properties were acceptable, with an internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) score of 0.613. Three factors explained 47.58% of the total variance (p < 0.0001): use (factor 1), effects (factor 2), and objectives (factor 3) of inhalers. The two-year follow-up ultimately considered 58 out of the 77 patients (10 deceased, 4 unlocated, 2 mistakes, 2 no inhaled treatment, and 1 withdrawal). Non-adherence was 48.3% in terms of the Morisky-Green test; 31% in terms of pharmacy dispensing data; and 40.4% considering both methods. There was low test-retest reliability, indicated by items 4, 8, and 9 of the CCTI-Questionnaire (Kappa = 0.4, 0.26, and 0.34; p-value < 0.0001, 0.008, and 0.001, respectively). There was mild correlation between beliefs and adherence. Conclusions: The ten-item CCTI-Questionnaire v.2.0 demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties regarding feasibility, reliability, and content validity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisca Muñoz-Cobos
- Andalusian Health Service, Málaga Biomedical Research Institute (IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND), University of Málaga, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| | - Virginia P. Aguiar-Leiva
- Research Unit Instituto CUDECA de Estudios e Investigación en Cuidados Paliativos Fundación CUDECA, Biomedical Research Institute (IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND), University of Málaga, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| | - Carmen Argüello-Suárez
- Multiprofessional Teaching Unit for Family and Community Care of the Málaga-Guadalhorce Primary Care District, 29009 Málaga, Spain
| | | | | | - Francisca Leiva-Fernández
- Andalusian Health Service, Málaga Biomedical Research Institute (IBIMA-Plataforma BIONAND), University of Málaga, 29590 Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kroenke K, Corrigan JD, Ralston RK, Zafonte R, Brunner RC, Giacino JT, Hoffman JM, Esterov D, Cifu DX, Mellick DC, Bell K, Scott SG, Sander AM, Hammond FM. Effectiveness of care models for chronic disease management: A scoping review of systematic reviews. PM R 2024; 16:174-189. [PMID: 37329557 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To conduct a scoping review of models of care for chronic disease management to identify potentially effective components for management of chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS Information sources: Systematic searches of three databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) from January 2010 to May 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on the effectiveness of the Chronic Care Model (CCM), collaborative/integrated care, and other chronic disease management models. DATA Target diseases, model components used (n = 11), and six outcomes (disease-specific, generic health-related quality of life and functioning, adherence, health knowledge, patient satisfaction, and cost/health care use). SYNTHESIS Narrative synthesis, including proportion of reviews documenting outcome benefits. RESULTS More than half (55%) of the 186 eligible reviews focused on collaborative/integrated care models, with 25% focusing on CCM and 20% focusing on other chronic disease management models. The most common health conditions were diabetes (n = 22), depression (n = 16), heart disease (n = 12), aging (n = 11), and kidney disease (n = 8). Other single medical conditions were the focus of 22 reviews, multiple medical conditions of 59 reviews, and other or mixed mental health/behavioral conditions of 20 reviews. Some type of quality rating for individual studies was conducted in 126 (68%) of the reviews. Of reviews that assessed particular outcomes, 80% reported disease-specific benefits, and 57% to 72% reported benefits for the other five types of outcomes. Outcomes did not differ by the model category, number or type of components, or target disease. CONCLUSIONS Although there is a paucity of evidence for TBI per se, care model components proven effective for other chronic diseases may be adaptable for chronic TBI care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kurt Kroenke
- Department of Medicine, Indiana School of Medicine and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - John D Corrigan
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Rick K Ralston
- Ruth Lilly Medical Library, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ross Zafonte
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Robert C Brunner
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jeanne M Hoffman
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Dmitry Esterov
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David X Cifu
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Bell
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Steven G Scott
- Center of Innovation on Disability & Rehab Research (CINDRR), James A Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Angelle M Sander
- H. Ben Taub Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, and Brain Injury Research Center, TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Emmesjö L, Gillsjö C, Dahl Aslan AK, Hallgren J. Patients' and next of kin's expectations and experiences of a mobile integrated care model with a home health care physician - a qualitative thematic study. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:921. [PMID: 37644455 PMCID: PMC10466758 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09932-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The organizational principle of remaining at home has offset care from the hospital to the home of the older person where care from formal and informal caregivers is needed. Globally, formal care is often organized to handle singular and sporadic health problems, leading to the need for several health care providers. The need for an integrated care model was therefore recognized by health care authorities in one county in Sweden, who created a cross-organisational integrated care model to meet these challenges. The Mobile integrated care model with a home health care physician (MICM) is a collaboration between regional and municipal health care. Descriptions of patients' and next of kin's experiences of integrated care is however lacking, motivating exploration. METHOD A qualitative thematic study. Data collection was done before the patients met the MICM physician, and again six months later. RESULTS The participants expected a sense of relief when admitted to MICM, and hoped for shared responsibility, building a personal contact and continuity but experienced lack of information about what MICM was. At the follow-up interview, participants described having an easier daily life. The increased access to the health care personnel (HCP) allowed participants to let go of responsibility, and created a sense of safety through the personalised contact and continuity. However, some felt ignored and that the personnel teamed up against the patient. The MICM structure was experienced as hierarchical, which influenced the possibility to participate. However, the home visits opened up the possibility for shared decision making. CONCLUSION Participants had an expectation of receiving safe and coherent health care, to share responsibility, personal contact and continuity. After six months, the participants expressed that MICM had provided an easier daily life. The direct access to HCP reduced their responsibility and they had created a personalised contact with the HCP and that the individual HCP mattered to them, which could be perceived as in line with the goals in the shift to local health care. The MICM was experienced as a hierarchic structure with impact on participation, indicating that all dimensions of person-centred care were not fulfilled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Emmesjö
- School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden.
- School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden.
| | - Catharina Gillsjö
- School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden
- College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Anna K Dahl Aslan
- School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden
| | - Jenny Hallgren
- School of Health Sciences, University of Skövde, P.O. Box 408, SE-541 28, Skövde, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leon N, Xu H. Implementation considerations for non-communicable disease-related integration in primary health care: a rapid review of qualitative evidence. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:169. [PMID: 36803143 PMCID: PMC9938355 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09151-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Integrated delivery of primary health care (PHC) services is a health reform recommended for achieving ambitious targets of the Sustainable Development Goals and Universal Health Coverage, responding to growing challenges of managing non-communicable and multimorbidity. However, more evidence is needed on effective implementation of PHC integration in different country settings. OBJECTIVE This rapid review synthesized qualitative evidence on implementation factors affecting integration of non-communicable disease (NCD) into PHC, from the perspective of implementers. The review contributes evidence to inform the World Health Organizations' guidance on integration of NCD control and prevention to strengthen health systems. METHOD The review was guided by standard methods for conducting rapid systematic reviews. Data analysis was guided by the SURE and WHO health system building blocks frameworks. We used Confidence in the Evidence of Reviews of Qualitative Research (GRADE-CERQual) to assess the confidence of the main findings. RESULTS The review identified 81 records eligible for inclusion, from 595 records screened. We sampled 20 studies for analysis (including 3 from expert recommendations). Studies covered a wide range of countries (27 countries from 6 continents), the majority from low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), with a diverse set of NCD-related PHC integration combinations and implementation strategies. The main findings were categorised into three overarching themes and several sub-themes. These are, A: Policy alignment and governance, B: Health systems readiness, intervention compatibility and leadership, and C: Human resource management, development, and support. The three overarching findings were assessed as each having a moderate level of confidence. CONCLUSION The review findings present insights on how health workers responses may be shaped by the complex interaction of individual, social, and organizational factors that may be specific to the context of the intervention, the importance of cross-cutting influences such as policy alignment, supportive leadership and health systems constraints, knowledge that can inform the development of future implementation strategies and implementation research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Leon
- Independent Public Health Researcher, Charlottesville, VA USA ,grid.40263.330000 0004 1936 9094Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI USA ,grid.415021.30000 0000 9155 0024South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - H. Xu
- grid.3575.40000000121633745Department of Noncommunicable Diseases, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barnea R, Tur-Sinai A, Levtzion-Korach O, Weiss Y, Tal O. Patient preferences and choices as a reflection of trust-A cluster analysis comparing postsurgical perceptions in a private and a public hospital. Health Expect 2022; 25:2340-2354. [PMID: 35833265 PMCID: PMC9615048 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Active participation of patients in managing their medical treatment is a major component of the patient empowerment process and may contribute to better clinical outcomes. Patient perceptions and preferences affect the patient–physician encounter in a variety of dimensions, such as patient autonomy, freedom of choice and trust in the healthcare system. The Israeli healthcare system is mostly publicly funded, with additional private healthcare services for surgery and other medical treatments. The aim of this study was to compare the perceptions and preferences of patients in the public and private hospitals in Israel. Methods A cross‐sectional study among 545 individuals who had surgical procedures at two hospitals in Israel (one public and one private). A structured questionnaire comprising 23 items was used to collect perceptions via personal telephone interviews. The responses were categorized into five clusters and compared by type of health services provider (public vs. private) and sociodemographic characteristics (gender, age and education level). Results A hierarchical cluster analysis methodology identified five conceptual groups: trust, concern towards medical errors, dialogue between medical staff and the patient/patient's family, confidentiality and staff bias towards more informed patients, or those with supportive families. Four main themes that highlight patients' preferences were found: physical conditions, personal empowerment and perceived autonomy, patient experience and patient–provider encounter communication. Significant differences between the private and the public healthcare systems were found in four clusters: trust and patient care, patient's concerns, the extent of explanation and medical staff's commitment. Differences secondary to sociodemographic parameters were noticed: patients treated at the private hospital scored significantly higher items of trust, medical staff caring and the importance of choosing their treating surgeon, while patients treated at the public hospital scored higher staff commitment to the patient than those treated at the private hospital. Conclusions The study revealed the perceptions underlying the decisions of patients to undergo surgical procedures in public or private hospitals. Mutual learning could pave the way to better patient–physician encounters. Patient or Public Contribution Patients from the two hospitals were involved in this study by responding to the questionnaire. The data presented is based on the patient's responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Royi Barnea
- Assuta Health Services Research Institute, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,School of Health Systems Management, Netanya Academic College, Netanya, Israel
| | - Aviad Tur-Sinai
- Department of Health Systems Management, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley, Israel.,School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | | | - Yossi Weiss
- Assuta Health Services Research Institute, Assuta Medical Centers, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,Ariel University, Ariel, Israel
| | - Orna Tal
- Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Zerifin, Israel.,Israeli Center for Emerging Technologies (ICET), Tel Aviv, Israel.,Department of Management, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ginting ML, Wong CH, Lim ZZB, Choo RWM, Carlsen SCH, Sum G, Vrijhoef HJM. A Patient-Centred Medical Home Care Model for Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Singapore: A Mixed-Method Study on Patient's Care Experience. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19084778. [PMID: 35457642 PMCID: PMC9030670 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Patient-Centred Medical Home (PCMH) is a strategy to enhance patient-centredness to improve care experience. We aimed to understand patient experience of an integrated PCMH model for complex community-dwelling older adults in Singapore. We used a mixed-method design with a prospective single-group pre-post quantitative component and a concurrent qualitative component. Participants were administered the validated Consumer Assessment of Health Providers and Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) at baseline (N = 184) and 6-month (N = 166) post-enrolment. We conducted focus group discussions (FGDs) on a purposive sample of 24 participants. Both methods suggest better care experience in PCMH relative to usual care. There were improvements in the CG-CAHPS measures on patient–provider communication, care coordination, office staff interactions, support for patients in caring for their own health, and provider rating in PCMH relative to usual care. In the FGDs, participants reported benefits of consolidated appointments and positive experience in sustained patient–provider relationship, shared-decision making, and family/caregiver engagement in PCMH. Participants may not fully comprehend the concept of integrated care, hindering both the effective communication of the intended care model and perceived benefits such as the provision of multidisciplinary team-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimaika Luluina Ginting
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore 768024, Singapore; (C.H.W.); (Z.Z.B.L.); (R.W.M.C.); (S.C.H.C.); (G.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Chek Hooi Wong
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore 768024, Singapore; (C.H.W.); (Z.Z.B.L.); (R.W.M.C.); (S.C.H.C.); (G.S.)
- Tsao Foundation, Singapore 168730, Singapore
- Health Services & Systems Research, Duke-NUS, Singapore 169857, Singapore
| | - Zoe Zon Be Lim
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore 768024, Singapore; (C.H.W.); (Z.Z.B.L.); (R.W.M.C.); (S.C.H.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Robin Wai Munn Choo
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore 768024, Singapore; (C.H.W.); (Z.Z.B.L.); (R.W.M.C.); (S.C.H.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Sheena Camilla Hirose Carlsen
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore 768024, Singapore; (C.H.W.); (Z.Z.B.L.); (R.W.M.C.); (S.C.H.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Grace Sum
- Geriatric Education and Research Institute, Singapore 768024, Singapore; (C.H.W.); (Z.Z.B.L.); (R.W.M.C.); (S.C.H.C.); (G.S.)
| | - Hubertus Johannes Maria Vrijhoef
- Panaxea, B.V., 1098 XH Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Patient & Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pillay T, Pillay M. Contextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2021; 68:e1-e12. [PMID: 34342487 PMCID: PMC8335787 DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.832] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study explored the available literature on the phenomenon of clinical reasoning and described its influence on the clinical swallow evaluation. By exploring the relationship between clinical reasoning and the clinical swallow evaluation, it is possible to modernise the approach to dysphagia assessment. Objectives This study aimed to contextualise the available literature on clinical reasoning and the CSE to low-middle income contexts through the use of a scoping review and expert consultation. Method A scoping review was performed based on the PRISMA-ScR framework. The data was analysed using thematic analysis. Articles were considered if they discussed the clinical swallow evaluation and clinical reasoning, and were published in the last 49 years. Results Through rigorous electronic and manual searching, 12 articles were identified. This review made an argument for the value of clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation. The results of the study revealed three core themes related to the acquisition, variability and positive impact of clinical reasoning in the clinical swallow evaluation. Conclusion The results of this review showed that the clinical swallow evaluation is a complex process with significant levels of variability usually linked to the impact of context. This demonstrates that in order to deliver effective and relevant services, despite challenging conditions, healthcare practitioners must depend on clinical reasoning to make appropriate modifications to the assessment process that considers these salient factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thiani Pillay
- Discipline of Speech-Language Pathology, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alderwick H, Hutchings A, Briggs A, Mays N. The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:753. [PMID: 33874927 PMCID: PMC8054696 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policymakers in many countries promote collaboration between health care organizations and other sectors as a route to improving population health. Local collaborations have been developed for decades. Yet little is known about the impact of cross-sector collaboration on health and health equity. METHODS We carried out a systematic review of reviews to synthesize evidence on the health impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations, and to understand the factors affecting how these partnerships functioned. We searched four databases and included 36 studies (reviews) in our review. We extracted data from these studies and used Nvivo 12 to help categorize the data. We assessed risk of bias in the studies using standardized tools. We used a narrative approach to synthesizing and reporting the data. RESULTS The 36 studies we reviewed included evidence on varying forms of collaboration in diverse contexts. Some studies included data on collaborations with broad population health goals, such as preventing disease and reducing health inequalities. Others focused on collaborations with a narrower focus, such as better integration between health care and social services. Overall, there is little convincing evidence to suggest that collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations improves health outcomes. Evidence of impact on health services is mixed. And evidence of impact on resource use and spending are limited and mixed. Despite this, many studies report on factors associated with better or worse collaboration. We grouped these into five domains: motivation and purpose, relationships and cultures, resources and capabilities, governance and leadership, and external factors. But data linking factors in these domains to collaboration outcomes is sparse. CONCLUSIONS In theory, collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations might contribute to better population health. But we know little about which kinds of collaborations work, for whom, and in what contexts. The benefits of collaboration may be hard to deliver, hard to measure, and overestimated by policymakers. Ultimately, local collaborations should be understood within their macro-level political and economic context, and as one component within a wider system of factors and interventions interacting to shape population health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hugh Alderwick
- Health Foundation, 8 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8AP UK
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | - Andrew Hutchings
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| | - Adam Briggs
- Health Foundation, 8 Salisbury Square, London, EC4Y 8AP UK
- University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL UK
| | - Nicholas Mays
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Santiago VA, Cassin SE, Wnuk S, Du C, Hawa R, Parikh SV, Sockalingam S. "If you're offered help, take it": A qualitative study examining bariatric patients' experience of telephone-based cognitive behavioural therapy. Clin Obes 2021; 11:e12431. [PMID: 33251753 DOI: 10.1111/cob.12431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The increased recognition of patients' mental health needs after bariatric surgery has resulted in the emergence of accessible psychosocial interventions; however, there is a dearth of literature on patient experience and satisfaction with these interventions. We explored patients' perceptions and experiences of telephone-based cognitive behavioural therapy (Tele-CBT) in this qualitative study. Ten participants from the Toronto Western Hospital Bariatric Surgery Program in Toronto, Canada who completed the Tele-CBT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02920112) were individually interviewed from November 2014 to June 2016 until thematic saturation occurred (ie, no more new coding groups emerged). Interviews were transcribed, independently coded, checked for discrepancies, and analysed using grounded theory. Four themes emerged: (1) participants were generally satisfied with Tele-CBT (eg, therapeutic alliance, resources provided, relevance of therapy to their own bariatric journey), (2) participants noticed emotional, cognitive, and behavioural changes following therapy, (3) the optimal time to deliver the Tele-CBT was when weight loss plateaued, generally at one-year post-surgery, and (4) participants found the telephone modality convenient. CBT was generally found to be helpful and the telephone format increased convenience and accessibility. Patients reported learning skills and receiving resources that could help them improve their well-being following bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent A Santiago
- Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bariatric Surgery Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie E Cassin
- Department of Psychology, Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Wnuk
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bariatric Surgery Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chau Du
- Bariatric Surgery Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raed Hawa
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bariatric Surgery Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sagar V Parikh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sanjeev Sockalingam
- Centre for Mental Health, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Bariatric Surgery Program, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rugkåsa J, Tveit OG, Berteig J, Hussain A, Ruud T. Collaborative care for mental health: a qualitative study of the experiences of patients and health professionals. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:844. [PMID: 32907559 PMCID: PMC7487713 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05691-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health policy in many countries directs treatment to the lowest effective care level and encourages collaboration between primary and specialist mental health care. A number of models for collaborative care have been developed, and patient benefits are being reported. Less is known about what enables and prevents implementation and sustainability of such models regarding the actions and attitudes of stakeholders on the ground. This article reports from a qualitative sub-study of a cluster-RCT testing a model for collaborative care in Oslo, Norway. The model involved the placement of psychologists and psychiatrists from a community mental health centre in each intervention GP practice. GPs could seek their input or advice when needed and refer patients to them for assessment (including assessment of the need for external services) or treatment. METHODS We conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with GPs (n = 7), CMHC specialists (n = 6) and patients (n = 11) in the intervention arm. Sample specific topic guides were used to investigate the experience of enablers and barriers to the collaborative care model. Data were subject to stepwise deductive-inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants reported positive experiences of how the model improved accessibility. First, co-location made GPs and CMHC specialists accessible to each other and facilitated detailed, patient-centred case collaboration and learning through complementary skills. The threshold for patients' access to specialist care was lowered, treatment could commence early, and throughput increased. Treatment episodes were brief (usually 5-10 sessions) and this was too brief according to some patients. Second, having experienced mental health specialists in the team and on the front line enabled early assessment of symptoms and of the type of treatment and service that patients required and were entitled to, and who could be treated at the GP practice. This improved both care pathways and referral practices. Barriers revolved around the organisation of care. Logistical issues could be tricky but were worked out. The biggest obstacle was the funding of health care at a structural level, which led to economic losses for both the GP practices and the CMHC, making the model unsustainable. CONCLUSIONS Participants identified a range of benefits of collaborative care for both patients and services. However, the funding system in effect penalises collaborative work. It is difficult to see how policy aiming for successful, sustainable collaboration can be achieved without governments changing funding structures. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03624829.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorun Rugkåsa
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
- Centre for Care Research, University of South-Eastern Norway, Porsgrunn, Norway
| | - Ole Gunnar Tveit
- R&D Department of Mental Health, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Julie Berteig
- Department of Acute Psychiatry Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ajmal Hussain
- Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Torleif Ruud
- R&D Department of Mental Health, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|